the question is, did he fire 5 hamburgers or 6. ize gots to know.

Comment by Drew — August 7, 2008 @ 3:06 pm

WANT!

my neighbors would freak out if that was on my porch….

Comment by storminator — August 7, 2008 @ 3:53 pm

WIN!!

and off road tires too!!!

Comment by DasMaus — August 7, 2008 @ 3:57 pm

Just don’t invite anyone working for airport security.

Comment by Korinthian — August 7, 2008 @ 6:05 pm

Go ahead, Make my steak!!!

Comment by CMoorehead — August 7, 2008 @ 6:30 pm

America, FUCK YEAH!!!

Comment by natedog — August 7, 2008 @ 7:43 pm

I guess I won’t be submitting this pic. I was going to submit 2 different pics of this.

Comment by nyokki — August 7, 2008 @ 7:51 pm

imagine if this fired the hamburgers through the barrel when they were cooked.

Comment by GorillaMunch — August 8, 2008 @ 3:08 am

this is the best thing I’ve seen all day!

Comment by robustion — August 8, 2008 @ 8:11 am

nyokki, send them in if you have them, I’d like to see this beast from different angles.

Comment by Marrock — August 8, 2008 @ 11:55 am

Is that all cops do then, shoot people?

Comment by teezy weezy — August 3, 2008 @ 5:21 am

Well no, cops also bring the dogs. And the bees. And the dogs with bees in their mouths. So that when they bark, they shoot bees at you.

Comment by AgZed — August 3, 2008 @ 5:53 am

its against the law in the US to be a vigilante. i would like to hear from people as to whether a gun would have saved them in a certain situation without legal ramifications.

Comment by Snow — August 3, 2008 @ 6:34 am

Snow: Of course it would have. Just ask Bernhard Goetz.

Oh wait.

Comment by AgZed — August 3, 2008 @ 7:00 am

Snow,
Alive and in jail vs. dead and law-abiding: your thoughts?

Comment by legba — August 3, 2008 @ 7:35 am

While I see the value of allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns as a deterrent against crime, I wouldn’t want one myself. The problem is if you were to shoot a criminal that was victimizing you, you’d have Al Sharpton calling you a racist.

Comment by AlecDalek — August 3, 2008 @ 7:44 am

ok legba what if you shoot someone who had honorable interntions? another thing is you americans have so little faith in your justice system that you carry around a gun. i know its your constitutional right but thats so far outdated. and legba if you are in jail you may as well be dead. give me liberty or give me death.

Comment by Snow — August 3, 2008 @ 8:12 am

The gun part of the costitution is so the USAders can dislodge incompetent governments. Notice how they all walk around with guns and none of them do shit to impeach Bush after sending their kids to war (etc). Use your damn guns for the right things damnit, or I’ll lose whatever faith I have left in your so called democratic country.

Comment by Korinthian — August 3, 2008 @ 9:26 am

So you want us to practice anarchy to prove democracy?

Comment by RSIxidor — August 3, 2008 @ 9:32 am

No, RSI. Korinthian is recommending we use force to exercise another constitutional right laid down by our very DECLARATION of Independence…

“…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

Comment by TrayShadix — August 3, 2008 @ 9:48 am

I think the problem is this: Our society sees Bush as a problem yes, but they just saw, “It won’t be a problem in 4/8 years.” The issue is that the majority of society sees the president as the power behind the government, and while this one can definitely be accused of abusing this, we also need to look at the other three branches.

That, and most Americans are too lazy to give a damn.

Comment by RSIxidor — August 3, 2008 @ 10:10 am

It’s not that we’re lazy, it’s just that there’s something on TV and we don’t have time to cook. Where’s the damn pizza boy?!!

Comment by Paul_Is_Drunk — August 3, 2008 @ 10:22 am

Its true TrayShadix, the government in the U.S. has been able to operate without fear of repercussion from its own people. They have continued to slowly allow things to falter in their own favor, and it seems most Americans are unable to see just how bad its become.

