404 – You Need Fresh Air
(8 votes, average: 2.25 out of 5)
Loading ...
Add to favoritesTags: Computers, Humor
2 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?2 Responses to 404 – You Need Fresh Air
Hide Comments | Add your comment
2 Responses to 404 – You Need Fresh Air
Jennifer Aniston – Purple Top
(22 votes, average: 4.45 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
14 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?14 Responses to Jennifer Aniston – Purple Top
-
Brad you MORON.
-
am i the only one who doesn’t find jennifer aniston attractive?
-
@dram
I’m sure you’re not alone.
However I find her bangarific.
-
Nope, dram, you’re not the only one.
Not even with Hitler’s dick.
-
You’ve got to be kidding me. She’s funny and hot, what else could you possibly want?
-
A sammich, thats what.
-
Hot, rich, funny and as a bonus has hot, rich friends to hang out with.
Nom nom nom and frankly *downbelow* noms too.
-
DO WANT
OM NOM NOM
-
Oh yeah, check out that side boob. You like that side boob? Well that’s my side boob!
-
Are these pictures new? Because if so, dayum she still looks good.
-
she’s the next Sarah Jessica Parker… the resemblance is scary in these shots!
-
I usually don’t find her attractive at all, but in these pictures she’s not half bad.
-
These photos must be old. She doesn’t look leathery and wrinkled.
-
TALENTLESS, HORSE-FACED SLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
Oh did I say that out loud?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
14 Responses to Jennifer Aniston – Purple Top
-
Brad you MORON.
-
am i the only one who doesn’t find jennifer aniston attractive?
-
@dram
I’m sure you’re not alone.
However I find her bangarific.
-
Nope, dram, you’re not the only one.
Not even with Hitler’s dick.
-
You’ve got to be kidding me. She’s funny and hot, what else could you possibly want?
-
A sammich, thats what.
-
Hot, rich, funny and as a bonus has hot, rich friends to hang out with.
Nom nom nom and frankly *downbelow* noms too.
-
DO WANT
OM NOM NOM -
Oh yeah, check out that side boob. You like that side boob? Well that’s my side boob!
-
Are these pictures new? Because if so, dayum she still looks good.
-
she’s the next Sarah Jessica Parker… the resemblance is scary in these shots!
-
I usually don’t find her attractive at all, but in these pictures she’s not half bad.
-
These photos must be old. She doesn’t look leathery and wrinkled.
-
TALENTLESS, HORSE-FACED SLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
Oh did I say that out loud?
Cougar Jump
(11 votes, average: 4.64 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to Cougar Jump
-
Invisible Hanglider!!
-
Jesus Christ, it’s a lion!
-
No you idiot, It’s a cougar.
-
Invisible Female Cougar
-
Here…fixed it for you.
Jesus Christ, it’s a MOUNTAIN lion!
-
There are mountain lions living about 200 yards from my dorm room.
-
-
Cougs got a 4th seed! Suck it bitches! Go Cougs!
Hide Comments | Add your comment
8 Responses to Cougar Jump
-
Invisible Hanglider!!
-
Jesus Christ, it’s a lion!
-
No you idiot, It’s a cougar.
-
Invisible Female Cougar
-
Here…fixed it for you.
Jesus Christ, it’s a MOUNTAIN lion!
-
There are mountain lions living about 200 yards from my dorm room.
-
-
Cougs got a 4th seed! Suck it bitches! Go Cougs!
Giraffe In The Woods
(8 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, wtf
2 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?2 Responses to Giraffe In The Woods
-
oh hai
-
“I knew I made a wrong turn at Albuquerque”
Hide Comments | Add your comment
2 Responses to Giraffe In The Woods
-
oh hai
-
“I knew I made a wrong turn at Albuquerque”
Holy Cloud Break
(9 votes, average: 4.89 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Nature, wtf
9 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?9 Responses to Holy Cloud Break
-
Looks like someone tried to open the Ark of the Covenant again.
Since it goes without saying that George Bush = Hitler, I suspect a bunch of GOP flunkies just got their faces melted off.
-
I don’t know about that. It could be the Obama zealots. I swear, everytime I hear Barack give a speech he sounds more and more like a Baptist Preacher giving a sermon and his followings swallowing it up like 1941 Hitler Youth reading Mein Kampf.
-
Geez.. did someone divide by Zero again? *sigh*
-
That almost looks exactly like the Portal Storm in Half Life2
-
That’s not “holy”. That’s pure Dawkins!
-
“NOD learns the true power behind the Ion Cannon… Making people on the internet post strange comments. Like this one!” 
-
That looks cool.
-
limit break
-
lets see… too light for a tornado, I’m guessing geyser?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
9 Responses to Holy Cloud Break
-
Looks like someone tried to open the Ark of the Covenant again.
