Anonymous – we are legion
(15 votes, average: 2.13 out of 5)
Loading ...
Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Anonymous – we are legion
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Anonymous – we are legion
Christianity Vs Atheism
(19 votes, average: 2.95 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Religion
43 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?43 Responses to Christianity Vs Atheism
-
atheists are depicted in a wrong way
-
-
In the beginning there was *everything*, which exploded.
-
Atheism does not necessitate belief in the big bang.
Christianity requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week.
-
In the beginning was MY DICK!!! … which asploded…
-
But the cosmic background radiation! And the maths! And the other stuff I am too forgetful to remember!
But I reckon the Big Bang wasn’t the ultimate start of everything. Isn’t there that hypothesis that the big bang was started by the collapse of an earlier universe? I think it possibly went on like that forever. Has that since been proven to be incorrect, or is it still a reasonable idea?
-
“Agnosticism: In the beginning there was something which humans are not able to understand (or at least those of us that are awake enough to understand we cannot understand). Which did something which we are attempted to try and understand through various means but we still do not truly know.”
Yay for logic. 
-
@Ando:
Not exactly. Creationism requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. Mentally sane Christians (like I am) can very well cope with the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs. Just because some dickheads take a book literally that was not even taken literally by the jews 3.000 years ago does not mean that Christianity doubts Evolution.
-
I am pleased. Goldfinger, you are verily a sensible fellow. I’ll turn a blind eye to your fetish for aiming lasers at sensitive parts of the anatomy.
-
It would just make sense then, that the big bang was caused when god himself exploded.
-
THERE WAS NO FUCKING BEGINNING.
Most of us are half-assed philosophers who need to assume there was a beginning because you can’t conceptualise something without it having a beginning.
How could there be nothing? To be is to exist, and nothing cannot be. So how could there have been nothing (which is a logical absurdity), in addition to this nothing (which doesn’t exist remember, it cannot be) preceding a beginning.
There being something requires less explanation than there being nothing. Somethingness is all we’ve ever known.
-
You said it yourself, “Somethingness is all we’ve ever KNOWN.”
-
Just to throw in a point, the Big Bang was just the beginning of the material universe, but the beginning of space-time itself. There was nothing before the big bang, because there was no time before the big bang. Its a nonsense question.
As Stephen Hawking put it, talking about what happened before the big bang is like talking about what’s North of the North Pole.
-
@Goldfinger
“the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs.”
That depends on the Christian in question.
How do you decide which parts of the bible to take metaphorically and which to take literally? Can you believe God is a metaphor and still be a Christian?
-
@reboot: Duh, the “Norther Pole” is North of the North Pole. North of that is the “Northest Pole”, and after that it just gets weird.
-
Atheists will believe what atheists want to believe. Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe. One has no real chance of convincing the other. Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.
-
“Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.”
Isn’t that a good enough reason?
-
Why dont we just copy everything from the FIRST TIME this was posted and paste it in here? Needless to say: REPOST
www.myconfinedspace.com/2007/12/17/christianity-vs-atheism-does-it-really-matter/does-it-matter-2/
-
It’s North Poles all the way up.
-
Basically, without stuff, there is no time, but the chance the universe creates itself exists. It somewhere where there isn’t time, this inevitably happens straight away.
Schrodingers cat explains quantum possibilities (Wrongly)- What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel” universe where it doesn’t. So the universe must exist, because it didn’t exist at the same time.
-
^^ my brain just exploded.
-
@Ando:
We may believe so today, but people a few thousand years ago were not stupid.
I’m a Christian, but as a historian I know that I have to treat the bible as a source. And actually we can separate the descriptions of real things/events/persons from the metaphors and the things we cannot prove.
The metaphor I meant before is God hanging the stars into the sky like lamps. We can be pretty sure that this is a satire aiming to piss off the Babylonians who believed the stars to be Gods. By showing that the hebrew God put these Gods in their places the Hebrews wanted to show that their God is superior to the Babylonian Gods.
On the other hand, the Bible gives us very accurate descriptions of how the Babylonian Ziqqurats were built.
And so forth.
And just to use a very simple example: As a Lutheran, do I have to believe that mankind was created 4000 B.C. just because Luther said so 500 years ago although we have proof he was wrong (and actually just called a random number because he didn’t care, too).
So, we know about Evolution, we know that mankind wasn’t created the way we know it today. So an approximatly 4.000 year old myth is busted. Still I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.
So much for my humble point of view 
-
Second paragraph was meant as a question, not as a statement. Damn my keyboard…
-
“What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel†universe where it doesn’t.”
Just be clear: that is a hypothesis. Until someone carries out an experiment to test the hypothesis, its not really even science.
Let’s leave making untestable claims about reality to the fundies, ok?
-
HA
HA
RELIGIOUS DEBATE
C’mon guys, you’re clogging up my internet tubes. At least suck less at this.
-
Wookie: “Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe.”
“Christians and other theists will believe what they are told* to believe”
Fixed.
-
@Goldfinger
Your “holy book”, the New Testament, was actually written more like 1800 years ago. None of the gospels were written by anyone that was alive when any of it happened (that’s why they contradict each other).
-
@Alec:
Parts of it were written in the 1st century, other parts later. Most of it are letters that don’t tell “the story” but are written to preach.
@Shanghai:
And atheist don’t believe what they are told because they have found the one and only truth without anybody telling them?
-
and who said fuck all about the truth? the “truth” sadly is subjective as all. fact on the other hand is an even bigger bitch to figure out, and anyone who knows the facts is usually branded a psychopath/sociopath/lunatic and summarily ignored.
-
why so cereal? religous debates are for people wit hnothing to do this why im not going to say anything other than tiki = forum fodder benevolant overlord.
-
“till I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.”
This is why I believe that there’s a teapot orbiting Mars.
Because no one has ever proved otherwise.
-
Grape juice is tasty…
-
mmmmmmmm, grape juice….
-
@Lord:
I enjoyed the ‘discussion’/sugar-fuelled rantings in the first post more than this one. Don’t mind reposts like this one, though . . .
@tiki:
Faith is powerful. We believe what we wish to believe (I know, that’s not news). I’d like to believe in some benevolent power that created everything, looks out for us, and will give us a pat on the the back and some sort of debriefing when we die, but the very fact that I’d LIKE to believe makes my interpretations suspect. And I know I’m not alone here.
-
And I fucking love white grape juice.
-
-
@tripolar
And I’m not alone in my teapot beliefs. The only thing that I know is that there is 100% definitely not someone in the sky that pats my back when I do good, and punishes people that do bad. It’s great to guess about certain things, but really, why make up some “guy in the sky” hypothesis that can never be tested nor proven?
-
People want things to make sense. A scenario where good is rewarded & evil punished makes sense to us, matches our sense of fair play. (Someone is an asshole in MCS, people want them punished, ie: banned: if some good-guy poster was banned, no-one would think that was just.) God is the referee/parent for a lot of people: he/she doles out the punishment AND the hugs. ‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.
-
@ Goldfinger
Apologies for my poor question. It made the assumtion that the bible consists solely of truth and metaphor.
A better question would have been:
“How can you tell what to take literally, what to take metaphorically and what to disregard as blatant fiction”
I find that a good general rule is to assume the latter unless there is evidence to the contrary.
@ Tiki
Do you believe that the milk goes in first or that the tea goes in first? *readies his kneecapping mallet*
-
ando, as everyone knows the natural and holy way is to put the tea in first. Anything else is blaspheme.
-
@tiki:
HERETIC!!! You will burn in HELL for your feeble belief that tea should go in first. Of course milk (and sugar) go in first and you NEVER, EVER, EVER stir!
Wait ’til I get hold of your kneecaps!
Tea in first. I’ve never heard such a nonsense.
@Ando:
That is a good general rule, indeed. But that brings us to the old problem that people will believe anything until they find out it’s in the Bible.
Most of the things in there, especially in the Old Testament are not simply one of the three categories but a part of each. If you take the story of Noah: Of course we know, that mankind and all the animals did not descend from the passengers of the Ark. We cannot prove, if there has ever been something like the Ark (but there has most probably not been one). But we can be pretty sure that there has been a remarkable flood disaster that this myth is evolved from. And the place where the Ark is said to have landed did exist, for that we have archaeological proof. Although all those people climbing up Mt. Ararat to find the remains don’t seem to know much about the hebraic language, which contains no vocals and therefor the word ‘rrt’ could mean Mt. Ararat but it could also mean the nation of Uratru which was a pretty large nation in today’s eastern Turkey and northern Iraq and Iran.
That’s actually one thing my Professors use to joke about: We have about 5 times as much requests for digging permissions for Mt. Ararat as we have for the whole of Urartu.