In countries like France, and the rest of Europe, the people have all the power. The government lives in fear and steps lightly that at any point the people will revolt and overthrow the current power. Protesting in Europe actually works. So the system is actually set up to keep the people happy, money being spent where the people want, and not the government. though I know that might seem odd to most.

Comment by MrDooves — August 3, 2008 @ 11:19 am

That does make sense, too bad the majority of Americans would balk at the idea that FRANCE of all places has it right.

Comment by RSIxidor — August 3, 2008 @ 11:32 am

“Alive and in jail vs. dead and law-abiding: your thoughts?”

It’s always better to take the moral high ground. The “two wrongs make a right” philosophy is the only reason there’s violent crime in the first place. If everyone put ethical conduct first and foremost there’s be little need for guns or cops.

You put papa legba’s name t oshame.

Comment by Caio — August 3, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

Also, Mr. Dooves: What the fuck are you talking about? Aren’t you Canadian? Canadians are totally apathetic about politics compared to Americans. As are most Europeans. Americans spend a lot more time talking politics than people in most other countries. And hell, even the French are pretty apathetic about politics compared to, say, the Italians, and most of the Italians are still pretty damn unhappy about the government.

As for French having all kinds of super-duper control over the government I would say no. Yes, proportional election systems encourage multi-party legislatures, which reflects the will of the people a lot more. But that doesn’t matter because, compared to European countries France puts a lot more power in the person of the Executive. From my experience most people in France see their government as corrupt, nepotistic and Byzantine.

And don’t tell me about the occasional protest. Race riots were once common in the States (1991, late 70s, several in the 50s&60s, zoot suit riots, etc). And as for the 60s youth mass protests in France, that was nothing but trendy hippy bullshit copied directly from Americans.

Dooves, you bullshit and are blatantly factually wrong about literally everything you post about, and you’re so bad at it. You are like Cliff from Cheers.

Comment by Caio — August 3, 2008 @ 10:11 pm

Repost is repost.

Comment by Thrella — August 4, 2008 @ 4:35 am

back in the days when i was being VERY naughty- i used to carry a gun when i was making “deliverys”. there were three occasions when i was REALLY glad i was armed. talk about TENSE.

LOL

i still carry a gun when i travel. better to have it and not need it.

Comment by storminator — August 4, 2008 @ 8:42 am

My father was killed by a gun that had been bought for protection.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Self-Defense: The Great Myth of America’s Gun Industry
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf.

Guns have long been seen as tools of self-defense in the United States. But, contrary to gun industry hype, unintended consequences often happen when people buy guns for self-defense. Studies by public health professionals have repeatedly found that having a gun around for any reason increases the likelihood that a family member—as opposed to a criminal—will be injured or killed with a gun. A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.

Other studies have looked specifically at the more narrow question of keeping guns in the home for self-defense. One, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.

These and other studies have documented repeatedly the enhanced risk that comes from bringing a gun into the home. Even the gun press admits the risk in unguarded moments. Describing the demise of so-called “lintel guns,” firearms hung over the door ready for immediate action in frontier times, Shooting Sports Retailer noted:

“Today, guns in a home used for self protection are not hung over the door but are more likely in a desk drawer or beside the bed in a night stand. When a child is hurt in a firearm accident it is often the self defense gun that was found, played with, and ultimately fired by the youngster.”

But how often do people use guns successfully to protect themselves from criminal acts? Does it justify the deaths and damage that comes with guns? Apparently not. Most studies have found that guns play a relatively minor role in preventing crime but a major role in facilitating it. For example, the US Department of Justice study found that, on the average, between 1987 and 1992 only one percent of actual or attempted victims of violent crime, or about 62,000 people, attempted to defend themselves with a firearm. On the other hand, criminals armed with handguns committed a record 931,000 violent crimes in 1992. Data from the FBI’s Crime in the United States reveals that for every time in 1998 that a civilian used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 50 people lost their lives in handgun homicides alone.