Since it goes without saying that George Bush = Hitler, I suspect a bunch of GOP flunkies just got their faces melted off. -
I don’t know about that. It could be the Obama zealots. I swear, everytime I hear Barack give a speech he sounds more and more like a Baptist Preacher giving a sermon and his followings swallowing it up like 1941 Hitler Youth reading Mein Kampf.
-
Geez.. did someone divide by Zero again? *sigh*
-
That almost looks exactly like the Portal Storm in Half Life2
-
That’s not “holy”. That’s pure Dawkins!
-
“NOD learns the true power behind the Ion Cannon… Making people on the internet post strange comments. Like this one!”
-
That looks cool.
-
limit break
-
lets see… too light for a tornado, I’m guessing geyser?
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Anonymous – we are legion
(15 votes, average: 2.13 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Humor
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Anonymous – we are legion
-
We are powerless……?
-
We are over rated.
-
I swear to god, these photoshop amatuers should get it into their heads that they are neither impressive nor graphic designers.
This guy has marred Anonymous’s good name
-
They are retarded.
-
Remember when Anonymous had a good name?
Anonymous never had a good name.
-
Photoshop amateurs? More like MSPaint n00bs…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Anonymous – we are legion
-
We are powerless……?
-
We are over rated.
-
I swear to god, these photoshop amatuers should get it into their heads that they are neither impressive nor graphic designers.
This guy has marred Anonymous’s good name
-
They are retarded.
-
Remember when Anonymous had a good name?
Anonymous never had a good name. -
Photoshop amateurs? More like MSPaint n00bs…
Pissed Off Female Stormtrooper
(11 votes, average: 3.91 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
13 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?13 Responses to Pissed Off Female Stormtrooper
-
Can I pet her?
-
is it wrong to want to titty-fuck plastic?
-
Even the Force cannot save you from PMS.
-
“The Rebels blew up WHAT?!”
-
That ridiculous little scooter on the floor behind her is the icing on the cake.
-
Maybe it’s not the time to ask for a sandwich
-
Sammich time? No, but it’s always time to IRON MY SHIRT!
-
I wonder if those heels are regulation?
-
THESE……ARE NOT……THE DROIDS WE ARE LOOKING FOR!
-
Uh… aren’t all Stormtroopers cloned from one dude? How’d they get a female one…?
-
In the beginning they were, but later clones became too expensive and they grew too slow to satisfy the Empire’s need for fresh troops so they started drafting.
Jeez, there I go again. Fanboy in frenzy 
-
Aren’t you a little bitchy for a stormtrooper?
-
darth stood her up
Hide Comments | Add your comment
13 Responses to Pissed Off Female Stormtrooper
-
Can I pet her?
-
is it wrong to want to titty-fuck plastic?
-
Even the Force cannot save you from PMS.
-
“The Rebels blew up WHAT?!”
-
That ridiculous little scooter on the floor behind her is the icing on the cake.
-
Maybe it’s not the time to ask for a sandwich
-
Sammich time? No, but it’s always time to IRON MY SHIRT!
-
I wonder if those heels are regulation?
-
THESE……ARE NOT……THE DROIDS WE ARE LOOKING FOR!
-
Uh… aren’t all Stormtroopers cloned from one dude? How’d they get a female one…?
-
In the beginning they were, but later clones became too expensive and they grew too slow to satisfy the Empire’s need for fresh troops so they started drafting.
Jeez, there I go again. Fanboy in frenzy
-
Aren’t you a little bitchy for a stormtrooper?
-
darth stood her up
Christianity Vs Atheism
(19 votes, average: 2.95 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Forum Fodder, Religion
43 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?43 Responses to Christianity Vs Atheism
-
atheists are depicted in a wrong way
-
-
In the beginning there was *everything*, which exploded.
-
Atheism does not necessitate belief in the big bang.
Christianity requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week.
-
In the beginning was MY DICK!!! … which asploded…
-
But the cosmic background radiation! And the maths! And the other stuff I am too forgetful to remember!
But I reckon the Big Bang wasn’t the ultimate start of everything. Isn’t there that hypothesis that the big bang was started by the collapse of an earlier universe? I think it possibly went on like that forever. Has that since been proven to be incorrect, or is it still a reasonable idea?
-
“Agnosticism: In the beginning there was something which humans are not able to understand (or at least those of us that are awake enough to understand we cannot understand). Which did something which we are attempted to try and understand through various means but we still do not truly know.”
Yay for logic.
-
@Ando:
Not exactly. Creationism requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. Mentally sane Christians (like I am) can very well cope with the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs. Just because some dickheads take a book literally that was not even taken literally by the jews 3.000 years ago does not mean that Christianity doubts Evolution.
