george lucas 1983 vs 2005

george lucas 1983 vs 2005


| Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    9 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    j_bryon

    Now compare the quality of the visual and sound effects between 1983 and 2005.

    tiki god

    pretty sure you’d get the same comparison. 1983 was awesome, 2005 was shit.

    bstaples

    OH NO IT’S TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT
    RUN DAMN YOU RUN

    bejamus

    No, it’s awful and unrealistic looking. Someone once made the comment that when he went to go see the movies, he started looking for his Xbox controller because it looks more like a video game any more than a movie.

    Tyger42

    Technological advancement isn’t always a good thing. Especially when it’s not well used. Combine that with the writing going to shit, and, well… Lucas is dead to me.

    bstaples

    Writing? Absolutely, oh god, yes.
    But i’d rather what we have now than puppets and models. It was awesome…for it’s time…we can move forward.

    Tyger42

    I liked the puppets. They may have looked artificial, but they looked more “there” than the CGI aliens that looked shoehorned into it. Practically felt like I was watching Who Framed Roger Rabbit…

    P41N90D

    Yea the acting pretty much sucked, Lucas should have stretched the movies, especially in III
    Longer movies could have saved his so called “reputation”