Christian vs Atheist

christian_vs_atheist


  • Leave A Comment

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    23 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    skndrbg

    The requirement for faith in defiance of fact and logic is a tenet of liberalism as well. Possibly why so many leftists lose their shit on Christianity. (while remaining oddly mute on islam or anything else that carries knives) They hate the competition.

    fink

    Liberalism is a religion in and of itself.

    skndrbg

    Just noticed the bullying element which further illustrates the left vs Christianity (and Judaism as well of course)

    storminator

    christians always run away from LOGIC. They fear it.

    guest

    That’s unfortunately false. Mostly because most “atheists” (at least on the internet) are just idiots who think that just because they figured out that Santa isn’t real, it means they have a superhuman grasp of logic and reason. Talk to them for ten seconds about any subject (especially politics) and you’ll notice they’re about as rational as the Westboro Baptist Church. They’re just marginally better at math.

    Gropegrope

    So your “logical” and “reasoned” response to someone asking you to provide some kind of proof to your faith is to call them irrational….?

    wadewilson

    This is rather childish.

    upyabutthofoo

    Irony being the video’s creators are Christians.

    Anyone who has ever called themselves “athiest” is a fucking retard. They’re usually “hipters” too and any other little term they can use to try and find somewhere to fit in and bitch with fellow losers.

    Korinthian

    Remember the days when Christians tried to argue for their religion on MCS? They all ran away or turned into trolls like you see above.

    fido139

    Logic, reason, and facts confine you to a small dark glass box known as the physical world. The only way to escape the confines of that box, is by your spirit.

    Gropegrope

    That’s what fiction is for….

    TheStone

    Dude, but down the bong, or pass it to me.

    CaptainCrunched

    Alvin Plantinga’s version of the ontological argument is solid and based entirely on modal logic.

    Nurgen

    It’s a rock-solid argument for the existence of the concept of a perfect being, but doesn’t begin to actually prove one… except to people that get fooled by the trickery of arbitrarily assigning the property of necessity, and playing swapsies with the word ‘possible’ (it means ‘hypothetically possible’ *waves magic wand* now it means ‘able to happen’!).

    If anyone assigns the name “God” to the being that this argument uses, then it’s a much bigger joke, since that name carries all sorts of baggage that negates several of the other definitions.

    wadewilson

    Maybe I’m a rarity here, but I don’t see the need to belittle an entire group of people just because they have different ideas about the world than you do. I’ve had the good fortune of meeting a lot of people that are very different from me, and I always try my best to find things we have in common, and enjoy those, not hash out the same arguments we’ll never see eye to eye on.

    wadewilson

    And you totally missed my point.

    TheStone

    wadewislon: 1
    npbnjvsxynpsff: 0

    wadewilson

    I’m a little curious how many people there were 2000 years ago that DIDN’T think the world was flat, or even had an opinion on the matter.

    wadewilson

    And menstruation is impure. That shit’s nasty, yo.

  • here's some related content from the store: