inside job

o23317.png (88 KB)


  • Leave A Comment

    Notify of
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments


    Wait, what’s the total death toll for Iraq & Afghanistan? The world will never know.


    Totally agree


    Don’t tell me people are still on about this stupid theory…


    Maybe you would feel more comfortable if instead of “inside job,” it read “intentional disregard” or “intentional neglect” or “quiet non-intervention” or “plausibly deniable unencumberance?”


    or “STFUGTFO”


    Inside the plane or inside the towers?



    Yes, because fire doesn’t melt steel says Rosie O’Donnell.


    If you set fire to O’Donnell I bet she would burn for months.


    Imagine the amount of soap we could render from her…..


    I don’t know about any of that, but this cuppa Folger’s is tasting pretty good, my doggie is on the bed behind me tearing one of her stuffed rabbits apart, and it’s gonna be in the high 70’s with clear skies today. Ahhh.


    Inside Joke


    One thing is to disregard as insane all the truly crazy theories about what really happened that day from people who’d clearly have a hard time spelling their own names, but a whole other thing is to be sufficiently retarded not to notice that nothing of what happened that day made any sense, and the official story is so ridiculous it looks like the work of a drunken, retarded mule.

    To begin with, the air space over the Pentagon is the second most restricted air space in the world (The White House is the first). They should have known an airplane was heading their way at least half an hour before it crashed, even on a day when two airplanes hadn’t already crashed into buildings. Yet they made absolutely no effort to evacuate or reduce the possible fatalities, or to shoot down the plane (which would have only required a dozen people with machine guns standing on the front lawn). And absolutely no heads rolled because of this. The plot of the last Matrix movie is move believable than that.

    And then there’s the three buildings who decided to disregard those pesky laws of physics that day. Anyone who knows more than one thing about physics and building design knows that the whole point of having load-bearing beams is that they distribute all vertical pressure evenly throughout their length. IOW, if you apply vertical pressure on a building, the load-bearing beams on every single floor will receive the exact same portion of that pressure, and will be just as equally likely to collapse. It’s physically impossible to cause a building’s floors to collapse in a neat little order from top to bottom by using only vertical pressure. If the pressure is enough to cause floor 150 to collapse, it is also enough to cause floor 30 to collapse because the pressure will invariably go equally through the whole building. In fact, floor 30 is more likely to collapse first because it’s already receiving the pressure caused by the weight of all the floors above it, which is less than what floor 150 is receiving.

    You can test this yourself at home. Make a tower out of half a dozen beer cans and apply pressure from the top. Will the cans collapse in order from top to bottom? Of course not. You can try a hundred times and won’t be able to get them to do that. Most likely, the first one to collapse will be the can at the middle of the tower.

    And in the case of WTC-4, we can see on the video that every single single load-bearing beam in the building failed at exactly the same time, which is not possible by normal means because load-bearing beams are structurally independent from each other. The amount of damage that one beam sustains has absolutely no effect on the one next to it. For an example of this check the Oklahoma City building. The explosion there took out a large number of load-bearing beams, and caused half the building to collapse. The other half remained standing with the only damage received being the result of the explosion’s shock-wave. The fact that the other half was damaged to the point of collapsing had no effect whatsoever on it.

    They claim “uh, 30% of WTC-4″ was damaged!!” So what? Why did the other 70% collapse too and at the exact same time? Empathy? It wanted to go with the flow? It didn’t want to be left behind?


    Mhm. And now for motive. They did it because of….what? So they can invade a totally worthless country with no resources whatsoever, no real geo-political value, so they can kill a lot of civilians and their own soldiers. And the arms industry will make a lot of money they would have made anyways. Makes perfect sense.
    And if they are so stone cold, why do you think a big conspiracy of media, politics and industry would do this whole job so badly every tard on the internet can find out?

    If you wanna make up a conspiracy, start by finding a reason for people to conspire. And ‘being evul’ is not a reason. Well, it may be for the Republican Party, but they are not a conspiracy.
    I actually like the one where they destroyed the WTC because it housed the film studios used for faking the moon landing (another big conspiracy every tard with internet access could blow) and now that the smart smart conspiracy hunters on the interwebs found out about it they wanted to destroy the proof. Again, makes perfect sense.

    Maybe we should ask Dan Brown about it. He’ll know that the catholic church, or maybe just the Opus Dei found out that dem Joos kept the Holy Grail in the WTC and the KKK wanted to destroy the WTC so neither Jews nor Catholics would have the Grail. And since every member of the Bush administration is a member, knows a member or comes from a state where somebody is a member of the KKK – again, makes perfect sense.


    >middle east
    >no resources
    >oil is not a resource the US needs


    If you want oil, why invade a country that doesn’t have any??? And Afghanistan is not part of the Middle East. It’s friggin’ Central Asia. Iraq made sense if you want oil. Having Pakistan as your ally makes sense so you have Iran in reach. But Afghanistan? Come on. It’s goat herders and poppy farmers.


    Can’t get tons of Heroin without poppy farmers.

    War on Drugs, Fuck yeah!


    War itself is profitable.


    Seriously? Popular Mechanics shot down every one of your examples years ago.


    Internet Argument BINGO

    The standard rejoinder is column 4, line 5, substituting “Hearst” for X. ‘Cause apparently the Hearst empire is neck deep in the New World Order herpaderpaderrrrrrrrrrrp…man I got tired of this shit 4 years ago.

    TrAyVon'S GhOSt, nuCca

    That was one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve read. Beer cans?

    Is that like poor people’s variant testing? If I place this beer can here in this tower and then…hang on I need to drink some more beer and finish the other tower or this experiment won’t be valid in the eyes of this government housing’s scientific community…

    Load bearing beams stand alone? Jesus…can I sell you this magic pen I have here? I’ll let you have it for 10000$ and it full on Harry Potter magic. You’ll love it, crazy person.


    You cant reason with 9-11 truther idiots. When you demonstrate that 98% of the people who know (the architects, the structural engineers, the chemical engineers) about the issues involved are unified that the jet fuel burn can and did cause the WTC collapse, they say “Experts don’t know everything.” Then, from under a rock, they’ll pull out their expert (who is usually a dentist, a lawyer, a muslim apologist, an anti-semite) and ask us to respect him.

    Oh, and the Pentagon, that’s also in the conspiracy too? I forget: is it a missile, or an unmanned 737? United 93– that was in the conspiracy too, right? They drove a plane into the ground for– I forget, why?

    Truthers = Birthers = Creationists = climate deniers = moonlanding deniers = holocaust deniers = UFO believers = JFK Conspiracists = … ?

    It’s the same mottled bag of high school educated (barely) Red State white folk who need to just get a job.


    If one thinks about these two questions, one will begin to consider alternatives to the “accepted” explanations:

    Who actually benefited from the events of that day? Who didn’t?

    However, one must also consider how many people would have had to maintained secrecy about it before and after, to this day, for any *inside-job conspiracy* explanation… and so it begins to look a bit more complicated and mundane than either side of the traditional argument thinks.

    I’m pretty sure it was agents of Atlantis who pulled it off.


    Allah benefited . . . or so Osama said at the time.


    Allah Shrugged.


    America, fuck yeah!


    I suggest it was Oswald, in the depository, with the rifle. I win!


    I propose it was Cheney, in the bunker, with the joystick.


    If there is a cover-up of anything it is the covering up of how our government, under rediculous leadership from both president and congress, didn’t see this type of attack coming from a mile away. I am betting all those whose policies allowed our defenses to become so relaxed and full of holes are glad there are still fools wasting time and energy on this ‘inside job’ garbage, just as long as they’re not trying to uncover the real cover up I explained above.

    TrAyVon'S GhOSt, nuCca

    The american education system has let a great many of you down.

    Here: if you hit a building with a plane it will fall down. Buildings don’t topple over because they’re not made of Jenga pieces. That’s what happened. Planes hit buildings and they fell down. Everything else you want to think about it makes you look like a fucking retard. To everyone. All over the world.


    Wtf happened to building 7? I agree that planes knock buildings down.


    falling debris sliced into the structure, making it unstable, and, again, unrestrained fires weakened the steel. that, or the USA did it on purpose at the very same time that muslim retards just happened to slam into WTC 1/2.

    you decide.

    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Bikinis Black and White Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Donald Trump Drugs Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Military Motorcycles Movie Posters Movie Reviews Movies Music Music Videos Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Science! Sexy Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF

    480 x 360 500 x 281 500 x 375 500 x 500 500 x 750 600 x 450 600 x 600 600 x 750 600 x 800 600 x 900 640 x 480 640 x 640 640 x 800 640 x 853 640 x 960 720 x 720 720 x 960 750 x 600 800 x 600 800 x 800 960 x 720 960 x 960 1024 x 683 1024 x 768 1080 x 1080 1080 x 1350 1200 x 630 1200 x 800 1200 x 900 1280 x 720 1280 x 800 1280 x 960 1280 x 1024 1440 x 900 1600 x 900 1600 x 1200 1680 x 1050 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1200 2048 x 1536 2560 x 1440 2560 x 1600 3024 x 4032 3840 x 2160 x

    ABoringDystopia Amoledbackgrounds AnimalsBeingDerps ATBGE awfuleverything Celebhub Celebs CityPorn comicbookart conceptart cosplaygirls Cyberpunk EarthPorn Eyebleach Faces FreckledGirls funny General Uploads gentlemanboners hmmmm Images Sub Space ImaginaryStarships ImaginaryTechnology InfowarriorRides interestingasfuck MarchAgainstNazis marvelstudios MCS Plus memes MilitaryPorn nocontextpics OldSchoolCool pictures PoliticalHumor PrequelMemes PropagandaPosters RetroFuturism sbubby StarshipPorn startrekmemes Storminator Super News Thanks I Hate It UrbanHell wallpaper

  • here's some related content from the store: