Baby Osama
(12 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Loading ...
Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Dark Humor
All hail the Glorious Cyanide And Happiness
3 Comments
Starbucks 9-11 Advertisement
(8 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Advertisements, Dark Humor
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Starbucks 9-11 Advertisement
-
-
heh, starbucks are fucking terrorists.
-
I was an employee at the time, and managed to snag on of these posters
-
I wanna see the hijacked dragonfly crash into one of those…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Starbucks 9-11 Advertisement
-
heh, starbucks are fucking terrorists.
-
I was an employee at the time, and managed to snag on of these posters
-
I wanna see the hijacked dragonfly crash into one of those…
The As-Yet-Unlearned lesson of 9-11-01
(16 votes, average: 3.94 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Dark Humor, Politics
25 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?25 Responses to The As-Yet-Unlearned lesson of 9-11-01
-
RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!!
-
Amen! The Liberal Party here in Canada tried to go down this road and they got their asses handed to them. Yes we have guns in Canada. Gotta protect yourself from the Moose and Bears.
-
If every American Citizen had a surface to air missile launcher 9/11 would never have happened.
-
Imagine how many hijackings could be prevented if people were allowed to bring guns on planes.
-
Guns solve so many problems!
Pedophilia? Make it compusory for all pre-teens to carry a firearm!
It’s genius!
-
Imagine how guns would be able to fix the recent economic downturn and mortgage crisis!
-
I would totally pack a .40 in my carry-on if it was allowed. It’d also make a great anger venting tool if my MP3 player decided to fuck up.
Piece of shit! *BLAM BLAM!*
-
Of course, unless you had the right kind of ammunition, one shot could crash the plane and kill you all.
-
Didn’t they disprove the explosive decompression theory?
-
Well, if one can not have a gun to kill everyone around him/her (or adjusting an unruly electronic device), why bother having one at all? Is that not the foundation of the U.S.? Killing Red Coats and Indians or whoever is in the way? I never had much interest in AmeriCan hIstOry, So, perhaps i aM erroR. HOld on, mY Caps loCk iS messinG Up. **Shoots keyboard** Better now.
-
Oh yeah, great concept. Arm every people, so they can kill each other faster.
-
What a load of crap. The founding fathers would be appalled to see how far the 2nd amendment has been taken. They didn’t forsee how much the word “arms” could be liberally interpreted. But that’s neither here nor there.
I love how NRA types always seem to think a world where everyone has guns is safer whereas a world where nobody has them is more dangerous. They always point to Hitler taking guns away and the dangerous of a universal gun control system where the people couldn’t fight against the government, but then they go on to say that gun control doesn’t work. People who want to get their hands on arms will always be able to. That’s true, but it’s incompatible with the other half of their arguments. You can’t have it both ways.
-
Except that Hitler didn’t take guns away. The truth is that more people could own more kinds of guns in Germany after The 1938 German Weapons Act than under the previous Weimar rules. He also dropped the minimum age for gun ownership from 20 to 18 and increased the term of a gun license from one year to three. Hitler wanted as many Germans as possible armed so he could make effective troops out of them.
That whole crone is just more NRA bullshit.
-
Not only did they disprove explosive decompression, but also, a hole in the fuselage won’t do anything. There are already valves in the fuselage that usually remain open, even at altitude, and they would close with additional holes being punched by bullets.
-
Note that when the second amendment was written, there WAS private ownership of artillery.
-
Actually, vygramul, while you’re technically correct, only a vastly wealthy individual might actually own artillery at that time. Virtually all the cannon used in the Revolutionary War were used by the British.
When the 2nd Amendment was written, it was phrased as it was because the United States didn’t have a standing army, and had no provision for creating one. The notion was, if the landowners had weapons – even the single-shot light arms of the day that often misfired – the country could be roused to war more quickly.
Think of the 2nd Amendment as the equivalent of a draft of all able-bodied men into a standing militia whenever the politicians ordered it and you’re closer to the original intent than the idea that everyone could keep assault rifles for their own amusement. The guns weren’t for personal defense. They were the pledge that the landowners were part of the US Army.
-
Dude, check out Article I section 8, especially the part about, “To raise and support armies,” and, “To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia.”
I’d say that had provision for making one, and also provision for arming people. Given that, why bother even writing the 2nd amendment?
-
Possibly because confiscating all the weapons from the population, and then rearming them would be a waste of energy? Or conceivably because trying to disarm a population that had just fought a revolution might have been unwise?
Or perhaps because no one at that time realized that civilians would have access to weapons that would allow a single individual to wipe out a small town with relative ease?
If the second amendment hadn’t been written, any individual state could have disarmed its population, regardless of article 1. No one wanted to tell the hunters to turn in their fowling pieces, and no one wanted to try to tax the populous to arm an army.
Everything has context. That’s why evil, cruel, stupid, mean-spirited liberals call the Constitution a “living document”.
Being simple-minded, I think almost everyone should be able to own hunting weapons and home protection type weapons, as desired. However, most folks shouldn’t have automatic rifles, grenades, rocket launchers, or nuclear weapons. Of course, that’s just me, YMMV… 8)
-
True enough, much of what you say, but let me point out that tradition long established the first ten amendments as “The Bill of Rights” and that they collectively have been taught as being the institutionalizing of individual liberties, so much so, that it’s easy to catch someone off-guard by making an off-hand comment that, “The Bill of Rights is not about individual liberties.” Usually, you’ll get a lecture about how you’re wrong. Right up until the point where you state, “So the second amendment is about individual liberties?”
Finally, the semantic argument seems to favor it being an individual liberty. To whom does the right to bear arms belong? There’s only one answer to that question from reading the amendment. The Constitution is remarkably consistent in its use of “the people” and it’s difficult to believe that this was some sort of quillo. (As opposed to typo.)
All this is aside from the moral proposition as to whether an armed society is a good idea or not.
-
I agree that we’ve wandered away from the question of whether an armed society is a good idea or not.
Now I certainly think that I should have a gun if I want one, as I am level-headed and calm. I’m just not sure you should be allowed to carry a gun, since you might be too hair-triggered. Of course, I realize that from your point of view, our opinions of who should have guns might well be reversed – right?
That’s my problem with arming everyone. If it was knives – no problem, since most random strangers won’t get hurt during a knife fight. If it’s single-shot flintlocks – sure, since by the time yours is loaded I’ll have had time to either draw my flintlock or run away. Since ‘arms’ now include laser scopes, automatic magazines, and armor piercing rounds (at least to extremists), maybe none of us should be carrying arms in public.
Hunting weapons? Sure – everyone except the demonstrably insane can have them. And have to learn basic gun safety rules, like the NRA teaches in their classes. 
-
WTF? since when did innocent = responsible?
Disarming innocent people does protect them, every innocent Kid that plays with the their dads gun for example. I’m not saying people shouldn’t have the responsibility but padded rooms (however stifling) are pretty safe.
-
Missouri recently enacted a concealed carry law, where if you aren’t semi-retarded, you get a license to carry a small weapon on you person (hidden).
The violent crime rate has gone down drastically.
The property crime rate has gone up, but Stolen TV’s beats dead people.
-
There were 27,353 violent crimes in Missouri in 1999, in 2009 there were 29,444
How is that “gone down drastically” ?
-
Excelsior – where are you getting your statistics from? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but your statement doesn’t match these statistics:
www.disastercenter.com/crime/mocrimn.htm
The murder rate / 100,000 is the same in 2006 as it was in 2000. The violent crime rate is higher.
Rates *did* drop in 2002, when the law was in the news, but the rates went back up. They’re not as high as in the early ’90′s, of course, but there are other reasons for that.
-
My Statistic probably is from that period where it fell.
Even apart from statistics though, a simple truth is that people who want to kill other people aren’t going to care about gun penalties.
As for people being clumsy with their own guns- If you shoot yourself, that’s Natural Selection, If you shoot someone else, then remember that we trust people with cars, and they use those to kill people every day.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
25 Responses to The As-Yet-Unlearned lesson of 9-11-01
-
RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!!
-
Amen! The Liberal Party here in Canada tried to go down this road and they got their asses handed to them. Yes we have guns in Canada. Gotta protect yourself from the Moose and Bears.
-
If every American Citizen had a surface to air missile launcher 9/11 would never have happened.
-
Imagine how many hijackings could be prevented if people were allowed to bring guns on planes.
-
Guns solve so many problems!
Pedophilia? Make it compusory for all pre-teens to carry a firearm!It’s genius!
-
Imagine how guns would be able to fix the recent economic downturn and mortgage crisis!
-
I would totally pack a .40 in my carry-on if it was allowed. It’d also make a great anger venting tool if my MP3 player decided to fuck up.
