Are you against gay marriage

Are you against gay marriage.png


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    9 Comment threads
    19 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    14 Comment authors
    NurgenGropegropeChet ManleyBolthornBolthorn Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    #makecasemdsgreatagain
    Member

    but then the gays will start having sex with little kids

    SonofSimon
    Member
    SonofSimon

    I want a tattoo of Jesus eating bacon.

    anonymouscommenter
    Member
    anonymouscommenter

    According to US law in ALL states, it is illegal to marry your own sister, and in most states it’s even illegal to marry your first cousin. Do you think that gross example of “marriage inequality” is justified? And why? Is it because: a) If two siblings decide to have children, the kids will have a slightly greater than average chance of having genetic disorders, and you totally agree with eugenics because the Nazis were totally right and you should never allow dwarfs to marry each other either since they have a 75% chance of producing a child with more… Read more »

    Luminary
    Member
    Luminary

    Let me guess: Game of Thrones marathon?

    Nurgen
    Member
    Nurgen

    “If two siblings decide to have children, the kids will have a slightly greater than average chance of having genetic disorder.”

    ‘Slightly’ is a gross understatement. Virtually everyone carries recessive disease genes, so for each of those genes carried by either parent of the siblings, there’s a 1 in 4 chance of that disease presenting in the siblings’ children.

    jonblaze81
    Member

    Yes, gays fucking is gross. But I am a libertarian, and if you wanna marry, knock yourselves out. (I’m betting even though I am neutral on gay marriage, I get down voted for expressing my opinion that gay sex is just nasty.) So, if you let the gays marry, you are gonna have to legalize plural marriage also (polygamy) at some point, and all of those brother-sister (incest) laws are out the door also. No, it’s not a straw-man, because those same individuals now should have the same protections of their beliefs (see the 14th amendment: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause) as those as… Read more »

    drew
    Member
    drew

    If gay sex is so gross then why are you watching it?

    jonblaze81
    Member

    Just trying to find the scene you told us you were in where 7 asian dudes all jizzed on your face.

    drew
    Member
    drew

    Uhhh, I’m not a dude, dude. I’m one of those lesbian chicks you were jerking off over about 3 posts up. The hint’s in the name.

    Jac
    Member

    This debate is so 2002. Of course teh Gays should be able to marry.

    But what I really wanted to say is I’ve known a couple of guys named Drew… it’s like Terry or Sandy, non-gender specific names.

    notspamming
    Member

    Doing whatever, being against whatever, whatever, just because some dude(s) write it in a book over 2000 years ago, is retarded a fuck^2.

    jonblaze81
    Member

    Oh look. My post where I sited credible sources, fact, logic, and even a neutral stance on gay marriage got down voted, simply for expressing an opinion that gay sex is fucking vomit inducing. Once again, proving that liberals are full of shit because they can’t stand it when someone expresses an opinion,that is contrary to theirs.

    Fuck you, liberals!

    Nurgen
    Member
    Nurgen

    Let’s blame liberalism for your downvotes! How about these reasons: – You haven’t worked out that the words ‘homosexual’ and ‘gay’ are not gender specific. – Your aversion to two guys having sex vs your appreciation of lesbian sex has WAY more to do with your attraction to who’s taking part in the act than anything else (the obvious hint is that you’re only referring to WHO is involved, not what they’re doing). Yes, you’ll find sex between any two people that you find extremely unattractive to be unappealing… not exactly a revelation, and clearly irrelevant to the topic at… Read more »

    Chet Manley
    Member

    >‘homosexual’ and ‘gay’ are not gender specific
    Then what’s the male word for “lesbian”? My understanding is that male homosexuals are “gay” and female homosexuals are “lesbian”.

    Nurgen
    Member
    Nurgen

    There isn’t one (good ol’ English), we’re stuck with ‘gay men’ for now.

    Chet Manley
    Member

    What if you’re an atheist and you’re against gay marriage?

    Bolthorn
    Member
    Bolthorn

    I can’t think of a compelling reason for an atheist to be against gay marriage. If there’s no imaginary sky creature telling you it’s not okay, why is it not okay?

    And for the Christians, if God showed up tomorrow and said “hey, gay marriage is cool. That rule was only really applicable when the infant mortality rate was super high. Same thing with the fruitful and multiply thing, knock that shit off. There are too many of you” would they listen?

    Chet Manley
    Member

    Gay marriage serves no purpose. The whole reason marriage came to into being was to protect the process of human reproduction. Since only heterosexuals can sexually reproduce with each other, it only makes sense for heterosexuals to be married.

    Graceless
    Member

    Actually, I’m fairly certain the purpose of marriage wasn’t to protect the process, but to control the process. But now we have things like condoms and other forms of birth control, so marriage is largely symbolic.

    Chet Manley
    Member

    Control as in prevent infidelity and ensure paternity. While marriage can work as a form of birth control, it effectively isn’t.

    Bolthorn
    Member
    Bolthorn

    So we shouldn’t let infertile people marry? Women who have gone through menopause? Men who have had a vasectomy? A women who had ovarian cancer and had her ovaries removed? What about people who have just decided not to have kids? Are you going to annul a marriage between two people who haven’t had a kid in X amount of time? Also you’re saying here that gay people can’t raise kids. Fuck that. Man, that’s a fucked up line of thinking. Your argument here is a shitty one. Pick a different one if this is what you’re going to try… Read more »

    Chet Manley
    Member

    You’ve just made my argument for me. Allowing homosexuals to marry makes marriage meaningless. We can give homosexual “couples” the same perks and tax breaks that come with marriage without them actually getting married, so there’s no point to them getting married. Heterosexual couples, on the other hand, can and do have children, therefor, marriage for them has a function.

    Bolthorn
    Member
    Bolthorn

    So the system won’t let me reply to your last post done there.

    No I didn’t make your point for you. I asked a series of questions about other groups it sounds like you don’t want to get married and you didn’t answer any of them.

    Chet Manley
    Member

    Why would I marry you? I don’t even know you. You’re not very good at debate.

    Bolthorn
    Member
    Bolthorn

    I didn’t ask that question anywhere up there. How you got that from anything I typed means debating this with you is pointless because you’re not paying attention or have poor reading comprehension skills. Restricting marriage only to people who plan to have children is still not a good argument for why Atheists should be against gay marriage.

    Gropegrope
    Member

    First line of the flow chart:
    “Are you against marriage because: the Bible”

    Not exactly sure how an atheist could be against gay marriage because of “the Bible”.

    Wouldn’t that be a different flow chart altogether…?

    Chet Manley
    Member

    Stop stalkering me gropey!!! … … .. … .. …

    Gropegrope
    Member

    Do you have anything intelligent to say on the topic…?
    Yet…?

    Or even address the point…?

    No…?