» Easter - My Confined Space

Bunny and Clod

2008

Mar 25

Posted by deuce on Mar 25th, 2008 in Easter , Humor , Politics , wtf

(4 votes, average: 4 out of 5)

Loading ...

Stumble it!

Comments(21)

Show Comments

Hide Comments | Add your comment

finally the president has found his intellectual equal.

Comment by ogie — March 25, 2008 @ 2:23 pm
what a fucking furry

Comment by natedog — March 25, 2008 @ 3:04 pm
i mean, look at how he fondles the fucking rabbit…

Comment by natedog — March 25, 2008 @ 3:05 pm
He looks so happy and blissful… like a small child. Wait, this is the guy that runs the country? $*!#%!

Comment by jasonp — March 25, 2008 @ 4:22 pm
Trying to make fun of President Bush still doesn’t change the fact that he won the Office two times in a row.

Comment by DemolitionsGeek — March 25, 2008 @ 4:49 pm
who’s laughing now?

Comment by el_metal — March 25, 2008 @ 5:09 pm
That’s a white bunny. Bush doesn’t care about black bunnies.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 25, 2008 @ 6:20 pm
@DemolitionsGeek

Twice? I thought he was appointed by his dads friends in the Supreme Court the first time. At least the was the story in the non-American newspapers. What did they tell you folks?

Comment by AlecDalek — March 25, 2008 @ 6:23 pm
Yiff yiff mr. prez.

Comment by RP — March 25, 2008 @ 6:29 pm
@ DemolitionsGeek

With the voting irregularities in BOTH the 2000 and 2004 elections I find it questionable whether George W Bush was properly elected ONCE. Of course it may just have been that the 2000 election was practice for when he would REALLY need to steal an election, but I could be wrong. Either way you look at it, this man is directly responsible for tens of thousands of civilian deaths in a war that was based on lies and misdirection.

LET THE GAMES COMMENCE!

Comment by wookie_x — March 25, 2008 @ 6:44 pm
@DemolitionsGeek
We’re not trying to make fun of him. We ARE making fun of him. Because no matter how you look at it, he’s kind of dumb. That fact that he was (questionably) elected just shows that most voters are kind of dumb, a theory continues to be supported by just about any quantitative measure.

Comment by reboot — March 25, 2008 @ 9:11 pm
I didn’t read any of your posts, but I consider this a victory because I got a rise out of you.

It’s the internet. Some say it’s serious business, but alas, ’tis not.

Either way, LOOK HOW CUTE THIS PICTURE IS LOLOLOLOLO

..L.

Comment by DemolitionsGeek — March 25, 2008 @ 9:28 pm
Now that I’ve [kind of] read your posts, I never said he was elected/appointed/bleh bleh bleh. I said he WON the Office.

You people are soo fast and soo ready to get into an internet tough guy political debate, it’s comical.

Comment by DemolitionsGeek — March 25, 2008 @ 9:31 pm
You’re weren’t being serious and you weren’t being funny, so that leaves…. not much.

Comment by reboot — March 25, 2008 @ 9:39 pm
To clarify: we are all on this board to look at images, read comments and write comments.
If someone reads your comment and writes a comment in response, how can that possibly be any kind of victory, since that’s the purpose of this website?

Comment by reboot — March 25, 2008 @ 9:43 pm
@ DemolitionsGeek

Yeah, he WON the office. Just like you WON that last hamburger you bought or you WON that last blow-job you had to pay for. Bitch, please. You’re going to instigate a fight then start talking about “internet tough guys”? If you weren’t so sad, you might ALMOST be funny!

Comment by wookie_x — March 25, 2008 @ 10:30 pm
One time I won a chocolate bunny by guessing how many jelly beans were in a jar.

Comment by Mayy — March 25, 2008 @ 11:36 pm
Technically, he WON the Supreme Court decision on halting the recount in Florida by 5-4.

Comment by deuce — March 26, 2008 @ 11:34 am
W still believes in the Easter Bunny. Someone is encouraging this belief. I am scared.