Piece of shit! *BLAM BLAM!*
-
Of course, unless you had the right kind of ammunition, one shot could crash the plane and kill you all.
-
Didn’t they disprove the explosive decompression theory?
-
Well, if one can not have a gun to kill everyone around him/her (or adjusting an unruly electronic device), why bother having one at all? Is that not the foundation of the U.S.? Killing Red Coats and Indians or whoever is in the way? I never had much interest in AmeriCan hIstOry, So, perhaps i aM erroR. HOld on, mY Caps loCk iS messinG Up. **Shoots keyboard** Better now.
-
Oh yeah, great concept. Arm every people, so they can kill each other faster.
-
What a load of crap. The founding fathers would be appalled to see how far the 2nd amendment has been taken. They didn’t forsee how much the word “arms” could be liberally interpreted. But that’s neither here nor there.
I love how NRA types always seem to think a world where everyone has guns is safer whereas a world where nobody has them is more dangerous. They always point to Hitler taking guns away and the dangerous of a universal gun control system where the people couldn’t fight against the government, but then they go on to say that gun control doesn’t work. People who want to get their hands on arms will always be able to. That’s true, but it’s incompatible with the other half of their arguments. You can’t have it both ways.
-
Except that Hitler didn’t take guns away. The truth is that more people could own more kinds of guns in Germany after The 1938 German Weapons Act than under the previous Weimar rules. He also dropped the minimum age for gun ownership from 20 to 18 and increased the term of a gun license from one year to three. Hitler wanted as many Germans as possible armed so he could make effective troops out of them.
That whole crone is just more NRA bullshit.
-
-
Not only did they disprove explosive decompression, but also, a hole in the fuselage won’t do anything. There are already valves in the fuselage that usually remain open, even at altitude, and they would close with additional holes being punched by bullets.
-
Note that when the second amendment was written, there WAS private ownership of artillery.
-
Actually, vygramul, while you’re technically correct, only a vastly wealthy individual might actually own artillery at that time. Virtually all the cannon used in the Revolutionary War were used by the British.
When the 2nd Amendment was written, it was phrased as it was because the United States didn’t have a standing army, and had no provision for creating one. The notion was, if the landowners had weapons – even the single-shot light arms of the day that often misfired – the country could be roused to war more quickly.
Think of the 2nd Amendment as the equivalent of a draft of all able-bodied men into a standing militia whenever the politicians ordered it and you’re closer to the original intent than the idea that everyone could keep assault rifles for their own amusement. The guns weren’t for personal defense. They were the pledge that the landowners were part of the US Army.
-
Dude, check out Article I section 8, especially the part about, “To raise and support armies,” and, “To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia.”
I’d say that had provision for making one, and also provision for arming people. Given that, why bother even writing the 2nd amendment?
-
Possibly because confiscating all the weapons from the population, and then rearming them would be a waste of energy? Or conceivably because trying to disarm a population that had just fought a revolution might have been unwise?
Or perhaps because no one at that time realized that civilians would have access to weapons that would allow a single individual to wipe out a small town with relative ease?
If the second amendment hadn’t been written, any individual state could have disarmed its population, regardless of article 1. No one wanted to tell the hunters to turn in their fowling pieces, and no one wanted to try to tax the populous to arm an army.
Everything has context. That’s why evil, cruel, stupid, mean-spirited liberals call the Constitution a “living document”.
Being simple-minded, I think almost everyone should be able to own hunting weapons and home protection type weapons, as desired. However, most folks shouldn’t have automatic rifles, grenades, rocket launchers, or nuclear weapons. Of course, that’s just me, YMMV… 8)
-
True enough, much of what you say, but let me point out that tradition long established the first ten amendments as “The Bill of Rights” and that they collectively have been taught as being the institutionalizing of individual liberties, so much so, that it’s easy to catch someone off-guard by making an off-hand comment that, “The Bill of Rights is not about individual liberties.” Usually, you’ll get a lecture about how you’re wrong. Right up until the point where you state, “So the second amendment is about individual liberties?”
Finally, the semantic argument seems to favor it being an individual liberty. To whom does the right to bear arms belong? There’s only one answer to that question from reading the amendment. The Constitution is remarkably consistent in its use of “the people” and it’s difficult to believe that this was some sort of quillo. (As opposed to typo.)
All this is aside from the moral proposition as to whether an armed society is a good idea or not.
-
I agree that we’ve wandered away from the question of whether an armed society is a good idea or not.
Now I certainly think that I should have a gun if I want one, as I am level-headed and calm. I’m just not sure you should be allowed to carry a gun, since you might be too hair-triggered. Of course, I realize that from your point of view, our opinions of who should have guns might well be reversed – right?
That’s my problem with arming everyone. If it was knives – no problem, since most random strangers won’t get hurt during a knife fight. If it’s single-shot flintlocks – sure, since by the time yours is loaded I’ll have had time to either draw my flintlock or run away. Since ‘arms’ now include laser scopes, automatic magazines, and armor piercing rounds (at least to extremists), maybe none of us should be carrying arms in public.
Hunting weapons? Sure – everyone except the demonstrably insane can have them. And have to learn basic gun safety rules, like the NRA teaches in their classes.
-
WTF? since when did innocent = responsible?
Disarming innocent people does protect them, every innocent Kid that plays with the their dads gun for example. I’m not saying people shouldn’t have the responsibility but padded rooms (however stifling) are pretty safe. -
Missouri recently enacted a concealed carry law, where if you aren’t semi-retarded, you get a license to carry a small weapon on you person (hidden).
The violent crime rate has gone down drastically.
The property crime rate has gone up, but Stolen TV’s beats dead people.-
There were 27,353 violent crimes in Missouri in 1999, in 2009 there were 29,444
How is that “gone down drastically” ?
-
-
Excelsior – where are you getting your statistics from? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but your statement doesn’t match these statistics:
www.disastercenter.com/crime/mocrimn.htm
The murder rate / 100,000 is the same in 2006 as it was in 2000. The violent crime rate is higher.
Rates *did* drop in 2002, when the law was in the news, but the rates went back up. They’re not as high as in the early ’90′s, of course, but there are other reasons for that.
-
My Statistic probably is from that period where it fell.
Even apart from statistics though, a simple truth is that people who want to kill other people aren’t going to care about gun penalties.
As for people being clumsy with their own guns- If you shoot yourself, that’s Natural Selection, If you shoot someone else, then remember that we trust people with cars, and they use those to kill people every day.
Post 9-11 World Environment Reality
(21 votes, average: 4.24 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Dark Humor
2 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?2 Responses to Post 9-11 World Environment Reality
-
I agree with this pic. It happened, what, six years ago now?
-
Yeah, but we’ve been attacked over and over again since by US citizens… oh, wait…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
2 Responses to Post 9-11 World Environment Reality
-
I agree with this pic. It happened, what, six years ago now?
-
Yeah, but we’ve been attacked over and over again since by US citizens… oh, wait…
The closest some of us will ever get to heaven – The World Trade Center – New York
(14 votes, average: 3.86 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Dark Humor, wtf
12 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?12 Responses to The closest some of us will ever get to heaven – The World Trade Center – New York
-
Is that the heaven with 72 virgins?
-
only 70
-
Is it me, or they trying to make us fell good for the people died there?
-
Hep: I think this might have been an advertisement from before 9-11.
-
Yeah, they’re trying to tell people that this is a tall building… that might fall down.
-
This is from a leaflet form the early eighties. I have one that I brought back with me to the UK, after going up to the observatory in 1981.
If anyone is interested, email me at pwynne@blueyonder.co.uk
-
Yes. When you go to heaven you will get 70 virgins. Unfortunately, it is in the form of a star trek convention.
-
IIIIRONYYYY
-
Great paintings! This is the type of information that are supposed to be shared across the internet. Shame on the seek engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and discuss with my website . Thanks =)
-
This image comes from a brochure given out my WTC during the early 80′s. I found one in my mom’s save box. It’s not a joke about what happened here in 2001.
-
As stated by some other members, it’s from a pamphlet detailing the skyline from the observation deck and surrounding neighbourhood from 1980-1985.
-
Hey.. I was watching this a couple years back..
around the 6 minute mark he speaks of this photo.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
12 Responses to The closest some of us will ever get to heaven – The World Trade Center – New York
-
Is that the heaven with 72 virgins?
-
only 70
-
Is it me, or they trying to make us fell good for the people died there?
-
Hep: I think this might have been an advertisement from before 9-11.
-
Yeah, they’re trying to tell people that this is a tall building… that might fall down.
