My Confined Space

This is an interior shot of http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/05/15/ghetto-bootie/

Comment by deuce — May 16, 2008 @ 11:59 am

That’s the main entrance of Hellhole Cave in West Virginia.

Comment by DemolitionsGeek — May 16, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

Someone put a Sword of Power under that thing. Quick, go.

Comment by Gunface01 — May 17, 2008 @ 12:52 am

lol i had no idea wat was with this pic untill i noticed what was going on in the front there….

Comment by xaldinlancer — May 11, 2008 @ 6:44 am

so much win

Comment by Andre666 — May 11, 2008 @ 7:31 am

Is it just me or does the shadow on the teacher’s face makes it look like she has some kind of facial hair?

Comment by OmfgWtfZergd — May 11, 2008 @ 9:11 am

Enroll me in this school.

NOW.

Comment by Gunface01 — May 11, 2008 @ 9:34 am

One of those girls looks like a man.

Comment by Bran — May 11, 2008 @ 10:57 am

Needs a giant Mech behind them

Comment by MrPsychic — May 11, 2008 @ 2:07 pm

Oh yeah! Front row tongue lashing

Comment by Nerozx — May 11, 2008 @ 4:31 pm

OMFG
that’s a bunch of win right there.

Comment by vutterfly — May 11, 2008 @ 5:12 pm

The two guys on the side just launched Core Fighters off their arms. The giant robots will come. And then hopefully those girls will cum.

Comment by RSIxidor — May 12, 2008 @ 8:20 am

And why the fuck is there a vintage gay image ad over there ->

Comment by RSIxidor — May 12, 2008 @ 8:21 am

It’s like everyone in Japan is aware of the stereotypes pertaining to themselves, and these students decided to act them all out in one picture.

Comment by Camiam321 — May 13, 2008 @ 8:03 am

I don’t know about the sentence structrure in my previous comment. Forgive me. I am an artist, not a Grammartician! hahhaa I made up a new word!

Comment by Camiam321 — May 13, 2008 @ 8:04 am

Why do you hate my eyes?

Comment by Luvmuchine — May 10, 2008 @ 1:26 pm

Stare at it long enough and you may have a seizure.

Comment by bright green — May 10, 2008 @ 1:44 pm

Monopoly, 21, OH GOD MY EYES ARE BLEEDING

Comment by numb7rs — May 10, 2008 @ 2:22 pm

Okay, this gets posted but none of the stuff I submit?

What?

Comment by silverflux — May 10, 2008 @ 9:34 pm

my retinas burn

Comment by Ohnoez — May 10, 2008 @ 10:18 pm

OW WTF. ass. here i am scrolling along minding my own busniess then this shit

Comment by Kero — May 11, 2008 @ 9:50 pm

@numb7rs:
Lol at the R.E.M. reference.

Comment by reptilecobra13 — May 12, 2008 @ 10:20 pm

wouldn’t being that close create some kind of drag coefficient or destabilized vortex?

Comment by maxcw — May 7, 2008 @ 9:55 pm

I was in the united airlines plane while this happened.

Comment by banjo_picker — May 7, 2008 @ 10:00 pm

Thats impossible, two planes cant be that close without some sort of impact. This image must be altered

Comment by czanime — May 7, 2008 @ 10:05 pm

Or maybe they appear closer due to the vantage point of the photographer; ever heard of forced perspective? You don’t need to “alter” ( I am guessing you are referring to shopped but decided not to use that term.)an image in order to achieve a desired effect.

Comment by thelotuseater725 — May 7, 2008 @ 10:21 pm

most likely they are a good ways out so the photographer was using a large telephoto lens. Zooming in makes things look much closer together especially when they are that far away.

Comment by Darthmalt — May 7, 2008 @ 10:45 pm

they r making little planes

Comment by RoQ — May 7, 2008 @ 10:45 pm

The United plane is a Boeing 757, and the Lufthansa plane is a Boeing 747, the latter a plane which is approximately three times the size of the former. You are correct Darthmalt when you said that this photograph is indeed unaltered in digital form, however, appears as an illusion due to the perspective of the photographer and possibly the lens.

Comment by Bodero — May 7, 2008 @ 10:51 pm

If it was forced perspective, though, wouldn’t the smaller plane in front look bigger than the plane in back? Or wouldn’t the letters on the plane behind be less in-focus than the letters on the one up front?

Seriously, I’m askin’. The last time I got higher than a C in a science class I was in the second grade.

Also, considering the light source, wouldn’t there be a shadow on the Lufthansa plane if they really were that close?

Comment by rattybad — May 7, 2008 @ 10:52 pm

this is what a parallel approach looks like….now they could have been landing on runways in close proximity….but they are not all that close to each other…..the photography is distorting our perspective

Comment by boris89 — May 7, 2008 @ 11:28 pm

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/360923/a319_on_parallel_approach_with_a_737/

Comment by boris89 — May 7, 2008 @ 11:29 pm

Yeah, perspective folks, simply put, the actual size of the aircraft makes it easier to spot.

Comment by Wally — May 8, 2008 @ 1:37 am

Oh, and nothing quite that rare, i do parallel approaches fairly often, in smaller aircraft mind you but a LOT closer than this without anything really scary.