Comment by saborlas — March 26, 2008 @ 2:13 pm
Well, it’s like the saying goes: Ask your parents if Santa is real, then ask them if the Easter Bunny is real, then ask if God is real. The answer will always be the same.

Comment by Ronwe — March 26, 2008 @ 4:38 pm
*The answer to all three questions will always be the same.

I apparently made this drink stronger than I thought, seeing as I left out a couple words.

Comment by Ronwe — March 26, 2008 @ 4:39 pm

Hide Comments | Add your comment

NSFW - Easter Boobs

2008

Mar 23

Bunnies are always nsfw :

Read more… or Read more right here… »

Posted by tiki god on Mar 23rd, 2008 in Easter , NSFW

(5 votes, average: 5 out of 5)

Loading ...

Stumble it!

Comments(4)

Show Comments

Kitty bunny

2008

Mar 23

Posted by tiki god on Mar 23rd, 2008 in Cute As Hell Animals , Easter

(5 votes, average: 5 out of 5)

Loading ...

Stumble it!

Comments(3)

Show Comments

happy easter - is the easter bunny real?

2008

Mar 23

Posted by tiki god on Mar 23rd, 2008 in Easter , Humor , Religion

(20 votes, average: 2.2 out of 5)

Loading ...

Stumble it!

Comments(22)

Show Comments

Hide Comments | Add your comment

Dude, seriously. The bible was just written by some people, and not some deity. Would a so-call “perfect” being write a book with so damn many mistakes?

http://skeptically.org/bible/id6.html

Comment by AlecDalek — March 23, 2008 @ 1:43 pm
Wow stunning new insight there alec.

Comment by Caio — March 23, 2008 @ 7:41 pm
It is for some people.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 23, 2008 @ 7:48 pm
Why wouldn’t Jesus be real, I know alot of Jesus’.

Also, Easter is named after a pagan Anglo, Saxon and Viking goddess Eostre, the name has nothing to do with christain bible.

Comment by gor — March 23, 2008 @ 7:57 pm
I was raised calling it Páscoa what does that mean Gor?

Comment by Caio — March 23, 2008 @ 8:03 pm
I believe the correct pluralization of Jesus is “Jesi”.

Comment by deuce — March 24, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
In regards to the site posted in comment 1: There aren’t 194 contradictions. I checked.

Comment by TANAKA-3 — March 24, 2008 @ 1:51 pm
@TANAKA-3

Ok, maybe it’s actually 195, or 196. Lets not split hairs. The point is that if god exists, he needs to get his story straight.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 24, 2008 @ 2:01 pm
@AlecDalek
No, there’s maybe five. Maybe. The rest are… taken out of context is the best way I can think of to say it. Like some one was looking to find things wrong with it and when they did, they wrote it down without trying to see if it could work. Does that make sense?

Comment by TANAKA-3 — March 24, 2008 @ 2:11 pm
Even if there is ONE contradiction, that invalidates the concept of a “perfect being”. You are admitting to at least 5, which is more than enough.

There are in fact hundreds of errors and contradictions in both the old and new testament. The list I linked to is actually over a 100 years old, and has been vetted and examined for a long time. I found a number of them on my own back when I was younger and my parents made be do daily bible readings.

But then your typical christian isn’t accustomed to looking at things objectively. They’re already 100% committed to the lie, and don’t want to leave their comfort zone.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 24, 2008 @ 2:27 pm
No, I said there might be five. I don’t care how old a list is, it can still be wrong. There are people on both sides of the issue who wont change their minds and are blind to what they don’t want to see.

I found a lot of these too when I was a kid too, but as I grew up I looked more closely and they aren’t contradictions. An angel showed up to Mary in Mathew, and Joseph in Luke. The angel just showed up twice, for two different reasons. Told Mary what was going to happen, and Joseph not to bail. The only one I have problems with is how Judas died. The rest are contextual.