-
This is from a leaflet form the early eighties. I have one that I brought back with me to the UK, after going up to the observatory in 1981.
If anyone is interested, email me at pwynne@blueyonder.co.uk
-
Yes. When you go to heaven you will get 70 virgins. Unfortunately, it is in the form of a star trek convention.
-
IIIIRONYYYY
-
Great paintings! This is the type of information that are supposed to be shared across the internet. Shame on the seek engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and discuss with my website . Thanks =)
-
This image comes from a brochure given out my WTC during the early 80′s. I found one in my mom’s save box. It’s not a joke about what happened here in 2001.
-
As stated by some other members, it’s from a pamphlet detailing the skyline from the observation deck and surrounding neighbourhood from 1980-1985.
-
Hey.. I was watching this a couple years back..
around the 6 minute mark he speaks of this photo.
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Kool Aid Man Caused 9-11
(17 votes, average: 3.53 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: 9-11, Dark Humor
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Kool Aid Man Caused 9-11
-
HAHAHAHA, thats friggin hilarious. Sorry guys, i’m aussie so i suppose 5 years after the whole thing happened i’m not really choked up about something like this!!
*giggles some more* flame me all you want, this is funny 
-
Fucking hilarious! I’ve seen plenty of these before but not one with the koolaid man. rofl
-
I prefer the Hulk Hogan one.
-
Poor taste. The image as well as the comments.
-
Awww you’re crazy. Kool-Aid tastes great…
-
lululululul
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Kool Aid Man Caused 9-11
-
HAHAHAHA, thats friggin hilarious. Sorry guys, i’m aussie so i suppose 5 years after the whole thing happened i’m not really choked up about something like this!!
*giggles some more* flame me all you want, this is funny
-
Fucking hilarious! I’ve seen plenty of these before but not one with the koolaid man. rofl
-
I prefer the Hulk Hogan one.
-
Poor taste. The image as well as the comments.
-
Awww you’re crazy. Kool-Aid tastes great…
-
lululululul
Pedometer
(16 votes, average: 4.06 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Technology, wtf
[pedobear]
11 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?11 Responses to Pedometer
-
I’ve seen them before…but I never took it that way. Thanks Tiki! Now I know what to say about the next person I run into that has one of those.
-
Hmm it has its very own category. Should I expect to see more “Pedo-bear”?
-
Pedobear approves of this thread.
-
um……….no wordz
-
Nice… someone left a pu\b\e
-
Oh shi-
-
Aah! 4Chan is everywhere..
-
So you can find a perfect girl to trouble her bum?
-
the pedo level’s OVER NINE THOUSAND!
-
The court ordered me to wear one. It constantly flashes 12:00. I dont think its set correctly.
-
It Measure how pedo they are. lol
Hide Comments | Add your comment
11 Responses to Pedometer
-
I’ve seen them before…but I never took it that way. Thanks Tiki! Now I know what to say about the next person I run into that has one of those.
-
Hmm it has its very own category. Should I expect to see more “Pedo-bear”?
-
Pedobear approves of this thread.
-
um……….no wordz
-
Nice… someone left a pu\b\e
-
Oh shi-
-
Aah! 4Chan is everywhere..
-
So you can find a perfect girl to trouble her bum?
-
the pedo level’s OVER NINE THOUSAND!
-
The court ordered me to wear one. It constantly flashes 12:00. I dont think its set correctly.
-
It Measure how pedo they are. lol
Starts Wars
(24 votes, average: 3.88 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Politics
[graffiti]
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Starts Wars
-
Is this a banksy work?
-
Doesn’t seem like it…Banksy does some really high-caliber stuff. This is eh.
-
I don’t get it.
-
He should really be dressed like Grand Moff Tarkin. To dress him like a storm trooper implies that he would actually go into battle.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Starts Wars
-
Is this a banksy work?
-
Doesn’t seem like it…Banksy does some really high-caliber stuff. This is eh.
-
I don’t get it.
-
He should really be dressed like Grand Moff Tarkin. To dress him like a storm trooper implies that he would actually go into battle.
Brittneys imaginary friend
(22 votes, average: 3.36 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Religion, wtf
Are you listening Britney? It’s me Jesus.
Yes master, I hear your thoughts.Is this good master?
Yes this pleases me greatly,
you will sleep again tonight.
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Brittneys imaginary friend
-
It’s a sword, on a field.
-
She failed so fucking hard last night. I had to laugh at her. Poor woman. She’ll never be able to get up in front of people again.
-
This is not about Spears.
Look at Christ, apathetically playing along. It’s not his idea at all, h
-
This is not about Spears.
Look at Christ, apathetically playing along. It’s not his idea at all, h
-
Just another stupid white chick who can’t handle her drugs.
-
“Just another stupid white chick who can’t handle her drugs”… and britney spears
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Brittneys imaginary friend
-
It’s a sword, on a field.
-
She failed so fucking hard last night. I had to laugh at her. Poor woman. She’ll never be able to get up in front of people again.
-
This is not about Spears.
Look at Christ, apathetically playing along. It’s not his idea at all, h -
This is not about Spears.
Look at Christ, apathetically playing along. It’s not his idea at all, h -
Just another stupid white chick who can’t handle her drugs.
-
“Just another stupid white chick who can’t handle her drugs”… and britney spears
Michael J. Fox
(26 votes, average: 2.15 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, wtf
7 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?7 Responses to Michael J. Fox
-
Awww, that’s just not cool. 
-
I didn’t get it, then I googled it, and I LOL’ed.
-
thank you for googling before asking… makes life a little better for the rest of us…
-
I lol’ed and felt bad for it, but i lol’ed
and Gaexion your example should be followed
-
Yup, not cool. His chick is hotter than yours.
-
I rofled. And to anyone saying this is “not cool”: this is filed under the “Dark humor” category. Deal.
-
nnnnnoit fuinnbyt havbe youi evbre triod tyopiungf yuth paerkensdons?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
7 Responses to Michael J. Fox
-
Awww, that’s just not cool.
-
I didn’t get it, then I googled it, and I LOL’ed.
-
thank you for googling before asking… makes life a little better for the rest of us…
-
I lol’ed and felt bad for it, but i lol’ed
and Gaexion your example should be followed -
Yup, not cool. His chick is hotter than yours.
-
I rofled. And to anyone saying this is “not cool”: this is filed under the “Dark humor” category. Deal.
-
nnnnnoit fuinnbyt havbe youi evbre triod tyopiungf yuth paerkensdons?
Silly Bear!
(20 votes, average: 3.55 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, wtf
2 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?2 Responses to Silly Bear!
-
Reminds me of this:
Pooh goes ape shit www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEmp69aOZ5M
-
Pffft. He crapped out before removing the flow inhibitor? Fucking rookie.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
2 Responses to Silly Bear!
-
Reminds me of this:
Pooh goes ape shit www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEmp69aOZ5M -
Pffft. He crapped out before removing the flow inhibitor? Fucking rookie.
God Hates Fags
(16 votes, average: 3.88 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Religion, wtf
19 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?19 Responses to God Hates Fags
-
Why can’t religious folks keep their retardation to themselves?
-
Wait if he is gay than why would he hold up a sign that says that God hates fags? I am so confused.
-
Because generally, people that go on witch hunts against homosexuals, are in the closet themselves. The more they hate “teh gheys”, the more likely they really hate themselves.
If one is truly confident and comfortable with their own sexuality, they’d have no reason to feel threatened by anyone else’s.
-
Bless you Alec – if you weren’t already married, I’d propose to you.
-
Grr these people make me angry…they showed up across the street from a classmate’s funeral (he died in Iraq) and protested…These people are mixed up. I’m sorry if someone disagrees, but they crossed the line too many times.
-
Thanks, Brigantyna. :*)
-
I wanna hurt that guy so much.
-
His website is funny; I started hating this guy when he was around the Matthew Shepard thing in Wyoming. His argument basically boils down to this: It’s possible for God to hate (most folks think he doesn’t) because he smites sinners down with fire and lightning. He hates fags because of Leviticus & Deuteronomy.
I was going to start a satirical website called www.godhateschildren.com, which would be exactly identical to his but with the words “fags” & “children” substituted.
There are plenty of quotes from scripture that would back this up: 2 Kings 2:23-25
“23 Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up by the way, young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, “Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!†24 When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 25 And he went from there to Mount Carmel, and from there he returned to Samaria.”
-
What’s the deal with christians that pick and choose parts of the old testament to follow and ignore the rest? Does he do his animal sacrifices too? What about pork? Does he make his wife go to outskirts of the village when she is having her “monthly issue”?
-
Nicely put Alec. Hell, I might propose to you anyway.