Well, I hope you get my point out of all this rigmarole.
-
Roffle.. okay, Tripolar, I’m gonna guess you were just kidding when you said: “‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.”
.. You did mean Karl Marx, right? 
If you did, good joke. If not.. heh.
-
@24601:
Yes, it was a joke. Bless you for noticing.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
43 Responses to Christianity Vs Atheism
-
atheists are depicted in a wrong way
-
-
In the beginning there was *everything*, which exploded.
-
Atheism does not necessitate belief in the big bang.
Christianity requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. -
In the beginning was MY DICK!!! … which asploded…
-
But the cosmic background radiation! And the maths! And the other stuff I am too forgetful to remember!
But I reckon the Big Bang wasn’t the ultimate start of everything. Isn’t there that hypothesis that the big bang was started by the collapse of an earlier universe? I think it possibly went on like that forever. Has that since been proven to be incorrect, or is it still a reasonable idea?
-
“Agnosticism: In the beginning there was something which humans are not able to understand (or at least those of us that are awake enough to understand we cannot understand). Which did something which we are attempted to try and understand through various means but we still do not truly know.”
Yay for logic.
-
@Ando:
Not exactly. Creationism requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. Mentally sane Christians (like I am) can very well cope with the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs. Just because some dickheads take a book literally that was not even taken literally by the jews 3.000 years ago does not mean that Christianity doubts Evolution.
-
I am pleased. Goldfinger, you are verily a sensible fellow. I’ll turn a blind eye to your fetish for aiming lasers at sensitive parts of the anatomy.
-
It would just make sense then, that the big bang was caused when god himself exploded.
-
THERE WAS NO FUCKING BEGINNING.
Most of us are half-assed philosophers who need to assume there was a beginning because you can’t conceptualise something without it having a beginning.
How could there be nothing? To be is to exist, and nothing cannot be. So how could there have been nothing (which is a logical absurdity), in addition to this nothing (which doesn’t exist remember, it cannot be) preceding a beginning.
There being something requires less explanation than there being nothing. Somethingness is all we’ve ever known.
-
You said it yourself, “Somethingness is all we’ve ever KNOWN.”
-
Just to throw in a point, the Big Bang was just the beginning of the material universe, but the beginning of space-time itself. There was nothing before the big bang, because there was no time before the big bang. Its a nonsense question.
As Stephen Hawking put it, talking about what happened before the big bang is like talking about what’s North of the North Pole. -
@Goldfinger
“the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs.”
That depends on the Christian in question.How do you decide which parts of the bible to take metaphorically and which to take literally? Can you believe God is a metaphor and still be a Christian?
-
@reboot: Duh, the “Norther Pole” is North of the North Pole. North of that is the “Northest Pole”, and after that it just gets weird.
-
Atheists will believe what atheists want to believe. Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe. One has no real chance of convincing the other. Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.
-
“Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.”
Isn’t that a good enough reason? -
Why dont we just copy everything from the FIRST TIME this was posted and paste it in here? Needless to say: REPOST
www.myconfinedspace.com/2007/12/17/christianity-vs-atheism-does-it-really-matter/does-it-matter-2/
-
It’s North Poles all the way up.
-
Basically, without stuff, there is no time, but the chance the universe creates itself exists. It somewhere where there isn’t time, this inevitably happens straight away.
Schrodingers cat explains quantum possibilities (Wrongly)- What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel” universe where it doesn’t. So the universe must exist, because it didn’t exist at the same time.
-
^^ my brain just exploded.
-
@Ando:
We may believe so today, but people a few thousand years ago were not stupid.
I’m a Christian, but as a historian I know that I have to treat the bible as a source. And actually we can separate the descriptions of real things/events/persons from the metaphors and the things we cannot prove.
The metaphor I meant before is God hanging the stars into the sky like lamps. We can be pretty sure that this is a satire aiming to piss off the Babylonians who believed the stars to be Gods. By showing that the hebrew God put these Gods in their places the Hebrews wanted to show that their God is superior to the Babylonian Gods.
On the other hand, the Bible gives us very accurate descriptions of how the Babylonian Ziqqurats were built.
And so forth.And just to use a very simple example: As a Lutheran, do I have to believe that mankind was created 4000 B.C. just because Luther said so 500 years ago although we have proof he was wrong (and actually just called a random number because he didn’t care, too).
So, we know about Evolution, we know that mankind wasn’t created the way we know it today. So an approximatly 4.000 year old myth is busted. Still I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.
So much for my humble point of view
-
Second paragraph was meant as a question, not as a statement. Damn my keyboard…
-
“What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel†universe where it doesn’t.”
Just be clear: that is a hypothesis. Until someone carries out an experiment to test the hypothesis, its not really even science.
Let’s leave making untestable claims about reality to the fundies, ok? -
HA
HA
RELIGIOUS DEBATE
C’mon guys, you’re clogging up my internet tubes. At least suck less at this.
-
Wookie: “Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe.”
“Christians and other theists will believe what they are told* to believe”
Fixed.
-
@Goldfinger
Your “holy book”, the New Testament, was actually written more like 1800 years ago. None of the gospels were written by anyone that was alive when any of it happened (that’s why they contradict each other).
-
@Alec:
Parts of it were written in the 1st century, other parts later. Most of it are letters that don’t tell “the story” but are written to preach.@Shanghai:
And atheist don’t believe what they are told because they have found the one and only truth without anybody telling them? -
and who said fuck all about the truth? the “truth” sadly is subjective as all. fact on the other hand is an even bigger bitch to figure out, and anyone who knows the facts is usually branded a psychopath/sociopath/lunatic and summarily ignored.
-
why so cereal? religous debates are for people wit hnothing to do this why im not going to say anything other than tiki = forum fodder benevolant overlord.
-
“till I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.”
This is why I believe that there’s a teapot orbiting Mars.
Because no one has ever proved otherwise.
-
Grape juice is tasty…
-
mmmmmmmm, grape juice….
-
@Lord:
I enjoyed the ‘discussion’/sugar-fuelled rantings in the first post more than this one. Don’t mind reposts like this one, though . . .@tiki:
Faith is powerful. We believe what we wish to believe (I know, that’s not news). I’d like to believe in some benevolent power that created everything, looks out for us, and will give us a pat on the the back and some sort of debriefing when we die, but the very fact that I’d LIKE to believe makes my interpretations suspect. And I know I’m not alone here. -
And I fucking love white grape juice.
-
-
@tripolar
And I’m not alone in my teapot beliefs. The only thing that I know is that there is 100% definitely not someone in the sky that pats my back when I do good, and punishes people that do bad. It’s great to guess about certain things, but really, why make up some “guy in the sky” hypothesis that can never be tested nor proven?
-
People want things to make sense. A scenario where good is rewarded & evil punished makes sense to us, matches our sense of fair play. (Someone is an asshole in MCS, people want them punished, ie: banned: if some good-guy poster was banned, no-one would think that was just.) God is the referee/parent for a lot of people: he/she doles out the punishment AND the hugs. ‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.
-
@ Goldfinger
Apologies for my poor question. It made the assumtion that the bible consists solely of truth and metaphor.
A better question would have been:
“How can you tell what to take literally, what to take metaphorically and what to disregard as blatant fiction”
I find that a good general rule is to assume the latter unless there is evidence to the contrary.@ Tiki
Do you believe that the milk goes in first or that the tea goes in first? *readies his kneecapping mallet* -
ando, as everyone knows the natural and holy way is to put the tea in first. Anything else is blaspheme.
-
@tiki:
HERETIC!!! You will burn in HELL for your feeble belief that tea should go in first. Of course milk (and sugar) go in first and you NEVER, EVER, EVER stir!
Wait ’til I get hold of your kneecaps!
Tea in first. I’ve never heard such a nonsense.@Ando:
That is a good general rule, indeed. But that brings us to the old problem that people will believe anything until they find out it’s in the Bible.
Most of the things in there, especially in the Old Testament are not simply one of the three categories but a part of each. If you take the story of Noah: Of course we know, that mankind and all the animals did not descend from the passengers of the Ark. We cannot prove, if there has ever been something like the Ark (but there has most probably not been one). But we can be pretty sure that there has been a remarkable flood disaster that this myth is evolved from. And the place where the Ark is said to have landed did exist, for that we have archaeological proof. Although all those people climbing up Mt. Ararat to find the remains don’t seem to know much about the hebraic language, which contains no vocals and therefor the word ‘rrt’ could mean Mt. Ararat but it could also mean the nation of Uratru which was a pretty large nation in today’s eastern Turkey and northern Iraq and Iran.That’s actually one thing my Professors use to joke about: We have about 5 times as much requests for digging permissions for Mt. Ararat as we have for the whole of Urartu.
