jimmieq — September 3, 2008 @ 11:20 am

OH YES! Gimme some of that.

garbledxmission — September 3, 2008 @ 11:45 am

You ever notice the only time she’s in photos without glasses are her modelling/beauty pagent shots? It’s like she’s terrified at the thought of people thinking she might be a stupid pretty girl if she doesn’t have her nerd specs on.

Deep seated insecurities. Another must have quality for a VP who more than likely will end up as prez when mcmummy finally packs it in.

garbledxmission — September 3, 2008 @ 11:46 am

Sorry, PAGEANT. Damn meth makin me type all jittery an stuff.

Puulaahi — September 3, 2008 @ 11:57 am

I am already sick of her.

colonel-yum-yum — September 3, 2008 @ 12:08 pm

@Puulaahi
+1
With all the issues being raised around this election, an election which is gonna have a big effect on most of the planet, and all most people can talk about is how much they would/wouldn’t bang the proposed vice-president? Goes to show how much interest people have in it.
/rant
by the way, I live in Ireland so I couldn’t give a Brad Pitt who wins, I wanna rant!

reboot — September 3, 2008 @ 12:20 pm

I think there should be real questions about whether she’s qualified to protect the space-time continuum.

Mayyday — September 3, 2008 @ 1:03 pm

@reboot

I thought the VP’s sole duty was to cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate.

Marianne_W — September 3, 2008 @ 1:11 pm

Absolutely right, Mayyday! I wonder if SHE knows that . . . ?

gx5000 — September 3, 2008 @ 1:15 pm

Prediction…
1- Loses VP Spot
2- Is found Guilty
3- Gets divorced over discovered affair.
4- Shows up in Playboy’s “Milfs I would hit but not vote for”

deuce — September 3, 2008 @ 1:16 pm

@colonel

Is that better or worse than our last election, when people voted for which candidate they’d rather have a beer with?

Mayyday — September 3, 2008 @ 1:26 pm

@Marianne_W

I was actually trying to set reboot up for a Futurama joke, but ok.

Elepski — September 3, 2008 @ 1:37 pm

She’s a religious wack job…. she is quoted as saying the war and the Alaska pipeline where “gods will”

Svartmetall — September 3, 2008 @ 1:59 pm

“I thought the VP’s sole duty was to cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate.”

Which, given that she’s a far right-winger who denies global warming, denies scienctific fact (i.e. is pro-creationism) and denies women the right to even decide what goes on their own bodies, is a very worrying thought indeed.

She may be an atractive woman, but so what? She’s only slightly to the left of Hermann Goering, and that’s the last thing America needs in a VP right after they’ve endured 8 years of the most divisive, criminal, hated and ridiculed President the nation has ever seen.

FlyingMantisShrimp — September 3, 2008 @ 2:00 pm

Wow. Ever since Mayyday’s attempt at a Futurama reference/setup, this thread has failed terribly.

reboot — September 3, 2008 @ 2:06 pm

Sarah is a Christian with decent Christian moral values and the American people appreciate that in her. She is a breath of fresh cold clean Alaska air and the fact that she is a regular person not more intelligent smarty college types proves that she is in touch. In fact, the fact that she has very little experience in government means she will win because MOST AMERICANS DO NOT HAVE GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE! She is one of us and she will win. SHAME ON THE LIBS for talking about her private life. WE NEVER DO THAT! WE RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO BE FREE IN AMERICA! It’s over, libs.

garbledxmission — September 3, 2008 @ 2:14 pm

Oh reboot, you are such a scamp!

gudis — September 3, 2008 @ 2:47 pm

@Svartmetall: Goering, and indeed, all of the Nazis were socialists (and thus about as far to the left as the scale goes), you fucking idiot.
Also, Godwin fail

reboot — September 3, 2008 @ 2:59 pm

@gudis
Nazi’s were left-wing socialists?! Do you even know what any of words mean?

Svartmetall — September 3, 2008 @ 3:17 pm

@ Gudis

Go to Wikipedia. Look up ‘National Socialism’. Then go sit in a corner and eat your own liver in shame at the epic self-ownage you just committed.

Mayyday — September 3, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

What is the internet coming to when we’d rather debate politics than make Futurama references?

reboot — September 3, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

I don’t know, Mayyday. I just don’t know.

mAgnUS BUTTfoorson — September 3, 2008 @ 4:33 pm

Ya Gudis considering the Nazi party was completely anti-socialist you kind of bonered yourself there. I think you were aiming for nationalist socialist which is a different animal. Like Svarmetall said go hit the books and come back with an apology and some cake.

I think this chick is awesome. Awesome to the max. Now don’t you guys worry about blank. Let her worry about blank. Blank!?! Blank!? You’re not looking at the big picture!