One advocate of the value of handguns for self-defense is Gary Kleck, professor of criminology at Florida State University in Tallahassee. Kleck and his colleague Mark Gertz claim their survey research indicates that civilians use guns in self-defense up to 2.5 million times a year. Naturally enough, the NRA and the gun industry have widely cited Kleck’s work as proof of the value of owning a gun. But Dr. David Hemenway, a professor at Harvard’s School of Public Health, dissected the work of Kleck and Gertz in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, concluding that their survey contained ”a huge overestimation bias” and that their estimate is “highly exaggerated.” Hemenway applied Kleckand Gertz’s methodology to a 1994 ABC News/Washington Post survey in which people were asked if they had ever seen an alien spacecraft or come into direct contact with a space alien. He demonstrated that, by the application of Kleck and Gertz’s methodology, one would conclude that almost 20 million Americans have seen a spacecraft from another planet and more than a million have actually met space aliens.

Comment by uttermost — August 5, 2008 @ 9:05 am

is this the lovechild of longcat and tacgnol?

Comment by natedog — July 30, 2008 @ 11:12 am

This looks shopped. I can tell by the repeat of the fur pattern. The pixels are also questionable.

Comment by Spaceduck — July 30, 2008 @ 11:26 am

i dont think its shopped.

also, Long[range]Cat, Locked and ready!

Comment by Zen — July 30, 2008 @ 12:42 pm

Lasercats!

Comment by suicydking — July 30, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

Shouldn’t the tail be pointed down range? That’s the dangerous end!

Comment by dyvefli — July 30, 2008 @ 2:37 pm

Its even got a tripod for the barrel! hahaha

Comment by robustion — July 30, 2008 @ 3:04 pm

that cat should have number 1′d and 2′d in his hand for such disrespect.

Comment by GorillaMunch — July 30, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

That rifle is amazing…

Comment by Throoper — July 28, 2008 @ 2:05 am

that camouflage is amazing…
looks not like a sniper - looks like a man in a coat with a rifle - foolproof!

Comment by Achi — July 28, 2008 @ 3:07 am

*pew pew pew* I make your head asplode!

Comment by colonel-yum-yum — July 28, 2008 @ 4:46 am

I agree with Achi.
Paint that sucker white if you don’t want to stick out like a bulldogs bollocks.

Comment by Ando — July 28, 2008 @ 5:14 am

Unless there’s combat going on in antartica, or the actual artic (wait a few years maybe), generally there is still gonna be a lot of black and dark green shrubs and trees sticking up and around. This guy is german, where even in the depths of winter there is still brush and forest. Laying out in the middle of an open white field, with no cover is stupid no matter how good your camo. Yet if he wore pure white, he would stick out from the available cover just as much. These are professionals, who know what they are doing. He’s balanced to the varied environment. Plus: From a couple km’s away, he might look like a tiny momentary flash and then your dead.

Comment by jesupocalypse — July 28, 2008 @ 6:42 pm

“Long Distance - The Next Best Thing To Being There”

Comment by storminator — July 29, 2008 @ 2:41 pm

Funny that It’s engraved “new world order” and the first one was given to bush Senior. Who when he addressed the UN. Used those very words. New world order indeed. I could see why a 1 world government could be appealing to some. No wars over land or resources , since there are no countries. Only threat is from individuals, which is where “report your neighbor” propaganda would step in. Turning everyone on each other to assure dominance of the state. hmm funny that oddly sounds familiar. ohh yaaa, watch out for those terrorists !

Comment by GorillaMunch — July 26, 2008 @ 12:32 pm

NEW WORLD ORDER
COMMEMORATIVE

is that your gun natedog?

Evil Illuminati is amused by your obvious label.

Hello Amero

Comment by EVIL ILLUMINATI — July 26, 2008 @ 12:35 pm

remember those little yellow flags Americans waved in 1991, what did it read on the label “support our terrorists”

Comment by EVIL ILLUMINATI — July 26, 2008 @ 12:37 pm

I’m surprised Illuminati didn’t post this. I knew he’d be commenting this thing right away though. I was right.

