i called them constructs.
see, they aren’t real.
they are ideals that are subject to the belief of the individual, even if there are a lot of individuals that share them.
In other words, “obligation” only means something if you imbue it with a meaning.

and. . . i don’t have a backyard,
or personal knowledge of what an obliterator is.
Bomb?
Orbital troop drop?

in any case, there are two important concepts here: “constructs” and “why the hell would a statement of over-the-top fictional aggression help you in any sort of discussion that wasn’t already taking place in a fictional framework?”

not gonna lie, guys, I love to listen to myself talk.

nah-
i don’t take it seriously, i just dropped some comment bait and you snapped it up, little fishy.
I’m not even arguing- it’s like debating whether or not, i don’t know, gravity exists. You can argue it if you want, there just isn’t really any point.
No, the reason I bothered replying to you was the whole “deep striked” bit-
I was just bemused at the use of text LARPing in a potentially philosophical discussion.