Windows XP Pro

Windows XP Pro


| Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    16 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Tyger42

    Well, it’s certainly…random.

    zilch

    why

    Luke Magnifico

    Because it is the BEST.

    hellb0y666

    And… because it’s for PROS

    Luke Magnifico

    It is for the BEST PROS.

    Sticky

    @LukeV1-5:
    It is for the BREAST POSE…wait, what?

    aarpie

    Because it still beats the pants off Vista?

    Vista can go suck leporous donkey balls

    The Matrix: Rebooted

    Sorry, Win2k is still the best.

    MonkeyHitman

    @reboot: win2k=vista

    Luke Magnifico

    @aarpie: Yes that is the correct answer

    aarpie is the winner of game

    Jaypeezy

    Next up, Windows 7 Professional

    Gouki4u

    @Sticky: BEAST PROSE!

    Phyreblade

    @reboot: Yeah, I agree… If developers were still writing games without XP apis, I’d still be runng W2k…

    @ColombianMonkey:
    I dunno about that. If memory serves, Vista’s internal rev number is actually only 3 or 4 revs above XP, and carries around a vast majority of it’s bloat. There were some minor internal speed, security and architecture optimizations performed, but beyond that, I think precious little was done to the kernel. It was primarily all additional bells and whistles.

    I think Windows 7 will have more in common with W2K than Vista…

    MonkeyHitman

    Windows 7 is just a big ass service pack instead they make money for this. vista technology comes from w2k as also like w7

    Phyreblade

    @ColombianMonkey: LOL From W2k on, they have all been big fat service packs… Nothing new there… Look at the OS version the kernel reports, they don’t lie. You can see how many steps they take with each new version, and they aren’t changing a heck of a lot…

    They could technically have just stuck with W2K, and made improvements, but there’s no money in that… :/