Well, I hope you get my point out of all this rigmarole.
-
Roffle.. okay, Tripolar, I’m gonna guess you were just kidding when you said: “‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.”
.. You did mean Karl Marx, right?
If you did, good joke. If not.. heh. -
@24601:
Yes, it was a joke. Bless you for noticing.
OH SHIT – I left 4chan on when I left the house
(16 votes, average: 4.19 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to OH SHIT – I left 4chan on when I left the house
-
I would fake being sick and sprint back home.
-
LOL PWNED
-
Shhhhh! Don’t let the plebs know about 4Chan.
-
hey! That’s a screenshot from the movie Frankenweenie!
My god, it’s been ages since I’ve seen that. Ahh, the memories.
-
Why the face, guy?
I love leaving it on the screen because about 20 minutes later I have this sick smile on my face when I hear the screams of the children looking at the guro porn.
-
I envied the girl in Frankenweenie who had on her own little house and TV set in it…
-
-
OH DEAR GOD NO D=
Hide Comments | Add your comment
8 Responses to OH SHIT – I left 4chan on when I left the house
-
I would fake being sick and sprint back home.
-
LOL PWNED
-
Shhhhh! Don’t let the plebs know about 4Chan.
-
hey! That’s a screenshot from the movie Frankenweenie!
My god, it’s been ages since I’ve seen that. Ahh, the memories.
-
Why the face, guy?
I love leaving it on the screen because about 20 minutes later I have this sick smile on my face when I hear the screams of the children looking at the guro porn.
-
I envied the girl in Frankenweenie who had on her own little house and TV set in it…
-
-
OH DEAR GOD NO D=
you shut your whore mouth when men are talking
(14 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Forum Fodder, Humor, Sexist
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to you shut your whore mouth when men are talking
-
-
Shazam.
-
bosha! hav that!
-
wth
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to you shut your whore mouth when men are talking
-
-
Shazam.
-
bosha! hav that!
-
wth
Zombie Emergency Procedure
(18 votes, average: 4.83 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Fantasy - Science Fiction, Forum Fodder, Humor
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Zombie Emergency Procedure
-
you don’t know how many times this has saved my ass … i keep a spare copy in my wallet at all times
-
What are the other 5% of zombies that can’t be killed by decapitation?
-
The real, magic kind. The current trend of either scientifically explainable, or scientifically killable zombies, are grossly misrepresented.
True zombies are magically raised by a “Zombie Master,” via arcane ritual, and therefore the entire body is sustained independent of standard biological explanation. These “true” zombies also do not crave brains or even human flesh, unless their master instructs them to do so. They are %100 slave workforce.
Also, the two buddies in “Idle Hands,” which were the awesomest undead guys ever.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Zombie Emergency Procedure
-
you don’t know how many times this has saved my ass … i keep a spare copy in my wallet at all times
-
What are the other 5% of zombies that can’t be killed by decapitation?
-
The real, magic kind. The current trend of either scientifically explainable, or scientifically killable zombies, are grossly misrepresented.
True zombies are magically raised by a “Zombie Master,” via arcane ritual, and therefore the entire body is sustained independent of standard biological explanation. These “true” zombies also do not crave brains or even human flesh, unless their master instructs them to do so. They are %100 slave workforce.Also, the two buddies in “Idle Hands,” which were the awesomest undead guys ever.
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Grinch – Do Want
(15 votes, average: 2.40 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
No Comments
Once you go black, we’re outta iraq
(24 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor, Politics
2 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?2 Responses to Once you go black, we’re outta iraq
-
That worked out well.
-
One thing he managed to get done, that and Bin Laden.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
2 Responses to Once you go black, we’re outta iraq
-
That worked out well.
-
One thing he managed to get done, that and Bin Laden.
Barrack Obama – Look at this fucking candidate
(25 votes, average: 4.04 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor, Politics
19 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?19 Responses to Barrack Obama – Look at this fucking candidate
-
I don’t care. I’m going to say it. This is the best political advertisement EVAR!!!!!
-
Fuck yes.
-
This ad is freakin epic!
Think of the difference between “My presidency will protect our children and our nation interests” compared to “You WILL be fucking safe and sound when I’m your chosen leader and I sure as hell will protect our country’s god damn interests!”
-
“..or get everyone laid, shit yeah!”
I was already planning on voting for Obama. Now this shit has been sealed. Written in stone, shall it be, he won our votes due to a shoop ad! Seriously. Badass motherfucker this man is.
-
“I’m Barack Fucking Obama and I approve this bad ass mother fucking message mother fucker.”
-
“I’m Barak motherfucking Obama and shit and if you dont fucking vote the motherfucking shit out of me i’ll break into your fucking shitty house and fuck the shit out of your sister and pets.
THIS AD HAS BEEN APPROVED BY A BUNCH OF ASSHOLES”
-
Well, he doesn’t have as big a penis as Hillary, but he certainly has bigger balls. And bitches love that shit.
-
I hope he wins. Cause everyone is blabbing about this shit like the God damned race for prom queen.
Vote for your savior and I’ll be over giggling because every politician will always fuck you. Especially one of the many who were lawyers beforehand.
Try not to look so surprised when it goes up your asses.
Voting is like enabling an addiction. It validates a system that is not working in your favour.
-
Oh, wait really? That’s what his policy is, well shit, NOW he tells me.
-
-
Well, jee Magnus. In some countries you can ‘vote naked’, that is, turn in a blank ballot, and they count them to register protest, and report them on the news and such. That kind of protest has really fixed up Brazil quite nice.
-
Idaho? lol wut?
-
“his font got serifs goddam”
-
bitches dont know about my superdelegates
-
“From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That’s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan. 143 days. I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.” Columnist Cheri Jacobus
-
I think this is the first time I have ever felt like saying, “Magnus is right. He’s hit the nail on the head on this one”.
-
Except for the winning par.
-
-
It’s the little kids who haven’t ever had to pay a bill from overtaxed wages who are bowing to this piece of socialist shit.
It’s kids who think it’s “the thing to do” who like this guy.
The very sight of this guy makes me sick.
WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
19 Responses to Barrack Obama – Look at this fucking candidate
-
I don’t care. I’m going to say it. This is the best political advertisement EVAR!!!!!
-
Fuck yes.
-
This ad is freakin epic!
Think of the difference between “My presidency will protect our children and our nation interests” compared to “You WILL be fucking safe and sound when I’m your chosen leader and I sure as hell will protect our country’s god damn interests!”
-
“..or get everyone laid, shit yeah!”
I was already planning on voting for Obama. Now this shit has been sealed. Written in stone, shall it be, he won our votes due to a shoop ad! Seriously. Badass motherfucker this man is.
-
“I’m Barack Fucking Obama and I approve this bad ass mother fucking message mother fucker.”
-
“I’m Barak motherfucking Obama and shit and if you dont fucking vote the motherfucking shit out of me i’ll break into your fucking shitty house and fuck the shit out of your sister and pets.
THIS AD HAS BEEN APPROVED BY A BUNCH OF ASSHOLES”
-
Well, he doesn’t have as big a penis as Hillary, but he certainly has bigger balls. And bitches love that shit.
-
I hope he wins. Cause everyone is blabbing about this shit like the God damned race for prom queen.
Vote for your savior and I’ll be over giggling because every politician will always fuck you. Especially one of the many who were lawyers beforehand.
Try not to look so surprised when it goes up your asses.
Voting is like enabling an addiction. It validates a system that is not working in your favour.
-
Oh, wait really? That’s what his policy is, well shit, NOW he tells me.
-
Well, jee Magnus. In some countries you can ‘vote naked’, that is, turn in a blank ballot, and they count them to register protest, and report them on the news and such. That kind of protest has really fixed up Brazil quite nice.
-
Idaho? lol wut?
-
“his font got serifs goddam”
-
bitches dont know about my superdelegates
-
“From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That’s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan. 143 days. I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.” Columnist Cheri Jacobus
-
I think this is the first time I have ever felt like saying, “Magnus is right. He’s hit the nail on the head on this one”.
-
Except for the winning par.
-
-
It’s the little kids who haven’t ever had to pay a bill from overtaxed wages who are bowing to this piece of socialist shit.
It’s kids who think it’s “the thing to do” who like this guy.
The very sight of this guy makes me sick.
WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE.
Great Americans
(38 votes, average: 2.29 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor, Religion
40 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?40 Responses to Great Americans
-
Thomas Edison is on there twice.
-
They’re all going to/in hell, too, apparently.
-
Oh, and since when is Terry Pratchett an American?