-
I am pleased. Goldfinger, you are verily a sensible fellow. I’ll turn a blind eye to your fetish for aiming lasers at sensitive parts of the anatomy.
-
It would just make sense then, that the big bang was caused when god himself exploded.
-
THERE WAS NO FUCKING BEGINNING.
Most of us are half-assed philosophers who need to assume there was a beginning because you can’t conceptualise something without it having a beginning.
How could there be nothing? To be is to exist, and nothing cannot be. So how could there have been nothing (which is a logical absurdity), in addition to this nothing (which doesn’t exist remember, it cannot be) preceding a beginning.
There being something requires less explanation than there being nothing. Somethingness is all we’ve ever known.
-
You said it yourself, “Somethingness is all we’ve ever KNOWN.”
-
Just to throw in a point, the Big Bang was just the beginning of the material universe, but the beginning of space-time itself. There was nothing before the big bang, because there was no time before the big bang. Its a nonsense question.
As Stephen Hawking put it, talking about what happened before the big bang is like talking about what’s North of the North Pole.
-
@Goldfinger
“the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs.”
That depends on the Christian in question.
How do you decide which parts of the bible to take metaphorically and which to take literally? Can you believe God is a metaphor and still be a Christian?
-
@reboot: Duh, the “Norther Pole” is North of the North Pole. North of that is the “Northest Pole”, and after that it just gets weird.
-
Atheists will believe what atheists want to believe. Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe. One has no real chance of convincing the other. Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.
-
“Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.”
Isn’t that a good enough reason?
-
Why dont we just copy everything from the FIRST TIME this was posted and paste it in here? Needless to say: REPOST
www.myconfinedspace.com/2007/12/17/christianity-vs-atheism-does-it-really-matter/does-it-matter-2/
-
It’s North Poles all the way up.
-
Basically, without stuff, there is no time, but the chance the universe creates itself exists. It somewhere where there isn’t time, this inevitably happens straight away.
Schrodingers cat explains quantum possibilities (Wrongly)- What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel” universe where it doesn’t. So the universe must exist, because it didn’t exist at the same time.
-
^^ my brain just exploded.
-
@Ando:
We may believe so today, but people a few thousand years ago were not stupid.
I’m a Christian, but as a historian I know that I have to treat the bible as a source. And actually we can separate the descriptions of real things/events/persons from the metaphors and the things we cannot prove.
The metaphor I meant before is God hanging the stars into the sky like lamps. We can be pretty sure that this is a satire aiming to piss off the Babylonians who believed the stars to be Gods. By showing that the hebrew God put these Gods in their places the Hebrews wanted to show that their God is superior to the Babylonian Gods.
On the other hand, the Bible gives us very accurate descriptions of how the Babylonian Ziqqurats were built.
And so forth.
And just to use a very simple example: As a Lutheran, do I have to believe that mankind was created 4000 B.C. just because Luther said so 500 years ago although we have proof he was wrong (and actually just called a random number because he didn’t care, too).
So, we know about Evolution, we know that mankind wasn’t created the way we know it today. So an approximatly 4.000 year old myth is busted. Still I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.
So much for my humble point of view
-
Second paragraph was meant as a question, not as a statement. Damn my keyboard…
-
“What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel†universe where it doesn’t.”
Just be clear: that is a hypothesis. Until someone carries out an experiment to test the hypothesis, its not really even science.
Let’s leave making untestable claims about reality to the fundies, ok?
-
HA
HA
RELIGIOUS DEBATE
C’mon guys, you’re clogging up my internet tubes. At least suck less at this.
-
Wookie: “Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe.”
“Christians and other theists will believe what they are told* to believe”
Fixed.
-
@Goldfinger
Your “holy book”, the New Testament, was actually written more like 1800 years ago. None of the gospels were written by anyone that was alive when any of it happened (that’s why they contradict each other).
-
@Alec:
Parts of it were written in the 1st century, other parts later. Most of it are letters that don’t tell “the story” but are written to preach.
@Shanghai:
And atheist don’t believe what they are told because they have found the one and only truth without anybody telling them?
-
and who said fuck all about the truth? the “truth” sadly is subjective as all. fact on the other hand is an even bigger bitch to figure out, and anyone who knows the facts is usually branded a psychopath/sociopath/lunatic and summarily ignored.
-
why so cereal? religous debates are for people wit hnothing to do this why im not going to say anything other than tiki = forum fodder benevolant overlord.
-
“till I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.”
This is why I believe that there’s a teapot orbiting Mars.
Because no one has ever proved otherwise.
-
Grape juice is tasty…
-
mmmmmmmm, grape juice….
