Leave A Comment

Please Login to comment
38 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
22 Comment authors
CaioTrayShadixtraptin85ieattime20Annarchy Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Luke Magnifico
Member

No, they’d just shoot her with their automatic weapons.

Or, alternatively, sneak up and hit her with a golf club.

I mean, come on, they’re professionals, their whole job is sneaking places, and doing things sneakily.

Luke Magnifico
Member

Also, she looks like a crazy person, who should never have a gun in the first place.

Caio
Member

I dunno man she’s kind of hot in a crazy old bitch way.

Corman
Member

‘Murrica

bright green
Member

Tiki we can read the text in the image, you don’t need to put it as a title.

Namelis1
Member

Its for google search.

camusapprentice
Member

“… because if she fired that gun that she bought for “Protection” shed probobly me knocked on her ass after one shot… that missed… and then she would be COMPLETELY DEFENSELESS. Her elected officials thought perhaps she should probobly learn how to PROPERLY defend herself.”

camusapprentice
Member

@tiki god: and more likely the cop will have body armor and then theyd have REASON to shoot her.

flintlocke
Member

Why is the assumption that the intruder is a “him”? That’s completely sexist. I’m sure bitches break into places all the time.

traptin85
Member

@LukeV1-5: you think she looks crazy just because she has her hair all over the place? perhaps the intruder came at night, and she just got out of bed?

stavros
Member

What if she’s the intruder, robbing a bank or just walking around aiming that thing at people? I demand bullet proof vests and rocket launchers

hvymetal86
Member

@tiki god: I thought the rule was to type any text in the picture in the description of the post, not the title…. @camusapprentice: Why assume she doesn’t know what she’s doing with a gun? Even though it is a fucking large one. My g/f prolly shot more guns than most of you fuckers. Though in truth, she’s actually shot quite a lot of them. As a kid, her grandfather had a gun room with literally hundreds of guns. When they went target shooting, she’d get to pick a few of em each time, what ever she wanted and would… Read more »

TrAyVon'S GhOSt, nuCca
Member

Seems to me that the intruder should be the one pissed off here. He was promised an unarmed occupant. Don’t trust politicians. They never deliver.

Luke Magnifico
Member

@traptin85: She looks crazy because of the crazy look in her eyes that makes her look crazy. My hair is always all over the place, and I’m perfectly sane.

sylvanish
Member

What happens when some high strung armed woman whose had a bad day, is typically urban paranoid, and armed, gets approached by a well meaning fellow who was just asking the time, and said twitchy lady gets the wrong idea and glocks him one? I’m just sayin’, paranoid nutbars are a major demographic for gun sales, but paranoid nutbars shouldn’t have guns. Another situation, a son or daughter snuck out one evening and is trying to sneak back in late, drunk and clumsy, they knock something over, aren’t moving with their “familiar” noises, and the sound is much like a… Read more »

sylvanish
Member

By the way, what kind of pistol is that?

Marrock
Member

@sylvanish: I was wondering the same thing.

Annarchy
Member

It’s the kind of pistol that will kill you. And, besides that, what if said intruder, male, female or goat, decides being shot really doesn’t matter? How many bullets does it take to incapacitate a tweaker? I wanna play that game.

camusapprentice
Member

@hvymetal86: I agree with you. I have not shot a gun, I have spent 5 of my 21 years choosing to learn about blade weaponry instead of guns. Main reason is because of logic founded in friends of mine that have guns that a gun incorperates recoil. In todays world, your average gun weilder is doing it for intimidation, not killing ability. Also in todays world, people shit their pants when they see someone handeling a blade like they know what they are doing because they dont know how to compute. I would gague that by looks as a HIGH… Read more »

caffino54
Member

… and nooone’s mentioned trigger discipline

SKILLERWHALE
Member
SKILLERWHALE

All the stories you people make up are just silly. There are intelligent people who have gun permitted and actually go to shooting ranges and learn about the WEAPON instead of going though all the permit hassles just to sleep with it loaded under their pillow.

And for the record, a in house permit is different from a side arm carrying permit. Just cuz you have a gun don’t mean you can just walk around with it. Morons.

ieattime20
Member

Yes, yes. I’m quite sure that if every legal citizen were allowed to have guns that no one would get addicted to drugs, or be poor, or hungry, or desperate and homicidal, or crazy, and that all homes would be safe.

It certainly isn’t the case that all robbers would ALSO ALWAYS carry guns since they know they’ll be going up against them, and now not only are you in trouble, but your kids held hostage, and every B&E becomes a Western-style shootout, straight from Stalingrad.