-
Kurt Vonnegut, Einstein, Ford, Edison, Hemingway and a few more are dead so they’d already be in hell. If it were real. Especially Einstein and Soderberg cause they’re jews.
Only one M in Hemingway though. I think.
-
Albert Einstein wasn’t an athiest. Shows how much a random picture on the internet knows! :\
-
Einstein was also German-born . . . so America can’t really claim credit for him.
-
Einstein wasnt american
and was gene wilder
idc
and Kathrine hephburn wasnt hot so idc
and wasnt she british too?
-
okay, and how many of them were actually american?
-
Henry Ford also openly supported the Nazi party and published anti-jewish propaganda. Not really a “great american’. Ford also had scattered religious beliefs. Unconventional, but very religious.
Kurt Vonnegut was an adamant atheist, but didn’t mind people who were religious, and even encouraged people to follow religion because he recognized how positive it could be in people’s lives.
This list contains at least four or five people who had religious beliefs, and a few agnostics. I would define atheist as someone who has a belief system revolving around the concept of no God, as opposed to an Agnostic or someone who doesn’t participate in organized religion but still has spiritual and/or religion-oriented beliefs.
Bertrand Russel was British – an Earl, I believe- and was the grandson of John Russel, an important Prime Minister. Richard Leakey was born in Kenya, and has lived in Africa most of his life.
Also, “great americans”. Since when did Penn, Teller, Steven Soderberg, Lance Armstrong and Gene Wilder qualify as “great” in the same way as Eistein, Edison or the Woz? Talented entertainers, but nothing significant in the long run.
Stupidest image I’ve seen in a while.
-
I’m just saying… But wasn’t Einstien technically a German Jew? I’m not saying he wasn’t atheist, I’m just saying I’m not sure he was American. If he was then nevermind this post… Doo dee dee.. daaa daaa da.. Hail Christ!
-
Einstein didn’t believe in a personal, human-like god, or in traditional Judaism, but he had beliefs in a higher power, and was by all accounts a very religions person.
-
“as opposed to an Agnostic or someone who doesn’t participate in organized religion but still has spiritual and/or religion-oriented beliefs.”
That’s not what an agnostic is,:
“a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience. ”
Or, in layman’s terms, someone that understands that they don’t know enough to make a decision on something so far beyond their own ability to think. They don’t need to be spiritual and/or have religion-oriented beliefs to be agnostic. They merely have to be intelligent enough to understand that taking something on ‘faith’ is insane. Atheists and theists alike fall prey to that type of insanity. 
-
I meant to but a comma there. I meant that atheism is different from agnosticism, and that atheism is also different from private spirituality.
-
I’m bored:
Magaret (spelt wrong up there) Sanger – Believed in eugenics. Nice in theory, has always been terrible in practise. Not Great
Ford – Nazi, anti-semite. Religious.
Einstein – Moved to america as an old man. Religious.
Lance Armstrong – No one will remember who he is in a few decades.
Hemingway – Disliked organized religion. Never claimed to be an atheist. Friends said he remained religion inspite of leaving the church.
Terry Prachett- British. Google indicates that he lives in Wiltshire, England.
George Bernard Shaw – Irish, lived in England most of his life.
Random TV icons – who cares?
Billy Joel – Flirted with Atheism. But went back to religion, though cynical of organized religion. Also, I love ‘The Stranger’, but is he really a Great American?
Bertrand Russel – British nobility
Richard Leakey – Kenyan, lives in and loves Africa.
Half of this list is outright wrong.
-
Damn Caio, you own them.
Christ, I thought I was a relatively bright guy, but damn.
-
Margaret Sanger was a very rabid eugenicist who supported abortion as a solution to the “Negro problem”. She also believed that poor women should be sterilized, especially poor non-white women.
-
She also started what became Planned Parenthood.
-
So after all this discussion I assume it is safe to say that who ever made this picture actually has no clue as to what they are talking about and it really doesn’t matter.
-
It might also be a “joke”.
-
Hahahahahah.
“Negro Problem”
wtf indeed.
-
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”
- Albert Einstein, German Physicist, 1941
Picture = fail.
-
Einstein:
“I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.”
“My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.”
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
-
Thomas Edison wasn’t an atheist. He just got someone to be an atheist for him.
-
@Dalek
ROFFLE
-
I have no right in questioning someone’s faith, I do, however, have the right to question someone’s intelligence.
Who ever made this list was a idiot and grotesquely misinformed, and no better than the people who hand out pamphlets saying Harry Potter makes children satanists.
It looks as if they thought anyone who contributed to the world scientifically ETC had to be an atheist.
Thus once again, proving once again, idiots exist on all sides of the debates.
On another thought, why the hell is Lance Armstrong on the list? Next to the obvious fact he’s done nothing particularly great worth remembering in future, he put out or endorsed those “Strength” bracelets which in some shape is a kind of “faith”.
-
I’m an atheist, and this “picture” is teh FAIL!
-
Wait so one on that list is no longer a genius because he was an anti semite? Can’t he be both?
And the other because she was racist? Can’t she be both?
Not sharing our modern views on things doesn’t negate their other contributions.
I’d like to see a list of post 1920 heavily religious geniuses.
-
Bertrand Russell!? God damn, the man was about as British as you can get. And George Bernard Shaw.. ugh. Stupid evangelical atheists.
-
if u want u could always list all the scientists who were christian… newton, da vinci, galileo, maxwell, heisenberg, schrodinger, mendel, linnaeus, fleming…
-
also, it appears that einsteins famous equation, e=mc^2 might be wrong, www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/scispeed116.xml
-
Aint Penn or teller Canadian? And Thomas “alba” edison i heard that he was either spanish or someway latin-american(alba is in spanish and means dawn i belive not sure) same with billy joel as i heard. hepburn while she was alive (and young) she was really hot. and yes she was from england. by the way einstein was a religous amn(just a little) but later when the nuklear bomb exploded he become a little or complete atheist not sure.
but heck ask thier zombies.
-
@Magnus: You’re the first person to use the word ‘Genius’ here. And considering this person seems to be looking for positive atheist role-models to prove atheist worth, than yes.
A Great Industrialist is not necessarily a Great Person. I certainly would pretend that Ford was part of my group just to score some points. Also, Margaret Sanger was a dickhead who hurt humanity by merely existing, not a genius.
@acid monkey – no no no no no. Penn and Teller and American. Alba means ‘Scotland’ in Scotish Gaelic, but his middle name was Alva. He was born in Ohio and his parents were of Dutch extraction. Billy Joel was a Jew, born and raised in Long Island (way to propagate stereotypes, Billy). Hepburn was born and died in Connecticut, she just put on a posh New England accent. lern2google
-
Arg, typo mania. You get the gist.
-
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” –Einstein. That doesn’t sound like something an Atheist would say, but I’m crazy that way.
-
@vygramul
Here the context of that quote:
www.sacred-texts.com/aor/einstein/einsci.htm
Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determines the goal, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up. But science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
He’s not really talking about God or Religion in the traditional sense.
-
Making advances for genocide doesn’t strike me as something that should be admired. Mengele was an atheist too- I definitely wouldn’t peg him as representational of the philosophy, but that’s what he was. He made some important medical discoveries (usually purely by accident, since he was much more interested in finding out how twins “work” than he was in science).
Margaret Sanger founded PP as part of her quest to exterminate “undesirables”.
-
I know it’s been stated on here somewhere, but just to get this across, Einstein is quoted with saying, “God doesn’t play dice with the universe,” as a response to the theory of quantum physics. He’s also not even fucking American.
-
well as I said before is something that I heard. but thanks for the advice. I have a cuestion to this matter. what do you mean by being american the ideology or just the birth place?
because somtimes its seems that is more important the ideology or am I wrong?
-
What ideology?
-
Well I always suppoused that north amercians have an idelogy. and that idea of mine was reinfiroced with that image. People from other places having ideas in usa and usa getin the credit for it. Ie Einstein. But i supouse Im wrong… rigth?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
40 Responses to Great Americans
-
Thomas Edison is on there twice.
-
They’re all going to/in hell, too, apparently.
-
Oh, and since when is Terry Pratchett an American?
-
Kurt Vonnegut, Einstein, Ford, Edison, Hemingway and a few more are dead so they’d already be in hell. If it were real. Especially Einstein and Soderberg cause they’re jews.
Only one M in Hemingway though. I think.
-
Albert Einstein wasn’t an athiest. Shows how much a random picture on the internet knows! :\
-
Einstein was also German-born . . . so America can’t really claim credit for him.
-
Einstein wasnt american
and was gene wilder
idc
and Kathrine hephburn wasnt hot so idc
and wasnt she british too? -
okay, and how many of them were actually american?