-
@Lord:
I enjoyed the ‘discussion’/sugar-fuelled rantings in the first post more than this one. Don’t mind reposts like this one, though . . .
@tiki:
Faith is powerful. We believe what we wish to believe (I know, that’s not news). I’d like to believe in some benevolent power that created everything, looks out for us, and will give us a pat on the the back and some sort of debriefing when we die, but the very fact that I’d LIKE to believe makes my interpretations suspect. And I know I’m not alone here.
-
And I fucking love white grape juice.
-
-
@tripolar
And I’m not alone in my teapot beliefs. The only thing that I know is that there is 100% definitely not someone in the sky that pats my back when I do good, and punishes people that do bad. It’s great to guess about certain things, but really, why make up some “guy in the sky” hypothesis that can never be tested nor proven?
-
People want things to make sense. A scenario where good is rewarded & evil punished makes sense to us, matches our sense of fair play. (Someone is an asshole in MCS, people want them punished, ie: banned: if some good-guy poster was banned, no-one would think that was just.) God is the referee/parent for a lot of people: he/she doles out the punishment AND the hugs. ‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.
-
@ Goldfinger
Apologies for my poor question. It made the assumtion that the bible consists solely of truth and metaphor.
A better question would have been:
“How can you tell what to take literally, what to take metaphorically and what to disregard as blatant fiction”
I find that a good general rule is to assume the latter unless there is evidence to the contrary.
@ Tiki
Do you believe that the milk goes in first or that the tea goes in first? *readies his kneecapping mallet*
-
ando, as everyone knows the natural and holy way is to put the tea in first. Anything else is blaspheme.
-
@tiki:
HERETIC!!! You will burn in HELL for your feeble belief that tea should go in first. Of course milk (and sugar) go in first and you NEVER, EVER, EVER stir!
Wait ’til I get hold of your kneecaps!
Tea in first. I’ve never heard such a nonsense.
@Ando:
That is a good general rule, indeed. But that brings us to the old problem that people will believe anything until they find out it’s in the Bible.
Most of the things in there, especially in the Old Testament are not simply one of the three categories but a part of each. If you take the story of Noah: Of course we know, that mankind and all the animals did not descend from the passengers of the Ark. We cannot prove, if there has ever been something like the Ark (but there has most probably not been one). But we can be pretty sure that there has been a remarkable flood disaster that this myth is evolved from. And the place where the Ark is said to have landed did exist, for that we have archaeological proof. Although all those people climbing up Mt. Ararat to find the remains don’t seem to know much about the hebraic language, which contains no vocals and therefor the word ‘rrt’ could mean Mt. Ararat but it could also mean the nation of Uratru which was a pretty large nation in today’s eastern Turkey and northern Iraq and Iran.
That’s actually one thing my Professors use to joke about: We have about 5 times as much requests for digging permissions for Mt. Ararat as we have for the whole of Urartu.
Well, I hope you get my point out of all this rigmarole.
-
Roffle.. okay, Tripolar, I’m gonna guess you were just kidding when you said: “‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.”
.. You did mean Karl Marx, right? 
If you did, good joke. If not.. heh.
-
@24601:
Yes, it was a joke. Bless you for noticing.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
43 Responses to Christianity Vs Atheism
-
atheists are depicted in a wrong way
-
-
In the beginning there was *everything*, which exploded.
-
Atheism does not necessitate belief in the big bang.
Christianity requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. -
In the beginning was MY DICK!!! … which asploded…
-
But the cosmic background radiation! And the maths! And the other stuff I am too forgetful to remember!
But I reckon the Big Bang wasn’t the ultimate start of everything. Isn’t there that hypothesis that the big bang was started by the collapse of an earlier universe? I think it possibly went on like that forever. Has that since been proven to be incorrect, or is it still a reasonable idea?
-
“Agnosticism: In the beginning there was something which humans are not able to understand (or at least those of us that are awake enough to understand we cannot understand). Which did something which we are attempted to try and understand through various means but we still do not truly know.”
Yay for logic.
-
@Ando:
Not exactly. Creationism requires belief that a beardy superman made everything in the universe in a week. Mentally sane Christians (like I am) can very well cope with the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs. Just because some dickheads take a book literally that was not even taken literally by the jews 3.000 years ago does not mean that Christianity doubts Evolution.
-
I am pleased. Goldfinger, you are verily a sensible fellow. I’ll turn a blind eye to your fetish for aiming lasers at sensitive parts of the anatomy.
-
It would just make sense then, that the big bang was caused when god himself exploded.
-
THERE WAS NO FUCKING BEGINNING.
Most of us are half-assed philosophers who need to assume there was a beginning because you can’t conceptualise something without it having a beginning.