-
What’s the deal with christians that pick and choose parts of the old testament to follow and ignore the rest?
Because the Old Testament is the true face of Christianity. The New Testament is a “mainstream” pussified version in order to appeal to new times.
-
The Old Testament is basicly the Torah, with minor cuts.
-
LOL @ Hepathos for the circumcision joke.
-
Well it’s wasn’t aimed for that, but now you mention it…
-
fuckin fundamentalists… makes the whole state of Kansas look bad…
-
That guy probably sucks SO MUCH DICK! He loves a good broom handle hung stud in his ass NIGHTLY!
-
The documentary about them by Keith Allen was pretty good.
Turns out that the son of one of the key members of their ‘church’ was born out of wedlock. Apparently god will forgive that minor indiscretion.
Wake up and smell the hypocricy.
-
Christians aren’t perfect. They just want you to be!
-
It may also be a good thing to note that the few quotes they based their entire anti-america campaign on are in English – phrases with a far different meaning than the original language of the bible. It’s interesting to look it up.
Not that I’m religious, just pointing that out
Look on Youtube for the video of her on Fox news arguing with the chick. The anchor brings up a good point: if you hate the country so much, why don’t you leave?
Amazing how they believe that these 80-something people (80% of which are in the same big family) are the only people in the history of the world who “got it right” and everyone else is wrong and going to hell. Just amazing.
And yes, Ando, the Keith Allen thing was awesome. Youtube that as well ^_^
Hide Comments | Add your comment
19 Responses to God Hates Fags
-
Why can’t religious folks keep their retardation to themselves?
-
Wait if he is gay than why would he hold up a sign that says that God hates fags? I am so confused.
-
Because generally, people that go on witch hunts against homosexuals, are in the closet themselves. The more they hate “teh gheys”, the more likely they really hate themselves.
If one is truly confident and comfortable with their own sexuality, they’d have no reason to feel threatened by anyone else’s.
-
Bless you Alec – if you weren’t already married, I’d propose to you.
-
Grr these people make me angry…they showed up across the street from a classmate’s funeral (he died in Iraq) and protested…These people are mixed up. I’m sorry if someone disagrees, but they crossed the line too many times.
-
Thanks, Brigantyna. :*)
-
I wanna hurt that guy so much.
-
His website is funny; I started hating this guy when he was around the Matthew Shepard thing in Wyoming. His argument basically boils down to this: It’s possible for God to hate (most folks think he doesn’t) because he smites sinners down with fire and lightning. He hates fags because of Leviticus & Deuteronomy.
I was going to start a satirical website called www.godhateschildren.com, which would be exactly identical to his but with the words “fags” & “children” substituted.
There are plenty of quotes from scripture that would back this up: 2 Kings 2:23-25
“23 Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up by the way, young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, “Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!†24 When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 25 And he went from there to Mount Carmel, and from there he returned to Samaria.”
-
What’s the deal with christians that pick and choose parts of the old testament to follow and ignore the rest? Does he do his animal sacrifices too? What about pork? Does he make his wife go to outskirts of the village when she is having her “monthly issue”?
-
Nicely put Alec. Hell, I might propose to you anyway.
-
What’s the deal with christians that pick and choose parts of the old testament to follow and ignore the rest?
Because the Old Testament is the true face of Christianity. The New Testament is a “mainstream” pussified version in order to appeal to new times.
-
The Old Testament is basicly the Torah, with minor cuts.
-
LOL @ Hepathos for the circumcision joke.
-
Well it’s wasn’t aimed for that, but now you mention it…
-
fuckin fundamentalists… makes the whole state of Kansas look bad…
-
That guy probably sucks SO MUCH DICK! He loves a good broom handle hung stud in his ass NIGHTLY!
-
The documentary about them by Keith Allen was pretty good.
Turns out that the son of one of the key members of their ‘church’ was born out of wedlock. Apparently god will forgive that minor indiscretion.Wake up and smell the hypocricy.
-
Christians aren’t perfect. They just want you to be!
-
It may also be a good thing to note that the few quotes they based their entire anti-america campaign on are in English – phrases with a far different meaning than the original language of the bible. It’s interesting to look it up.
Not that I’m religious, just pointing that out
Look on Youtube for the video of her on Fox news arguing with the chick. The anchor brings up a good point: if you hate the country so much, why don’t you leave?
Amazing how they believe that these 80-something people (80% of which are in the same big family) are the only people in the history of the world who “got it right” and everyone else is wrong and going to hell. Just amazing.
And yes, Ando, the Keith Allen thing was awesome. Youtube that as well ^_^
Conjoined Squirrel Taxidermy
(7 votes, average: 4.14 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Fantasy - Science Fiction, Nature, wtf
More creatures at www.customcreaturetaxidermy.com, including carcass art, cryptic curios, pickled pets, and jewelry.
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Conjoined Squirrel Taxidermy
-
PETA’s gonna come after you for this one Carpet Teeth. Run, run now….
-
This is awesome… I need to get one for my dog to play with.
-
Watch one of the heads actually move. That’ll be the day. iddqd made me lol
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Conjoined Squirrel Taxidermy
-
PETA’s gonna come after you for this one Carpet Teeth. Run, run now….
-
This is awesome… I need to get one for my dog to play with.
-
Watch one of the heads actually move. That’ll be the day. iddqd made me lol
Irony?
(7 votes, average: 4.14 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor
Live like you mean it – Barcardi
11 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?11 Responses to Irony?
-
No, that’s not irony.
Irony does not mean ‘funny coincidence’.
-
Irony here would apply if there was some way to determine this crash was due to a drunk driver with Bacardi on-board.
Looking too much into things sometimes takes the fun out of stuff. =\
-
“Irony here would apply if there was some way to determine this crash was due to a drunk driver with Bacardi on-board.”
No, that’s still just a ‘funny coincidence’.
-
Alright Lawnmower, what would have to happen in this picture for it to be considered ironic?
Let me give more info first. The driver hit a lamp post that fell and hit the Bacardi truck that was going the other way.
Anyway the important thing is that there is one less Del Sol out there.
-
@The Lawnmower
I think the fact someone that gets killed or almost killed by something that has “Live like you mean it” as slogan is pretty ironic.
Bacardi is telling you to drink up, which in turn will mean you want to live, while having a perfect example of how it does everything but give you life.
Keep in mind I’m not saying alcohol = death, but it’s clear that when you “drink like you mean it” you don’t have control of 100% of your body which or its senses, which could lead to an accident or even death.
And yes, I drink so I’m not preaching here. Just trying to get my point across in the whole “Irony” thing.
-
Coincidence. Is. Not. Irony.
-
You could say the slogan of the product (alcohol) that causes a large number of deaths, ‘Live like you mean it.’, is ironic (in a shallow interpretation).
But that has nothing to do with the car crash.
-
Isn’t that what I said..? If the crash *was* caused by someone drinking alcohol, preferibly Bacardi, it’d be ironic to see a Bacardi truck that promotes “life” by telling you to drink.
-
I’m not going to repeat myself.
-
I think the irony is that it’s illegal in California to use the name of any restaurant, retailer, etc in an ad for an alcoholic beverage. That truck is basically a rolling ad for Bacardi that has the distribution company’s name on the side too. Just imagine that the cop is ticketing the truck driver for that.
-
Don’t repeat yourself lawnmower because you sound ignorant. dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony
The messaging of the van and implied life endangerment are indeed ironic by its definition. Yes, “ironic” is misused and overused everywhere – but not here.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
11 Responses to Irony?
-
No, that’s not irony.
Irony does not mean ‘funny coincidence’.
-
Irony here would apply if there was some way to determine this crash was due to a drunk driver with Bacardi on-board.
Looking too much into things sometimes takes the fun out of stuff. =\
-
“Irony here would apply if there was some way to determine this crash was due to a drunk driver with Bacardi on-board.”
No, that’s still just a ‘funny coincidence’.
-
Alright Lawnmower, what would have to happen in this picture for it to be considered ironic?
Let me give more info first. The driver hit a lamp post that fell and hit the Bacardi truck that was going the other way.
Anyway the important thing is that there is one less Del Sol out there. -
@The Lawnmower
I think the fact someone that gets killed or almost killed by something that has “Live like you mean it” as slogan is pretty ironic.
Bacardi is telling you to drink up, which in turn will mean you want to live, while having a perfect example of how it does everything but give you life.
Keep in mind I’m not saying alcohol = death, but it’s clear that when you “drink like you mean it” you don’t have control of 100% of your body which or its senses, which could lead to an accident or even death.
And yes, I drink so I’m not preaching here. Just trying to get my point across in the whole “Irony” thing.
-
Coincidence. Is. Not. Irony.