Comment by Exacerbate — July 26, 2008 @ 1:56 pm

this is great. the smoking gun.

Comment by SKILLERWHALE — July 26, 2008 @ 5:37 pm

facepalm.jpg @your first comment, EI

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE LINK BEHIND THE CURTIAN

i stumbled upon the site and found it interesting; i figured linking the page and quoting it would give it away…

also, WFT does this have to do with the Amero?

Comment by natedog — July 26, 2008 @ 7:59 pm

also, i submitted this like weeks ago

Comment by natedog — July 26, 2008 @ 7:59 pm

NWO = A GOOD ASS FUCK FOR ALL

The Bush Regime has done nothing to help the United States or any other country for that reason. The agenda of Bush Sr & Jr goes far beyond what any normal people could fathom.

This whole NWO thing should concern everyone, regardless of what country race or religion you are. Your rights as a citizen and a human being will be greatly altered once this country becomes a one governed globe.

The NWO analyze the way that Hitler and the Nazi’s took over as a so called ” first attempt at global domination”. Now I dont know about you but I can not think of one thing that we could possibly learn from Nazis.

Next time kids we will talk about UFO’s and technology.

Comment by mosher111 — July 27, 2008 @ 2:42 am

Jul 29 1921
The Council on Foreign Relations is incorporated in New York City by a group of bankers and other influentials, including John D Rockefeller. The CFR remains a vital component of the New World Order, and is surpassed in importance only by the Trilateral Commission. Now that you have this information, you know too much.

Comment by storminator — July 29, 2008 @ 9:30 pm

WTF does “can hasing” mean?

i can just imagine the plot.

prolly from the same cookie cutter they used on Transporter, Bank Job, Crank…

Comment by natedog — July 24, 2008 @ 4:02 pm

I can has “insert object of desire here”. To can has as in the manner of a lol cat?

I didn’t think that would be misunderstood, lol.

Comment by hvymetal86 — July 24, 2008 @ 4:04 pm

Who cares if his films are all the same? Stafam’s the man.

Clint Eastwood’s, Marion Morrison’s, Jackie Chan and Jimmy Cagney’s films are largely the same too, nobody cares about them either.

Comment by JamesTuskGeorge — July 24, 2008 @ 4:12 pm

I got the “can hasing” right away, but i can see how natedog was thrown off.

I don’t think the movie will be that good, but I’m prepared to be entertained by the mindless action.

Also, Ian McShane is the fucking shit.

Comment by Camiam321 — July 24, 2008 @ 4:13 pm

death race 2000 with Stallone is the best race movie…

Comment by hellb0y666 — July 24, 2008 @ 4:30 pm

Whats with the delayed posts?

Comment by Excelsior — July 24, 2008 @ 4:37 pm

I was bouncing around during the preview. The cars look awesome… I think I’ll dload it and watch it with the sound off.

Comment by outofocus — July 24, 2008 @ 5:23 pm

This is yet another movie that doesn’t need to be remade because the original is already badass. From the preview, it looks like they’ve taken out the parts about running over pedestrians, which is a cop-out.

Comment by reboot — July 24, 2008 @ 6:28 pm

My mouth hung open for 3/4ths of the preview? It’s like, everything has a question mark on the end of it? And I’m imagining it being said by someone who’d actually talk like that?

In all seriousness, it doesn’t need a remake, but I’ll probably put money toward it.

Comment by ladyoftheorb — July 24, 2008 @ 7:50 pm

@ladyoftheorb

yeah… typo, lol. I fixed the spelling errors Firefox so helpfully pointed out and stopped there.

Comment by hvymetal86 — July 24, 2008 @ 9:23 pm

I have one thing to say - Euthanasia Day at the Geriatrics Hospital.

Comment by NoOneInParticular — July 25, 2008 @ 3:49 am

I am pretty sure watching that movie would make me race to kill myself.