Yes, everyone having guns solves all crime problems forever.

Alte
Member

Mateba Model 6 Unica:

It is currently the only automatic revolver made in the world today.

Weight: 2.96 lbs (1.340 kg)(6 inch barrel) empty.
Caliber: .357 magnum
Barrel Length: 3 inches (7.6 cm), 4 inch (10.2 cm), 5 inch (12.7 cm), or 6 inch (15.2 cm).
Action: Semi-automatic Double Action.
Range: 200 ft (60 m).
Cylinder: 6 rounds .
Cost: $ 1,000.
Made in: Italy.
Special: Semi-automatic action. Very accurate, very high quality, interchangable barrels.

SKILLERWHALE
Member
SKILLERWHALE

Leattime, so the way things are makes it better? LOL@U

Guess it depends where you live. Have you ever had a burglar come into your house while you where asleep?

sylvanish
Member

For when I go hunting with my family, I have a 7mm RUM. It practically jumped out of my hands the first time I shot it, but I quickly got a feel for its bite and now i love it. I’m only 115 lbs too. I’ve also fired a .357 and a .44 magnum revolver at a range too, and didn’t find them at all hard to handle. Maybe if it was this lady’s first time firing this gun, she’d have a problem, but the human body, it has this wonderful ability to adapt to things. @SKILLERWHALE: I don’t deny… Read more »

SKILLERWHALE
Member
SKILLERWHALE

Answer me this then, do you think an idiot who cannot balance a check book is going to apply for a gun permit? Doubtful, my gripe is normal people who do apply and are turned down for no reason.

wopfart
Member

1) the cops cant get there in time
2) an armed population is a deterrant against tirany
3) we’re frikin crazy and go shooting each other
wtf, but if i’m on the road, i leave my lady at with a double barrel remington. recoil or not. in the real world you may get one shot off before you shit your self

Caio
Member

No an armed population is the cause of “tirany”.

You think all those crazy regimes in the world were established through status quo? No, the batshit regimes came about through violent citizen revolution.

Gilly
Member

If that chick actually uses a Mateba to protect her home, she’s definetly not right in the head.
Either she’s rich enough to HIRE security, or too fucking MAD to reliably protect herself.

sylvanish
Member

@SKILLERWHALE: I couldn’t say, but I think yes, probably such an idiot would indeed. There is no limit to what idiots do/

sylvanish
Member

But why does balancing a check book define idiocy? What about those many who don’t have them?

ieattime20
Member

@SKILLERWHALE: Oh wow man. Clever and well thought out answer. ‘LOL@U’. I guess that refutes everything. Welcome to teh intarnets.

And no, I haven’t. But I know people who have. And if the choice is “Both of us probably have guns” or “Neither of us probably have guns” I’d pick the latter, because as a middle-class WASP I don’t really know how to shoot, but I’m sure an armed criminal does.

hvymetal86
Member

@camusapprentice: Why choose guns over knives? Why choose knives over guns? I choose both 😀

Annarchy
Member

@SKILLERWHALE: By your logic, even people who qualify for a driver’s license, pass the test and drive on a daily basis wouldn’t be allowed to carry or own a gun. Which is fine by me. Have you seen the morons on the road?

ieattime20
Member

@wopfart: An armed population is the crudest form of defense against tyranny, and the most consistently defeated. Either you enlist your armed population, or galvanize them towards something distracting to justify your tyranny. Either way, sweet army, and you save money buying guns for them! The best form of defense, the most humane, is a system of revolution that does not include violence, like with elections, democracy, and a divided, competing governmental body. Not an armed populace. It’s like saying a bomb on your front door is a deterrant against home invasion. Sure is, but is that the kind of… Read more »

Annarchy
Member

@ieattime20: Here here!

ieattime20
Member

Oh yeah, other best defense against a tyranny: An intelligent populous. Not that guns and smarts are mutually exclusive, but they’re also not the same. Don’t let your people get dumb (such as with the thinking: the only way to solve conflict and crime is with bullets), and you’ll never have to worry about a dictator.

traptin85
Member

@LukeV1-5: she has a crazy look in her eyes because she’s pissed that someone woke her up and broke into her house!!!!!

TrayShadix
Member

Yet again, I’m bored with this. Lefties see only city violence control and righties see only their amendments being taken away. Anyone to the left of you is a socialist and anyone to the right a fascist…I can’t wait until these partys’ representatives die off and we get a new generation of assholes with something more interesting to fight over.

Does anyone actually, realistically, think that city violence will drop OR people will be disallowed gun ownership because of a new figurehead? {snore}