Leave A Comment

Leave a comment ?

6 Responses to The Government Has No Plan for Reuniting the Immigrant Families It Is Tearing Apart

  1. I am not in favor of separating children from their parents. The parents should not have broken the law which resulted in the separation. This post is a lie, the parents are in contact with their children on a daily basis. This is a democratic law. Have read the law in which President Clinton signed into effect I believe it was 1995 not sure about that.

    Reply

    • TRUTH

      So dishonest…. About Those Children…in March 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Flores vs Reno. The Court decided that minors couldn’t be incarcerated with adults accompanying them illegally across the U.S. border. The decision was the result of a long dispute in how to best care for these children while the adults were detained for criminal proceedings.

      When aliens cross the border illegally – that is, not at a point of entry – they are incarcerated until their criminal case is decided. The understandable argument at the time was “why should children be incarcerated while their parents are in jail?” It seemed a fundamental violation of international human rights.

      As a result, The Flores case drew a line in the sand. Children could not be incarcerated with their parents or accompanying adults while being held for illegal immigration violations. And a subsequent 1997 agreement stipulated that children must be placed in a safer environment where they could enjoy *certain privileges, including education, a clean, safe environment and other normal life cycle amenities that incarcerated individuals do not enjoy.*

      It was considered a “victory” for human rights. By separating adult and child, we protected the children, reducing any harm done to them for their parent’s or accompanying adult’s decisions.

      A lot has happened since then. Bottom line, these shelters have been operating in accordance with the law and are overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services to protect those children from the hazards of parental incarceration since 1997.

      So, since Donald Trump was running his real estate empire, selling wine and casinos in 1993, we are left to determine just how he managed to orchestrate this cruel “separation of immigrant parent and child” 25 years BEFORE he was President of the United States. The obvious answer is, he didn’t. He had nothing to do with establishing this United States immigration policy. Today, he simply enforces it.

      This one story illustrates how important it is for us to do our research regarding today’s headlines. The Corporate Media either refuses to do the research, is incapable of doing the research or has done the research and decided to lie to you about its findings. Either way, this would make the Corporate Media lazy, incompetent or just plain deceptive.p

      Reply

      • This is being done to LEGAL ASYLUM SEEKERS arriving at LEGAL POINTS OF ENTRY. Your rant is invalid.

        Reply

      • Hey genius, if what you say is actually true, (spoiler alert, not really). I’m all for holding those who started this downright evil practice to account. But in the meantime, the people doing it RIGHT FUCKING NOW need to be stopped. THAT is the thing that matters. And mealy mouthed dissembling motherfuckers should either step the fuck up and denounce it, or shut the motherfucking hell up about Clinton started a law that could be interpreted to mean that immigrantswhocameintotheUnitedStatesviacertainwaysandwhodiddngdletlhblahblah. Fuck off and shut up.

        Reply

        • But.. but.. what matters right now is not that children are being forcibly ripped from their mothers’ to be herded into mass incarceration facilities by the land of the free and home of the motherfuckin’ brave. The lifelong trauma suffered by most of these kids, and the physical and sexual abuse suffered by some of them… these are all irrelevant. What really, truly matters right now is that everyone needs to accept that this practice has some tenuous roots in a law passed by a Democrat. THAT is the thing that matters.

          (also, fuck off)

          Reply

    • this post is the truth, there is no lie here other than what you’re trying to insinuate with your lying post.

      Reply

Leave a Comment



Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Motorcycles Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas


  • Here's a few awesome images!