How could there be nothing? To be is to exist, and nothing cannot be. So how could there have been nothing (which is a logical absurdity), in addition to this nothing (which doesn’t exist remember, it cannot be) preceding a beginning.
There being something requires less explanation than there being nothing. Somethingness is all we’ve ever known.
-
You said it yourself, “Somethingness is all we’ve ever KNOWN.”
-
Just to throw in a point, the Big Bang was just the beginning of the material universe, but the beginning of space-time itself. There was nothing before the big bang, because there was no time before the big bang. Its a nonsense question.
As Stephen Hawking put it, talking about what happened before the big bang is like talking about what’s North of the North Pole. -
@Goldfinger
“the Theory of Evolution which stands in no conflict with Christian beliefs.”
That depends on the Christian in question.How do you decide which parts of the bible to take metaphorically and which to take literally? Can you believe God is a metaphor and still be a Christian?
-
@reboot: Duh, the “Norther Pole” is North of the North Pole. North of that is the “Northest Pole”, and after that it just gets weird.
-
Atheists will believe what atheists want to believe. Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe. One has no real chance of convincing the other. Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.
-
“Why even try? All these posts do it try to piss off one or the other.”
Isn’t that a good enough reason? -
Why dont we just copy everything from the FIRST TIME this was posted and paste it in here? Needless to say: REPOST
www.myconfinedspace.com/2007/12/17/christianity-vs-atheism-does-it-really-matter/does-it-matter-2/
-
It’s North Poles all the way up.
-
Basically, without stuff, there is no time, but the chance the universe creates itself exists. It somewhere where there isn’t time, this inevitably happens straight away.
Schrodingers cat explains quantum possibilities (Wrongly)- What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel” universe where it doesn’t. So the universe must exist, because it didn’t exist at the same time.
-
^^ my brain just exploded.
-
@Ando:
We may believe so today, but people a few thousand years ago were not stupid.
I’m a Christian, but as a historian I know that I have to treat the bible as a source. And actually we can separate the descriptions of real things/events/persons from the metaphors and the things we cannot prove.
The metaphor I meant before is God hanging the stars into the sky like lamps. We can be pretty sure that this is a satire aiming to piss off the Babylonians who believed the stars to be Gods. By showing that the hebrew God put these Gods in their places the Hebrews wanted to show that their God is superior to the Babylonian Gods.
On the other hand, the Bible gives us very accurate descriptions of how the Babylonian Ziqqurats were built.
And so forth.And just to use a very simple example: As a Lutheran, do I have to believe that mankind was created 4000 B.C. just because Luther said so 500 years ago although we have proof he was wrong (and actually just called a random number because he didn’t care, too).
So, we know about Evolution, we know that mankind wasn’t created the way we know it today. So an approximatly 4.000 year old myth is busted. Still I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.
So much for my humble point of view
-
Second paragraph was meant as a question, not as a statement. Damn my keyboard…
-
“What really happens is everytime something happens, there is a “parellel†universe where it doesn’t.”
Just be clear: that is a hypothesis. Until someone carries out an experiment to test the hypothesis, its not really even science.
Let’s leave making untestable claims about reality to the fundies, ok? -
HA
HA
RELIGIOUS DEBATE
C’mon guys, you’re clogging up my internet tubes. At least suck less at this.
-
Wookie: “Christians and other theists will believe what they want to believe.”
“Christians and other theists will believe what they are told* to believe”
Fixed.
-
@Goldfinger
Your “holy book”, the New Testament, was actually written more like 1800 years ago. None of the gospels were written by anyone that was alive when any of it happened (that’s why they contradict each other).
-
@Alec:
Parts of it were written in the 1st century, other parts later. Most of it are letters that don’t tell “the story” but are written to preach.@Shanghai:
And atheist don’t believe what they are told because they have found the one and only truth without anybody telling them? -
and who said fuck all about the truth? the “truth” sadly is subjective as all. fact on the other hand is an even bigger bitch to figure out, and anyone who knows the facts is usually branded a psychopath/sociopath/lunatic and summarily ignored.
-
why so cereal? religous debates are for people wit hnothing to do this why im not going to say anything other than tiki = forum fodder benevolant overlord.
-
“till I cannot see any proof for the non-existence of any God at all.”
This is why I believe that there’s a teapot orbiting Mars.
Because no one has ever proved otherwise.
-
Grape juice is tasty…
-
mmmmmmmm, grape juice….
-
@Lord:
I enjoyed the ‘discussion’/sugar-fuelled rantings in the first post more than this one. Don’t mind reposts like this one, though . . .@tiki:
Faith is powerful. We believe what we wish to believe (I know, that’s not news). I’d like to believe in some benevolent power that created everything, looks out for us, and will give us a pat on the the back and some sort of debriefing when we die, but the very fact that I’d LIKE to believe makes my interpretations suspect. And I know I’m not alone here. -
And I fucking love white grape juice.