-
You could say the slogan of the product (alcohol) that causes a large number of deaths, ‘Live like you mean it.’, is ironic (in a shallow interpretation).
But that has nothing to do with the car crash. -
Isn’t that what I said..? If the crash *was* caused by someone drinking alcohol, preferibly Bacardi, it’d be ironic to see a Bacardi truck that promotes “life” by telling you to drink.
-
I’m not going to repeat myself.
-
I think the irony is that it’s illegal in California to use the name of any restaurant, retailer, etc in an ad for an alcoholic beverage. That truck is basically a rolling ad for Bacardi that has the distribution company’s name on the side too. Just imagine that the cop is ticketing the truck driver for that.
-
Don’t repeat yourself lawnmower because you sound ignorant. dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony
The messaging of the van and implied life endangerment are indeed ironic by its definition. Yes, “ironic” is misused and overused everywhere – but not here.
They’ve already won
(24 votes, average: 3.83 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Politics, Religion
Ahmed… don’t bother planning future attacks. We’ve already won.
Headline: NSA collection phone records on ordinary americans.
27 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?27 Responses to They’ve already won
-
So these crazy religious hooligans are going to stop trying to install Islam as the national world religion just because the NSA starts collecting phone records on suspected terrorists who make calls overseas to other suspected terrorists or questionable suspects…?
SAGE.
THIS.
SHIT.
-
Not that they’d stop, but the point is well taken.
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Ben Franklin
BUMP.
THIS.
SHIT.
-
Wow, JC Denton. Shouldn’t you be off killing MJ12 Troopers?
-
“The Constitution…is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Let’s play my favirote game, where we quote old people that lived over 200 years ago and take their quotes as commandments. You think our so-called liberties in the Constitution are being exterminated? Do me a favor faggot, take some valium and shoot yourself before you give me a peptic ulcer.
-
You think that calling people you don’t know a “faggot” somehow makes your argument more convincing? Don’t bother shooting yourself, you’re not worth the cost of the lead.
-
Yeah, we Americans are *so* oppressed.
Yes, this is definitely what the terrorists want. No, not millions of dead Americans, but Americans listening to other Americans make phone calls.
Please.
-
Actually, I think it’s a reference to the fact that, in the first couple years after 9-11, no Republican could shut their mouth about “The terrorists hate freedom” or “The terrorists are jealous of our freedom” or the whopper “If we sacrifice our freedoms, the terrorists win”.
Of course, those platitudes were quickly forgotten once the republicans figured out that the only way to “fight” terrorism is by attacking the Americans and that freedoms must be sacrificed for our ? (still haven’t figured out what you folks are fighting for if not freedom… little flags? Crying bald eagles? Christianity as a national world religion?)
-
The terrorists hate freedom.
Politicians reacted to terrorism by taking away our own freedom.
——————————–
= The terrorists win!
-
The terrorists do not hate “freedom.” What they hate is Western civilization, not “freedom.” We only think they do because we equate our way of life as the definition of freedom.
And what “freedoms,” exactly, have you lost, Alec? And you might want to answer quickly since we all know that the Gestappo is on the way to house right now to apprehend you for spreading this propaganda.
And “collecting phone records,” doesn’t mean they’re listening to your every freaking phone call. Give me a break. More than likely, what they do is check your records, see where you were calling, and if something strikes them as odd, maybe THEN they listen to your calls.
Do I agree with everything this administration has done? Certainly not. But I’m getting damn tired of people whining about how Americans are “losing their freedom,” or our “civil rights are in jeopardy.” Give it a rest.
Healthy skepticism is one thing, but don’t start thinking we’re a repressed people. That’s just ignorant.
-
“The Constitution…is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Let’s play my favirote game, where we quote old people that lived over 200 years ago and take their quotes as commandments. You think our so-called liberties in the Constitution are being exterminated? Do me a favor faggot, take some valium and shoot yourself before you give me a peptic ulcer.
-
So terrorists love freedom? That’s news to me. I guess that’s why they hung around the Taliban.
As for the rest of your diatribe:
They came for my neighbour, and I said nothing,
They came for my father and I said nothing,
They came for my sister and I said nothing,
They came for my wife and I said nothing,
Now I think they’re here for me,
Why won’t anyone speak up for me?
-
*cough* habeus corpus *cough* separation of powers *cough* indefinite detainment without conviction *cough*
Flying Mantis Strip, you people have lost the freedoms that make every other freedom possible. Sure, it hasn’t all gone downhill yet, but all the protection is gone. At this point, US politicians are on the honour system not to turn you into a freaking dictatorship. Willing to trust in that? Because the people who invented habeus corpus and separation of powers sure as hell weren’t, from their own personal experience.
The problem with you Americans is that you’ve had too many generations of relative comfort with your political system. Live through a dictatorship, and you’ll see the value of even the freedoms you consider marginal.
-
Caio,
First of all, don’t tell me that I don’t see the values of my freedom. I know all too well the priceless value of it all. I see what you’re saying, and I do agree to a certain point, but don’t even begin to say that all Americans are like that. Fuck you. I’ve been to Iraq and seen firsthand the chaos there, so don’t tell me what I do and don’t appreciate. Again, fuck you.
Secondly, in reference your argument that we have lost the “freedom that makes every other freedom possible, that simply doesn’t make logical sense. Because, logically speaking, if one loses something that is the “enabler,” or the reason other things are able to exist, then it logically foollows that the things it was enabling would also cease to exist. Ergom according to your argument, we have effectively lost *all* freedoms…which I’m fairly certain isn’t true.
And Alec, come on man. You completely misinterpretted what I said. Terrorists do not hate freedom. They hate Western Civilization, Christianity, etc. etc. A widely held problem in America and Western Civ, for that matter, is that we equate our way of life with freedom. That meaning that we see our way of life as the *only* way of being free. Wouldn’t you agree it’d be fair to say that various cultures would have various conceptions of things? And why not
freedom?
Look, do I think that there are things in our country that need to be changed? Most certainly, I do. I’m just trying to say that people are so quick to yell out “OPPRESSION!” Again, you still have yet to tell me what freedoms you’ve lost, Alec. I just don’t see why people find it necessary to portray America as a modern day V For Vendetta society. Average, every day Americans are *not* getting plucked from their houses and herded into prisoner camps for speaking their minds.
So long as “speaking their mind” doesn’t include things like calling for the destruction of America, killings, etc. etc, of course.
-
If You’re Happy And You Know It – Bomb Iraq
If you cannot find Osama,bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky,
Pakistan is looking shifty,
North Korea is too risky,
Bomb Iraq.
-
Jose Padilla
-
Funny how when you have a country run by fascist religious fanatics who like to blow sh*t up to further their political agenda they’re immediately labeled as terrorists… unless the country is ours. Let’s hear it for fundamentalist Christian America!
-
Dude, the terrorists in question are Muslims. They don’t want you to be free to drink alcohol, practice other religions, or even let women walk around in public without being covering in dark robes. That is not freedom! What the hell is wrong with you?
-
Religion of any kind is a man made prison designed to control and exploit people and limit their freedom. Christians might let you practice another religion (as long as their God is mentioned on our money and in the Pledge of Allegiance), drink (except for when they passed prohibition), let women have a voice (but only after 1920 – not even 100 years yet – and still not allowed by the church to have an abortion), but really what is the difference? Every religion wants you to believe in an invisible man that will destroy you if you don’t love him and give him your money. The only thing going to hell is organized religion and the people that lead and follow it.
-
-
That’s a nice argument, Flying, and I’m sure you’d get an A+ in philosophy class, because it has nothing to do whatsoever with observed reality.
Let me explain to you, Flying, the type of dictatorship which is not only the most common in the modern world. The type you’d find in Zimbabwe for example. I’ll use an example I’m familiar with, Salazar-era Portugal.
You see, during the Salazar years, Portugal was a free and open democracy with fair elections, separation of powers, rule of law, and it didn’t even have the death penalty *on paper*. It just happened to be that the same party won the elections always for almost fifty years and there was no opposition except Delgado, and some blacks and Timorenses off-shore.
Of course, just as Bush has given the Administration the power (unused?) to form a ‘council’ controlled entirely by the administration which can detain people indefinitely, in secret, and without trail, Salazar had the PIDE/PVDE. Essentially, like the ‘council’ Bush has given himself the right to create, PIDE existed above all Portuguese law and could freely vanish people. Generally those people weren’t communists and terrorists (from the Colonies, who were fighting a war for independence), as Salazar promised, but newspaper reporters, opposition candidates and regular people who were overhead by the spy network.