Comment by jasonp — July 25, 2008 @ 12:04 pm

in an interview in that like preview section before the preview section at the movie theater, statham said something along the lines of “it’s crazy, fast, and sexy” and i couldn’t help but think….

Isn’t that the typical statham movie?

Comment by Gilez — July 25, 2008 @ 12:31 pm

Okay, it looks neat. But here’s my problem.

I am so sick of these Mustangs being shoved down my throat. Every movie that has something to do with Cars always has to have a freaking Ford Mustang in it as the main, cool car. Screw that.

Let’s see, Transformers had a Saleen, so, might as well be a Mustang, and then blasphemy of blasphemy, Nightrider is now driving a Mustang, never mind the old Kit, the Trans Am kit would whoop ass on pos mustang. There’s been several other flicks with Mustangs, and I’m just so bored of seeing the things.

Comment by awfulintentions — July 26, 2008 @ 4:33 am

The piss stain on the seat would put most off.

Comment by teezy weezy — July 23, 2008 @ 5:21 am

Attempted carjacked twice. One citizens arrest, one guy running away in the night like a pussy. Surprisingly, both times without having to use a gun. Oh, wait. I don’t have a small penis. Sorry, almost forgot.

Comment by Paul_Is_Drunk — July 23, 2008 @ 7:58 am

You used your penis to apprehend these criminals… no wonder he ran… swing your non-small penis at them… I wouldn’t car-jack you either.

Some of us do have a small penis and can easily make up for it by waving a gun that makes the carjackee’s penis become smaller.

Comment by TrendyPick — July 23, 2008 @ 9:28 am

Lol.

“Attempted carjacked twice.”

–Insert line about learning from history–

Don’t worry. I’m sure when somebody finally does carjack you with a gun or some other weapon, your gigantic dong will defend you and save the day.

Comment by FlyingMantisShrimp — July 23, 2008 @ 11:06 am

magazine*

Comment by dekay46 — July 23, 2008 @ 11:46 am

i’ve shot that gun, it’s not accurate and cheaply made.

Comment by Drew — July 23, 2008 @ 5:47 pm

@teezy weezy: I think its a creampie stain. Yeah, that means I had sex w/ a chick and my cum came out of her onto my seat. so go fuck yourself.

@drew: go fuck yourself too! at least mine was made in america

Comment by token2k6 — July 23, 2008 @ 6:14 pm

Wow, token. Paul accuses you of having a tiny penis, so then you come along and remove all doubt.

Comment by Lord Cocksworth — July 23, 2008 @ 9:32 pm

If your American gun performs like American cars, I wouldn’t trust my life to it.

Comment by wombat — July 23, 2008 @ 10:07 pm

My father was killed with a gun bought for protection.
===============================================
Self-Defense: The Great Myth of America’s Gun Industry
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf.

Guns have long been seen as tools of self-defense in the United States. But, contrary to gun industry hype, unintended consequences often happen when people buy guns for self-defense. Studies by public health professionals have repeatedly found that having a gun around for any reason increases the likelihood that a family member—as opposed to a criminal—will be injured or killed with a gun. A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
Other studies have looked specifically at the more narrow question of keeping guns in the home for self-defense. One, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
These and other studies have documented repeatedly the enhanced risk that comes from bringing a gun into the home. Even the gun press admits the risk in unguarded moments. Describing the demise of so-called “lintel guns,” firearms hung over the door ready for immediate action in frontier times, Shooting Sports Retailer noted:
“Today, guns in a home used for self protection are not hung over the door but are more likely in a desk drawer or beside the bed in a night stand. When a child is hurt in a firearm accident it is often the self defense gun that was found, played with, and ultimately fired by the youngster.”
But how often do people use guns successfully to protect themselves from criminal acts? Does it justify the deaths and damage that comes with guns? Apparently not. Most studies have found that guns play a relatively minor role in preventing crime but a major role in facilitating it. For example, the US Department of Justice study found that, on the average, between 1987 and 1992 only one percent of actual or attempted victims of violent crime, or about 62,000 people, attempted to defend themselves with a firearm. On the other hand, criminals armed with handguns committed a record 931,000 violent crimes in 1992. Data from the FBI’s Crime in the United States reveals that for every time in 1998 that a civilian used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 50 people lost their lives in handgun homicides alone.

