Female Ghost Busters

Added on July 14th, 2015 by kaylene38y | Report Post
Tags:Ghostbusters, Movies, WTF

I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.

15 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

theredshoes (#190905)

8 years ago

I don’t understand why they all have to be female, or indeed the need to remake Ghostbusters in the first place. If they really felt the urge to regurgitate it, a mixed sex team might have had a more interesting dynamic, but most of this lot are a known group quantity and have made money in the past. That’s Showbiz.

www.denofgeek.com/movies/ghostbusters/36169/ghostbusters-dan-aykroyd-confirms-cameo-role

Then there’s this. It’s possible that Aykroyd is so enthusiastic about it because he was a co-writer and maybe has a financial slice of the pie, in which case a re-hash would make him some money.

tiki god (#1) (MCS+)

Admin

Reply to theredshoes

8 years ago

from what I understand, it’s not a remake, it’s a true sequel, where there’s GB franchises set up

Saborlas (#554)

Reply to tiki god

8 years ago

No, it’s a remake. You understand nothing. 😛 Also, I think there’s a problem with the emoticons.

-1

notspamming (#44655)

8 years ago

[quote]I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.[/quote]
I, for one, thank FSM that it doesn’t.
Although the ones on the right could be butterfaces.

Saborlas (#554)

Reply to notspamming

8 years ago

The original uniforms didn’t fit perfectly, either.

-1

Aquaman43 (#85320)

8 years ago

“I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.”
Because it sucks, that’s why. This will fucking fail, as it should. Pointless.

downvotethis (#3429)

8 years ago

I was hoping for something a little more like this…

[img]http://www.angeles-hill.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/nutbusters.jpg[/img]

skndrbg (#191104)

8 years ago

Revisionism has ‘fixed’ (as in a ‘trip to the vet’) a phallocentric franchise which supported privilege and the patriarchy. It might not support the shallow construct that is humour but I’m sure there will be many teachable moments. All hail The Narrative.

Caio (#104)

Reply to skndrbg

8 years ago

I wasted a lot of my best years getting various liberal arts degrees but I have never seen anything this bullshit-filled in my entire life.

“Shallow construct that is humour”? Get over yourself.

skndrbg (#191104)

Reply to skndrbg

8 years ago

Weight and significance is suggested wrt your “best years” and “liberal arts degrees” (apparently too numerous to detail?) and the amazing scope of what you have seen … and I’m supposed to get over MYself? That was excellent. Thank you.

Gropegrope (#189286)

Reply to skndrbg

8 years ago

I kinda liked your deer jokes Skndrbg….I even up-thumb them.
But then you had to spoil my new found respect with all this pompous nonsense.
Back to your narrative it is then…..