-
Henry Ford also openly supported the Nazi party and published anti-jewish propaganda. Not really a “great american’. Ford also had scattered religious beliefs. Unconventional, but very religious.
Kurt Vonnegut was an adamant atheist, but didn’t mind people who were religious, and even encouraged people to follow religion because he recognized how positive it could be in people’s lives.
This list contains at least four or five people who had religious beliefs, and a few agnostics. I would define atheist as someone who has a belief system revolving around the concept of no God, as opposed to an Agnostic or someone who doesn’t participate in organized religion but still has spiritual and/or religion-oriented beliefs.
Bertrand Russel was British – an Earl, I believe- and was the grandson of John Russel, an important Prime Minister. Richard Leakey was born in Kenya, and has lived in Africa most of his life.
Also, “great americans”. Since when did Penn, Teller, Steven Soderberg, Lance Armstrong and Gene Wilder qualify as “great” in the same way as Eistein, Edison or the Woz? Talented entertainers, but nothing significant in the long run.
Stupidest image I’ve seen in a while.
-
I’m just saying… But wasn’t Einstien technically a German Jew? I’m not saying he wasn’t atheist, I’m just saying I’m not sure he was American. If he was then nevermind this post… Doo dee dee.. daaa daaa da.. Hail Christ!
-
Einstein didn’t believe in a personal, human-like god, or in traditional Judaism, but he had beliefs in a higher power, and was by all accounts a very religions person.
-
“as opposed to an Agnostic or someone who doesn’t participate in organized religion but still has spiritual and/or religion-oriented beliefs.”
That’s not what an agnostic is,:
“a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience. ”
Or, in layman’s terms, someone that understands that they don’t know enough to make a decision on something so far beyond their own ability to think. They don’t need to be spiritual and/or have religion-oriented beliefs to be agnostic. They merely have to be intelligent enough to understand that taking something on ‘faith’ is insane. Atheists and theists alike fall prey to that type of insanity.
-
I meant to but a comma there. I meant that atheism is different from agnosticism, and that atheism is also different from private spirituality.
-
I’m bored:
Magaret (spelt wrong up there) Sanger – Believed in eugenics. Nice in theory, has always been terrible in practise. Not Great
Ford – Nazi, anti-semite. Religious.
Einstein – Moved to america as an old man. Religious.
Lance Armstrong – No one will remember who he is in a few decades.
Hemingway – Disliked organized religion. Never claimed to be an atheist. Friends said he remained religion inspite of leaving the church.
Terry Prachett- British. Google indicates that he lives in Wiltshire, England.
George Bernard Shaw – Irish, lived in England most of his life.
Random TV icons – who cares?
Billy Joel – Flirted with Atheism. But went back to religion, though cynical of organized religion. Also, I love ‘The Stranger’, but is he really a Great American?
Bertrand Russel – British nobility
Richard Leakey – Kenyan, lives in and loves Africa.
Half of this list is outright wrong.
-
Damn Caio, you own them.
Christ, I thought I was a relatively bright guy, but damn.
-
Margaret Sanger was a very rabid eugenicist who supported abortion as a solution to the “Negro problem”. She also believed that poor women should be sterilized, especially poor non-white women.
-
She also started what became Planned Parenthood.
-
So after all this discussion I assume it is safe to say that who ever made this picture actually has no clue as to what they are talking about and it really doesn’t matter.
-
It might also be a “joke”.
-
Hahahahahah.
“Negro Problem”
wtf indeed. -
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”
- Albert Einstein, German Physicist, 1941Picture = fail.
-
Einstein:
“I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.”
“My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.”
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
-
Thomas Edison wasn’t an atheist. He just got someone to be an atheist for him.
-
@Dalek
ROFFLE -
I have no right in questioning someone’s faith, I do, however, have the right to question someone’s intelligence.
Who ever made this list was a idiot and grotesquely misinformed, and no better than the people who hand out pamphlets saying Harry Potter makes children satanists.
It looks as if they thought anyone who contributed to the world scientifically ETC had to be an atheist.
Thus once again, proving once again, idiots exist on all sides of the debates.
On another thought, why the hell is Lance Armstrong on the list? Next to the obvious fact he’s done nothing particularly great worth remembering in future, he put out or endorsed those “Strength” bracelets which in some shape is a kind of “faith”.
-
I’m an atheist, and this “picture” is teh FAIL!
-
Wait so one on that list is no longer a genius because he was an anti semite? Can’t he be both?
And the other because she was racist? Can’t she be both?
Not sharing our modern views on things doesn’t negate their other contributions.
I’d like to see a list of post 1920 heavily religious geniuses.
-
Bertrand Russell!? God damn, the man was about as British as you can get. And George Bernard Shaw.. ugh. Stupid evangelical atheists.
-
if u want u could always list all the scientists who were christian… newton, da vinci, galileo, maxwell, heisenberg, schrodinger, mendel, linnaeus, fleming…
-
also, it appears that einsteins famous equation, e=mc^2 might be wrong, www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/scispeed116.xml
-
Aint Penn or teller Canadian? And Thomas “alba” edison i heard that he was either spanish or someway latin-american(alba is in spanish and means dawn i belive not sure) same with billy joel as i heard. hepburn while she was alive (and young) she was really hot. and yes she was from england. by the way einstein was a religous amn(just a little) but later when the nuklear bomb exploded he become a little or complete atheist not sure.
but heck ask thier zombies. -
@Magnus: You’re the first person to use the word ‘Genius’ here. And considering this person seems to be looking for positive atheist role-models to prove atheist worth, than yes.
A Great Industrialist is not necessarily a Great Person. I certainly would pretend that Ford was part of my group just to score some points. Also, Margaret Sanger was a dickhead who hurt humanity by merely existing, not a genius.
@acid monkey – no no no no no. Penn and Teller and American. Alba means ‘Scotland’ in Scotish Gaelic, but his middle name was Alva. He was born in Ohio and his parents were of Dutch extraction. Billy Joel was a Jew, born and raised in Long Island (way to propagate stereotypes, Billy). Hepburn was born and died in Connecticut, she just put on a posh New England accent. lern2google
-
Arg, typo mania. You get the gist.
-
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” –Einstein. That doesn’t sound like something an Atheist would say, but I’m crazy that way.
-
@vygramul
Here the context of that quote:
www.sacred-texts.com/aor/einstein/einsci.htm
Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determines the goal, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up. But science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
He’s not really talking about God or Religion in the traditional sense. -
Making advances for genocide doesn’t strike me as something that should be admired. Mengele was an atheist too- I definitely wouldn’t peg him as representational of the philosophy, but that’s what he was. He made some important medical discoveries (usually purely by accident, since he was much more interested in finding out how twins “work” than he was in science).
Margaret Sanger founded PP as part of her quest to exterminate “undesirables”.
-
I know it’s been stated on here somewhere, but just to get this across, Einstein is quoted with saying, “God doesn’t play dice with the universe,” as a response to the theory of quantum physics. He’s also not even fucking American.
-
well as I said before is something that I heard. but thanks for the advice. I have a cuestion to this matter. what do you mean by being american the ideology or just the birth place?
because somtimes its seems that is more important the ideology or am I wrong? -
What ideology?
-
Well I always suppoused that north amercians have an idelogy. and that idea of mine was reinfiroced with that image. People from other places having ideas in usa and usa getin the credit for it. Ie Einstein. But i supouse Im wrong… rigth?
Beaver – Do Want
(17 votes, average: 4.53 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
One Comment
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?One Response to Beaver – Do Want
-
I do believe that is a prairie dog.
Beavers have big teeth.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
One Response to Beaver – Do Want
-
I do believe that is a prairie dog.
Beavers have big teeth.
Scheming Cat Has Secret Plans
(9 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor, lolcats
One Comment
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?One Response to Scheming Cat Has Secret Plans
-
I always loved this pic, the one in the back looks like my cat!
Hide Comments | Add your comment
One Response to Scheming Cat Has Secret Plans
-
I always loved this pic, the one in the back looks like my cat!
This is delicious Plant You must eat it
(12 votes, average: 3.42 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor, lolcats
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to This is delicious Plant You must eat it
-
-
Enough of the cats. They stopped being cute or funny some time ago.
-
Kittens can never be not cute.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to This is delicious Plant You must eat it
-
Enough of the cats. They stopped being cute or funny some time ago.
-
Kittens can never be not cute.
I’m still free. What about you?
(18 votes, average: 4.89 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Politics
24 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?24 Responses to I’m still free. What about you?
-
Whenever I see that particular photo of the faggot, it makes me think of Bert.
-
inb4 ~POLITICIAL ARGUMENT ON THE INTERNET LOLOL~
-
At least get her to buy you dinner and flowers first, Osama.