One advocate of the value of handguns for self-defense is Gary Kleck, professor of criminology at Florida State University in Tallahassee. Kleck and his colleague Mark Gertz claim their survey research indicates that civilians use guns in self-defense up to 2.5 million times a year. Naturally enough, the NRA and the gun industry have widely cited Kleck’s work as proof of the value of owning a gun. But Dr. David Hemenway, a professor at Harvard’s School of Public Health, dissected the work of Kleck and Gertz in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, concluding that their survey contained ”a huge overestimation bias” and that their estimate is “highly exaggerated.” Hemenway applied Kleckand Gertz’s methodology to a 1994 ABC News/Washington Post survey in which people were asked if they had ever seen an alien spacecraft or come into direct contact with a space alien. He demonstrated that, by the application of Kleck and Gertz’s methodology, one would conclude that almost 20 million Americans have seen a spacecraft from another planet and more than a million have actually met space aliens.

Comment by uttermost — July 24, 2008 @ 12:08 am

Whilst I agree with the spirit of that article, and certainly am against all things gunnish, it’s important to note that drawing direct correlations such as those in this article can be misleading. For example, you would probably find that a high proportion of “protection” gun owners live in areas with a low quality of life index. This would account for the high level of crime that might have inspired them to buy a gun. But such areas might also have a higher incidence of suicide, mental illness and all other kinds of things that could cause the effects these studies have seen. Obviously, I’ve got no data to back this up, but worth bearing in mind.

Comment by daviest11 — July 24, 2008 @ 3:43 am

All I have in my glove box is a roadmap. And maybe some gum and a couple of CDs.

Mind you, I live in the UK where we have less car-jackings. And more importantly, less gun-loving Americans carrying weapons of death around, because it’s there right to be surrounded by lethal objects.

Comment by phantomwhale — July 24, 2008 @ 8:15 am

i’m glad your faggot father died from a handgun.

Comment by Drew — July 24, 2008 @ 10:47 am

Thanks Drew.

Comment by uttermost — July 24, 2008 @ 11:01 am

@ uttermost
Sorry, that was rude.

Comment by Drew — July 25, 2008 @ 12:56 pm

are you two gonna hold hands and cuddle now?

Comment by dekay46 — July 25, 2008 @ 9:41 pm

I grew up hunting with guns and still enjoy it so I don’t think I am so much anti-gun, as maybe I am more pro-trigger-lock. Since my father’s death 20 years ago I’ve collected many stories and reports.
================================================
Man Accidentally Kills Neighbor While Cleaning Gun
24 Sep 2006
Posted By: Mandi Bishop
WOAI.com San Antonio news. Texas

Jesse Hernandez says he was cleaning his M-16 when it just went off. The bullet went through his wall and killed 24-year-old neighbor Salvo Garcia. This all happened late Friday night into Saturday morning on Bandera Road near Hillcrest. Garcia’s wife found her husband when she got home from work just after midnight Saturday morning. Police aren’t sure if any charges will be filed in the case but they do say the shooting does look accidental. Hernandez says he feels bad for the Garcia family and wishes it never happened. He also says he is getting rid of his gun. He bought it a few months ago for protection.

Comment by uttermost — July 25, 2008 @ 10:56 pm

a gun is a responsability just like anything else, you can kill someone or commit suicide with an automobile, and there are far more car deaths worldwide then gun violence yet nobody is protesting cars.

Comment by SKILLERWHALE — July 26, 2008 @ 6:02 pm

That could not be any more true.