-
-
@tripolar
And I’m not alone in my teapot beliefs. The only thing that I know is that there is 100% definitely not someone in the sky that pats my back when I do good, and punishes people that do bad. It’s great to guess about certain things, but really, why make up some “guy in the sky” hypothesis that can never be tested nor proven?
-
People want things to make sense. A scenario where good is rewarded & evil punished makes sense to us, matches our sense of fair play. (Someone is an asshole in MCS, people want them punished, ie: banned: if some good-guy poster was banned, no-one would think that was just.) God is the referee/parent for a lot of people: he/she doles out the punishment AND the hugs. ‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.
-
@ Goldfinger
Apologies for my poor question. It made the assumtion that the bible consists solely of truth and metaphor.
A better question would have been:
“How can you tell what to take literally, what to take metaphorically and what to disregard as blatant fiction”
I find that a good general rule is to assume the latter unless there is evidence to the contrary.@ Tiki
Do you believe that the milk goes in first or that the tea goes in first? *readies his kneecapping mallet* -
ando, as everyone knows the natural and holy way is to put the tea in first. Anything else is blaspheme.
-
@tiki:
HERETIC!!! You will burn in HELL for your feeble belief that tea should go in first. Of course milk (and sugar) go in first and you NEVER, EVER, EVER stir!
Wait ’til I get hold of your kneecaps!
Tea in first. I’ve never heard such a nonsense.@Ando:
That is a good general rule, indeed. But that brings us to the old problem that people will believe anything until they find out it’s in the Bible.
Most of the things in there, especially in the Old Testament are not simply one of the three categories but a part of each. If you take the story of Noah: Of course we know, that mankind and all the animals did not descend from the passengers of the Ark. We cannot prove, if there has ever been something like the Ark (but there has most probably not been one). But we can be pretty sure that there has been a remarkable flood disaster that this myth is evolved from. And the place where the Ark is said to have landed did exist, for that we have archaeological proof. Although all those people climbing up Mt. Ararat to find the remains don’t seem to know much about the hebraic language, which contains no vocals and therefor the word ‘rrt’ could mean Mt. Ararat but it could also mean the nation of Uratru which was a pretty large nation in today’s eastern Turkey and northern Iraq and Iran.That’s actually one thing my Professors use to joke about: We have about 5 times as much requests for digging permissions for Mt. Ararat as we have for the whole of Urartu.
Well, I hope you get my point out of all this rigmarole.
-
Roffle.. okay, Tripolar, I’m gonna guess you were just kidding when you said: “‘Tis a notion that can never be tested, to be sure, but Groucho said religion was the opiate of the masses: it makes people feel better when things hurt, it helps them to order their lives.”
.. You did mean Karl Marx, right?
If you did, good joke. If not.. heh. -
@24601:
Yes, it was a joke. Bless you for noticing.
Big Pig
(7 votes, average: 3.43 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, wtf
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Big Pig
-
-
Man, bearpig you say?
-
Since when was Rosie O’donnell allowed on the couch?
-
Baccon?
-
Looks like the duffus is gonna get lucky.
-
Is it not, pig-bear-man? Excelsior!! Swooshhhhh….
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Big Pig
-
-
Man, bearpig you say?
-
Since when was Rosie O’donnell allowed on the couch?
-
Baccon?
-
Looks like the duffus is gonna get lucky.
-
Is it not, pig-bear-man? Excelsior!! Swooshhhhh….
Doggy hair Pull
(7 votes, average: 4.43 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Humor
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Doggy hair Pull
-
The dog sez “Heeel B***h!”
-
You’re allowed to say bitch. And fuck, and cunt, and etc. Like this:
I’d throw that puppy off a cliff and fuck that bitch in the cunt!
Though now I feel bad for saying cunt. I don’t know why.
-
Now I know why! It was in a sentence where I actually said I would fuck a blonde chick.
Blonde women are ew.
Redheads ftw.
-
i’ll show her how a real dog pulls her hair
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Doggy hair Pull
-
The dog sez “Heeel B***h!”
-
You’re allowed to say bitch. And fuck, and cunt, and etc. Like this:
I’d throw that puppy off a cliff and fuck that bitch in the cunt!
Though now I feel bad for saying cunt. I don’t know why.
-
Now I know why! It was in a sentence where I actually said I would fuck a blonde chick.
Blonde women are ew.
Redheads ftw.
