For the love of GOD, please kill that thing.
Recent Comments from kuTTer
- Comment on seXi lAtiN MaMi
For the love of GOD, please kill that thing. - Comment on The Colosseum
hmmm, i bet it took alot of spit and chewing to make that thing! That alien looks mad! - Comment on Awesome Bride!
PS2 FTW! - Comment on Chameleon
gimme back that filet o fish, gimme back that fish - Comment on Glow in the dark tatoo
this is pretty neat - i gotta do more research on it. I'm thinking a hybrid of classic ink & this type of reactive ink in 1 tatt.
Sandrine
(4 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ...
Add to favoritesTags: Sexy, Technology, wtf
12 Comments
chair
(6 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
One Comment
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?One Response to chair
-
thats actually pretty creepy
reminds me of silent hill when a monster rushes at you @__@
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
One Response to chair
-
thats actually pretty creepy
reminds me of silent hill when a monster rushes at you @__@
ellen von unwerth
(9 votes, average: 3.89 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
4 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?4 Responses to ellen von unwerth
-
lose the cigar and this pic is hot
-
the photographs by unwerth, who is the model?
-
No…who ARE the models?
-
I think the Cigar is what makes it extra hot.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
4 Responses to ellen von unwerth
-
lose the cigar and this pic is hot
-
the photographs by unwerth, who is the model?
-
No…who ARE the models?
-
I think the Cigar is what makes it extra hot.
the dealer
(4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy, wtf
6 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?6 Responses to the dealer
-
I’ll take one… is there a financing plan avaliable?
-
I’ll take a baker’s dozen please…
I need to get ridd of the memory of the previous pic(trashy).
and btw, just because you might see a dozen wings tatts doesn’t mean “everyone” has one….
Just means you need to find a better group to socialise with…ugh.
-
Huge ears
-
How many do you think I’d have to get for them to be able to lift me up and carry me around all the time?
-
30 day free sample?
-
Phail. The bow is entirely too large.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
6 Responses to the dealer
-
I’ll take one… is there a financing plan avaliable?
-
I’ll take a baker’s dozen please…
I need to get ridd of the memory of the previous pic(trashy).and btw, just because you might see a dozen wings tatts doesn’t mean “everyone” has one….
Just means you need to find a better group to socialise with…ugh.
-
Huge ears
-
How many do you think I’d have to get for them to be able to lift me up and carry me around all the time?
-
30 day free sample?
-
Phail. The bow is entirely too large.
trashy
(14 votes, average: 4.07 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy, Tattoos
20 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?20 Responses to trashy
-
angel wings are fast becoming like tribal tattoos. Everyone has some.
-
at least these are well done
-
Just looking at this picture makes me feel like I am gonna get an std.
-
The “Fallen” type should and could read as “FAILED”…
Monster Tatts, for those who just can’t wait to show the world the are trash.
-
Id hit it.
-
@DullMentalRacket: Agreed. She has a dark Jesse Jane thing going on.
-
by a toilet, where she belongs?
-
@DullMentalRacket:
Make sure you wrap your tool twice.
-
No thanks. I’d like to not get AIDS or Hepatitis.
-
I must say, I love wing tattoos (and tattoos in general, actual.) These are really well-done wings, too.
-
Wow.
Amy Winehouse finally put on a little weight.
-
I have a friend who has wing tattoos that span from his shoulders to his ankles.
-
She just looks dirty because of her eyeshadow and clothing. If she wore a nice suit or something formal you could never tell the difference.
-
I dont get why tatoos means shell sleep with anything that comes along.
-
@DullMentalRacket: People get tattoos for other people to see. The more tattoos they have the more skin is there for display. Wearing a small amount of clothing is typically associated with being a whore. And that is why everyone thinks she is a whore.
-
Reverse Kanga: The produced result of one straddling a toilet bowl in reverse, thus laying faeces across the front side of the porcelain – urbandictionary
-
@Doctor Thompson: General statement is general.
I have tattoos. They are for me, not for anyone else.
I think it’s the intent of the photo to make her look trashy… that and the title given each photo gives us a pre-judgment for that photo. It seems to make a difference as to how people respond.
-
@Doctor Thompson -
YOU ARE A DUMB ASS. and, i’m betting too scared of the tiny needle. you fucking pussy.
-
Maybe she’s a fan of the Transformers as well? Anyhoo, my only problem is all that shit on her arms not the wings on her back. Other than that I’m on board.
-
I’m guessing she is a fan of Max Payne…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
20 Responses to trashy
-
angel wings are fast becoming like tribal tattoos. Everyone has some.
-
at least these are well done
-
Just looking at this picture makes me feel like I am gonna get an std.
-
The “Fallen” type should and could read as “FAILED”…
Monster Tatts, for those who just can’t wait to show the world the are trash.
-
Id hit it.
-
@DullMentalRacket: Agreed. She has a dark Jesse Jane thing going on.
-
by a toilet, where she belongs?
-
@DullMentalRacket:
Make sure you wrap your tool twice. -
No thanks. I’d like to not get AIDS or Hepatitis.
-
I must say, I love wing tattoos (and tattoos in general, actual.) These are really well-done wings, too.
-
Wow.
Amy Winehouse finally put on a little weight. -
I have a friend who has wing tattoos that span from his shoulders to his ankles.
-
She just looks dirty because of her eyeshadow and clothing. If she wore a nice suit or something formal you could never tell the difference.
-
I dont get why tatoos means shell sleep with anything that comes along.
-
@DullMentalRacket: People get tattoos for other people to see. The more tattoos they have the more skin is there for display. Wearing a small amount of clothing is typically associated with being a whore. And that is why everyone thinks she is a whore.
-
Reverse Kanga: The produced result of one straddling a toilet bowl in reverse, thus laying faeces across the front side of the porcelain – urbandictionary
-
@Doctor Thompson: General statement is general.
I have tattoos. They are for me, not for anyone else.
I think it’s the intent of the photo to make her look trashy… that and the title given each photo gives us a pre-judgment for that photo. It seems to make a difference as to how people respond.
-
@Doctor Thompson -
YOU ARE A DUMB ASS. and, i’m betting too scared of the tiny needle. you fucking pussy.
-
Maybe she’s a fan of the Transformers as well? Anyhoo, my only problem is all that shit on her arms not the wings on her back. Other than that I’m on board.
-
I’m guessing she is a fan of Max Payne…
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
selma blair
(20 votes, average: 4.70 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sexy
16 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?16 Responses to selma blair
-
I havent been a huge fan of her acting, but selma fucking blair is so damn sexxy to me. i, for some reason, would love to be her husband, and she, my wife.
-
-
Successful image, I want to penetrate.
-
She’s always looked a little “harsh” to me. Like staring into the face of a dental hygienist.
Is she still coupled with one of the Zappa (“Moon Unit”, “Dweezil”?) kids?
-
-
Damn… pardon me, I need to go and watch a certain scene from Cruel Intentions.
-
Do want
-
@Silverwolf: Nah, she and Ahmet Zappa split probably about a year ago.
I have always liked her but she has always looked to me like she needs to eat a cheeseburger or something. Just a little too thin, IMO.
-
Yum Yum
-
Wow. This photo must be from like a hundred years ago! 
-
@TrikYodz: I’m nailing your wife
-
@Dyna-Mole:
Security access granted. Commence procreation. Upon termination, emit oratory “Angel”, and initiate digital interaction with cheek prior to egress.
-
Another good one of the lovely Miss Blair:
-
@freakymescan:
clean up after youre done.
-
LOVELY
-
@MalcoveMagnesia:
Yeah she does sometimes look a little harsh…
@penguin_lady:
I agree, a little on the thin side for me, though this pic must be from a long time ago, she’s little more than a little beanpole here…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
16 Responses to selma blair
-
I havent been a huge fan of her acting, but selma fucking blair is so damn sexxy to me. i, for some reason, would love to be her husband, and she, my wife.
-
Successful image, I want to penetrate.
-
She’s always looked a little “harsh” to me. Like staring into the face of a dental hygienist.
Is she still coupled with one of the Zappa (“Moon Unit”, “Dweezil”?) kids?
-
-
Damn… pardon me, I need to go and watch a certain scene from Cruel Intentions.
-
Do want
-
@Silverwolf: Nah, she and Ahmet Zappa split probably about a year ago.
I have always liked her but she has always looked to me like she needs to eat a cheeseburger or something. Just a little too thin, IMO.
-
Yum Yum
-
Wow. This photo must be from like a hundred years ago!
-
@TrikYodz: I’m nailing your wife
-
@Dyna-Mole:
Security access granted. Commence procreation. Upon termination, emit oratory “Angel”, and initiate digital interaction with cheek prior to egress. -
Another good one of the lovely Miss Blair:
-
@freakymescan:
clean up after youre done. -
LOVELY
-
@MalcoveMagnesia:
Yeah she does sometimes look a little harsh…@penguin_lady:
I agree, a little on the thin side for me, though this pic must be from a long time ago, she’s little more than a little beanpole here…
some time long ago
(6 votes, average: 4.17 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: wtf
17 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?17 Responses to some time long ago
-
Everyone used to wear hats.
Nobody wears hats anymore.
At least not interesting hats, anyway.
-
SMOKE
-
@RSIxidor: this is true.
And for the record a baseball cap turned a 1/4 turn to the side is not interesting, it just makes you look like a knob.
-
And not an ankle in sight…
-
1902!
-
-
YOU SMOKIN YET?
-
@Skulltimo: Actually i see lots of ankles… just no uncovered ones…
-
@Phyreblade:
I have an issue of “hot amish” here, it shows plenty of hot ankle action.
it’s hawt
-
I absolutely adore hats. They don’t look as good on me now w/ the extra weight, but I do love me hats.
-
-
I fully endorse the wearing of hats (that are nor baseball style caps). Bowlers are wonderful, done right.
-
@nyokki: Err ok… Define “right”?
-
@Phyreblade: The opposite of wrong.
-
@nyokki: As the antithesis of an unfashionably worn Bowler?
-
@Phyreblade: Wee wee monsewer.
-
@nyokki: very helpful… as usual… I think… :/
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
17 Responses to some time long ago
-
Everyone used to wear hats.
Nobody wears hats anymore.
At least not interesting hats, anyway.
-
SMOKE
-
@RSIxidor: this is true.
And for the record a baseball cap turned a 1/4 turn to the side is not interesting, it just makes you look like a knob.
-
And not an ankle in sight…
-
1902!
-
-
YOU SMOKIN YET?
-
@Skulltimo: Actually i see lots of ankles… just no uncovered ones…
-
@Phyreblade:
I have an issue of “hot amish” here, it shows plenty of hot ankle action.it’s hawt
-
I absolutely adore hats. They don’t look as good on me now w/ the extra weight, but I do love me hats.
-
I fully endorse the wearing of hats (that are nor baseball style caps). Bowlers are wonderful, done right.
-
@nyokki: Err ok… Define “right”?
-
@Phyreblade: The opposite of wrong.
-
@nyokki: As the antithesis of an unfashionably worn Bowler?
-
@Phyreblade: Wee wee monsewer.
-
@nyokki: very helpful… as usual… I think… :/
Can you see me?
(8 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals, Humor
14 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?14 Responses to Can you see me?
-
why is there a hollow (air) tube/stick sticking out. who’d hiding there!!
-
Its his coke straw.
That or its the whats left after someone picked a dandelion or some such. Your call
-
OMG! I am going to puke a rainbow now. How freakin’ cute!!!
-
I’ll pee right there.
-
@ColombianMonkey: It looks like the stem of a dandelion with the flower popped off to me.
-
Yes. Hide better. Oh, and get me the key to Salma’s suite while your at it. Kthnxbai.
-
@Phyreblade:
I see him too, he’s not fooling anyone.
Stupid cat.
-
@tiki god: Most definitely a silly cat.
-
-
@Phyreblade: How the hell would I know, I can’t tell the difference between a horse nose and a donkey nose.
-
@Phyreblade:
The cat is a ninja, which is why we can only see flowers and hamster (?).
-
@Annarchy: Works for me.
-
@Annarchy: Ninja cat? I totally believe it. In fact I used to have one. Wily little critter. Just kept appearing out of nowhere and stealing my sammiches…
-
@Phyreblade:
Damn cats steal everything that’s not nailed down. I know, I have two furry ninjas at home.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
14 Responses to Can you see me?
-
why is there a hollow (air) tube/stick sticking out. who’d hiding there!!
-
Its his coke straw.
That or its the whats left after someone picked a dandelion or some such. Your call
-
OMG! I am going to puke a rainbow now. How freakin’ cute!!!
-
I’ll pee right there.
-
@ColombianMonkey: It looks like the stem of a dandelion with the flower popped off to me.
-
Yes. Hide better. Oh, and get me the key to Salma’s suite while your at it. Kthnxbai.
-
@Phyreblade:
I see him too, he’s not fooling anyone.Stupid cat.
-
@tiki god: Most definitely a silly cat.
-
@Phyreblade: How the hell would I know, I can’t tell the difference between a horse nose and a donkey nose.
-
@Phyreblade:
The cat is a ninja, which is why we can only see flowers and hamster (?). -
@Annarchy: Works for me.
-
@Annarchy: Ninja cat? I totally believe it. In fact I used to have one. Wily little critter. Just kept appearing out of nowhere and stealing my sammiches…
-
@Phyreblade:
Damn cats steal everything that’s not nailed down. I know, I have two furry ninjas at home.
well behaved?
(9 votes, average: 3.44 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Politics, Sexy
23 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?23 Responses to well behaved?
-
or blueberry muffins…
-
You can misbehave with me sweetheart.
Wait . . . a/s/l?
-
THIS IS NO TIME FOR QUOTES. YOUR HOUSE IS FALLING OVER.
-
what a horrible unkempt kitchen…. im ashamed
but other than that…
i think im in love.
-
oh what a silly woman, getting her words confused like that!
it should read: well behaved women make men sandwiches.
-
clean your house and your twat
-
I’d do her… even in that craphole she’s standing in.
-
and her hips are too big
-
NEITHER DO ANGRY, BITTER FEMINISTS!
-
@angelus1987: I was gonna say:
Neither do mouthy bitches with no social skills.
It’s about the same.
-
by: Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
lol… Mormons are adorable. Always fantasizing about the outside world they don’t live in.
-
Kitchen<History
-
It’s endemic to tramps that quoting Laurel Thatcher Ulrich justifies their sexual whimsies. There are plenty of well-behaved women who’ve made history, and very few dumbass slutty teenagers with a fondness for quoting actual famous women who’ve made history. I bet she couldn’t name who said it, either. Probably thinks it’s Madonna or Avril Lavigne.
-
Grrr. That’s a great saying with meaning… some stupid girl who looks about as intelligent as my cat just poops all over it.
-
Well-behaved ANYONE rarely makes history.
Also…”hips are too big?” wtf? Those are child-bearing hips, dude.
-
The saying is true. She’s cute. But what is up with the angle of the camera? It makes my brain cry.
-
@Annarchy:
I guess its a “badly-behaving” angle.
-
Marie Curie = well behaved woman
Well behaved woman =/= history making
Marie Curie =/= making history?
LOGIC INVALID
Screw the “rarely”, I’m making a fucking point.
Or am I?
-
@LukeV1-5: Are you? It’s hard to tell.
-
@Dacianprick: Her hips are too big? Wat?
@LukeV1-5: All you have to do is come up with a statistically relevant list of well behaved women in history to prove the initial assertion incorrect.
Yep. Real easy. Go on then. That list isn’t gonna make itself now…
-
@Dacianprick: maybe for your tiny cock. some of us need a little more clearance.
-
The motto of psychotic bitches everywhere.
Every time I see a female quote this sentence, I know that they are prone to selfish and reprehensible behavior. The safest way to deal with them is to NOT deal with them. Remove yourself from their presence with as much speed as required. Failure to do so will result in her screwing you over, and not in the fun way.
-
@saborlas:
Do you prefer nice, meek women just like your mommy?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
23 Responses to well behaved?
-
or blueberry muffins…
-
You can misbehave with me sweetheart.
Wait . . . a/s/l?
-
THIS IS NO TIME FOR QUOTES. YOUR HOUSE IS FALLING OVER.
-
what a horrible unkempt kitchen…. im ashamed
but other than that…
i think im in love. -
oh what a silly woman, getting her words confused like that!
it should read: well behaved women make men sandwiches.
-
clean your house and your twat
-
I’d do her… even in that craphole she’s standing in.
-
and her hips are too big
-
NEITHER DO ANGRY, BITTER FEMINISTS!
-
@angelus1987: I was gonna say:
Neither do mouthy bitches with no social skills.
It’s about the same.
-
by: Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
lol… Mormons are adorable. Always fantasizing about the outside world they don’t live in.
-
Kitchen<History
-
It’s endemic to tramps that quoting Laurel Thatcher Ulrich justifies their sexual whimsies. There are plenty of well-behaved women who’ve made history, and very few dumbass slutty teenagers with a fondness for quoting actual famous women who’ve made history. I bet she couldn’t name who said it, either. Probably thinks it’s Madonna or Avril Lavigne.
-
Grrr. That’s a great saying with meaning… some stupid girl who looks about as intelligent as my cat just poops all over it.
-
Well-behaved ANYONE rarely makes history.
Also…”hips are too big?” wtf? Those are child-bearing hips, dude.
-
The saying is true. She’s cute. But what is up with the angle of the camera? It makes my brain cry.
-
@Annarchy:
I guess its a “badly-behaving” angle. -
Marie Curie = well behaved woman
Well behaved woman =/= history making
Marie Curie =/= making history?
LOGIC INVALID
Screw the “rarely”, I’m making a fucking point.
Or am I?
-
@LukeV1-5: Are you? It’s hard to tell.
-
@Dacianprick: Her hips are too big? Wat?
@LukeV1-5: All you have to do is come up with a statistically relevant list of well behaved women in history to prove the initial assertion incorrect.
Yep. Real easy. Go on then. That list isn’t gonna make itself now…
-
@Dacianprick: maybe for your tiny cock. some of us need a little more clearance.
-
The motto of psychotic bitches everywhere.
Every time I see a female quote this sentence, I know that they are prone to selfish and reprehensible behavior. The safest way to deal with them is to NOT deal with them. Remove yourself from their presence with as much speed as required. Failure to do so will result in her screwing you over, and not in the fun way.