One thing I know is this: she’s very anti-abortion. Even in cases of rape. Which means if I rape her just right she’ll be forced to have my bastard baby and I’ll be the unwanted stepfather of American royalty and forever go down in history as one cool motherfucker.

RSIxidor — September 3, 2008 @ 5:24 pm

Do it faggot

Puulaahi — September 3, 2008 @ 5:45 pm

@colonel-yum-yum

Screw politics, I want to drink Guinness!

gudis — September 3, 2008 @ 8:03 pm

Yep, nothing socialist here…

9. All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.

10. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all Consequently we demand:

11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery.

12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).

14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.

20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.

21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.

jimmieq — September 4, 2008 @ 12:01 am

I demand rule 34!
fap fap fap

gregzombie — September 4, 2008 @ 1:30 am

I’d hit it…TWICE!!! And then I would have sex with it.

AbNo — September 4, 2008 @ 6:39 am

I’d tap it like a drum set.

Phyreblade — September 4, 2008 @ 6:03 pm

@jimmieq
Just thought I’d point out that Rule 34 is not something that can be demanded. It is a law of the universe. It exists whether you want it to or not.

IE
Sarah Palin exists, ergo Rule 34. No exceptions.

TrikYodz — June 21, 2008 @ 12:11 pm

yes i would

nyoki — June 21, 2008 @ 1:34 pm

I not only believe but admire them.

Caio — March 18, 2008 @ 11:31 pm

Wow, not self-important know-it-all twat college students can criticize broad trends in egg form too.

Guswut — March 18, 2008 @ 11:32 pm

I wonder how long it’ll take for the FBI to be called out on this and for the overbearing fear to make Easter eggs a thing of the past…?

Caio — March 18, 2008 @ 11:33 pm

*now

Better make an egg about typos lol

Guswut — March 18, 2008 @ 11:41 pm

”
You Be
Having
A Typo
——-^
”

Heh.

dorix — March 19, 2008 @ 12:51 am

“You gonna get raped.”

cpnichol — March 19, 2008 @ 8:10 am

Nice idea, but open to abuse by people like me. I’d put wasps in one, big, angry wasps.

Max — March 19, 2008 @ 12:59 pm

@nichol
lol.

ack — February 27, 2008 @ 7:10 am

Hail Lord Xenu, may you rule for a thousand years!

Gary Scenario — February 27, 2008 @ 7:45 am

That’s gotta be annoying

Ando — February 27, 2008 @ 9:13 am

I for one welcome our new bauble covered overlords.

el_metal — February 27, 2008 @ 2:03 pm

i for one … damn it!!!

gpat — February 6, 2008 @ 6:21 pm

Know what’s scarier than scientology? Recognized religions like Christianity. Get your f&@king priorities straight, people. Real threats to your liberty are coming from theocratic nutballs like George W. Bush, not fringe philosophical movements like Scientology.

schulzbrianr — February 6, 2008 @ 6:25 pm

No, I don’t think so. I know the religion debate is just about as awesome as the politics debate, but, you really can’t call Scientology a religion, more of some nutballs sci-fi novel taken about 18 steps too far.

gpat — February 6, 2008 @ 6:58 pm

Who called Scientology a religion?

schulzbrianr — February 6, 2008 @ 7:04 pm

“Know what’s scarier than scientology? Recognized religions”
Meaning that Scientology is an UNrecognized religion?

gpat — February 6, 2008 @ 7:12 pm

Ah. Sorry that was confusing. I didn’t intend the reader to make that logical leap. Read the last sentence where I refer to Scientology as a “fringe philosophical movement”, rather than a religion.
The Anonymous NYC protest is about Scientology suppressing our Freedom of Speech on the Internet. My point was that if you really care about your liberties and freedoms, you should be paying attention to what recognized religions are trying to do, rather than wasting time on Scientology.

Caio — February 6, 2008 @ 7:17 pm

@gpat - Here’s the thing, gpat. I can criticize George Bush all day. I can’t look at the enternet without some 14 year old trying to stick it to the man. And when some guy on TV makes a documentary about Pope Joan, the Vatican does nothing to try and stop it.
.
On the other hand, scientology has been conducting lawsuits in order not to win, but to quote L. Ron Hubbard: “The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win.” They’ve been driving all their critics to bankruptcy in lawsuits they, most of the time, don’t actually win. They censor more than the fucking government. And let’s not forget Lisa McPherson, when they clearly murdered a woman, slowly and painfully, and then threw enough money at the court system to get away with it.
.
Fuck scientology. Scientology is what the mainstream churches were a few hundred years ago. As far as I’m concerned, this Anonymous vs. Scientology thing could be fucking history.