-
i’ll show her how a real dog pulls her hair
Kiefer Sutherland – Fancy Smoker
(6 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to Kiefer Sutherland – Fancy Smoker
-
He’s probably considering one of the hundreds if not thousands of ways he can kill you with it.
No doubt behind him he’s choking the life from someone…
-
Fancy? He’s sucking the shit out of it!
-
Will he pull a “Columbo” with that 24 series?
-
Keifer vs MarkyMark irl?
or
Jack Bauer vs. Wahlberg’s character in “The Big Hit”?
-
How about Marky Mark just leaves without getting his ass kicked in or out of character…
-
Goddamnit, I wanna start smoking again so I can look cool.
-
i want that suit, that’ll be cooler than smoking,
-
All I can see is “The Lost Boys Vampire punk.” Be one of us Michael
Hide Comments | Add your comment
8 Responses to Kiefer Sutherland – Fancy Smoker
-
He’s probably considering one of the hundreds if not thousands of ways he can kill you with it.
No doubt behind him he’s choking the life from someone…
-
Fancy? He’s sucking the shit out of it!
-
Will he pull a “Columbo” with that 24 series?
-
Keifer vs MarkyMark irl?
or
Jack Bauer vs. Wahlberg’s character in “The Big Hit”?
-
How about Marky Mark just leaves without getting his ass kicked in or out of character…
-
Goddamnit, I wanna start smoking again so I can look cool.
-
i want that suit, that’ll be cooler than smoking,
-
All I can see is “The Lost Boys Vampire punk.” Be one of us Michael
Lamborghini Street Crossing Advertisement
(6 votes, average: 4.17 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Advertisements, Humor
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to Lamborghini Street Crossing Advertisement
-
I had to see it full size to realize what was going on…
-
i still dont get it
-
She has to use the telescope to see if a Lambo is coming.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
3 Responses to Lamborghini Street Crossing Advertisement
-
I had to see it full size to realize what was going on…
-
i still dont get it
-
She has to use the telescope to see if a Lambo is coming.
For Sale – One Totally Useless Cat
(9 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Humor
One Comment
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?One Response to For Sale – One Totally Useless Cat
-
Garfield perhaps?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
One Response to For Sale – One Totally Useless Cat
-
Garfield perhaps?
Frozen Street Corner
(6 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: wtf
No Comments
Warhammer 40k – Terminator Armor
(6 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Warhammer 40k
12 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?12 Responses to Warhammer 40k – Terminator Armor
-
Not to weild the Nerd Bat too heavily, but that’s not a Terminator. That’s a Dreadnaught. 
-
I’ll take a big swing with that bat and say that’s not only a dreadnaught, but a Blood Angel’s Dreadnaught, with a plasma cannon to boot.
-
swing and a miss.
-
What do you mean “miss”? I knock it into the left outfield second deck in Nerd Park!
Use you eyes, Ump!
-
I cry foul ball!
OK, I thought I had put this behind me a long time ago (damn dawn of war!)
That is a blood angels dreadnought which is the clue.
It is holding a multi-melta, not a plasma cannon.
This was the origonal spec for the blood angels “Furioso” dreadnaught that has now been changed for one with two power fists.
now if you will excuse me I’m off for a little cry.
-
oh, ok, I admit it, I panicked and didn’t get the right name on there.
fuck.
-
Damn it!
-
Nelson, I think I love you…
Can I… touch you? Please?
-
wow. Just… wow.
I hate to admit it, but I’m impressed.
-
…spots, returning,.. Hair, getting greasy
Mwwahaaahhheugh!!!!
Oh, but yea sure you can touch me
might want to wait a week till all my jeans change back from shorts
-
To give tiki a little credit, Terminator armor is also known as Tactical Dreadnaught Armor. Its original purpose was to serve as an intermediary between the more durable dreadnaughts and the lighter suits of power armor. An additional bonus is that you don’t have to be entombed in terminator armor.
-
Actually, the Tactical Dreadnaught Armor (or Terminator Armor) evolved from utility suits worn in plasma forges. Basically, fancy factory worker gear. Ironically, That same armor will not do well against plasma-based weapons. Better than wearing power armor, but still.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
12 Responses to Warhammer 40k – Terminator Armor
-
Not to weild the Nerd Bat too heavily, but that’s not a Terminator. That’s a Dreadnaught.
-
I’ll take a big swing with that bat and say that’s not only a dreadnaught, but a Blood Angel’s Dreadnaught, with a plasma cannon to boot.
-
swing and a miss.
-
What do you mean “miss”? I knock it into the left outfield second deck in Nerd Park!
Use you eyes, Ump!
-
I cry foul ball!
OK, I thought I had put this behind me a long time ago (damn dawn of war!)
That is a blood angels dreadnought which is the clue.