Comment by TANAKA-3 — March 24, 2008 @ 2:37 pm
I don’t know what more than I can offer than cold hard proof. But the fact that there are so many different religions that have sprung up from one single book goes to show just how contradictory it really is.

If it was written by an all knowing god, you’d think they would be smart enough to know how to clearly communicate with their own creation. The fact that it can be interpreted in so many different ways testifies to it’s human origins.

Not to mention the fact that it took “god” over 4000 year to write one book (they created the entire earth in only 6 days). And even after the bible was written, around 100 AD, it was well over another 1000 years before it was made available to everyone to read. What took so long?

Comment by AlecDalek — March 24, 2008 @ 3:03 pm
Do people ever misunderstand you? You communicate well, but ill bet people don’t always understand what you say or what you are trying to communicate. People want to take thing out of context and use them their own advantage. If I can use the Bible to prove that God wants me in power, why wouldn’t I do it. We can take anything out of context and make it say almost anything we want.

Comment by TANAKA-3 — March 24, 2008 @ 3:38 pm
You’re absolutely right. But would think that if god gave us a book, it would be a lot clearer. He would have divine insight into how people would try to bend his words, and nip them in the bud by adding more details (like when exactly does a fetus become “human”).

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not an atheist, and I hope there really is a god or gods. I just haven’t been convinced. I don’t think you can prove there is a god and I don’t think you can prove there isn’t.

I just wish religious groups would stop imposing their beliefs on others (in a seemingly blatant attempt at convincing themselves). None of the major religions agree on very much, so civilization and human development get dragged down while a few closed minded “believers” drag the rest of us into wars and oppression. Given the track record, I think we may have been better without any of these “holy” documents.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 24, 2008 @ 4:01 pm
“I just wish religious groups would stop imposing their beliefs on others ”
I would be content if they didn’t close the liquor stores on Easter.

Comment by reboot — March 24, 2008 @ 4:16 pm
It’s ironic that the only place you can get booze on Easter Sunday is at the Easter Service itself.

Comment by AlecDalek — March 24, 2008 @ 4:50 pm
I would have to agree on that point too. One really can’t prove one way or the other. Makes these arguments kind of frustrating. and yeah, Christians need to stop trying to bring about a perfect world here.

Comment by TANAKA-3 — March 24, 2008 @ 4:51 pm
@TANAKA-3
“One really can’t prove one way or the other.”
That old chestnut.
The burden of proof lies with the party making the ridiculous claim - see FSM.

Comment by Ando — March 25, 2008 @ 5:17 am
I don’t think it’s fair to assume that the contradictions are God’s…considering the text was written in several languages originally, and then transcribed and retranscribed over the ages, with Middle Ages monks purposefully changing the text to make themselves “immortal,” so to speak, and that’s only accounting for purposeful mistakes–how many people post here and misspell words that or say things that they don’t mean to? And then you have the King James Bible which was published with the express purpose of making the text more artful, and New Age Bibles that are meant to simplify ideas. So yeah, there could be some contradictions, but whether those were in there originally or not is impossible to say.

Comment by rattybad — March 25, 2008 @ 7:34 pm
@rattybad
“o yeah, there could be some contradictions, but whether those were in there originally or not is impossible to say.”
uh, no.

For the most part the original scriptures are still available, and ready for anyone to go back and translate / interpret them

Comment by tiki god — March 25, 2008 @ 7:48 pm
Tiki’s right. You can walk into almost any Christian bookstore and purchase “interlinear” versions of the Bible that have the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.

Also, if God exists, I’m sure he’d exercise some influence over the transcription of the text to ensure his original message gets through. Without this assumption, how can a Christian believe a single word of it?

Comment by AlecDalek — March 25, 2008 @ 7:59 pm
How do you expect God to answer your prayers if He can’t even maintain editorial control over His own work? God supposed killed a guy just for trying to keep the Ark from tipping over, He should be able to bitch slap a monk for making a typo.

Comment by reboot — March 25, 2008 @ 8:17 pm