Comment by ttudrew98 — July 3, 2008 @ 2:05 pm

after katrina, the cops confiscated all of the guns by force… house to house… sadness…

Comment by DisplacedTexan — July 3, 2008 @ 2:06 pm

I like that 12 guage. Nom

Comment by Gunface01 — July 3, 2008 @ 2:14 pm

I can’t believe they left out that zombies want your brains

Comment by DasMaus — July 3, 2008 @ 2:15 pm

You’re right tt98, here in Baltimore the police are so protective and responsive to calls that it has been almost whole day since our last murder and almost 12 hours since our last home evasion.

Comment by gor — July 3, 2008 @ 2:20 pm

@gor

What!?

Comment by silverflux — July 3, 2008 @ 2:25 pm

Let’s not forget the appeal of masturbation.

Comment by warren — July 3, 2008 @ 2:32 pm

and Velociraptors.

Comment by ZeroMG — July 3, 2008 @ 2:38 pm

Ok, here in Baltimore legal gun ownership for self-defense is not allowed and we have a murder rate 6 times higher then New York, but any areas in this state that has a high legal gun ownership the murder rate is next to zero and very little home invasion. Go figure.

After reading tt98 post again, I see that I misread it (I thought he was saying that the “poster” info was wrong) my bad.

Comment by gor — July 3, 2008 @ 2:39 pm

Katrina illustrated that in extreme situations the police are either unable or unwilling to do there jobs and it becomes up to the local community to protect their homes. In the next few years there will more than likely be similar situations where order will be maintained by well armed citizens

Comment by dhg4983 — July 3, 2008 @ 3:44 pm

Or you could buy the guns for self defense or collect them as a hobby. Stupid liberal bullshit.

Comment by Exacerbate — July 3, 2008 @ 4:07 pm

I would like to think this where the modern interpretation of the 2nd amendment is going. In usual situations (like Katrina) a trained group of volunteer neighbors could, at a moments notice, secure and assist their local neighborhood until the proper authorities have the ability to resume their assigned duties.

This needs to be more than just a bunch of gun toting knuckleheads, but people who have proven the can use their equipement in a safe and reliable manner (which in my opinion would not just be weapons, but advanced first aid, radio communications, water purification, emergency shelter contruction and the like).

Comment by gor — July 3, 2008 @ 4:08 pm

Gun violence is high in certain areas not because of excessive gun laws but because of widespread poor and lack of education.

Comment by MikeBabaguh — July 3, 2008 @ 4:36 pm

I’ve been (and lived) in rural areas most everyone is poor and stupid and where everyone owns a legal firearm, yet they don’t seem to shooting the crap out of each other.

Comment by gor — July 3, 2008 @ 4:48 pm

the 2nd amendment provided for well regulated militias and by that they meant regulated private militias. Thats right back in the 18th & 19th century private militias were very common in the USA. If you can have private militias then private gun ownership is completely implied. Extreme liberal minority groups are trying to push their ideas on the majority of the country.

Comment by dhg4983 — July 3, 2008 @ 4:50 pm

I suppose this would be a good time to point out the recent supreme court ruling affirming the right to have guns for self-defense in the home and declaring that gun bans in cities like Washington D.C are unconstitutional.

Comment by Marrock — July 3, 2008 @ 5:21 pm

I said certain areas, gor. Population density is a factor in gun crime also, and as such you’ll see it mostly in urban areas.

Also, I’m really tired of hearing the tired argument that “liberal radicals are forcing their beliefs on us”.

Comment by MikeBabaguh — July 3, 2008 @ 5:40 pm

@MikeBabaguh
If you want to stop hearing that, then tell those blasted liberal radicals to stop arguing that more gun control will reduce gun violence. It is an equally tired and flawed an argument…

Comment by Phyreblade — July 3, 2008 @ 6:58 pm

agreed phyreblade. I wish i could push a button and send all the liberals packing back north where they can drink their fucking starbucks, complain about the death penalty, trans-fat, what euros think about americans, and arroganatly look down their nose at conservatives as dumb hicks. They could be free to do all this as along as they pack there shit and do it in Chicago, or Oregon or New York City, and leave real americans to live their lives unfettered.

