PETA? I’d rather wear fur.

Comment by unknown — January 4, 2008 @ 11:06 am

But I’d rather SHE was naked lol. That is some hot stuff. You know you would..

Comment by Will — January 4, 2008 @ 11:09 am

She has a great body, never been too sure about the face - always expect her to have a voice like a bloke.. she does look slightly tranny.

Comment by Halfmad — January 4, 2008 @ 11:44 am

Turn around, I bet she’s wearing fur - a big nasty patch of it that’ll take a weed whacker to bust through.

Comment by bob — January 4, 2008 @ 12:25 pm

For me, just one more reason to love the girl that is pretty much always showing her cleavage, always and forever.

Comment by RSIxidor — January 4, 2008 @ 12:36 pm

I hate these hypocritical PETA celeb pics. It almost ruins the effect of seeing a nearly naked body. Well, what the hell, I’ll give you guys a li’l Eva, potentially NSFW if your boss is real anal….

She’s not wearing the fur, right?

http://farm3.static.flickr.com.....2aae_o.jpg

Oh wait…in this one she is. Damn.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com.....1fb2_o.jpg

Ok, this one isn’t fur related, but still PETA friendly….

http://farm3.static.flickr.com.....b6fb_o.jpg

Have a nice day!

Comment by wookie_x — January 4, 2008 @ 2:41 pm

wookie_x, thanks for pointing out the hypocrisy, but more importantly thanks for extra Eva Mendes pics.

Comment by reboot — January 4, 2008 @ 2:44 pm

wookie ftw

Comment by natedog — January 4, 2008 @ 2:59 pm

No one’s ever heard of faux?

Comment by RSIxidor — January 4, 2008 @ 3:48 pm

Or possibly pre-peta eva. Unlike gayness, few people are born cruelty free.

Comment by RSIxidor — January 4, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

@ RSIxidor

Fine, you got me. It’s less about PETA and more about an opportunity to share other pics of the Eva.

Comment by wookie_x — January 4, 2008 @ 10:21 pm

@wookie_x
there is such a thing as fake fur. Tho if you’re against the idea of fur, I don’t see why you’d dig the fake version. Sort of like Tofurkey… lame on all counts.

/back to the Eva pix

Comment by st_judas — January 10, 2008 @ 8:58 am

That image can’t be from 1984, look at the blaster the middle martian is carrying. Its a Zero Toys, smoke ring blaster which came out sometime after 2000 IIRC. Clever remake image though.

Comment by bob — November 27, 2007 @ 11:37 am

The best way to watch this stinker is the old MST3k send-up of it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0776520/

Comment by HappyPig — November 27, 2007 @ 12:04 pm

Holy crap. The whole MST3K-enhanced movie is up on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT6akoSCzpw

Comment by HappyPig — November 27, 2007 @ 12:05 pm

This is a pic from a group in Orange County… they act it out live every Christmas.

Comment by ooklamok — November 27, 2007 @ 1:16 pm

uh…. something seems off about this. i dont buy it.

Comment by GlowMonkay — November 27, 2007 @ 7:34 am

BOOBATRON! ASSEMBLE!

Comment by w0x — November 27, 2007 @ 7:52 am

As-per-usual… the before looks better than the after.

Comment by Q-delta — November 27, 2007 @ 9:43 am

See there are some bonuses to getting knocked up ladies!!

Comment by Jet — November 27, 2007 @ 9:57 am

I must disagree with Delta, I find the after quite more delicious.

Comment by RSIxidor — November 27, 2007 @ 11:15 am

why does her neck look three times as thick in the after…

Comment by Gaexion — November 27, 2007 @ 12:15 pm

between the push-up of the corset and the newly aquired milk in those boobies they look quite real to me.

Comment by Musashi1584 — November 27, 2007 @ 12:17 pm

Om…nom….nom…nom?

Amirite?

Comment by LukeV1-5 — November 27, 2007 @ 2:46 pm

Gwen 2.0. By Microsoft…

Comment by phyreblade — November 27, 2007 @ 10:37 pm

Yeah, typical Microsoft style phyreblade, looks pretty, but effectively useless!! comes with bugs as well…

Comment by Wally — November 28, 2007 @ 2:29 am

i agree with luke on this oen

Comment by Poogers — November 28, 2007 @ 9:03 am

@Wally
Yeah. Kinda like Vista…

Comment by Phyreblade — November 28, 2007 @ 6:38 pm

gimme both. But the old gwen is much hotter. nom.

Comment by Gilez — December 4, 2007 @ 12:40 am

with socks no less

Comment by maxcw — November 19, 2007 @ 4:03 am

http://www.thebestpageintheuni.....?u=fashion

Comment by diabeetus — November 19, 2007 @ 5:21 am

‘Nuff Said.

Comment by phyreblade — November 19, 2007 @ 6:00 am

Not just with socks, with POTUS socks!

I wanna pair of those…

Comment by Anonymouse — November 19, 2007 @ 6:42 am

I don’t care what people say about ‘em..

With black socks, they’re comfy as all hell.

Comment by Gunface01 — November 19, 2007 @ 6:42 pm

Busted by Snopes:

http://www.snopes.com/crime/warnings/jenkem.asp

Comment by dorix — November 11, 2007 @ 8:06 pm

How the hell did leeroy jenkins get mixed up in this?

Comment by casemods — November 11, 2007 @ 8:17 pm

If it works, I have no doubt people would do it.

No doubt @ all.

So the question is, what chemicals are produced when it ferments?

Comment by GrandAdmiralThrawn — November 11, 2007 @ 8:37 pm

My guess would be Methane, thought I’m not sure you can actually get high off that.

Comment by phyreblade — November 11, 2007 @ 9:10 pm

I really hope there was someone stupid enough to try this.

Comment by Wisebrute — November 11, 2007 @ 10:03 pm

also known as “butt hash” yet another fine example of journalism excelence at Fox News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UsNbsjpuLc

Comment by 8870949 — November 11, 2007 @ 10:33 pm

Busted. And disgusting!

Comment by windrider — November 12, 2007 @ 3:00 am

You have to be pretty desperate to have the taste of sewage in your mouth for several days to get high for 20 minutes.

Comment by Kolossos — November 12, 2007 @ 4:57 am

Why, oh why would you inhale fermented piss and shit when you can get a blunt for $5 on the streets?

Comment by Namelis1 — November 12, 2007 @ 7:08 am

Wake and Jenk, Bitches.

Comment by Caio — November 12, 2007 @ 2:23 pm

That man in the Youtube clip deserves an award for saying “butt hash” with a straight face.

Comment by L_Tetris_Block — November 12, 2007 @ 8:02 pm