Of course, Portugal had a nice dictatorship by world standards. Me and my family are from Brazil. The military regime of my childhood didn’t really need secrets, because the “threat” of communist terrorists was apparently so grim, that it gave them the right to open fire on underage protesters. Everyone was being spied on Constantly, and if you weren’t a famous singer, you were likely to end up who knows fucking where. At one point my Uncle, Aunt, and three cousins all vanished, and their farm land was assumed as Gov. property, later sold at auction. We still haven’t got an explanation for that one. Are they in prison? In some grave. My Grandparents hired a detective after the dictatorship ended, and still no info whatsoever.
But I’m sure your six month tour in Iraq on base was hell and taught you about life.
But no, creating a council controlled directly by the administration which exists above the law could never go wrong. Only hippies from san francisco want to vote. Real freedoms are the freedom to go to monster truck rallies, evangelist churches and nigger lynchings. God bless the american way..
-
Man I love this shit I dont know what gets people riled up more religion and polotics or Mac vs PC?
-
Mac vs PC = Religion
-
True. They’re both fun back n’ forths to watch. We could always combine the two and talk about how religion hasn’t put out an upgrade in centuries and politics keeps crashing because its kernel is corrupted.
-
If you don’t want them to listen to your conversation (and you’re not that special sorry, they WON’T listen to your conversation) so bad then you’re obviously doing something wrong your self.
Or maybe you’re just too idealistic, and theres no place for that here.
-
Oh and Caio: On the Brazilian Military Regime, I think it was better off having some people getting shot at and having some security (crime wasn’t THIS intense here back then) then having Corrupt politicians washing money like theres no tomorrow into exterior bank accounts and literally bending the country over and fucking it. Not to mention the deterioration of the public systems such as health, the police, and even road paving that has happened in the major metropolitan areas.
Bush is not a dictator either. The US works on a checks and balance system and the GOPS haven’t been elected consecutively for 50 years. This cabinet is nothing more then to hold people who are suspected of terrorist links for the security of the country. Torture is bad, but if we were getting attacked constantly then you wouldn’t be saying that. Also trying to link the regime in portugal to what we have in the U.S right now is just stupid, considering the Congress is Democratic right now, and (supposedly) oppose the president. Because by god we know the Democratic congress has been oh so very great in increasing our budget and sinking us ever so deeper in debt. But no worries, it’s obviously Bush’s fault.
-
LOL Osama has lost the game… 
-
Sure, the Islamists spent a few million – and the US spent trillions, almost bankrupting our economy. They lost thousands of uneducated street urchins, we lost thousands of highly trained professionals. They used IEDs that cost them a few dollars, we used cruise missiles and smart bombs that cost millions a pop. Before 9/11, Islamic fundamentalism was small news, now it’s talked about every day worldwide and thousands are signing up to become martyrs for Allah. Now it takes hours just to get on a plane and your shampoo is confiscated, all because some Islamist just TALKED about making a bomb out of it. Once, they were ignored, now almost every security decision hinges on Islamic terrorism.
Yes, he’s dead – but what soldier wouldn’t gladly die to advance his cause and become a legend in the eyes of his people?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
27 Responses to They’ve already won
-
So these crazy religious hooligans are going to stop trying to install Islam as the national world religion just because the NSA starts collecting phone records on suspected terrorists who make calls overseas to other suspected terrorists or questionable suspects…?
SAGE.
THIS.
SHIT. -
Not that they’d stop, but the point is well taken.
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Ben Franklin
BUMP.
THIS.
SHIT. -
Wow, JC Denton. Shouldn’t you be off killing MJ12 Troopers?
-
“The Constitution…is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Let’s play my favirote game, where we quote old people that lived over 200 years ago and take their quotes as commandments. You think our so-called liberties in the Constitution are being exterminated? Do me a favor faggot, take some valium and shoot yourself before you give me a peptic ulcer.
-
You think that calling people you don’t know a “faggot” somehow makes your argument more convincing? Don’t bother shooting yourself, you’re not worth the cost of the lead.
-
-
Yeah, we Americans are *so* oppressed.
Yes, this is definitely what the terrorists want. No, not millions of dead Americans, but Americans listening to other Americans make phone calls.
Please.
-
Actually, I think it’s a reference to the fact that, in the first couple years after 9-11, no Republican could shut their mouth about “The terrorists hate freedom” or “The terrorists are jealous of our freedom” or the whopper “If we sacrifice our freedoms, the terrorists win”.
Of course, those platitudes were quickly forgotten once the republicans figured out that the only way to “fight” terrorism is by attacking the Americans and that freedoms must be sacrificed for our ? (still haven’t figured out what you folks are fighting for if not freedom… little flags? Crying bald eagles? Christianity as a national world religion?)
-
The terrorists hate freedom.
Politicians reacted to terrorism by taking away our own freedom.
——————————–
= The terrorists win! -
The terrorists do not hate “freedom.” What they hate is Western civilization, not “freedom.” We only think they do because we equate our way of life as the definition of freedom.
And what “freedoms,” exactly, have you lost, Alec? And you might want to answer quickly since we all know that the Gestappo is on the way to house right now to apprehend you for spreading this propaganda.
And “collecting phone records,” doesn’t mean they’re listening to your every freaking phone call. Give me a break. More than likely, what they do is check your records, see where you were calling, and if something strikes them as odd, maybe THEN they listen to your calls.
Do I agree with everything this administration has done? Certainly not. But I’m getting damn tired of people whining about how Americans are “losing their freedom,” or our “civil rights are in jeopardy.” Give it a rest.
Healthy skepticism is one thing, but don’t start thinking we’re a repressed people. That’s just ignorant.
-
“The Constitution…is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Let’s play my favirote game, where we quote old people that lived over 200 years ago and take their quotes as commandments. You think our so-called liberties in the Constitution are being exterminated? Do me a favor faggot, take some valium and shoot yourself before you give me a peptic ulcer.
-
So terrorists love freedom? That’s news to me. I guess that’s why they hung around the Taliban.
As for the rest of your diatribe:
They came for my neighbour, and I said nothing,
They came for my father and I said nothing,
They came for my sister and I said nothing,
They came for my wife and I said nothing,
Now I think they’re here for me,
Why won’t anyone speak up for me? -
*cough* habeus corpus *cough* separation of powers *cough* indefinite detainment without conviction *cough*
Flying Mantis Strip, you people have lost the freedoms that make every other freedom possible. Sure, it hasn’t all gone downhill yet, but all the protection is gone. At this point, US politicians are on the honour system not to turn you into a freaking dictatorship. Willing to trust in that? Because the people who invented habeus corpus and separation of powers sure as hell weren’t, from their own personal experience.
The problem with you Americans is that you’ve had too many generations of relative comfort with your political system. Live through a dictatorship, and you’ll see the value of even the freedoms you consider marginal.
-
Caio,
First of all, don’t tell me that I don’t see the values of my freedom. I know all too well the priceless value of it all. I see what you’re saying, and I do agree to a certain point, but don’t even begin to say that all Americans are like that. Fuck you. I’ve been to Iraq and seen firsthand the chaos there, so don’t tell me what I do and don’t appreciate. Again, fuck you.
Secondly, in reference your argument that we have lost the “freedom that makes every other freedom possible, that simply doesn’t make logical sense. Because, logically speaking, if one loses something that is the “enabler,” or the reason other things are able to exist, then it logically foollows that the things it was enabling would also cease to exist. Ergom according to your argument, we have effectively lost *all* freedoms…which I’m fairly certain isn’t true.
And Alec, come on man. You completely misinterpretted what I said. Terrorists do not hate freedom. They hate Western Civilization, Christianity, etc. etc. A widely held problem in America and Western Civ, for that matter, is that we equate our way of life with freedom. That meaning that we see our way of life as the *only* way of being free. Wouldn’t you agree it’d be fair to say that various cultures would have various conceptions of things? And why not
freedom?Look, do I think that there are things in our country that need to be changed? Most certainly, I do. I’m just trying to say that people are so quick to yell out “OPPRESSION!” Again, you still have yet to tell me what freedoms you’ve lost, Alec. I just don’t see why people find it necessary to portray America as a modern day V For Vendetta society. Average, every day Americans are *not* getting plucked from their houses and herded into prisoner camps for speaking their minds.
So long as “speaking their mind” doesn’t include things like calling for the destruction of America, killings, etc. etc, of course.
-
If You’re Happy And You Know It – Bomb Iraq
If you cannot find Osama,bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky,
Pakistan is looking shifty,
North Korea is too risky,
Bomb Iraq. -
Jose Padilla
-
Funny how when you have a country run by fascist religious fanatics who like to blow sh*t up to further their political agenda they’re immediately labeled as terrorists… unless the country is ours. Let’s hear it for fundamentalist Christian America!