Comment by dhg4983 — July 3, 2008 @ 7:05 pm

You also need this type of protection now that the fags are all getting married. So sick. Dicks belong in pussies not assholes.

Comment by ttudrew98 — July 3, 2008 @ 7:09 pm

@dhg4983
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Comment by Exacerbate — July 3, 2008 @ 9:54 pm

You guys should be careful. Someone might think you really ARE dumbass hicks who cling to their god and their guns because they aren’t as intelligent as the rest of us.

Comment by MikeBabaguh — July 4, 2008 @ 12:48 am

@mikebabaguh

Liberals already view the rest of America as a bunch of dumb hicks who need to be led by the liberal elite because they are to stupid to take care of themselves. Liberals think patriotism means paying your taxes. Liberals are the ones who when they go backpacking through Europe they pretend they are from Canada. Liberals are the ones who get so embarrassed by euros overseas because they cant explain why the US isnt a carbon copy of the typical liberal euro nation. Bottom line: Liberal=traitor. Should be only one penatly for traitors on earth. And as Dante explained they have a special place waiting for them in the afterlife.

Comment by dhg4983 — July 4, 2008 @ 8:12 am

@MikeBabaguh
I think that anyone who would jump to the conclusion that someone is less intelligent than they, simply because their views differ on any particular point, is actually demonstrating their inability to make logical and unbiased deductions based on the evidence at hand.

In fact I think that kind of behavior is a better indication of ones intelligence than anything else one says or does. I would not waste my time attempting to argue my position with those kinds of people, as they tend to blatantly ignore anything that does not fit into their absolute paradigm of the universe.

However, their annoyingly shrill cries of fear echo unrelentingly all over the country, and lawmakers constantly capitulate, sans logic or reason. They all seem to think that their way is the best way.

That’s all good and fine, but I take exception to others who, having never been in anyone shoes but their own, act as if everyone else is living in the same world they are, and try to make everyone else follow whatever rules seems to makes sense to them at the time…

Drives me absolutely nuts…

Comment by Phyreblade — July 4, 2008 @ 3:57 pm

Well posted, Phyreblade.

Comment by Le Qube — July 4, 2008 @ 4:28 pm

Americans are morons, enjoy your guns bowys

Comment by teezy weezy — July 6, 2008 @ 11:25 am

I love this plane.
Close air support at it’s best.
Well at least the way I take it.

Comment by Namelis1 — June 24, 2008 @ 7:04 am

AMERICA…fuck yeah!

Comment by robustion — June 24, 2008 @ 7:05 am

If youre going to bold something, make sure its correct. : >

Comment by NoirJ — June 24, 2008 @ 7:26 am

Has /k/ invaded MCS?

Comment by The Lawnmower — June 24, 2008 @ 8:04 am

YAAAAAA…. OOOOOOOAAAAHHH… CRRYYYY SOOME MOOOOOOOOREE!!!

Comment by Gunface01 — June 24, 2008 @ 9:49 am

you see, this is what i’m talking about.

“AK-47, the very best there is. When you absolutely, positively, have to kill every single motherfucker in the room; accept no substitute” .. .?

bring me my GAU8, and we’ll talk.

Comment by JustSomeGuy — June 24, 2008 @ 10:09 am

I think every home in the country should be protected by one of these. Or, fourteen. Mounted on turrets. And attached to motion sensors. With cameras. And manual override, so you can play a few rounds of “Goop the Crackhead” when you’re bored at 3am.

Comment by AgZed — June 24, 2008 @ 2:07 pm

AgZed brilliant- the end of burglaries and girl scout cookies.

Comment by Excelsior — June 24, 2008 @ 2:25 pm

1 order of friendly fire to go.

Comment by teezy weezy — June 24, 2008 @ 6:08 pm

Fuckin’ BAD ASS. Loaded with depleted uranium rounds. They’ll burn right through armor, and spaul inside of a tank. Ricocheting pieces of molten uranium. What a way to go…

Comment by storminator — July 3, 2008 @ 5:04 pm