-
@saborlas:
Do you prefer nice, meek women just like your mommy?
flying away
(6 votes, average: 3.83 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: wtf
10 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?10 Responses to flying away
-
Is that from Mule Variations?
-
ah, i see your plan was well thought out…
-
Obligatory “will it take off?”
-
Flying… you’re doing it wrong?
-
Don’t be a pussy! JUMP!
-
@HoChunk: Looks like it could be, but I don’t think it is
-
IN SOVIET RUSSIA, THIS UNITED AIRLINES!
-
Needs moar bird.
-
sauce? i kinda have vague memories of seeing this before. summat like “mr and mrs harrington” but idk. halp?
-
drop the cage and you might go somewhere.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
10 Responses to flying away
-
Is that from Mule Variations?
-
ah, i see your plan was well thought out…
-
Obligatory “will it take off?”
-
Flying… you’re doing it wrong?
-
Don’t be a pussy! JUMP!
-
@HoChunk: Looks like it could be, but I don’t think it is
-
IN SOVIET RUSSIA, THIS UNITED AIRLINES!
-
Needs moar bird.
-
sauce? i kinda have vague memories of seeing this before. summat like “mr and mrs harrington” but idk. halp?
-
drop the cage and you might go somewhere.
love
(9 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals
14 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?14 Responses to love
-
we do know how to love. 
-
aw. i just shit out a unicorn
-
This forbidden love is where the flying monkeys from the wizard of oz came from.
-
I can understand a small monkey hugging something but a pigeon standing still like that?
Aw fuck it, I’ll just enjoy the pleasant image. We need more of this in today’s world.
-
@aharrigan: I’m hoping that was a Tinman reference. When the flying monkeys came from between Kathleen Robertson’s tits, part of my soul came back to life. I killed it immediatly afterwards, but wow.
-
@aharrigan: that statement made the picture worhtwhile
-
I saw this in a newspaper once. Had to cut it out and hang it on my wall!
-
Damn I just came a rainbow
-
and then the monkey contracted a disease from the rat with wings and died.
-
-
Now I need a hug.
-
repoast
-
@Dyna-Mole: Is there nothing original anymore? *sigh*
-
Wow, this is a great shot
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
14 Responses to love
-
we do know how to love.
-
aw. i just shit out a unicorn
-
This forbidden love is where the flying monkeys from the wizard of oz came from.
-
I can understand a small monkey hugging something but a pigeon standing still like that?
Aw fuck it, I’ll just enjoy the pleasant image. We need more of this in today’s world.
-
@aharrigan: I’m hoping that was a Tinman reference. When the flying monkeys came from between Kathleen Robertson’s tits, part of my soul came back to life. I killed it immediatly afterwards, but wow.
-
@aharrigan: that statement made the picture worhtwhile
-
I saw this in a newspaper once. Had to cut it out and hang it on my wall!
-
Damn I just came a rainbow
-
and then the monkey contracted a disease from the rat with wings and died.
-
Now I need a hug.
-
repoast
-
@Dyna-Mole: Is there nothing original anymore? *sigh*
-
Wow, this is a great shot
crowd
(4 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Visual Tricks, wtf
3 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?3 Responses to crowd
-
This is the result of letting Ron Jeremy into the zebra enclosure at the zoo.
-
looks like striped hershey kisses
-
Modern day Candy Stripers?
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
3 Responses to crowd
-
This is the result of letting Ron Jeremy into the zebra enclosure at the zoo.
-
looks like striped hershey kisses
-
Modern day Candy Stripers?
a baby elephant
(6 votes, average: 4.83 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Cute As Hell Animals
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to a baby elephant
-
that’s so cute, I just may crap out a rainbow later. Or blood.
-
I think blood.
-
The first picture looks like a fuzzy vagina with an eye.
-
@Sticky: looks like someone just got an idea. a revolutionary one.
-
@clawoo:
Nope. Not into bestiality. If that’s your thing though, who am I to judge?
-
omg benjamin button baby elephant
-
It’s so fuzzy!
-
lol reminds me of russel brand i saw last night.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
8 Responses to a baby elephant
-
that’s so cute, I just may crap out a rainbow later. Or blood.
-
I think blood.
-
The first picture looks like a fuzzy vagina with an eye.
-
@Sticky: looks like someone just got an idea. a revolutionary one.
-
@clawoo:
Nope. Not into bestiality. If that’s your thing though, who am I to judge? -
omg benjamin button baby elephant
-
It’s so fuzzy!
-
lol reminds me of russel brand i saw last night.
Archer
(7 votes, average: 2.43 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Music, Sexy
20 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?20 Responses to Archer
-
You’re doing it wrong.
-
I’m not sure that’d even make much noise at all unless the arrowhead started twanging the strings.
-
You’re not edgy and you’re not cool. It has been done before. STFU.
-
The “guitar having a gothish/punkish/metalish hot chick play a guitar like a cello or upright double bass with a metal hunting arrow instead of a horse hair bow” has been done before?
-
There are some kick-ass punk rock bands with upright basses, so he might be referring to that.
This is just idiotic though.
-
I may be looking at that picture all wrong, but that looks more like a riding crop, to me, than it does an arrow.
-
@howsyoursister:
Thats because it is a riding crop. The shape is a big clue.
-
Yeah, I really doubt that’s how she plays. It’s probably a promotional poster. Assuming she really plays like that is like assuming the dude’s in Metallica will be in electric chairs onstage.
-
Pretty sure it’s a riding crop. However playing an electric guitar upright with a bow has been done before. Mana of Malice Mizer fame did it pretty regularly. They’re a quirky Visual-Kei band from Japan. Goth-Metal-ish.
-
@Ben1605: i lold
-
silly little goth girl…
Emilie Autumn you are not. Not with a guitar anyway.
-
@taganoth: How I know I’ve lost touch with the rest of society: I was wondering why you were explaining who Malice Mizer was. I thought everyone knew who they were…
-
Trying too hard.
-
Any of you ever heard of Sigur Rós?
-
Looks like a schecter C-1. Schecters = great guitars. I’d play them over gibsons any day
-
@DavidtheLast: heard of them? i’ve fucking met them!
-
This is not relevant to my interests.
-
@nyokki: Ditto.
-
Scary!
-
@Puulaahi:
A woman? Scary?
I’m getting some vibes here.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
20 Responses to Archer
-
You’re doing it wrong.
-
I’m not sure that’d even make much noise at all unless the arrowhead started twanging the strings.
-
You’re not edgy and you’re not cool. It has been done before. STFU.
-
The “guitar having a gothish/punkish/metalish hot chick play a guitar like a cello or upright double bass with a metal hunting arrow instead of a horse hair bow” has been done before?
-
There are some kick-ass punk rock bands with upright basses, so he might be referring to that.
This is just idiotic though.
-
I may be looking at that picture all wrong, but that looks more like a riding crop, to me, than it does an arrow.
-
@howsyoursister:
Thats because it is a riding crop. The shape is a big clue. -
Yeah, I really doubt that’s how she plays. It’s probably a promotional poster. Assuming she really plays like that is like assuming the dude’s in Metallica will be in electric chairs onstage.
-
Pretty sure it’s a riding crop. However playing an electric guitar upright with a bow has been done before. Mana of Malice Mizer fame did it pretty regularly. They’re a quirky Visual-Kei band from Japan. Goth-Metal-ish.
-
@Ben1605: i lold
-
silly little goth girl…
Emilie Autumn you are not. Not with a guitar anyway.
-
@taganoth: How I know I’ve lost touch with the rest of society: I was wondering why you were explaining who Malice Mizer was. I thought everyone knew who they were…
-
Trying too hard.
-
Any of you ever heard of Sigur Rós?
-
Looks like a schecter C-1. Schecters = great guitars. I’d play them over gibsons any day
-
@DavidtheLast: heard of them? i’ve fucking met them!
-
This is not relevant to my interests.
-
@nyokki: Ditto.
-
Scary!
-
@Puulaahi:
A woman? Scary?I’m getting some vibes here.
God Less America
(12 votes, average: 4.58 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Humor, Religion
37 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?37 Responses to God Less America
-
Oh! A buffet!
-
-
I need a new house.
-
Wow! Cunningham are my favourite firm of realtors!
-
the sign tells the truth
-
Why does there have to be one?
-
I wonder if the B was removed by an act of god or if godless hooligans vandalized it.
-
Sad but true
-
At last the phrase has been fixed.
-
God less America – one can only hope.
-
This was taken in the bible belt.:)
-
@Lockett:
I second that emotion. I don’t need a “god” to be a good person.
-
@Lockett:
@CathyLong:
You know I have never seen the logic in that point of view…
My experience has been that it is not ones belief in an all seeing deity (or the lack thereof) that makes people a person good or bad.
it seems that it is inherently the nature of each individual, and how they interpret the world around them that determines whether they decide to be good or bad. Their paradignm of the world, whether religious or not, seems to seep into everything, including how they interpret their religious texts (if they are theist) or how they define right and wrong (if they are secular).
Both theists and atheists can be equally cruel or equally kind. Based on what I’ve seen, I think a persons individual belief system is generally just used as a means of rationalizing their actions, regardless of what they are…
If a Godless America would mean a more benevolent America, I might agree with you, but unfortunately, greed, selfishness, cruelty, etc. do not seem to be the sole domain of religion, so I tend to doubt that would be the case…
-
I think for the most part, this country has been a godless nation. Throughout most of its history, religion has not been invoked nor used as a reason for any given policy. The use of theistic language notwithstanding, w/ few exceptions, most arguments have been secular. I use religious terms all the time because they’re handy, vivid and understood by most, yet I am an atheist.