I dunno actually…just had another look…doesn’t seem to quite add up, even with the thought of different fancy lenses in mind. i can understand making a single object look a lot closer than it really is but two objects in the same frame…well, i ain’t no photographer but i am a pilot and they definitely wouldn’t have been as close as some people seem to think.

Comment by Wally — May 8, 2008 @ 1:42 am

Hey Wally, I remember seeing on Discovery Channel once about how the draft or whatever created by an airplane is not felt in an immediate proximity, and it actually only affects the pressure outside the area. So basically, if you were standing on the tip of the wing, you won’t feel as much … push as you would if you were like…20 ft outside of the wing. Is that true?
Can that be whats happening here?

Comment by SuperJay — May 8, 2008 @ 3:38 am

@ SuperJay: No. Air pressure doesn’t just “jump” 20 feet over “unpressurized” air.

Comment by unknown — May 8, 2008 @ 5:40 am

snopes has an article on this, and it basically boils down to the face that one of them is nearly 3 times larger then the other one. sadly I cannot find the exactly page on their site, but Here’s one that’s kinda like it and explains what’s going on

Comment by tiki god — May 8, 2008 @ 10:44 am

Some of them are from salad dressing commercials from the olden days. Maybe a year or two ago.

Comment by Tardex — May 7, 2008 @ 4:22 pm

Even the smoke coming from the fire?

Comment by numb7rs — May 7, 2008 @ 4:34 pm

^ its cotton candy

Comment by TrikYodz — May 7, 2008 @ 4:40 pm

**hehehe**. Would love to see the muted reaction to a fart in that thing!

Comment by colonel-yum-yum — May 7, 2008 @ 10:32 am

women on motorcycles = sexy.

Comment by storminator — May 7, 2008 @ 10:52 am

Her arse looks like molded pair of bowling balls.

Comment by numb7rs — May 7, 2008 @ 12:03 pm

That is shit hot. Is that a visible camel toe?

Comment by Mack — May 7, 2008 @ 1:53 pm

lol @ the motion blur on everything except the bike and biker

…spitshine!…

Comment by TrayShadix — May 7, 2008 @ 4:14 pm

Wearing heels on a bike? Bitch has got skillz.

Comment by numb7rs — May 7, 2008 @ 4:59 pm

Cool bike.

Comment by TGGeko — May 7, 2008 @ 8:25 pm

These are the kind of pics for which a Sexy*2 tag is necessary. Or even better Sexy^2…

Comment by Phyreblade — May 9, 2008 @ 6:50 pm

now i kinda want 3 hands..

Comment by Madru — May 3, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

The triple-breasted whore of Eroticon 6?

Comment by ohmybob — May 3, 2008 @ 3:19 pm

“now i kinda want 3 hands..”

No, no, no…two breasts to squeeze, then the middle one to suck on.

Comment by Tattooed-Geek — May 3, 2008 @ 3:41 pm

That’s the girl from “Good Luck Chuck” right?

Comment by fatkidsay — May 3, 2008 @ 4:05 pm

Reminds me of Total Recall.

Comment by MikeBabaguh — May 3, 2008 @ 4:24 pm

Ohh ooooooh so that’s what the third one is for!

Comment by Madru — May 3, 2008 @ 4:31 pm

pixels!

Comment by irkusk — May 4, 2008 @ 12:17 am

Ahh…to be Zaphod Beeblebrox…

Comment by reptilecobra13 — May 4, 2008 @ 12:22 am

This totally beats any other fantasy I’ve ever dreamed of.

Comment by Bran — May 4, 2008 @ 1:53 pm

What am I meant to be seeing?

Comment by bright green — May 3, 2008 @ 9:02 am

how is it that there are there denizens of the internet that are still unaware of goatse?

Comment by samoses — May 3, 2008 @ 10:02 am

Ew

Comment by Tardex — May 3, 2008 @ 10:30 am

@samoses
They are the lucky ones…

Comment by Phyreblade — May 3, 2008 @ 1:24 pm

I know what goatse is, but I just don’t see anything resembling it in this image. Maybe I’m not the one after all.

Comment by Nemo Intermundorum — May 3, 2008 @ 1:41 pm

I see it, and what I’ve seen cannot be unseen.

Comment by Tattooed-Geek — May 3, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

Lean your head to the left, and think of goatse.

Comment by multi_masked — May 3, 2008 @ 9:42 pm

You have to stand back a bit as well to see it.

Comment by rebelyell2006 — May 4, 2008 @ 12:31 am

oh gawd, I came

wait, what?

Comment by tiki god — May 4, 2008 @ 1:04 am

AWESOME

Comment by jose_lucca — May 2, 2008 @ 8:04 am

Wow. That is just awsome.

Comment by bright green — May 2, 2008 @ 8:54 am

Looks like Julian Beever’s work.

Comment by Billy Manic — May 2, 2008 @ 7:06 pm

This artists name is Kurt Wenner…
More sauce: http://www.kurtwenner.com/

Comment by Phyreblade — May 2, 2008 @ 7:54 pm

I’ve got some great pics of siv

Comment by Bakudai — May 2, 2008 @ 3:33 am

Everyone has great pics of Siv.

Well, Siv and a goat.

Comment by LukeV1-5 — May 2, 2008 @ 5:26 am

I was drunk, okay? I don’t know where the purple dildo came from.

Comment by siv0r — May 2, 2008 @ 5:01 pm

Ben?

Comment by wetpiggirl — May 3, 2008 @ 11:05 am