global warming changes the Earth

3102_dd26.jpeg (75 KB)

| Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Notify of
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    It’s what you AREN’T told that is telling…

    The “1978” picture is taken with Ektachrome Slide film in “normal” light (Ektachrome was the Slide Film of preference for Landscape Photographers since it accentuated Blues and Greens) while the “2012” image is a Digital Image taken in the Infrared Spectrum. It would also help to know what month each Image was taken.

    Dick Nixon

    So following these images the continental US and Mexico have swollen to almost three times there original size. and the earth itself has become oblong.
    Really…. bad…. photoshop.


    The continental United States is not a dry, brown wasteland as depicted in the 2012 picture. Go outside and look around, Spring is here and everything is turning green. The cult MMGW has lied to you.


    It’s horrific the amount that the U.S has grown in that time. Another hundred years and it will almost cover the Earth!


    What’s truly amazing is that in that 34-year span, nothing else occurred over that plot of land, making Global Warming the obvious and only cause.



    Global warming is a fact, but this picture smells of bullshit.

    TrAyVon'S GhOSt, nuCca

    Proving once again that only retarded people think global warming is an accurate theory and not just alarmist bullshit designed to get everyone to bend over for some new taxes.


    Worst case scenario: we save the world!

    Best case scenario: Navi pays for it all.


    Actually global warming is a fact. The ENHANCED GREENHOUSE EFFECT, often mistakenly called global warming, is what is debated. See, global warming is the name given to the natural tendency of the earth to warm up. The enhanced greenhouse effect is the theory that human activity is speeding up or causing the earth to warm up.
    So yes, you’re right. Only retarded people think global warming is accurate theory…


    In one sentence you say that the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect is a fact and in another you say it is a theory. Which is it exactly?

    Nevermind, I happen to know. It’s a theory. Still to be proven and therefore NOT a fact.

    The picture is bullshit by the way.

    And could you please get rid of that fricken Lexu ad that pops up all the time?


    How many times have more intelligent people told you what “theory” means in this context?

    Do you have a learning or a reading disability, or do you simply suffer from being a creationist?


    Why are you idiots always confusing the word Theory ? How many times do we have to explain to you that in Scientific terms a Theory IS a fact, and a hypothesis is what you actually think it is ? anyone over the age of eighteen that still lacks the basic knowledge of the Scientific Method deserves to be sent overseas…You kids are making Idiocracy into a Documentary.


    Butthead is clearly going for the “most wrong poster of all time” title on m[c]s. Just because some evidence was faked does not disprove any theory. it just calls for better sources.


    Right on K !

    Dyon 86

    Well, at least the people in Kansas can now go to the beach without having to travel very far.
    Trolling, Trolling, Trolling, Rawhide!!!


    First a quick definition: “A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it’s an accepted hypothesis.” Secondly, anthropological global warming is not a fact. It’s a theory which is hotly debated by scientists worldwide and from recent investigation, more often supported by falsified… Read more »


    What has something being “hotly debated” got to do with anything?

    An occurrence can be a fact, and the theory of said occurrence is a theory.

    Rocket science!


    Well, since someone called me on the theory versus fact definition issue, it has a lot to do with it. As I noted above, something is an accepted scientific theory when most scientists agree. They take a hypothesis proposed by one guy and then do their own peer reviews. I’ll use the example of Darwinism since I was called a creationist up above, which I am not by the way. Darwinism is an accepted theory – fact if you will – but that term is really too rough for science since theories, even though accepted at one point can be… Read more »


    Anybody who actually gets hung up on the “accuracy” of the photo either needs new eyes or a new frontal lobe.
    By the time global-warming changes are visible from space, we on the surface will have long since ceased debating it.


    Or…OR, spring and winter contrasts.


    But, the one on the right looks fake. I’ve seen first graders draw the states better than that.