FUCK GOOGLE!!!!!!!

Google-Censorship-Graphic-01.jpg (1 MB)


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    13 Comment threads
    14 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    20 Comment authors
    DUCKDUCKGOnick pdieAntagonistanatedogegosumnemo Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Puulaahi
    Member

    Alternatives?

    The Matrix: Rebooted
    Member

    I have no problem using Google for torrent searches. Sounds like the problem exists between the keyboard the chair.

    rebelyell2006
    Member

    Quick Google search for “bittorent” = “About 66,400,000 results (0.12 seconds)”

    tiki god
    Admin

    they’re talking about the instant search feature that suggests all sorts of fun stuff for you.

    DaCheetah
    Member

    I get plenty of utorrent suggestions, once you finish the first word.

    Tyger42
    Member

    Yes, them not popping up auto suggestions is the same as “censoring!”

    …moron.

    Bushman
    Member

    Moron? Really? Get a Dictionary. (That’s a book that tells you what words mean).

    Or, maybe Google the word “censorship”. Failing to meet your desires is not censorship. Not suggesting something is not the same thing as censorship.

    What would be censorship is Tiki deleting your post to protect us from your rant.

    WistfulD
    Member

    I’m sorry, but he’s the one that is ranting? Try googling ‘reality.’

    Bushman
    Member

    Reality is what you make of it. Just ask Casemods. Try googling: Ad hominem Wait, maybe Google will “censor” (snicker) and not auto-complete the word when you type ” ad ” Just in case: An ad hominem (Latin: “to the man”), also known as argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1] The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy,[2] but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue.[3] (Sorry… Read more »

    Tyger42
    Member

    While you’re suggesting words for me to look up, here’s one for you to look up: SARCASM.

    Good god, jackass, I couldn’t have made it any more obvious that I was being sarcastic there.

    Bushman
    Member

    Sorry, I missed the “sacrasm” font you used, lol.

    Tyger42
    Member

    The wording, the quotes around “censoring!”, and the pot-shot insult a couple lines down were pretty blatant clues.

    nyoki
    Member

    Uh…I think he was being sarcastic.

    mld
    Member

    funny that the enlarged version of the image does not load..
    censorship?

    flintlocke
    Member

    Isn’t the Google suggestion logic based on the frequency of similar searches? That would imply that an inordinate amount of people are looking for those things, rather than Google “giving” you those things. And if people want that info, why would they censor it? Durhur.

    casemods UID# 667
    Member

    damn it

    anyone got tips for kidnapping kids?

    Awesome1
    Member

    I was shocked to see that someone actually chose Papyrus

    goatsgomoo
    Member

    Well, this makes sense, since we all already know that copyright infringement is far worse than murder and kidnapping.

    PatientZed
    Member

    So basically it’s a choice between one set of censored searches and another?

    And I’m pretty sure I can find out how to make bombs and mustard gas from a library.

    DaCheetah
    Member

    Censorship is not involved. The searches are different. Notice all the examples have at least one entire word?
    Type in the whole word utorrent, and you get plenty of valid suggestions.
    Case closed.

    natedog
    Member

    you people that think this isnt censorship are retarded.

    Bushman
    Member

    As defined by Webster:

    Definition of CENSOR

    transitive verb
    : to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable ; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable

    Being too lazy to finish typing a word is not the same as the information being deleted or not listed by Google.

    Maybe if “you people” spent more time thinking logically and less time looking for something to be mad about, you might get more accomplished with your life.

    natedog
    Member

    yes, the reason google auto-completes other words but not anything to do with torrents is because it is lazy and not because it is being censored

    dieAntagonista
    Guest

    Are you saying a search engine on the Internuts can’t have emotions and feelings? What a preposterous notion.

    And at the cheeta guy above: You get suggestions for “how to build a bom” but not for “how to tor”, both have incomplete words at the end, only one gets suggestions.

    I don’t even know why everyone acts like Google wouldn’t do this, they’ve done it before and they were called out on it already.

    nick p
    Guest
    nick p

    i think i would have taken this more seriously if the creator didn’t papyrus.

    DUCKDUCKGO
    Guest

    Try DuckDuckGo works like a charm. And you don’t get the aweful google personalized search shit!

    duckduckgo.com/