Most people are not evil, regardless of their stand on religion and belief. Most people try to do good deeds, try to be a positive influence on those around them. Most people will try to interfere w/ those who want to do evil. Recognizing evil is a tad more complicated. Figuring out what works is a tad more complicated.
-
@nyokki: I think the “recognizing evil” is the part where people seem to get tripped up. I find that while people, in general, do not want to be considered evil, they do evil things, and tell themselves they are doing good.
And I’m not a pessimist or anything, but from what I’ve seen, I think it’s more accurate to say people don’t want to be thought of as evil. But the vast majority of them aren’t nice either, and the fact that a person may not want to be perceived as evil does not make it so.
The more irritating thing to me is that people do things to others that they would like to see someone do to them and still don’t think they are in the wrong. Socio/Psycho pathological personalities excluded, I don’t get that…
-
@Phyreblade: It is hard to recognize evil. It’s even harder to recognize your own evil-ness. Most people have a hard time being evil/mean/nasty face to face, but given any level of anonymity, it bleeds out of their pores, myself included. I don’t know how to deal w/ people that are always sure that they’re always right and good. Happily I don’t know any personally.
-
@nyokki: That is an interesting observation. I’ve noticed that peoples true colors tend to show if they know they can get away with whatever they want with impunity. And if there is one thing the internet has taught me, it is that people will be A$$holes when given anonymity.
This is what leads me to believe that people are basically evil, not good. Evil is the natural state of humanity, kept in check only by the possibility of consequences.
OK, So let me ask you this. Why are you evil? Why do you do evil things, knowing that they are evil?
-
Nothing is right or wrong, it’s all a matter of opinions.
-
@Dreth: No, I disagree. It would be more accurate to say that no individual action is *inherently* wrong or right. However for every action, there is a scenario where it is wrong, and a scenario where it is right.
There is a big difference between the concept of there being a complete absence of right/wrong, and that right and wrong are often highly subjective relative concepts that nonetheless still exist.
My perspective is that just because a concept is a fabricated construct does not mean it cannot have an absolute frame of reference. Most people, if they actually think about it, will be able to tell you what is right and wrong, regardless of their background, culture, creed, belief system, etc.
The fact that it is a construct does not make it any less real nor concrete, and regardless of the paradigm within which it is defined, I have yet to find a definition that did not have elements in common with every single other definition I have run across.
Even people whose belief systems based on hypothetical models that eschew the traditional definitions of good and evil in favor of action and reaction are still painfully able to identify benevolent actions from malevolent ones.
So I don’t believe that these ideas are as entirely relative as people like to argue…
-
The only way you can say there’s some sort of instinct that tells apart the right and the wrong, is to completely prohibit any sort of influence that may trigger conscience or imitable behaviour.
I don’t think it’ll ever happen because even in psychology, it’s unethical,
-
@Dreth: I am not arguing that there is an instinct that defines right and wrong. Far from it. In fact I think the assumption that right and wrong could possibly be an instinctual knowledge is deeply flawed. I think the very opposite is true, left to our instincts alone, there would, in fact be no such thing as right or wrong.
The only reason that the concept of right and wrong exists is because as humans, we have an ability that no other creature on the planet possesses. The ability to reason.
Right and wrong cannot be coherently determined by emotion, instinct or feelings. It is purely an intellectual construct, and as such, I believe it can only be properly defined by intellectual examination. This ability is common to every human, and is actually what I base my belief of the existence of a universal paradigm within which right and wrong can be defined.
Not that right and wrong has nothing to do with feelings, but rather that intelligent thought *must* be applied to those feelings in order to develop any kind of rational definition for those constructs.
-
I don’t even see it (right and wrong) only as result of our ability to reason. It’s what happens when we decide to live in a society. A man alone on an island needs no morals. One must ask What does it mean to live as a man among other men? What principles do we all need to agree upon? Now, it is by reason that we ask these questions and answer them. Does a pack of wolves have individual virtues? I don’t know that I use the word evil to mean anything other than an act that does 95%+ harm (I pulled that number out of thin air). There are people in my past that I would describe as nothing other than evil, maybe even pure evil. Why is anyone evil? Why does anyone choose to do evil? I don’t know, but I do think that they don’t think what they’re doing is evil. In some really skewed sense of virtue, they think they are doing right. There does appear to be people who believe they are evil, and must do evil things, but even there, they tend to think that there is an overall virtue in being evil. Something along the lines of being part of God’s great plan, which must include pure evil. They think they’re playing a part in God’s world.
I hope there aren’t too many typos or contradictions because I’m not re-reading it to check it.
-
PARAGRAPHS, NYOKKI! PARAGRAPHS!
-
@nyokki: I disagree… I think right and wrong *has* to be about our ability to reason. I don’t think the ideas of right and wrong can be limited purely to our interaction with other humans. Evil actions can also be defined by how we treat other creatures, the earth, the environment, etc.
A person who commits acts of cruelty to animals can be considered just as cruel as one who does so to humans, in spite of the fact that the concept of “evil” is foreign to an animal. it is their mindset that makes them evil. So clearly the definition goes beyond just how we interact, and must be defined as a part of any individuals reasoning process.
IE The individual is evil by virtue of how they think, regardless of whether or not they are given the opportunity to demonstrate it by their actions. This way of thinking also allows us to account for the latent *propensity* for evil, regardless of whether they are put in the position of acting out their evil or not.
This is why I believe it has to be a function of our ability to think, and not just a by-product of interacting with other thinking creatures.
So far as peoples self perception of what is evil, or good, I find that the vast majority of people who do evil things, ironically also express a desire to avoid the displeasure of experiencing that very same evil they have perpetuated upon others.
It is true that there are some evils that are hard to identify. But most are not, except to the mentally unstable. My experience has been that the rest either cannot, or otherwise simply do not perform the introspection required to make that determination in a logical fashion. But almost everyone has the ability, which is a source of great frustration for me…
P.S.
If you would like, I would be honored to tutor you in the use of paragraphs… Say for a nominal fee of 9000 internets?
-
@Phyreblade: You’re saying that humans have the ability to be evil in a way other animals cannot, by virtue of our ability to reason? I can see that.
Animals w/in a group also seem to have some ability to be good or evil, w/in the context of what’s good for the group. It certainly seems to be the case w/in primate groups and that would make some sense.
This is why I believe it has to be a function of our ability to think, and not just a by-product of interacting with other thinking creatures.
We don’t disagree on this. It is more or less what I said coming from the other direction.
I don’t…see it (right and wrong) only as result of our ability to reason.
People may wish to avoid being a victim of their own cruel ways, but it usually because they have already been the victim of someone else’s cruel ways. I think every one of them have justified it in their own mind somehow. Whatever twisted logic they use, they do use it.
-
@nyokki: Well I think you are making a similar argument, but not quite the same argument. Good and evil, from my perspective, would have no meaning to animals, because regardless of what they do, they do not use reason to determine their actions.
They may use their intelligence to form action/result relationships, and even engage in behavior that could be harmful to the group or themselves. But they do not do so with a “big picture” understanding of what they are doing. They do not “reason”, they simply react to what their instincts tell them to do. It’s not quite the same as what we do.
If I extrapolate from that, then I can define the constructs of good and evil *only* as a result of reason, and *nothing* else, like instinct or anything like that, which was not the impression I got you were arguing.
And while I agree that evil people generally do have some logic to justify their evil actions, the problem is that their logic isn’t sound. Saying, for instance, “I do it because someone else did it to me, and that is the way of the world.” Is circular logic.
It ignores the fact that they did not like it when it was done to them, and that in spite of the fact they they, unlike animals, have a choice, and can choose to do something else, they chose to perpetuate the wrong that was visited upon themselves. There is no honest logic there, only highly flawed rationalization for self gratification…
-
@Phyreblade: More or less. I think that it’s possible to abuse a person (usually a child) to the extent that logic is not part of their world. Logic doesn’t allow what’s happened to them, it has no meaning. We have to learn nearly everything. We’re not really tabula rasa, but we are certainly born w/ fewer instincts than any other animal. We have the capacity for reason, that doesn’t mean we’ve actually learned it.
I would also say that evil comes from a lack of reason. Some evil people are evil because they’ve allowed their primitive brain to rule them. We’ve certainly seen it people that have demonstrable brain damage. They may not be 100% responsible for their actions, but that doesn’t lessen the evil they do. Some seem to recognize that reason exists, but have no clue how to employ it, so they end up trying to copy what they don’t understand. These people will stick to their flawed arguments, regardless of proof against them. Again, something we see to a lesser extent in other arguments (e.g. religion, philosophy, psychology).
-
Look ma…paragraphs!
-
@nyokki: Oh Miracle of Miracles!! There be paragraphs here!
But yes, I agree, good points about the effects of abuse. I think that some people who are abused do end up reverting to instinctual responses as a coping mechanism to handle what they see around them, and end up having that response so hard coded into their psyche, that they never learn how to objectively apply reason to any situation.
Another interesting thing I found, I think I read a study about it, is that when people become angry, excessively emotional, or even obsessed with something, their IQ apparently drops several points, as their instinctual brain centers actually override their logical thought process.