-
-
lol
Me – US citizen, capable of walking the streets in (relative) safety, without concern that several nations are actively hunting my ass in order to kill me.
Osama – the exact opposite of the preceeding statement.
-
Yep, he’s free alright.
-
“Arabs? In my bunker?”
It’s more likely than you think.
-
LOL @ Americans.
-
@chaingunner
Oh he’s as safe as houses. Our frenemies in Saudi Arabia are taking good care of him. I’m sure if some foreign agent showed up to get him, the Sauds would make them disappear.
-
“You know that, somebody on a dialysis machine in a cave didn’t have NORAD stand down, didn’t do war games of planes flying into buildings that morning, didn’t do CIA insider trading, didn’t call Mayor Willie Brown & tell him not to fly and Ashcroft and everybody else. You know that..
What really happened on September 11th, when 3000 Citizens were sent into Heaven?
Why’d they air a fake Bin Laden video confession?
Why’s the fairy tale version got so many questions?
Where radical hijackers that were only using box cutters, sliced up pilots like a knife cuttin hot butter.
They had it strainin like a NASDAQ stock runner.
They flew the planes like a Tom Cruise top gunner.
But the story’s bogus, I know this.
Dick Cheney ran 9/11 drinkin Diet Sprite sodas.
You only gotta look at how the buildings collapsed, bombs poppin off, listen cuz they buildin the facts.
A controlled demolition had a molten pool of steel up in Ground Zero~that’s the temperature that drown heroes.
Fires in the buildings that were oxygen starved.
People waiving from the windows where the bombing was started.
So let me get this straight… these fires couldn’t melt people or glass, but they could melt 47 steel frames?
World Trade 7 wasn’t hit by a plane, but at 5pm collapsed and they couldn’t explain, how for the 3rd time in history, a steel buliding melted, in a neat little pile.
How’d it happen? Such a mystery.
The owner said “pull it” and admitted they knew. That’s Larry Silverstein, a partner with the Blackstone Group.
They got the act all cool. They made 6 billion dollars. takin blood money, drippin off a neck-tie collars.
The South Tower burned for like 48 minutes, while the buliding in Madrid burned for 28 hours.
Shootin white hot flames, but they never collapsed. Ask your scientist, professor. Make them try and explain that.
Or just watch the videos with concrete shootin out the blast points, You hear explosions at the flash points.
C4 hit ‘em like an asteriod; planted a controlled demolition, got a question, you can ask Roy.
You got a question? You can ask Roy.
What you believe doesn’t necessarily make it so. And so, people say ‘How dare you change my reality on 9/11? I don’t want to believe that.’ Regardless of what you believe, the facts are still the facts. Let me just say this…
Yo! For real! Why was Dick Cheney runnin hijacking drills?
And why does George Shultz got a mind that can kill?
Why’d they steal the footage when the missle hit the Pentagon?
Why’d they stage terror, like in Beirut, Lebanon?
Why is it that NORAD never try & intercept?
Why were Rumsfeld’s ‘stand down’ orders so direct?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, because the facts make it easy to solve.
So The Project for a New American Century said we need to mobilze ‘em with a new Pearl Harbor.
Yeah, we got ‘em by the chains, but we need to pull harder.
In a cashless society, control grid slaughter.
So 3000 Citizens were martyred.
The military scene budget jumpin like a young Vince Carter.
9/11′s really just a starter.
They plannin more terrorism all the way from here to Jakarta.
After the fact, they passed the Patriot Act.
They left the Constitution murdered, with stake in its back.
Cuz they had to get a stake in Iraq. Bechtel, Raytheon, DynCorp and the Haliburton contracts.
Children get abducted like alien contact at Abu Gharib Prison during military combat.
Cheney’s that man sayin ‘bomb that’, ‘I’m that Vice President that played possum like a wombat.’
He stole the plan outta Operation Northwoods.
Him and Scooter Libby burn crosses and they sport hoods.
Peter Shumacher and the shadow government are runnin martial law takeover drills out of Ft. Hood.
CIA runnin crack.
Teenagers poppin more Vicodin than Laura Bush.
Deficits they runnin up.
3 trillion missin from the Pentagon budget.
The water supply druggin it.
Why you think they lovin it? Lovin it? They got a system where the terrorism happens, cuz the CIA fundin it.
Abu Moussad Al Zaquari’s just a one-legged schill.
Bin Laden’s already been killed.
Just false-flag mind-control, sythetic terrorism.
Comic book villans, now Americans are scared of livin.
Blind to the 9/11 inside job.
It’s Roy Shivers to the truth, like religion & God.
Face the facts. There’s no debating it. All the evidence points towards David Ray Griffin’s 4th scenario, government total involvement. That is a criminal element within the government. That doesn’t mean your mailman was involved, or the cop was involved, or your cousin who’s FBI was involved.
Yo! For real! Why was Buzzy Krongard sellin airline stocks?
Why does Bush’s brain start where his hairline stops?
Why the Pentagon officials all cancel their flights?
.hy does flouride in water cause cancer in mice?
Why would World Trade 7 all the sudden collapse?
Why was Dick Cheney plannin for a war in Iraq?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, beacuse the facts make it easy to solve.
Mohammad Atta trained as a spy up in Cali for the Able Danger program in the Monterrey Valley.
The he transferred to a CIA flight school in Venice.
FBI double-agent terrorist apprentice.
With Cheney runnin drills like a dentist, remote control piloted & crashed into the World Trade Centers.
And now he claimin that he can defend us?
Haliburton’s makin 20 billion off of genocide agendas.
Economy done toppled like Jenga.
Mass media is runnin bigger scams than credit card lenders.
This New World Order that we enter, is David Rockefeller’s wet dream, cuz he’s chicken like tenders.
It’s really not the end of it.
The Federal Reserve print money and they spendin it.
It’s Roy Shivers, I can smell a psy-op from the scent of it.
Knowin that the NSA ran at least 80% of it.
They knocked down the towers like a tenament, ensurin that the military industrial complex benefit.
You hear the truth in my sentiment.
Bush Administration officials, they take reality & bendin it.
It, it’s called cover action, it’s called compartmentilization. This is what they do. The CIA admits to hundreds of bombings all over the world, to blame it on people.
Why’d supposed hijackers train at Air Force bases?
And why did Flight 93 land in 2 places?
And why did they replace it with a drone?
Why did Paul Wolfowitz mention Richard Pearl talkin with Sharon?
Why did agents from Moussad have a video tape?
Why did FBI agents go & let them escape?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, because the facts make it easy to solve.
I have official government documents for 9/11. I have official government documents for Operation Gladio. I have official government documents where they carried attacks out. Do you understand?!? That’s the number 1 piece of evidence. Number 2, is the motive. And we say ‘well, we didn’t want to believe that, so let’s look at the evidence.’ And you look at the evidence.. Only 1 country, and other governments have looked at this, only 1 country forgets somebody in a cave. Only 1 country could pull this off in America.”
-
in before tl;dr
-
Are 9-11 conspiracy theorists writing poetry now? Awesome, here is my alien haiku:
Aliens Rule Earth
Stealing all our Precious Cows
Humanity’s Doomed
-
Paul is really dead
It is a zionist plot
World Rule Through Beatles
-
-
Go back to sleep, sheep
You live a life of blind fear
that you just can’t see
-
Haley’s Comet Comes
Through our deaths we shall Save Earth
One World Government
Deus Ex Was Right!
Why can’t the fools see the truth?
Kill all the normals!
-
Zionist Conspiracy Limerick:
There once was a man named George Double.
The Jew made him cause lots of trouble.
He attacked the US
And Betrayed the White Race
Jesus shall purge him and the devil jewish race in the fires of hell WHITE POWER-you
-
Sorry Caio, but you fail at limerick. The 3rd and fourth line should rhyme with each other and the last line should rhyme with the first 2 (*ouble). It would have more or less worked if you’d gone with “double-you” and “trouble-you,” as “S (ess)” and “ace” sort of rhyme (but not really).
-
God damnit, nothing rhymes with ‘w’. Or Jew for that matter.
Shit, wait, let me think about this.
-
Thanks, natedog, for vomiting text at us. Class.
-
ATTENTION:
THE ISRAEL-BRAZIL-ALIEN CONFEDERATION IS BUILDING A GIANT JEW SNAKE WITH THE EXPRESS INTENTION OF EATING ANGOLA.
PROOF:
-
No, no, no. Brazil is just a smoke screen. Israel is actually working with former Nazi scientists in Argentina to make the Jew Snake.
-
Actually he’s dead now…
-
^what he said
Hide Comments | Add your comment
24 Responses to I’m still free. What about you?
-
Whenever I see that particular photo of the faggot, it makes me think of Bert.
