Login
-
Categories
- Site News (110)
- Affiliate Program (136)
- Contests - Past (77)
- MCS Advertisements (76)
- Discussion (2)
- Images (5976)
- Paid Posts (3)
- Quotes (2)
- Removed Posts (4)
- Video (46)
Archives
-
RSS Feeds
-
The Tiki Web Group
Photoshop: A powerful tool
Posted on March 30, 2008 by AngryGuy | 9 Comments by AngryGuy - AngryGuyFiled Under Uncategorized and has these tags: Humor, Sexy




(10 votes, average: 4 out of 5)Comments(9)
God Bless America
Posted on March 30, 2008 by AngryGuy | 3 Comments by AngryGuy - AngryGuyFiled Under Uncategorized and has these tags: Humor, Military, Politics




(17 votes, average: 4.24 out of 5)Comments(3)
-
Win.
Comment by Gunface01 — March 30, 2008 @ 9:21 am
-
Won.
Comment by Pants — March 30, 2008 @ 9:00 pm
-
Losing as we speak.
Also: are you really proud of this?
Comment by MagonistaRevolt — April 1, 2008 @ 9:35 am
Minesweeper Epic Fail
Posted on November 21, 2007 by AngryGuy | 10 Comments by AngryGuy - AngryGuyFiled Under Uncategorized and has these tags: Gaming, Humor




(14 votes, average: 3.86 out of 5)Comments(10)
-
God damn, that’s funny.
-
I got an extra laugh when I tried to replicate this (thinking they just had a large playing grid with a high number of mines). Apparently, unless I have godly luck, it’s impossible* to lose on the first turn.
* Unless, of course, your ability to fail has reached epic proportions.
-
nocash: as you can see, there’s only one mine on the entire field.
Comment by phil — November 22, 2007 @ 1:11 am
-
ROFL
Seriously. How badly would you have to have offended lady luck in order for this to happen…Comment by phyreblade — November 22, 2007 @ 1:14 am
-
Ahem, this is impossible in the Windows Minesweeper. The game generates the field only after the first click is performed, making it impossible to lose on the first click.
Ignorance was bliss, wasn’t it?
Comment by unknown — November 22, 2007 @ 2:35 am
-
Fuck you I’m keeping my Lulz.
Comment by Gaexion — November 22, 2007 @ 2:55 am
-
Wow, unknown, way to kill a joke for no reason. Except maybe to display your amazing minesweeper expertise. In which case: Good job, you know everything about minesweeper.
Comment by Caio — November 22, 2007 @ 7:12 am
-
no this is “Epic Minesweeper”
Comment by Cargen — November 22, 2007 @ 8:27 am
-
actually, i’ve lost on the first turn plenty of times, especially when clicking in the corners.
Comment by mechaxl — November 22, 2007 @ 1:48 pm
-
@unknown
I disagree. All that means is that the fates actually conspired against this player to ensure that a bomb existed under the first tile that got clicked.This player did not just phail. It was, in fact, A MEGA EPIC PHAIL of BIBLICAL proportions.
My lulz remain inviolate.

Comment by phyreblade — November 22, 2007 @ 4:13 pm
Camping…
Posted on November 21, 2007 by AngryGuy | 13 Comments by AngryGuy - AngryGuyFiled Under Uncategorized and has these tags: Gaming, Humor




(10 votes, average: 3.4 out of 5)Comments(13)
-
a strategy for fags with out any combat honor
-
without
Comment by mAgnUS BUTTfoorson — November 21, 2007 @ 9:47 pm
-
nkv, you better be talking about about some video game or some shit, because I don’t want to hear you thinking there’s such a thing as combat honour, god damnit.
Comment by Caio — November 21, 2007 @ 9:53 pm
-
It’s so lame when I see people just sitting there, and BAM, I’m dead. It’s like they need to get the kill for satisfaction or something…satisfaction of being a camping little pussy.
-
For those who don’t know, its from Red vs Blue -making fun of casemod’s problem there.
This image is one of their t-shirts: http://www.roosterteethstore.com/rt0065.html
Comment by anidiot — November 21, 2007 @ 10:40 pm
-
LOL, you know, I actually find campers an interesting challenge. There’s nothing more satisfying than creeping up on a camper and stabbin’ em with a knife. Or shooting them through their scopes (if they have them).
Much like nkv and casemods, I find most people spend so much time whining about campers that they stop trying to figure out how to to deal with them. Barring haxxoring bastiges, there is generally always a few different ways of dealing with a camper, if you actually apply yourself, rather than just get frustrated…
Of course if you suck, then it won’t matter if sombody’s camping or not. You’ll still get pwnt.