I know this phenomenon is common, amygdalya hijacking is a very well recognized phenomenon, especially where great emotion, such as anger, fear or sadness is involved, I just hadn’t realized how much the same mechanism affects ones ability to reason even when people aren’t actually angry.
That might explain peoples narrow mindedness of thought with regards to philosophy, psychology, religion, etc. There are days when I humans could just turn that part of our brains off. But then life really wouldn’t be much fun now would it…
-
@Phyreblade: We should teach a class on how to argue a point and reach relative agreement.
-
That’d be a fucking boring class.
We want, nay, we NEED chaos. It’s the only thing that keeps life interesting.
-
@Dreth: Chaos only works when it’s defined as opposed structure.
-
@nyokki:
@Dreth:
LOL yeah, a class might be fun, though I couldn’t help but wonder if Dreth was right about the possibility of it being boring as mud…
Though I also agree that Chaos does not exist unless order exists… And I’d also add that I think it is variety, and not necessarily chaos, that makes life interesting. Even though variety is often a byproduct of chaos, variety can also be had even in order.
For some reason people always seem to assume the opposite is *always* true…
-
Variety is good. But then there’d be some butt-tard so ‘varied’ that he’ll think he’s among all the other variations and begin cussing them out and telling them they suck. Then the bigger group goes against the butt-tard, but then some of the same group see some benefits for the butt-tard’s radical, yet obstructed, thinking and will secede.
There will be a battle and after the bigger group wins, they will wonder if it was worth it, some will make an organization for cherishing the fallen ones and bringing support, while there will be people in protest of using funds for just ‘praising dead people’. This will surge into another argument and probably another war.
We’re so susceptible to chaos! IT KEW’
-
Chaos is needed because we seem to have a need to not know how it’s going to end. We think we want to know, but are disappointed when we get it right, like it was too easy or something. If it’s easy, we get bored. If it’s simple we get bored. If it’s understood, we get bored. The unknown and our unease w/ it is somehow very important to our sense of well being.
-
@Dreth: LOL ok then…
@nyokki: Perhaps we are just looking at it differently, but my definition of order does not preclude the unknown or unpredictable. It simply organizes what is.
If all that is required in order to preclude boredom is unpredictability, variety and/or the enigmatic, I’m not sure that chaos is a necessity. At least not in my paradigm of the universe anyway.
Order and organization is, at best, a good predictor of outcomes, not a precognitive tool. I do not believe that order requires absolute control, in fact I think that is impossible. But I could also be defining chaos in overtly broad terms…
-
@Phyreblade: There’s a balance between order and chaos that needs to be maintained. Too much order and you stagnate. Too much chaos and everything falls apart.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
37 Responses to God Less America
-
Oh! A buffet!
-
-
I need a new house.
-
Wow! Cunningham are my favourite firm of realtors!
-
the sign tells the truth
-
Why does there have to be one?
-
I wonder if the B was removed by an act of god or if godless hooligans vandalized it.
-
Sad but true
-
At last the phrase has been fixed.
-
God less America – one can only hope.
-
This was taken in the bible belt.:)
-
@Lockett:
I second that emotion. I don’t need a “god” to be a good person. -
@Lockett:
@CathyLong:
You know I have never seen the logic in that point of view…My experience has been that it is not ones belief in an all seeing deity (or the lack thereof) that makes people a person good or bad.
it seems that it is inherently the nature of each individual, and how they interpret the world around them that determines whether they decide to be good or bad. Their paradignm of the world, whether religious or not, seems to seep into everything, including how they interpret their religious texts (if they are theist) or how they define right and wrong (if they are secular).
Both theists and atheists can be equally cruel or equally kind. Based on what I’ve seen, I think a persons individual belief system is generally just used as a means of rationalizing their actions, regardless of what they are…
If a Godless America would mean a more benevolent America, I might agree with you, but unfortunately, greed, selfishness, cruelty, etc. do not seem to be the sole domain of religion, so I tend to doubt that would be the case…
-
I think for the most part, this country has been a godless nation. Throughout most of its history, religion has not been invoked nor used as a reason for any given policy. The use of theistic language notwithstanding, w/ few exceptions, most arguments have been secular. I use religious terms all the time because they’re handy, vivid and understood by most, yet I am an atheist.
Most people are not evil, regardless of their stand on religion and belief. Most people try to do good deeds, try to be a positive influence on those around them. Most people will try to interfere w/ those who want to do evil. Recognizing evil is a tad more complicated. Figuring out what works is a tad more complicated.
-
@nyokki: I think the “recognizing evil” is the part where people seem to get tripped up. I find that while people, in general, do not want to be considered evil, they do evil things, and tell themselves they are doing good.
And I’m not a pessimist or anything, but from what I’ve seen, I think it’s more accurate to say people don’t want to be thought of as evil. But the vast majority of them aren’t nice either, and the fact that a person may not want to be perceived as evil does not make it so.
The more irritating thing to me is that people do things to others that they would like to see someone do to them and still don’t think they are in the wrong. Socio/Psycho pathological personalities excluded, I don’t get that…
-
@Phyreblade: It is hard to recognize evil. It’s even harder to recognize your own evil-ness. Most people have a hard time being evil/mean/nasty face to face, but given any level of anonymity, it bleeds out of their pores, myself included. I don’t know how to deal w/ people that are always sure that they’re always right and good. Happily I don’t know any personally.
-
@nyokki: That is an interesting observation. I’ve noticed that peoples true colors tend to show if they know they can get away with whatever they want with impunity. And if there is one thing the internet has taught me, it is that people will be A$$holes when given anonymity.
This is what leads me to believe that people are basically evil, not good. Evil is the natural state of humanity, kept in check only by the possibility of consequences.
OK, So let me ask you this. Why are you evil? Why do you do evil things, knowing that they are evil?
-
Nothing is right or wrong, it’s all a matter of opinions.
-
@Dreth: No, I disagree. It would be more accurate to say that no individual action is *inherently* wrong or right. However for every action, there is a scenario where it is wrong, and a scenario where it is right.
There is a big difference between the concept of there being a complete absence of right/wrong, and that right and wrong are often highly subjective relative concepts that nonetheless still exist.
My perspective is that just because a concept is a fabricated construct does not mean it cannot have an absolute frame of reference. Most people, if they actually think about it, will be able to tell you what is right and wrong, regardless of their background, culture, creed, belief system, etc.
The fact that it is a construct does not make it any less real nor concrete, and regardless of the paradigm within which it is defined, I have yet to find a definition that did not have elements in common with every single other definition I have run across.
Even people whose belief systems based on hypothetical models that eschew the traditional definitions of good and evil in favor of action and reaction are still painfully able to identify benevolent actions from malevolent ones.
So I don’t believe that these ideas are as entirely relative as people like to argue…
-
The only way you can say there’s some sort of instinct that tells apart the right and the wrong, is to completely prohibit any sort of influence that may trigger conscience or imitable behaviour.
I don’t think it’ll ever happen because even in psychology, it’s unethical,
-
@Dreth: I am not arguing that there is an instinct that defines right and wrong. Far from it. In fact I think the assumption that right and wrong could possibly be an instinctual knowledge is deeply flawed. I think the very opposite is true, left to our instincts alone, there would, in fact be no such thing as right or wrong.
The only reason that the concept of right and wrong exists is because as humans, we have an ability that no other creature on the planet possesses. The ability to reason.
Right and wrong cannot be coherently determined by emotion, instinct or feelings. It is purely an intellectual construct, and as such, I believe it can only be properly defined by intellectual examination. This ability is common to every human, and is actually what I base my belief of the existence of a universal paradigm within which right and wrong can be defined.
Not that right and wrong has nothing to do with feelings, but rather that intelligent thought *must* be applied to those feelings in order to develop any kind of rational definition for those constructs.
-
I don’t even see it (right and wrong) only as result of our ability to reason. It’s what happens when we decide to live in a society. A man alone on an island needs no morals. One must ask What does it mean to live as a man among other men? What principles do we all need to agree upon? Now, it is by reason that we ask these questions and answer them. Does a pack of wolves have individual virtues? I don’t know that I use the word evil to mean anything other than an act that does 95%+ harm (I pulled that number out of thin air). There are people in my past that I would describe as nothing other than evil, maybe even pure evil. Why is anyone evil? Why does anyone choose to do evil? I don’t know, but I do think that they don’t think what they’re doing is evil. In some really skewed sense of virtue, they think they are doing right. There does appear to be people who believe they are evil, and must do evil things, but even there, they tend to think that there is an overall virtue in being evil. Something along the lines of being part of God’s great plan, which must include pure evil. They think they’re playing a part in God’s world.
I hope there aren’t too many typos or contradictions because I’m not re-reading it to check it.
-
PARAGRAPHS, NYOKKI! PARAGRAPHS!
-
@nyokki: I disagree… I think right and wrong *has* to be about our ability to reason. I don’t think the ideas of right and wrong can be limited purely to our interaction with other humans. Evil actions can also be defined by how we treat other creatures, the earth, the environment, etc.
A person who commits acts of cruelty to animals can be considered just as cruel as one who does so to humans, in spite of the fact that the concept of “evil” is foreign to an animal. it is their mindset that makes them evil. So clearly the definition goes beyond just how we interact, and must be defined as a part of any individuals reasoning process.