-
inb4 ~POLITICIAL ARGUMENT ON THE INTERNET LOLOL~
-
At least get her to buy you dinner and flowers first, Osama.
-
-
lol
Me – US citizen, capable of walking the streets in (relative) safety, without concern that several nations are actively hunting my ass in order to kill me.
Osama – the exact opposite of the preceeding statement.
-
Yep, he’s free alright.
-
“Arabs? In my bunker?”
It’s more likely than you think.
-
LOL @ Americans.
-
@chaingunner
Oh he’s as safe as houses. Our frenemies in Saudi Arabia are taking good care of him. I’m sure if some foreign agent showed up to get him, the Sauds would make them disappear.
-
“You know that, somebody on a dialysis machine in a cave didn’t have NORAD stand down, didn’t do war games of planes flying into buildings that morning, didn’t do CIA insider trading, didn’t call Mayor Willie Brown & tell him not to fly and Ashcroft and everybody else. You know that..
What really happened on September 11th, when 3000 Citizens were sent into Heaven?
Why’d they air a fake Bin Laden video confession?
Why’s the fairy tale version got so many questions?
Where radical hijackers that were only using box cutters, sliced up pilots like a knife cuttin hot butter.
They had it strainin like a NASDAQ stock runner.
They flew the planes like a Tom Cruise top gunner.
But the story’s bogus, I know this.
Dick Cheney ran 9/11 drinkin Diet Sprite sodas.
You only gotta look at how the buildings collapsed, bombs poppin off, listen cuz they buildin the facts.
A controlled demolition had a molten pool of steel up in Ground Zero~that’s the temperature that drown heroes.
Fires in the buildings that were oxygen starved.
People waiving from the windows where the bombing was started.
So let me get this straight… these fires couldn’t melt people or glass, but they could melt 47 steel frames?
World Trade 7 wasn’t hit by a plane, but at 5pm collapsed and they couldn’t explain, how for the 3rd time in history, a steel buliding melted, in a neat little pile.
How’d it happen? Such a mystery.
The owner said “pull it” and admitted they knew. That’s Larry Silverstein, a partner with the Blackstone Group.
They got the act all cool. They made 6 billion dollars. takin blood money, drippin off a neck-tie collars.
The South Tower burned for like 48 minutes, while the buliding in Madrid burned for 28 hours.
Shootin white hot flames, but they never collapsed. Ask your scientist, professor. Make them try and explain that.
Or just watch the videos with concrete shootin out the blast points, You hear explosions at the flash points.
C4 hit ‘em like an asteriod; planted a controlled demolition, got a question, you can ask Roy.
You got a question? You can ask Roy.What you believe doesn’t necessarily make it so. And so, people say ‘How dare you change my reality on 9/11? I don’t want to believe that.’ Regardless of what you believe, the facts are still the facts. Let me just say this…
Yo! For real! Why was Dick Cheney runnin hijacking drills?
And why does George Shultz got a mind that can kill?
Why’d they steal the footage when the missle hit the Pentagon?
Why’d they stage terror, like in Beirut, Lebanon?
Why is it that NORAD never try & intercept?
Why were Rumsfeld’s ‘stand down’ orders so direct?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, because the facts make it easy to solve.So The Project for a New American Century said we need to mobilze ‘em with a new Pearl Harbor.
Yeah, we got ‘em by the chains, but we need to pull harder.
In a cashless society, control grid slaughter.
So 3000 Citizens were martyred.
The military scene budget jumpin like a young Vince Carter.
9/11′s really just a starter.
They plannin more terrorism all the way from here to Jakarta.
After the fact, they passed the Patriot Act.
They left the Constitution murdered, with stake in its back.
Cuz they had to get a stake in Iraq. Bechtel, Raytheon, DynCorp and the Haliburton contracts.
Children get abducted like alien contact at Abu Gharib Prison during military combat.
Cheney’s that man sayin ‘bomb that’, ‘I’m that Vice President that played possum like a wombat.’
He stole the plan outta Operation Northwoods.
Him and Scooter Libby burn crosses and they sport hoods.
Peter Shumacher and the shadow government are runnin martial law takeover drills out of Ft. Hood.
CIA runnin crack.
Teenagers poppin more Vicodin than Laura Bush.
Deficits they runnin up.
3 trillion missin from the Pentagon budget.
The water supply druggin it.
Why you think they lovin it? Lovin it? They got a system where the terrorism happens, cuz the CIA fundin it.
Abu Moussad Al Zaquari’s just a one-legged schill.
Bin Laden’s already been killed.
Just false-flag mind-control, sythetic terrorism.
Comic book villans, now Americans are scared of livin.
Blind to the 9/11 inside job.
It’s Roy Shivers to the truth, like religion & God.Face the facts. There’s no debating it. All the evidence points towards David Ray Griffin’s 4th scenario, government total involvement. That is a criminal element within the government. That doesn’t mean your mailman was involved, or the cop was involved, or your cousin who’s FBI was involved.
Yo! For real! Why was Buzzy Krongard sellin airline stocks?
Why does Bush’s brain start where his hairline stops?
Why the Pentagon officials all cancel their flights?
.hy does flouride in water cause cancer in mice?
Why would World Trade 7 all the sudden collapse?
Why was Dick Cheney plannin for a war in Iraq?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, beacuse the facts make it easy to solve.Mohammad Atta trained as a spy up in Cali for the Able Danger program in the Monterrey Valley.
The he transferred to a CIA flight school in Venice.
FBI double-agent terrorist apprentice.
With Cheney runnin drills like a dentist, remote control piloted & crashed into the World Trade Centers.
And now he claimin that he can defend us?
Haliburton’s makin 20 billion off of genocide agendas.
Economy done toppled like Jenga.
Mass media is runnin bigger scams than credit card lenders.
This New World Order that we enter, is David Rockefeller’s wet dream, cuz he’s chicken like tenders.
It’s really not the end of it.
The Federal Reserve print money and they spendin it.
It’s Roy Shivers, I can smell a psy-op from the scent of it.
Knowin that the NSA ran at least 80% of it.
They knocked down the towers like a tenament, ensurin that the military industrial complex benefit.
You hear the truth in my sentiment.
Bush Administration officials, they take reality & bendin it.It, it’s called cover action, it’s called compartmentilization. This is what they do. The CIA admits to hundreds of bombings all over the world, to blame it on people.
Why’d supposed hijackers train at Air Force bases?
And why did Flight 93 land in 2 places?
And why did they replace it with a drone?
Why did Paul Wolfowitz mention Richard Pearl talkin with Sharon?
Why did agents from Moussad have a video tape?
Why did FBI agents go & let them escape?
Really, why was 9/11 such an inside job? Well, because the facts make it easy to solve.I have official government documents for 9/11. I have official government documents for Operation Gladio. I have official government documents where they carried attacks out. Do you understand?!? That’s the number 1 piece of evidence. Number 2, is the motive. And we say ‘well, we didn’t want to believe that, so let’s look at the evidence.’ And you look at the evidence.. Only 1 country, and other governments have looked at this, only 1 country forgets somebody in a cave. Only 1 country could pull this off in America.”
-
in before tl;dr
-
Are 9-11 conspiracy theorists writing poetry now? Awesome, here is my alien haiku:
Aliens Rule Earth
Stealing all our Precious Cows
Humanity’s Doomed -
Paul is really dead
It is a zionist plot
World Rule Through Beatles -
-
Go back to sleep, sheep
You live a life of blind fear
that you just can’t see -
Haley’s Comet Comes
Through our deaths we shall Save Earth
One World GovernmentDeus Ex Was Right!
Why can’t the fools see the truth?
Kill all the normals! -
Zionist Conspiracy Limerick:
There once was a man named George Double.
The Jew made him cause lots of trouble.
He attacked the US
And Betrayed the White Race
Jesus shall purge him and the devil jewish race in the fires of hell WHITE POWER-you -
Sorry Caio, but you fail at limerick. The 3rd and fourth line should rhyme with each other and the last line should rhyme with the first 2 (*ouble). It would have more or less worked if you’d gone with “double-you” and “trouble-you,” as “S (ess)” and “ace” sort of rhyme (but not really).
-
God damnit, nothing rhymes with ‘w’. Or Jew for that matter.
Shit, wait, let me think about this.
-
Thanks, natedog, for vomiting text at us. Class.
-
ATTENTION:
THE ISRAEL-BRAZIL-ALIEN CONFEDERATION IS BUILDING A GIANT JEW SNAKE WITH THE EXPRESS INTENTION OF EATING ANGOLA.