Comment by phyreblade — November 22, 2007 @ 1:05 am
-
Man, whining about campers is like whining about “FUKK MAN, I’VE STEPPED ON 7 NADES AND I DEID, FUCK”
Go into Solid Snake, find the camper then fry his ass. What do you think, what does real life snipers does in wars?Comment by Hepathos — November 22, 2007 @ 3:42 pm
-
Yes Hepathos, but CS and other games aren’t sniper only…in fact the sniper is prob the least used gun
-
LOL, sniper, AK-74, no matter. I’ve actually been accused of sniping with a Deagle. Point is, There is always a way to take a camper out… Your job is to find it…
Comment by phyreblade — November 25, 2007 @ 4:00 am
-
I’ve gotta agree with phyreblade. I actually kinda like it when I find a camper because either I kill him and feel great for making up for him getting the drop on me, or he kills me, and I begin my revenge-obsession for 1-3 kills. It makes games fun!

Comment by Max — November 27, 2007 @ 3:33 am
-
Max, that is almost never the case.
Crouching and not moving gives you better accuracy and less recoil, giving the camper a 20% increase in skill. Moving standing up makes it so inaccurate and gives a lot more recoil.
And co-op makes games more fun btw

-
campers only suck when there spawn camping
Comment by knogoodidleft — November 27, 2007 @ 3:50 am
-
@case
But you are also overlooking the fact that they are much more susceptible to diversions and sneak attacks from uncovered directions. I have yet to play a game where a camper was so well embedded that I was entirely unable to do anything about it (barring glitching and/or hax). It may take a few deaths to figure it out, but there is always a way…Comment by phyreblade — November 27, 2007 @ 4:40 am
-
OBAMA 2008
-
Next Theme Day
-
-
Super Duper Things:
This is a cloud of tags
9-11 420 Advertisements Aerial Animated Image Comic Books Computers Cthulhu Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Fantasy - Science Fiction Food Forum Fodder Gaming Holiday Humor Jack Daniels / Alcohol Legos lol cats Military Motivational Poster Movies Music Nature NSFW Pedo-Bear Politics Racist Religion Sad :( Science! Sexist Sexy Space Tattoos Television Toys Visual Tricks Wallpaper Warhammer 40k Weapons wtf X-MasBuy Tiki A beer

As you can see, it is not a good idea to apply a little photoshop to a photo that needs a fucking METRIC TON.
Comment by unknown — March 30, 2008 @ 10:33 am
I’d hit it.
Comment by Gunface01 — March 30, 2008 @ 10:42 am
so would I
Comment by hvymetal86 — March 30, 2008 @ 11:27 am
Should have fixed the tits more. You can tell it’s shopped by the way the back of the tits seem to hover (where the fat was) and the rest of it kind of curves over an invisible stomach.
Comment by Andrew — March 30, 2008 @ 11:49 am
You’d hit the old version. Oh yeah.
Comment by w0x — March 30, 2008 @ 12:13 pm
Thank god they got the contrast. The colour was a little faded..
oh, and notice how the skinny one looks happier heh.
Comment by lee7 — March 30, 2008 @ 12:45 pm
I’d hit either.
Comment by RSIxidor — March 30, 2008 @ 12:58 pm
Looks shopped. You can tell because of the pixels.
Comment by Wyvern — March 30, 2008 @ 4:09 pm
I think both versions of her are okay.
Comment by Wisebrute — March 31, 2008 @ 4:14 am