-
Dude, the terrorists in question are Muslims. They don’t want you to be free to drink alcohol, practice other religions, or even let women walk around in public without being covering in dark robes. That is not freedom! What the hell is wrong with you?
-
Religion of any kind is a man made prison designed to control and exploit people and limit their freedom. Christians might let you practice another religion (as long as their God is mentioned on our money and in the Pledge of Allegiance), drink (except for when they passed prohibition), let women have a voice (but only after 1920 – not even 100 years yet – and still not allowed by the church to have an abortion), but really what is the difference? Every religion wants you to believe in an invisible man that will destroy you if you don’t love him and give him your money. The only thing going to hell is organized religion and the people that lead and follow it.
-
-
That’s a nice argument, Flying, and I’m sure you’d get an A+ in philosophy class, because it has nothing to do whatsoever with observed reality.
Let me explain to you, Flying, the type of dictatorship which is not only the most common in the modern world. The type you’d find in Zimbabwe for example. I’ll use an example I’m familiar with, Salazar-era Portugal.
You see, during the Salazar years, Portugal was a free and open democracy with fair elections, separation of powers, rule of law, and it didn’t even have the death penalty *on paper*. It just happened to be that the same party won the elections always for almost fifty years and there was no opposition except Delgado, and some blacks and Timorenses off-shore.
Of course, just as Bush has given the Administration the power (unused?) to form a ‘council’ controlled entirely by the administration which can detain people indefinitely, in secret, and without trail, Salazar had the PIDE/PVDE. Essentially, like the ‘council’ Bush has given himself the right to create, PIDE existed above all Portuguese law and could freely vanish people. Generally those people weren’t communists and terrorists (from the Colonies, who were fighting a war for independence), as Salazar promised, but newspaper reporters, opposition candidates and regular people who were overhead by the spy network.
Of course, Portugal had a nice dictatorship by world standards. Me and my family are from Brazil. The military regime of my childhood didn’t really need secrets, because the “threat” of communist terrorists was apparently so grim, that it gave them the right to open fire on underage protesters. Everyone was being spied on Constantly, and if you weren’t a famous singer, you were likely to end up who knows fucking where. At one point my Uncle, Aunt, and three cousins all vanished, and their farm land was assumed as Gov. property, later sold at auction. We still haven’t got an explanation for that one. Are they in prison? In some grave. My Grandparents hired a detective after the dictatorship ended, and still no info whatsoever.
But I’m sure your six month tour in Iraq on base was hell and taught you about life.
But no, creating a council controlled directly by the administration which exists above the law could never go wrong. Only hippies from san francisco want to vote. Real freedoms are the freedom to go to monster truck rallies, evangelist churches and nigger lynchings. God bless the american way..
-
Man I love this shit I dont know what gets people riled up more religion and polotics or Mac vs PC?
-
Mac vs PC = Religion
-
-
True. They’re both fun back n’ forths to watch. We could always combine the two and talk about how religion hasn’t put out an upgrade in centuries and politics keeps crashing because its kernel is corrupted.
-
If you don’t want them to listen to your conversation (and you’re not that special sorry, they WON’T listen to your conversation) so bad then you’re obviously doing something wrong your self.
Or maybe you’re just too idealistic, and theres no place for that here.
-
Oh and Caio: On the Brazilian Military Regime, I think it was better off having some people getting shot at and having some security (crime wasn’t THIS intense here back then) then having Corrupt politicians washing money like theres no tomorrow into exterior bank accounts and literally bending the country over and fucking it. Not to mention the deterioration of the public systems such as health, the police, and even road paving that has happened in the major metropolitan areas.
Bush is not a dictator either. The US works on a checks and balance system and the GOPS haven’t been elected consecutively for 50 years. This cabinet is nothing more then to hold people who are suspected of terrorist links for the security of the country. Torture is bad, but if we were getting attacked constantly then you wouldn’t be saying that. Also trying to link the regime in portugal to what we have in the U.S right now is just stupid, considering the Congress is Democratic right now, and (supposedly) oppose the president. Because by god we know the Democratic congress has been oh so very great in increasing our budget and sinking us ever so deeper in debt. But no worries, it’s obviously Bush’s fault.
-
LOL Osama has lost the game…
-
Sure, the Islamists spent a few million – and the US spent trillions, almost bankrupting our economy. They lost thousands of uneducated street urchins, we lost thousands of highly trained professionals. They used IEDs that cost them a few dollars, we used cruise missiles and smart bombs that cost millions a pop. Before 9/11, Islamic fundamentalism was small news, now it’s talked about every day worldwide and thousands are signing up to become martyrs for Allah. Now it takes hours just to get on a plane and your shampoo is confiscated, all because some Islamist just TALKED about making a bomb out of it. Once, they were ignored, now almost every security decision hinges on Islamic terrorism.
Yes, he’s dead – but what soldier wouldn’t gladly die to advance his cause and become a legend in the eyes of his people?
-
Angry For Allah
(27 votes, average: 3.22 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Religion
When isn’t a muslim angry? Oh right, when they’re seething with rage.
16 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?16 Responses to Angry For Allah
-
Don’t they realize that they’re just fucking idiots?
-
….that they’re killing themselves and everyone else for nothing?? For a smelly, stinky, dirt floor, wipe your ass with your hand country??? If they just got a little nicer they might get some toilet paper.
-
I know this will be edited..but what the hay…
Know this, many of us don’t distinguish between these islamist extremists and christian or jewish nutters. Just too bad we can’t become marsies and leave this planet to you dumbasses to fight over with Myth as your guiding light. It’s the new Millenium, stop the decent into the new Dark age already !!!
-
Anyone who beleives in an invisible man is a fucking idiot.
-
It’s sad, if they only would realize how people are using their religion to make them do what they want
And that they are looked at as cannon fodder to further others agenda.
-
There was times when christians did the same things as muslims. Who will be next? Extreme Buddhists?
-
@Hepathos:
“Let go of your commitments to material goods or die!”
-
“May you die in peace and harmony” *BOOOM*
-
I suspect that these are not your typical Muslims, but just a bunch of rejects that can’t get laid, so they want to go to heaven and be with the 72 virgins. Problem is, they don’t realize that the virgins are virgins because they are in fact lesbians. Enjoy eating box for all eternity, losers.
-
Christians and Muslims I don’t get. Why everyone in your country, and every country you come in contact with, has to believe the same thing as you, I’ll never understand. Yet, that’s the entire history of Christianity, and a on-again-off-again theme in Islam.
Do you think the average Buddhist gives a shit weather everyone in the world is Buddhist? Not that I’ve ever heard of. And contrary to what the media leads you to believe, Israel is chalk-full of Christians, Druze and uncle-Tom Israelized Muslims. Hell, I can’t think of a single religion that’s half as spazzy as christianity and Islam are. It’s just too bad that angry young atheists measure religion as a whole on the basis of those two fuck-headed religions.
-
Christianity and Muslim are created to control people. They forcefully try to assimilate every person, so the leaders of the religion can control the belief of everybody.
-
every time i see one of this selfexploding assholes i lol a little, they will blow themselves up for a paradise and 72 virgins, i’d love to see their faces when they find out all the shit they were fed about islam is big lie, and i lol too when i think of christians and all the money they give to the guy in a white suit.
-
They won’t ever find out. When you die, you just rot in the ground. Unless someone can prove otherwise, with ya know, evidence.
-
i know they won’t find out but it would be so cool if they did, just for moar lulz.
-
What I find interesting is that if you look at the age of islam, 1400+ years, you will find it awfully similar in behavior to that of christianity at the same age: crusades, inquisition, the whole shebang. People better look out for scientologists around the year 3370!
-
“Counter Terrorists win”
Hide Comments | Add your comment
16 Responses to Angry For Allah
-
Don’t they realize that they’re just fucking idiots?
-
….that they’re killing themselves and everyone else for nothing?? For a smelly, stinky, dirt floor, wipe your ass with your hand country??? If they just got a little nicer they might get some toilet paper.
-
I know this will be edited..but what the hay…
Know this, many of us don’t distinguish between these islamist extremists and christian or jewish nutters. Just too bad we can’t become marsies and leave this planet to you dumbasses to fight over with Myth as your guiding light. It’s the new Millenium, stop the decent into the new Dark age already !!! -
Anyone who beleives in an invisible man is a fucking idiot.
-
It’s sad, if they only would realize how people are using their religion to make them do what they want
And that they are looked at as cannon fodder to further others agenda. -
There was times when christians did the same things as muslims. Who will be next? Extreme Buddhists?