IE The individual is evil by virtue of how they think, regardless of whether or not they are given the opportunity to demonstrate it by their actions. This way of thinking also allows us to account for the latent *propensity* for evil, regardless of whether they are put in the position of acting out their evil or not.
This is why I believe it has to be a function of our ability to think, and not just a by-product of interacting with other thinking creatures.
So far as peoples self perception of what is evil, or good, I find that the vast majority of people who do evil things, ironically also express a desire to avoid the displeasure of experiencing that very same evil they have perpetuated upon others.
It is true that there are some evils that are hard to identify. But most are not, except to the mentally unstable. My experience has been that the rest either cannot, or otherwise simply do not perform the introspection required to make that determination in a logical fashion. But almost everyone has the ability, which is a source of great frustration for me…
P.S.
If you would like, I would be honored to tutor you in the use of paragraphs… Say for a nominal fee of 9000 internets? -
@Phyreblade: You’re saying that humans have the ability to be evil in a way other animals cannot, by virtue of our ability to reason? I can see that.
Animals w/in a group also seem to have some ability to be good or evil, w/in the context of what’s good for the group. It certainly seems to be the case w/in primate groups and that would make some sense.
This is why I believe it has to be a function of our ability to think, and not just a by-product of interacting with other thinking creatures.
We don’t disagree on this. It is more or less what I said coming from the other direction.
I don’t…see it (right and wrong) only as result of our ability to reason.
People may wish to avoid being a victim of their own cruel ways, but it usually because they have already been the victim of someone else’s cruel ways. I think every one of them have justified it in their own mind somehow. Whatever twisted logic they use, they do use it.
-
@nyokki: Well I think you are making a similar argument, but not quite the same argument. Good and evil, from my perspective, would have no meaning to animals, because regardless of what they do, they do not use reason to determine their actions.
They may use their intelligence to form action/result relationships, and even engage in behavior that could be harmful to the group or themselves. But they do not do so with a “big picture” understanding of what they are doing. They do not “reason”, they simply react to what their instincts tell them to do. It’s not quite the same as what we do.
If I extrapolate from that, then I can define the constructs of good and evil *only* as a result of reason, and *nothing* else, like instinct or anything like that, which was not the impression I got you were arguing.
And while I agree that evil people generally do have some logic to justify their evil actions, the problem is that their logic isn’t sound. Saying, for instance, “I do it because someone else did it to me, and that is the way of the world.” Is circular logic.
It ignores the fact that they did not like it when it was done to them, and that in spite of the fact they they, unlike animals, have a choice, and can choose to do something else, they chose to perpetuate the wrong that was visited upon themselves. There is no honest logic there, only highly flawed rationalization for self gratification…
-
@Phyreblade: More or less. I think that it’s possible to abuse a person (usually a child) to the extent that logic is not part of their world. Logic doesn’t allow what’s happened to them, it has no meaning. We have to learn nearly everything. We’re not really tabula rasa, but we are certainly born w/ fewer instincts than any other animal. We have the capacity for reason, that doesn’t mean we’ve actually learned it.
I would also say that evil comes from a lack of reason. Some evil people are evil because they’ve allowed their primitive brain to rule them. We’ve certainly seen it people that have demonstrable brain damage. They may not be 100% responsible for their actions, but that doesn’t lessen the evil they do. Some seem to recognize that reason exists, but have no clue how to employ it, so they end up trying to copy what they don’t understand. These people will stick to their flawed arguments, regardless of proof against them. Again, something we see to a lesser extent in other arguments (e.g. religion, philosophy, psychology).
-
Look ma…paragraphs!
-
@nyokki: Oh Miracle of Miracles!! There be paragraphs here!
But yes, I agree, good points about the effects of abuse. I think that some people who are abused do end up reverting to instinctual responses as a coping mechanism to handle what they see around them, and end up having that response so hard coded into their psyche, that they never learn how to objectively apply reason to any situation.
Another interesting thing I found, I think I read a study about it, is that when people become angry, excessively emotional, or even obsessed with something, their IQ apparently drops several points, as their instinctual brain centers actually override their logical thought process.
I know this phenomenon is common, amygdalya hijacking is a very well recognized phenomenon, especially where great emotion, such as anger, fear or sadness is involved, I just hadn’t realized how much the same mechanism affects ones ability to reason even when people aren’t actually angry.
That might explain peoples narrow mindedness of thought with regards to philosophy, psychology, religion, etc. There are days when I humans could just turn that part of our brains off. But then life really wouldn’t be much fun now would it…
-
@Phyreblade: We should teach a class on how to argue a point and reach relative agreement.
-
That’d be a fucking boring class.
We want, nay, we NEED chaos. It’s the only thing that keeps life interesting.
-
@Dreth: Chaos only works when it’s defined as opposed structure.
-
@nyokki:
@Dreth:
LOL yeah, a class might be fun, though I couldn’t help but wonder if Dreth was right about the possibility of it being boring as mud… Though I also agree that Chaos does not exist unless order exists… And I’d also add that I think it is variety, and not necessarily chaos, that makes life interesting. Even though variety is often a byproduct of chaos, variety can also be had even in order.
For some reason people always seem to assume the opposite is *always* true…
-
Variety is good. But then there’d be some butt-tard so ‘varied’ that he’ll think he’s among all the other variations and begin cussing them out and telling them they suck. Then the bigger group goes against the butt-tard, but then some of the same group see some benefits for the butt-tard’s radical, yet obstructed, thinking and will secede.
There will be a battle and after the bigger group wins, they will wonder if it was worth it, some will make an organization for cherishing the fallen ones and bringing support, while there will be people in protest of using funds for just ‘praising dead people’. This will surge into another argument and probably another war.
We’re so susceptible to chaos! IT KEW’
-
Chaos is needed because we seem to have a need to not know how it’s going to end. We think we want to know, but are disappointed when we get it right, like it was too easy or something. If it’s easy, we get bored. If it’s simple we get bored. If it’s understood, we get bored. The unknown and our unease w/ it is somehow very important to our sense of well being.
-
@Dreth: LOL ok then…
@nyokki: Perhaps we are just looking at it differently, but my definition of order does not preclude the unknown or unpredictable. It simply organizes what is.
If all that is required in order to preclude boredom is unpredictability, variety and/or the enigmatic, I’m not sure that chaos is a necessity. At least not in my paradigm of the universe anyway.
Order and organization is, at best, a good predictor of outcomes, not a precognitive tool. I do not believe that order requires absolute control, in fact I think that is impossible. But I could also be defining chaos in overtly broad terms…
-
@Phyreblade: There’s a balance between order and chaos that needs to be maintained. Too much order and you stagnate. Too much chaos and everything falls apart.
Fuck it
(7 votes, average: 3.71 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Tattoos
12 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?12 Responses to Fuck it
-
i’d hit it.
the foot, that is. . .
-
She’s earned my “That’s Pretty Tough, Though” award.
-
Yea that had to hurt real bad. I can’t let someone touch my feet without laughing – getting a tattoo there has to hurt. Oh and I would hit it.
-
I would imagine that it’s pretty easy to focus past. My feet aren’t ticklish anyhow.
I got tattoos in my ears (small) and that did hurt. I can’t imagine the bottom of the foot being worse than that.
-
I’d accept a footjob from it.
-
She’s doing it wrong: www.frolicssuperstore.com/browseproducts/KAYLANI'S-FOOT-MASTURBATOR.html
-
For some reason, the bottom of her foot makes me think of old 50 year old whore like that one movie where the old whore wanted a sponge bath. Other then that, the rest of her body is perfect. BTW I love heels.
-
haha i have this swim suit, but i think i fill it out a bit better
-
Actually, all three visible tats are on very sensitive areas.
-
Bottom of the foot is meant to be the most painful part of the body. Definite tough points for this.
-
@Xp: Meant to be…? That suggests fate or some planned creation.
I’ve done a lot of damage to the bottom of my feet and I can say that there are other areas that hurt more.
-
No, I’d rather not. But thanks anyway.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
12 Responses to Fuck it
-
i’d hit it.
the foot, that is. . . -
She’s earned my “That’s Pretty Tough, Though” award.
-
Yea that had to hurt real bad. I can’t let someone touch my feet without laughing – getting a tattoo there has to hurt. Oh and I would hit it.
-
I would imagine that it’s pretty easy to focus past. My feet aren’t ticklish anyhow.
I got tattoos in my ears (small) and that did hurt. I can’t imagine the bottom of the foot being worse than that.
-
I’d accept a footjob from it.
-
She’s doing it wrong: www.frolicssuperstore.com/browseproducts/KAYLANI'S-FOOT-MASTURBATOR.html
-
For some reason, the bottom of her foot makes me think of old 50 year old whore like that one movie where the old whore wanted a sponge bath. Other then that, the rest of her body is perfect. BTW I love heels.
-
haha i have this swim suit, but i think i fill it out a bit better
-
Actually, all three visible tats are on very sensitive areas.
-
Bottom of the foot is meant to be the most painful part of the body. Definite tough points for this.
-
@Xp: Meant to be…? That suggests fate or some planned creation.
I’ve done a lot of damage to the bottom of my feet and I can say that there are other areas that hurt more.
-
No, I’d rather not. But thanks anyway.
Mommy, do wabbits eat ppl?