Hazard — February 6, 2008 @ 8:15 pm

Bringing Discordians? Brilliant! I hope the raid is awesome!

ryu09 — February 7, 2008 @ 12:32 am

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Read the whole thing…freedom of religion…

schulzbrianr — February 7, 2008 @ 12:38 am

What does that have to do with anything here?

monkeybum — February 7, 2008 @ 1:26 am

I say let the nut-jobs have their “religion.” They’re easier to poke fun at when they are all grouped together.

Phyreblade — February 7, 2008 @ 1:57 am

OK, what is it with the crooked mustache?

Ando — February 7, 2008 @ 4:37 am

@ Phyreblade
It’s to make him look like Epic Fail Guy, I think. (google it if you don’t know)

I’d be going to the London one but I’m busy.

The difference between Scientology and other recognised religions (Scientology IS a recognised religion and has tax exempt status in many countries) lies in it’s aggressive tactics, brainwashing and blatant deceitfulness.

Caio — February 7, 2008 @ 11:37 am

@ryu: There’s another thing. Go to a scientology library, and they’ll specifically tell you ‘We’re not a religion. We’re an alternative to therapy.” Fuckin hell.
.
I didn’t say anything about the volcano or thetans or shit. Hail all the damned Xenus you want. I’m saying they need to tighten up civil law (something that needs to happen anyway) and start slapping multi-million dollar reckless litigation fines on the fuckers. Just because you invented some religion on your yacht doesn’t give you the right to debase the very foundations of the judicial system, and human society as a whole. Nor does it give you the right to torture a girl to death. Hail Xenu in the privacy of your own Church without suing or killing anybody damnit.

Jimmed — February 7, 2008 @ 1:55 pm

@Ando
It’s the moustache taken from the Fawkesian mask worn by V, from the film V for Vendetta. If you haven’t seen the film, fucking watch it NOW! V is a Discordian.

mechiah — February 7, 2008 @ 2:10 pm

i won’t be going to the anon protest. turns out, i’m not fourteen anymore

Professor Cramulus — February 7, 2008 @ 2:50 pm

This isn’t about freedom of religion. This is about a cult (well actually a corporation masquerading as a religion) which is responsible for numerous deaths, dissapearances, ideological terrorism, brainwashing, and a heaping spoonful of taking advantage of their followers. I have no problem with people believing whatever they want - but I don’t think you should have to pay for your beliefs. And if you choose to believe something else, members of your old religion shouldn’t go out of their way to fuck up your life. Which is par for the course for scientologists.

As for anon being a bunch of 14 year olds - check it out before you make your decision - the other protests in the country have been attended mostly by adults.

And by the way, the moustache and goatee is originally Guy Fawkes, a symbol of protest. This image has been coopted by V for Vendetta and Epic Fail Guy, but his original meaning is protest.

diabeetus — January 3, 2008 @ 3:20 pm

People who usually complain about freedom excessively are people who usually advocate anarchy.

reboot — January 3, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

kind of lame. I can’t even imagine who it would apply to. Closeted homosexuals? Wii owners?

@diabeetus, WTF are you on? Nobody is advocating anarchy, the image even acknowledges legality as a valid consideration.

Gilly — January 3, 2008 @ 3:41 pm

It might even be pro-anarchism, but arguing that even though such things ARE legal, people don’t do them.

Does this make sense…?

natedog — January 3, 2008 @ 4:07 pm

doesn’t freedom also mean the freedom to NOT do something if you dont want to?

deuce — January 3, 2008 @ 4:26 pm

This is too wordy… I would change it to:

Is there anything that you would like to do
that doesn’t hurt anybody
that would be fun
that is illegal

If the answer is “yes”
then YOU ARE NOT FREE

Much more appropriate in today’s authoritarian societies.

tiki god — January 3, 2008 @ 6:53 pm

IE:
I won’t get a tattoo cause of what people would think.

or

i won’t date that girl because my friends will mock me

or

I can’t talk about my religious views because I know that I’ll lose my job

schulzbrianr — January 3, 2008 @ 7:02 pm

Is this supposed to imply that there is some sort of law restricting these activities? Or that there should be a law to make sure your friends don’t insult you for dating an unacceptable female? If you don’t do something because you are afraid of the reaction:

“I won’t get a tattoo cause of what people would think.”

“i won’t date that girl because my friends will mock me”

Then you are not free, but those types of freedoms should not be protected by law. You’re own insecurity is something you have to man up (or woman up) and conquer on your own.

Religion is different, because everybody gets their panties in a bunch over their God, Gods, or lack thereof, or what have you. You are free to practice any sort of religion you want, as long as it does not infringe upon anyone else.

reboot — January 3, 2008 @ 7:12 pm

I kind of get you’re drift, tiki. I guess I just don’t see much of any of those issues. Maybe its because I’m a no good, hippy, liberal, but I just don’t know anybody who thinks like that.
Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.

neekbunny — January 3, 2008 @ 9:50 pm

I think this has a connection to the 420 movement. It stands to reason.