-
@Hepathos:
“Let go of your commitments to material goods or die!”
-
“May you die in peace and harmony” *BOOOM*
-
I suspect that these are not your typical Muslims, but just a bunch of rejects that can’t get laid, so they want to go to heaven and be with the 72 virgins. Problem is, they don’t realize that the virgins are virgins because they are in fact lesbians. Enjoy eating box for all eternity, losers.
-
Christians and Muslims I don’t get. Why everyone in your country, and every country you come in contact with, has to believe the same thing as you, I’ll never understand. Yet, that’s the entire history of Christianity, and a on-again-off-again theme in Islam.
Do you think the average Buddhist gives a shit weather everyone in the world is Buddhist? Not that I’ve ever heard of. And contrary to what the media leads you to believe, Israel is chalk-full of Christians, Druze and uncle-Tom Israelized Muslims. Hell, I can’t think of a single religion that’s half as spazzy as christianity and Islam are. It’s just too bad that angry young atheists measure religion as a whole on the basis of those two fuck-headed religions.
-
Christianity and Muslim are created to control people. They forcefully try to assimilate every person, so the leaders of the religion can control the belief of everybody.
-
every time i see one of this selfexploding assholes i lol a little, they will blow themselves up for a paradise and 72 virgins, i’d love to see their faces when they find out all the shit they were fed about islam is big lie, and i lol too when i think of christians and all the money they give to the guy in a white suit.
-
They won’t ever find out. When you die, you just rot in the ground. Unless someone can prove otherwise, with ya know, evidence.
-
i know they won’t find out but it would be so cool if they did, just for moar lulz.
-
What I find interesting is that if you look at the age of islam, 1400+ years, you will find it awfully similar in behavior to that of christianity at the same age: crusades, inquisition, the whole shebang. People better look out for scientologists around the year 3370!
-
“Counter Terrorists win”
child crossing points sign
(15 votes, average: 4.07 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, wtf
10 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?10 Responses to child crossing points sign
-
Holy shit those are some expensive kids. They were only worth 25 points back when I was learning how to drive!
-
What are worth more? Honour students or “mentally challenged”?
-
Dalek, that can be different types of points. Points for hitting a honour student are points for “hitting” (for more difficulty). Points for hitting a “mentally challenged†kid are “laughing” points.
-
In Canada, if you hit a moose, and live, and can drive away from it, you get so many points you can just retire from the sport.
-
Hmmm…but you have to divide up the “Mentally Challenged” kids into two categories “Fast Movers” ie Wheel Chairs, Electric Wheel Chairs and “Slow Movers” ie those on Crutches etc…
Now of COURSE the Fast Movers are worth more
Wow, someone really needs to create an easy to read list of point values!! School Zones, here i come!!
-
What kind of points would I get if, rather then hitting a moose with a car, I did it with my fist? And will I get a prize too?
-
Well if you manage to knock the moose out cold, Maddox would retire and you would take over his website.
-
ROFFLE. No more hitting little kids. I’m going for the big game.
-
Fuck yes. I hate kids.
-
kids = crotch fruit
Hide Comments | Add your comment
10 Responses to child crossing points sign
-
Holy shit those are some expensive kids. They were only worth 25 points back when I was learning how to drive!
-
What are worth more? Honour students or “mentally challenged”?
-
Dalek, that can be different types of points. Points for hitting a honour student are points for “hitting” (for more difficulty). Points for hitting a “mentally challenged†kid are “laughing” points.
-
In Canada, if you hit a moose, and live, and can drive away from it, you get so many points you can just retire from the sport.
-
Hmmm…but you have to divide up the “Mentally Challenged” kids into two categories “Fast Movers” ie Wheel Chairs, Electric Wheel Chairs and “Slow Movers” ie those on Crutches etc…
Now of COURSE the Fast Movers are worth more
Wow, someone really needs to create an easy to read list of point values!! School Zones, here i come!!
-
What kind of points would I get if, rather then hitting a moose with a car, I did it with my fist? And will I get a prize too?
-
Well if you manage to knock the moose out cold, Maddox would retire and you would take over his website.
-
ROFFLE. No more hitting little kids. I’m going for the big game.
-
Fuck yes. I hate kids.
-
kids = crotch fruit
George W. Bush
(31 votes, average: 2.23 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, Politics
17 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?17 Responses to George W. Bush
-
Wow, he sure did fuck up that flag!
-
…..is a douchebag.
-
…is transparent and belligerent.
-
Are you guys ready for me to bring the hardcore topical political flaming, because I will, and without reservation or remorse.
George W. Bush, more like George W. LAME
-
I want to deficate on to that mans face.
-
Oh I get it. Bush used the flag to wipe off the rib sauce like Homer did in that Stonecutters episode. Except Bush is certainly no golden child. More like Idiot Savant without the Savant.
-
“more like George W. LAME”… whoah… slow down there Caio. You really brought that “hardcore topical political flaming” didn’t you? Next time, try not to be so ‘hardcore’.
-
Every time I think of the Iraq War I think of his father, the commentary by George Carlin, and the Bigger Dick Foreign Policy at work.
-
Whoever painted that should draw a piece of shit next, it’ll be a step up.
-
A real American hero.
-
He’s getting ready to shoot his heroin.
-
A real American HOMO
-
Hazard: I thought that’s what he did.
-
*snort* He endorsed Australia’s current Prime Minister (who is seriously lagging in the polls and coming up to election time). So given Bush’s lack of popularity in Australia, he certainly didn’t help Mr J Howard’s election chances.
-
Has there EVER been an Australian PM other than Howard? I swear he’s the southern hemisphere’s answer to Castro.
-
-
@egnilk66 in post #2:
You’re wrong, he’s a double douche bag.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
17 Responses to George W. Bush
-
Wow, he sure did fuck up that flag!
-
…..is a douchebag.
-
…is transparent and belligerent.
-
Are you guys ready for me to bring the hardcore topical political flaming, because I will, and without reservation or remorse.
George W. Bush, more like George W. LAME
-
I want to deficate on to that mans face.
-
Oh I get it. Bush used the flag to wipe off the rib sauce like Homer did in that Stonecutters episode. Except Bush is certainly no golden child. More like Idiot Savant without the Savant.
-
“more like George W. LAME”… whoah… slow down there Caio. You really brought that “hardcore topical political flaming” didn’t you? Next time, try not to be so ‘hardcore’.
-
Every time I think of the Iraq War I think of his father, the commentary by George Carlin, and the Bigger Dick Foreign Policy at work.
-
Whoever painted that should draw a piece of shit next, it’ll be a step up.
-
A real American hero.
-
He’s getting ready to shoot his heroin.
-
A real American HOMO
-
Hazard: I thought that’s what he did.
-
*snort* He endorsed Australia’s current Prime Minister (who is seriously lagging in the polls and coming up to election time). So given Bush’s lack of popularity in Australia, he certainly didn’t help Mr J Howard’s election chances.
-
Has there EVER been an Australian PM other than Howard? I swear he’s the southern hemisphere’s answer to Castro.
-
@egnilk66 in post #2:
You’re wrong, he’s a double douche bag.
Ronald McDonald has had enough of your shit
(18 votes, average: 2.89 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor, wtf
5 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?5 Responses to Ronald McDonald has had enough of your shit
-
they had to give the bird nipples..
-
NOT GRIMACE!!!
-
This is bullshit. NOTHING CAN KILL THE GRIMACE.
-
The Hamburgler must’ve gotten off scott-free.
-
monochromatic custaceans? Not on my watch.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
5 Responses to Ronald McDonald has had enough of your shit
-
they had to give the bird nipples..
-
NOT GRIMACE!!!
-
This is bullshit. NOTHING CAN KILL THE GRIMACE.
-
The Hamburgler must’ve gotten off scott-free.
-
monochromatic custaceans? Not on my watch.
Vick Vs Doggy Jury
(13 votes, average: 3.92 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Dark Humor
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Vick Vs Doggy Jury
-
Tough Crowd, lulz!!!
-
-
Heeeey, hoooo, heeey, hooo
-
dog jury noice!!, but i guess the traitor snoop dog is with the defendant.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Vick Vs Doggy Jury
-
Tough Crowd, lulz!!!
-
-
Heeeey, hoooo, heeey, hooo
-
dog jury noice!!, but i guess the traitor snoop dog is with the defendant.
September 11, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Repost from only 8 posts ago. Damn.
September 11, 2007 at 4:53 pm
Dude must have had pancakes for lunch… or steel reinforced concrete wrapped in stainless. Either way.
September 11, 2007 at 5:06 pm
Tiki you nicked my post you bleimy bastard :p
Oh well.
Happy 9/11