(5 votes, average: 4.40 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Humor, wtf
8 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?8 Responses to Mommy, do wabbits eat ppl?
-
yes they do eat people. thats why we must stay very very still.
-
What ever you do dont move.Just dont move stay verun run for your fucking live.
-
Anyone ever see Night of the Lepus?
-
@Nimbo: lol’d.
-
a new alfred hitchcock anyone?
-
Be vewy, vewy quiet….we’re hunting peopooh…..
-
-
Yes babygirl, they do… Be vewwy quiet…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
8 Responses to Mommy, do wabbits eat ppl?
-
yes they do eat people. thats why we must stay very very still.
-
What ever you do dont move.Just dont move stay verun run for your fucking live.
-
Anyone ever see Night of the Lepus?
-
@Nimbo: lol’d.
-
a new alfred hitchcock anyone?
-
Be vewy, vewy quiet….we’re hunting peopooh…..
-
Yes babygirl, they do… Be vewwy quiet…
Jamaican Flag
(8 votes, average: 3.38 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Politics
26 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?26 Responses to Jamaican Flag
-
Rasta… one love brada.
-
Pure love! That’s where my grandfather was from. Represent, yo.
-
-
Ya mon. I must go there. The Caribbean is calling me.
One love.
-
I’m a Rasta who doesn’t smoke 
gotta change that one day
-
One of the last places in the Western hemisphere where bashing homos is still encouraged.
-
@deuce:
Are you kidding me? So all the other countries in the west are perfectly fine with homosexuals. Yeah right.
-
Bless I and I, spread one love and peace and have unity, no matter what babylon mi a say, they aingt going to hold us back, jah will always be on our side.
-
always proud to represent the Caribbean.
-
@dieAntagonista: No, I meant literally bashing homos. Most of the western hemisphere at least discourages it on principle.
-
@deuce:
Every country has their own issues, don’t act like other countries in the west don’t do equally bad things.
America fights fire with fire, Georgia has too much time on their hands, in Africa they ‘cure’ homosexuality with rape, the Japanese produce sex toys for ten year olds and somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted. I said somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted.
I know those aren’t just countries in the West, so what. Why is a crime against a certain group of people worse than if they were against any other group. And to divide issues by cardinal points is ridiculous also.
-
@deuce: just want to inform if you didn’t know, reggae flows with one love, respect all white black purple green orange brown. and there is the dancehall society that most of them do bash gay, for example Elephant Man, Vybz Kartel, Movado, Sizzla are pretty much hate gay people. mainly sizzla (who is reggae and dancehall) but he is big time hypocrite first he talk about love but then he talk about gunshot to them gays. so sizzla and elephant man are banned in canada and in german because they dont want to sign the Reggae Compassion Act. which basicly means your not allowed to talk or sing about this even thou you have freedom of speech. here you go : www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-7563.html you might learn something if you didn’t know. im not mad r ntn but just setting the record straight. lol
-
@dieAntagonista: sorrrryy i had to leave soo fast and didn’t get to say bye. hope to have another convo like that again see you soon
-
@dieAntagonista: Somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted.
-
@thatonejimguy: “Hooray, Beer!”
-
@Puulaahi:
Because somewhere in Florida, votes are still being counted.
And Dick Cheney is peeing all over himself in spasmodic delight.
Make fun of politicians, it’s easy, especially with Republicans
like Rudy Giuliani, Colin Powell, and . . . Al Gore.
Create fatuous juxtapositions of personalities and political philosophies
as if communism were the opposite of democracy,
as if we needed Darth Vader, not Ralph Nader.
-
@dieAntagonista: My comments were just about Jamaica and the western hemisphere. It is one of only 2 countries on this side of the earth where homosexuality is still a crime, and large parts of the culture still encourage gay-bashing. Just cuz other people and cultures around the world are discriminated against or experience hate crimes doesn’t mean we can’t condemn it in one country at a time.
-
@deuce: I’m sorry. If you feel the need to point the crimes of a country out every time you see their flag, then go ahead. But comparing A with B like that is completely irrelevant and pretentious.
-
@dieAntagonista: If i remember correctly, your of israeli decent? AND jamaican? Wher did your parents meet? Must of been one hell of a party!
-
@Moe:
You don’t remember correctly.
My mother was Romanian and Hebrew, my father is Egyptian and Jamaican.
They met in Romania where they both studied medicine.
Yeah, my parents and grandparents knew how to look past race and religion.
-
@dieAntagonista: The way it should be. Nom
-
@dieAntagonista: LOL… I love the variety of your heritage…
-
@deuce: dude you are 100% wrong for blaming the whole country if only a good handle are like that, they don’t encourage they only say what will happen if they come to them.
-
@Phyreblade: Haha aw. Why thank you mister. That made me smile.
-
@dieAntagonista: Good. Smiling is good for you.
-
ONE LOVE. Rasta in my heart always
peace
love
unity
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
26 Responses to Jamaican Flag
-
Rasta… one love brada.
-
Pure love! That’s where my grandfather was from. Represent, yo.
-
-
Ya mon. I must go there. The Caribbean is calling me.
One love.
-
I’m a Rasta who doesn’t smoke
gotta change that one day -
One of the last places in the Western hemisphere where bashing homos is still encouraged.
-
@deuce:
Are you kidding me? So all the other countries in the west are perfectly fine with homosexuals. Yeah right.
-
Bless I and I, spread one love and peace and have unity, no matter what babylon mi a say, they aingt going to hold us back, jah will always be on our side.
-
always proud to represent the Caribbean.
-
@dieAntagonista: No, I meant literally bashing homos. Most of the western hemisphere at least discourages it on principle.
-
@deuce:
Every country has their own issues, don’t act like other countries in the west don’t do equally bad things.
America fights fire with fire, Georgia has too much time on their hands, in Africa they ‘cure’ homosexuality with rape, the Japanese produce sex toys for ten year olds and somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted. I said somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted.
I know those aren’t just countries in the West, so what. Why is a crime against a certain group of people worse than if they were against any other group. And to divide issues by cardinal points is ridiculous also.
-
@deuce: just want to inform if you didn’t know, reggae flows with one love, respect all white black purple green orange brown. and there is the dancehall society that most of them do bash gay, for example Elephant Man, Vybz Kartel, Movado, Sizzla are pretty much hate gay people. mainly sizzla (who is reggae and dancehall) but he is big time hypocrite first he talk about love but then he talk about gunshot to them gays. so sizzla and elephant man are banned in canada and in german because they dont want to sign the Reggae Compassion Act. which basicly means your not allowed to talk or sing about this even thou you have freedom of speech. here you go : www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-7563.html you might learn something if you didn’t know. im not mad r ntn but just setting the record straight. lol
-
@dieAntagonista: sorrrryy i had to leave soo fast
and didn’t get to say bye. hope to have another convo like that again see you soon -
@dieAntagonista: Somewhere in Florida votes are still being counted.
-
@thatonejimguy: “Hooray, Beer!”
-
@Puulaahi:
Because somewhere in Florida, votes are still being counted.
And Dick Cheney is peeing all over himself in spasmodic delight.
Make fun of politicians, it’s easy, especially with Republicans
like Rudy Giuliani, Colin Powell, and . . . Al Gore.
Create fatuous juxtapositions of personalities and political philosophies
as if communism were the opposite of democracy,
as if we needed Darth Vader, not Ralph Nader. -
@dieAntagonista: My comments were just about Jamaica and the western hemisphere. It is one of only 2 countries on this side of the earth where homosexuality is still a crime, and large parts of the culture still encourage gay-bashing. Just cuz other people and cultures around the world are discriminated against or experience hate crimes doesn’t mean we can’t condemn it in one country at a time.
-
@deuce: I’m sorry. If you feel the need to point the crimes of a country out every time you see their flag, then go ahead. But comparing A with B like that is completely irrelevant and pretentious.
-
@dieAntagonista: If i remember correctly, your of israeli decent? AND jamaican? Wher did your parents meet? Must of been one hell of a party!
-
@Moe:
You don’t remember correctly.
My mother was Romanian and Hebrew, my father is Egyptian and Jamaican.
They met in Romania where they both studied medicine.
Yeah, my parents and grandparents knew how to look past race and religion.
-
@dieAntagonista: The way it should be. Nom
-
@dieAntagonista: LOL… I love the variety of your heritage…
-
@deuce: dude you are 100% wrong for blaming the whole country if only a good handle are like that, they don’t encourage they only say what will happen if they come to them.
-
@Phyreblade: Haha aw. Why thank you mister. That made me smile.
-
@dieAntagonista: Good. Smiling is good for you.
-
ONE LOVE. Rasta in my heart always
peace
love
unity
Theres No Way Like The American Way
(8 votes, average: 4.88 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Sad :(
21 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?21 Responses to Theres No Way Like The American Way
-
It’s funny because it was taken in america’s worst economic disaster!
-
“World’s Highest Standard of Living” doesn’t sound very good considering that there’s a “standard of living” wage requirement. Perhaps “World’s Highest Quality of Living…”
-
Only because of Costco. That’s why the standard was horrible back then. At least stock guys jumped out windows back then.
-
-
@riverdaledragon: You… you -are- retarded aren’t you?
-
good ol’ 2008
-
America, FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!