Professor Cramulus — January 3, 2008 @ 10:08 pm

I didn’t make this image, but I think it’s talking about self-emancipation. It’s like that line in the Principia Discordia “Ye have locked yerselves up in cages of fear–and, behold, do ye now complain that ye lack FREEDOM!” Even things you like, such as your preferences and opinions can be your jailers if they restrict you from doing stuff you want to do.

Hazard — January 3, 2008 @ 10:31 pm

BAAAAAAAW I CANT LISTEN TO MY IPOD IN CLASS ;_;

Hepathos — January 3, 2008 @ 10:58 pm

Yeah, like I really want to rape the girl next door, but nooooooo….

bluebec — January 4, 2008 @ 1:05 am

I didn’t read it as legal freedom but personal freedom. If you don’t do something because of your own insecurities, then you are not free within yourself.

AlecDalek — January 4, 2008 @ 4:55 am

My definition of freedom is some topless chick.

SirWishbone — January 4, 2008 @ 9:09 am

Great… Now all of those of wannabe Furries on MCS will have the courage to make fursuits and go to lame conventions so they can find someone to yiff.

Wtg, Prof.

T G Geko — January 4, 2008 @ 1:08 pm

You people are missing the point. The idea is that we are not free because WE MAKE OURSELVES NOT FREE! all the things above:
social stigma
job
of what people would think
you’re no good at it
nobody wants to hear it?

Only apply BECAUSE WE LET THEM APPLY! If I didn’t care what people thought, then so many more options would open up. But as it is, I am trapping myself behind my own barriers.

Such limitations only exist because we let them

jeffapotimus — January 4, 2008 @ 1:18 pm

Fucking hippie.

rorschach — January 4, 2008 @ 2:58 pm

Spag. Can’t expect these mycons to get PD stuff.

the_duck — November 15, 2007 @ 12:41 pm

Only 13 years old when he died? Dude must of eaten too many Cheezburgers.

garbledxmission — November 15, 2007 @ 1:31 pm

Farewell Frank, we hardly knew ye, but gained much entertainment from the trend you started.
Rest In Peace. Hope the Korean Restaurant didn’t get you.

phyreblade — November 15, 2007 @ 1:47 pm

And this, ladies and germs, is what a lifetime of eating cheezburgers will do to you. cut you down in your prime. Frank, I salute you.

eric — November 15, 2007 @ 5:49 pm

Far better to swallow 13 years of fresh, yummy cheeseburgers than endure long, grueling years more of cardboardy diet cat chow and stale mouse bottoms! Fairwell mighty slayer of tasty sandwiches…

phyreblade — November 15, 2007 @ 6:09 pm

Hear, hear!

GrandAdmiralThrawn — November 15, 2007 @ 8:04 pm

R.I.P.

Frank — November 15, 2007 @ 8:57 pm

I’d say I was named after him, but I’m older… so he’s named after me.

Mayy — November 15, 2007 @ 11:07 pm

First the Lolrus and now this. Who’s next, I say?

Billy Manic — November 15, 2007 @ 11:32 pm

Damn, i predict a meme downfall.
Status on the O RLY owl?

caradoc — November 16, 2007 @ 10:36 am

That’s one down…

el_metal — November 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

how’s longcat doing?. oh noes, is pedobear next? noooooo!!!11oneuno

phyreblade — November 16, 2007 @ 11:03 pm

Actually as afar as I can tell, longcat is still going strong.

As for pedobear, he’ll probably outlast everyone else. The freakin’ pervs always seem to live forever…

silverflux — November 17, 2007 @ 3:16 am

i think it’s a conspiracy. the walrus and now the cat? it’s awfully suspicious.

phyreblade — November 17, 2007 @ 6:20 pm

A serial iMeme killer? Inconceivable!

alvin — November 29, 2007 @ 11:56 am

So, any plans to make a cheezeburger out of him?

I can has catburger?

egnilk66 — September 7, 2007 @ 1:32 pm

Dude, Tikigod, if you’re allowing this post you should allow mine with car with the moustache and the hot chick. This is lame.

the_duck — September 7, 2007 @ 1:45 pm

Awesome.

“I want my money!…I need to get my drink on”

Hepathos — September 7, 2007 @ 2:25 pm

Pearl is so friggin cute in Ferrel’s videos

tiki god — September 7, 2007 @ 4:16 pm

egnilk66
don’t be a fucking douche bag.

AlecDalek — September 7, 2007 @ 5:33 pm

Is that Jack Thompson?