It is holding a multi-melta, not a plasma cannon.This was the origonal spec for the blood angels “Furioso” dreadnaught that has now been changed for one with two power fists.
now if you will excuse me I’m off for a little cry.
-
oh, ok, I admit it, I panicked and didn’t get the right name on there.
fuck.
-
Damn it!
-
Nelson, I think I love you…
Can I… touch you? Please? -
wow. Just… wow.
I hate to admit it, but I’m impressed. -
…spots, returning,.. Hair, getting greasy
Mwwahaaahhheugh!!!!
Oh, but yea sure you can touch me
might want to wait a week till all my jeans change back from shorts
-
To give tiki a little credit, Terminator armor is also known as Tactical Dreadnaught Armor. Its original purpose was to serve as an intermediary between the more durable dreadnaughts and the lighter suits of power armor. An additional bonus is that you don’t have to be entombed in terminator armor.
-
Actually, the Tactical Dreadnaught Armor (or Terminator Armor) evolved from utility suits worn in plasma forges. Basically, fancy factory worker gear. Ironically, That same armor will not do well against plasma-based weapons. Better than wearing power armor, but still.
Mountain Climbers
(10 votes, average: 4.60 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Aerial, Nature, wtf
No Comments
Super Condom
(5 votes, average: 3.80 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Humor, wtf
9 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?9 Responses to Super Condom
-
That just begs to be put on some car’s tailpipe. Watching that thing blow up and seeing the person’s reaction would be priceless.
-
Big dick is……. big?
-
Bout time.
-
Hmm… Given that a wang has to be a good bit bigger in girth than a condom’s diameter in order for it to not slip off, I’d have to say it would take one hell of a woman to take on that monster.
-
And still they can’t make in MY size.
And by that i mean my penis is big.
-
i think it’s my boss’ hat.
-
So your boss is a dickhead?
-
Is it not a lot more likely that this is just a little person holding a regular condom?
-
What the hell’s a condom?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
9 Responses to Super Condom
-
That just begs to be put on some car’s tailpipe. Watching that thing blow up and seeing the person’s reaction would be priceless.
-
Big dick is……. big?
-
Bout time.
-
Hmm… Given that a wang has to be a good bit bigger in girth than a condom’s diameter in order for it to not slip off, I’d have to say it would take one hell of a woman to take on that monster.
-
And still they can’t make in MY size.
And by that i mean my penis is big.
-
i think it’s my boss’ hat.
-
So your boss is a dickhead?
-
Is it not a lot more likely that this is just a little person holding a regular condom?
-
What the hell’s a condom?
Valley View
(9 votes, average: 4.44 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Aerial
One Comment
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?One Response to Valley View
-
Mt. Beauty Australia… *I think*
Hide Comments | Add your comment
One Response to Valley View
-
Mt. Beauty Australia… *I think*
Twister
(7 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Nature
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to Twister
-
…and Benny the windmill realized this was the day he had been waiting for.
-
Still needs more wind. Not impressed.
-
couldn’t the windmill just switch to going the other way and just blow it away?
-
morbo says, “THAT’S NOT HOW WINDMILLS WORK!”
-
Needs more wallcloud.
-
That’s Super Quixote coming its way. The mill is in serious trouble.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
6 Responses to Twister
-
…and Benny the windmill realized this was the day he had been waiting for.
-
Still needs more wind. Not impressed.
-
couldn’t the windmill just switch to going the other way and just blow it away?
-
morbo says, “THAT’S NOT HOW WINDMILLS WORK!”
-
Needs more wallcloud.
-
That’s Super Quixote coming its way. The mill is in serious trouble.
Jane Seymour
(11 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to Jane Seymour
-
this picture is so bad that no one has even bothered to post the infamous “Do NOT WANT!” yet so… let me be the first!
DO NOT WANT!!
bleh… Dr. Quinn = boner death
-
still, on a scale of one to ten,
i’d still put it in her butt.
-
She had me at “Somewhere in Time”.
-
Jet, obviously you are gay.
She’s hotter than shit.
In the trunk- no doubt.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
4 Responses to Jane Seymour
-
this picture is so bad that no one has even bothered to post the infamous “Do NOT WANT!” yet so… let me be the first!
DO NOT WANT!!
bleh… Dr. Quinn = boner death
-
still, on a scale of one to ten,
i’d still put it in her butt. -
She had me at “Somewhere in Time”.
-
Jet, obviously you are gay.
She’s hotter than shit.
In the trunk- no doubt.
March 12, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Is it sad that I automatically put “Price of Bel-” inbetween ‘Fresh’ and ‘Air’?
And immediately began singing the theme song?
March 12, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Yes. Incredibly sad. You really should just kill yourself now.