PROOF:
-
No, no, no. Brazil is just a smoke screen. Israel is actually working with former Nazi scientists in Argentina to make the Jew Snake.
-
Actually he’s dead now…
-
^what he said
Sam Fisher-Cat Is Behind You
(14 votes, average: 3.36 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, lolcats
No Comments
Doggy – Do Want
(20 votes, average: 4.45 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Forum Fodder, Humor
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Doggy – Do Want
-
Cute, but what is it putting ites head threw?
-
it looks like one of those cheap workout contraptions where you pull against the bands.
-
Those are certified amnesty intl. jail bars.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Doggy – Do Want
-
Cute, but what is it putting ites head threw?
-
it looks like one of those cheap workout contraptions where you pull against the bands.
-
Those are certified amnesty intl. jail bars.
What atheists cry out during sex
(19 votes, average: 2.32 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
21 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?21 Responses to What atheists cry out during sex
-
God damnit, we cry out “Oh God!” as often as everyone else.
-
I don’t. Mostly I scream FREUD WAS RIGHT! FREUD WAS RIGHT!! Then i cry for 20 minutes, and go to work.
-
I cry out “Oh god!” (Yes, with a small “g”; I’m that good.) This lets me sin twice as much: not only am I have sex for pleasure, rather than procreation (strike 1) but I’m also blaspheming (strike 2).
-
“Hail Xenu!”
-
“oh, chemical chance! chemical chance!”
-bill hicks
-
“THE PRICE IS RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT”
-Me?
-
Pfft, Athiests dont have sex.
-
Atheists do to have sex, they just don’t reproduce, because god doesn’t give them babies to born.
-
Sneaky Snake has a point. It’s human nature. The more you forbid something, the more we do it. Take away the taboo of something, and it become mundane. Kind of makes it pointless to forbid anything. Shouldn’t your god know this? Sounds more like something a tribe of prehistoric barbarian nomads would come up with.
-
@mystik – I happen to know that this image was created with the specific purpose of oppressing and spreading hateful misinformation about Atheists.
-
This agnostic wants to know how Atheists are being oppressed.
-
-
I was raised Cafflik. Our parish must’ve been cheap, cause we never ate no babies . . .
-
@tripolar: Didn’t you hear? Everyone is oppressed now. I’d quickly start calling yourself an agnosticIST and start j’acuseing people over the hundreds of years of mental slavery you’ve been subjected to. If that doesn’t work for you you, ItrovertISTs and ExtravertISTs have been oppressing each other pretty tyrannically lately. I’d get in on the victimization while it’s fresh.
Also, Atheists don’t say anything during sex: They never fuck because their constant complaining is so unappealing.
-
I lol’d. Though the nasty sentiments in the comments are somewhat unpleasant.
-
As an atheist, personally I go with the more humanistic and filthy “Oh fuck!” with an optional “Say thank you, slut.” after.
-
What Catholics cry out during sex: But I poop from there, Father!
What Muslims cry out during sex: Derka derka Mohamed Jihad
continued…?
-
nice repost you drunk!
-
I personally scream ‘REPOST’!
-
where’s the original? I keep trying to find it, but failing.
-
I know I saved it . . .
Hide Comments | Add your comment
21 Responses to What atheists cry out during sex
-
God damnit, we cry out “Oh God!” as often as everyone else.
-
I don’t. Mostly I scream FREUD WAS RIGHT! FREUD WAS RIGHT!! Then i cry for 20 minutes, and go to work.
-
I cry out “Oh god!” (Yes, with a small “g”; I’m that good.) This lets me sin twice as much: not only am I have sex for pleasure, rather than procreation (strike 1) but I’m also blaspheming (strike 2).
-
“Hail Xenu!”
-
“oh, chemical chance! chemical chance!”
-bill hicks -
“THE PRICE IS RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT”
-Me?
-
Pfft, Athiests dont have sex.
-
Atheists do to have sex, they just don’t reproduce, because god doesn’t give them babies to born.
-
Sneaky Snake has a point. It’s human nature. The more you forbid something, the more we do it. Take away the taboo of something, and it become mundane. Kind of makes it pointless to forbid anything. Shouldn’t your god know this? Sounds more like something a tribe of prehistoric barbarian nomads would come up with.
-
@mystik – I happen to know that this image was created with the specific purpose of oppressing and spreading hateful misinformation about Atheists.
-
This agnostic wants to know how Atheists are being oppressed.
-
-
I was raised Cafflik. Our parish must’ve been cheap, cause we never ate no babies . . .
-
@tripolar: Didn’t you hear? Everyone is oppressed now. I’d quickly start calling yourself an agnosticIST and start j’acuseing people over the hundreds of years of mental slavery you’ve been subjected to. If that doesn’t work for you you, ItrovertISTs and ExtravertISTs have been oppressing each other pretty tyrannically lately. I’d get in on the victimization while it’s fresh.
Also, Atheists don’t say anything during sex: They never fuck because their constant complaining is so unappealing.
-
I lol’d. Though the nasty sentiments in the comments are somewhat unpleasant.
-
As an atheist, personally I go with the more humanistic and filthy “Oh fuck!” with an optional “Say thank you, slut.” after.
-
What Catholics cry out during sex: But I poop from there, Father!
What Muslims cry out during sex: Derka derka Mohamed Jihadcontinued…?
-
nice repost you drunk!
-
I personally scream ‘REPOST’!
-
where’s the original? I keep trying to find it, but failing.
-
I know I saved it . . .
Owl Family
(4 votes, average: 4.75 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Forum Fodder, Nature
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Owl Family
-
o rly?
-
Wow, the one on the right of the middle there is definitely thinking “I see what you did there…”
-
ya rly…
-
The owl family frowns on your shenanigans.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Owl Family
-
o rly?
-
Wow, the one on the right of the middle there is definitely thinking “I see what you did there…”
-
ya rly…
-
The owl family frowns on your shenanigans.
Internet Troll
(10 votes, average: 2.80 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to Internet Troll
-
I’ll bet that if you turn that screen around, you’ll see him logged in as mAgnUS.
-
spacebar abuser
-
A/S/L?
-
Looks like a good pet.
-
Remember when troll was a verb?
-
OK, so he has power enough for a PC, but not for a light bulb? Call me a nerd, but that candle can’t be good for that monitor…
-
@Gary: Remember when babies routinely died of smallpox? Stop glorifying the past man, be forward-looking. One day, I’d like to see troll as a pronoun.
-
First thought, Gargamel.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
8 Responses to Internet Troll
-
I’ll bet that if you turn that screen around, you’ll see him logged in as mAgnUS.
-
spacebar abuser
-
A/S/L?
-
Looks like a good pet.
-
Remember when troll was a verb?
-
OK, so he has power enough for a PC, but not for a light bulb? Call me a nerd, but that candle can’t be good for that monitor…
-
@Gary: Remember when babies routinely died of smallpox? Stop glorifying the past man, be forward-looking. One day, I’d like to see troll as a pronoun.
-
First thought, Gargamel.
Batman says : Papa Spank!
(9 votes, average: 3.89 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Comic Books, Forum Fodder, Humor
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Batman says : Papa Spank!
-
A lot of people don’t know this, but there is an obscure law on the books that allows a man to wipe off a woman’s makeup immediately, if it displeases him. If the woman resists, you are legally permitted to spank her until she submits. It’s true! Batman is just upholding the law.
-
Batman doesn’t break the law. He is the law. In tights.
-
Thought that was Judge Dredd?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Batman says : Papa Spank!
-
A lot of people don’t know this, but there is an obscure law on the books that allows a man to wipe off a woman’s makeup immediately, if it displeases him. If the woman resists, you are legally permitted to spank her until she submits. It’s true! Batman is just upholding the law.
-
Batman doesn’t break the law. He is the law. In tights.
-
Thought that was Judge Dredd?
-
Frog of Doom
(10 votes, average: 4.10 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
All that you know is at an end.
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Frog of Doom
-
I fucking hate that motherfucking know-it-all frog.
-
And yet, his predictions are always right..
-
Hypnotoad is better.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Frog of Doom
-
I fucking hate that motherfucking know-it-all frog.
-
And yet, his predictions are always right..
-
Hypnotoad is better.
March 12, 2008 at 10:19 am
We are powerless……?
March 12, 2008 at 10:30 am
We are over rated.
March 12, 2008 at 1:47 pm
I swear to god, these photoshop amatuers should get it into their heads that they are neither impressive nor graphic designers.
This guy has marred Anonymous’s good name
March 12, 2008 at 2:00 pm
They are retarded.
March 12, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Remember when Anonymous had a good name?
Anonymous never had a good name.
March 13, 2008 at 8:01 am
Photoshop amateurs? More like MSPaint n00bs…