-
Some people still fail at history it seems. It’s cool though, I’m sure CNN, FOX, and all them other bullshit media stations will catch the clueless up. Probably not, but it’s nice to hope for change, that one day people will not be so fucking stupid.
-
@sylvanish: Bleak forecasts of Unemployment projected for this year haven’t been so low since a time when Native Americans owned Lousianna, Unemployment is lower then when Reagan, Clinton, or the Bush’s stepped into office, and when if the auto industries close down…
-
It’s funny that there isn’t one white person standing in that line, oh wait, yes there is, in the poster driving away!!!
-
@Dublin0:
Those same people forecast great things for Nortel.
It’s called manipulating the market.
According to those same people the world is ending unless we add in some new taxes.
Thanks for taking the bait.
-
@ mightattom: silly black people…happiness is for white folk…now shine my shoes and smile at me!
-
LOL @America…
-
There’s no place like home…There’s no place like home…There’s no place like home…
-
-
Where Da White Wimmin At?
-
Yep, this looks like it’s exactly where we’re headed to once again.
Thanks, Congress!
-
@mAgnUS BUTTfoorson: awww well put? or not, the same people? Link it fuckstick. Wasn’t that Canada’s largest company? Troll my nuts, your point just re-enforces my point if the same analysts did in fact make that prediction.
-
Gots to be somebody needs sum killin’
-
i’ve seen this before, although not here.
-
Cool.
Now, if anyone cares, raise their hand.
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
21 Responses to Theres No Way Like The American Way
-
It’s funny because it was taken in america’s worst economic disaster!
-
“World’s Highest Standard of Living” doesn’t sound very good considering that there’s a “standard of living” wage requirement. Perhaps “World’s Highest Quality of Living…”
-
Only because of Costco. That’s why the standard was horrible back then. At least stock guys jumped out windows back then.
-
@riverdaledragon: You… you -are- retarded aren’t you?
-
good ol’ 2008
-
America, FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!
-
Some people still fail at history it seems. It’s cool though, I’m sure CNN, FOX, and all them other bullshit media stations will catch the clueless up. Probably not, but it’s nice to hope for change, that one day people will not be so fucking stupid.
-
@sylvanish: Bleak forecasts of Unemployment projected for this year haven’t been so low since a time when Native Americans owned Lousianna, Unemployment is lower then when Reagan, Clinton, or the Bush’s stepped into office, and when if the auto industries close down…
-
It’s funny that there isn’t one white person standing in that line, oh wait, yes there is, in the poster driving away!!!
-
@Dublin0:
Those same people forecast great things for Nortel.
It’s called manipulating the market.
According to those same people the world is ending unless we add in some new taxes.
Thanks for taking the bait.
-
@ mightattom: silly black people…happiness is for white folk…now shine my shoes and smile at me!
-
LOL @America…
-
There’s no place like home…There’s no place like home…There’s no place like home…
-
Where Da White Wimmin At?
-
Yep, this looks like it’s exactly where we’re headed to once again.
Thanks, Congress!
-
@mAgnUS BUTTfoorson: awww well put? or not, the same people? Link it fuckstick. Wasn’t that Canada’s largest company? Troll my nuts, your point just re-enforces my point if the same analysts did in fact make that prediction.
-
Gots to be somebody needs sum killin’
-
i’ve seen this before, although not here.
-
Cool.
Now, if anyone cares, raise their hand.
spirals
(7 votes, average: 4.71 out of 5) Loading ...Add to favoritesTags: Science!, wtf
21 Comments
Hide Comments
Leave a comment ?21 Responses to spirals
-
[user was banned for this post]
-
but it’s only 20,000 digits
-
Maybe that just banned natedog #1 or #2
-
Im in ur art putting in a Fibonacci sequence in
-
The last one appeals to my current state of hunger, assuming they’re M&Ms or Skittles or something.
-
Those are balls! You’re looking at balls!
-
@RSIxidor:
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
-
Nature is so fukken cool.
-
@Nimbo: I just love me some Golden Ratio. I’ll go for a Taylor’s Series and a nice convergence if Fibonacci doesn’t do it for me.
-
Math is derishus.
-
@Sticky: smarties….
-
if anyone was wondering, the other natedog posted PHI to 20,000 places.
goldennumber.net/phi20000.htm
he could have posted PHI to 100,000 places, but he didn’t.
goldennumber.net/PhiTo100000Places.txt
-
the last one looks mighty tasty…
Uzumaki FTW…
-
@Phyreblade: Dang, I was hoping to be the first to make a post about Junji Ito. Thanks to him and Uzumaki, I get goosebumps whenever I see a spiral… especially snails… damn creepy snails.
-
@ColombianMonkey:
They aren’t Smarties. Smarties have an indentation in the middle.
-
@Silverwolf: LOL Yeah, Uzumaki was pretty trippy…
-
-
-
@nyokki: Rofl… Wow… That was… lol…
-
@Phyreblade: Disturbing, funny, frightening and kinda sexy. Isabella Rossalini is one of my favorite actors, as was her mother.
-
@nyokki: LOL Yes, that…
And I had to look up that her mother was Ingrid Bergman… I did not know that… Makes it much clearer where she gets it from…
Hide Comments | Add your comment
Leave a comment ?
21 Responses to spirals
-
[user was banned for this post]
-
but it’s only 20,000 digits
-
Maybe that just banned natedog #1 or #2
-
Im in ur art putting in a Fibonacci sequence in
-
The last one appeals to my current state of hunger, assuming they’re M&Ms or Skittles or something.
-
Those are balls! You’re looking at balls!
-
@RSIxidor:
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU -
Nature is so fukken cool.
-
@Nimbo: I just love me some Golden Ratio. I’ll go for a Taylor’s Series and a nice convergence if Fibonacci doesn’t do it for me.
-
Math is derishus.
-
@Sticky: smarties….
-
if anyone was wondering, the other natedog posted PHI to 20,000 places.
goldennumber.net/phi20000.htmhe could have posted PHI to 100,000 places, but he didn’t.
goldennumber.net/PhiTo100000Places.txt -
the last one looks mighty tasty…
Uzumaki FTW…
-
@Phyreblade: Dang, I was hoping to be the first to make a post about Junji Ito. Thanks to him and Uzumaki, I get goosebumps whenever I see a spiral… especially snails… damn creepy snails.
-
@ColombianMonkey:
They aren’t Smarties. Smarties have an indentation in the middle. -
@Silverwolf: LOL Yeah, Uzumaki was pretty trippy…
-
@nyokki: Rofl… Wow… That was… lol…
-
@Phyreblade: Disturbing, funny, frightening and kinda sexy. Isabella Rossalini is one of my favorite actors, as was her mother.
-
@nyokki: LOL Yes, that…
And I had to look up that her mother was Ingrid Bergman… I did not know that… Makes it much clearer where she gets it from…
March 8, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Who?
Also, I’m not complaining, but what’s with all these pictures of secksy wimmen? Is it some kind of 8th-of-the-month-hot-women-theme day? If so, I approve.
March 8, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Well the stockings match the wallpaper, but do does the carpet match the drapes?
March 8, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Well the stockings match the wallpaper, but does the carpet match the drapes?
March 8, 2009 at 3:41 pm
I love this picture.
March 8, 2009 at 3:47 pm
if you’d remember Tiki said he had a bunch of nsfw in moderation. and now you see em.
March 8, 2009 at 3:50 pm
@Senshi: last time i checked it’s a wooden floor.
March 8, 2009 at 4:29 pm
@ColombianMonkey: Oh. Yes. That is his bad.
Clearly, the carpet has been removed. That is a perfectly smooth surface.
I like….wooden floors. Floors where the carpet is not there.
March 8, 2009 at 5:27 pm
@LukeV1-5:
@ColombianMonkey:
I was holding them back, because I was contemplating deleting them all.
If you remember, I also once said there would be no more NSFW submissions, and all these were submitted without any tags, most noticably, the NSFW tag which was required for NSFW posts.
I’m still thinking of not permitting NSFW submissions, and forcing them over to Random Nude
March 8, 2009 at 6:52 pm
@tiki god: Well, if you want to stop NSFW on MCS, this is a step in the right direction. You should continue to do this.
March 8, 2009 at 8:45 pm
@tiki god:
i can dig some boobs, but today is kinda some overload going on. boobs are cheap on the ‘tubes – even cheaper than funny, sickening, strange or awe-inspiring or whatever. get tired of feeling like as a dude on the tubes i’m expected to objectify every piece of flesh that crosses my path and start foaming at the mouth because OMFG LADIE PARTS I NEBER SEEN DEM BEFOR LOOK AT ALL DEM BOOBEHS.
A nice picture of a good looking or interesting form is cool, but after a while… eh. seen one piece of tubetrash, seen it all. can’t think with my dick ALL the time.
March 9, 2009 at 1:47 am
@tiki god: i think if you completly remove NSFW it would take a bite out of M[c]S but i would agree to lessen the amount of nsfw. i mean im no homo. but seeing nsfw all the time is getting to be a sore in the eyes. it should be something special and not day to day basis.anyhow i go for stricter moderation. but don’t remove it completly.
March 9, 2009 at 11:32 pm
@ColombianMonkey: NSFW posts are makeing your eyes sore? BLASPHEMY!!!! Go wash your mouth out with lysol, and say 20 Hail Mary’s…
Making your eyes sore… Pffft…