Explain the Differance

10830971_502951419845020_5675143521749889358_o.jpg (134 KB)

  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    5 Comment threads
    12 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    9 Comment authors
    przxqglnotspammingdirkGropegropedrevil007 Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Gropegrope
    Member

    I dunno about either of those girls.
    But I do wonder what this guy’s excuse was…?

    [imgcomment image[/img]

    Something about guns, wasn’t it…?
    I guess folks get religion about a lot of strange shit…

    drevil007
    Member
    drevil007

    And how does McVeigh compare to the perpetrators of 40,000 – 50,000 or so terrorist attacks who justified their actions based on the Koran since his attack 20 years ago? Twenty years ago compared to this week, last week and probably next week. One attack compare to over 25,000 since 911. Its the exact same thing, isn’t it?

    Gropegrope
    Member

    Killing innocents is wrong no matter who does it. If we want to claim the high ground, then we have to walk it. Absolutely no doubt that certain sects of Islam are the most violent religion today…and they kill thousands…of their own and ours. But our hands aren’t clean either. We used 911 (perpetrated by what…15 Saudis, 2 Arabs, 1 Lebanonese, and 1 Egyptian) as an excuse to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, and kill literally hundreds of thousand of civilians. And all we managed was to destabilize the region and make it easier for extremists to organize and kill more… Read more »

    Animus
    Member

    The first girl probably can’t spell much beyond NRA, GOP, and FOX….

    Old Tofu
    Member
    Old Tofu

    and the second can’t spell that much because they wouldn’t let her go to school:/

    skndrbg
    Member
    skndrbg

    Well deflected. So everyone is afraid of both equally? Riiiight. That’s honest. All hail the narrative.

    Gropegrope
    Member

    I’m not sure which narrative you mean…?

    notspamming
    Member

    The difference is about 600 years.
    So if you look at Christianity around 1400’s, you’ll understand.

    MarauderDeuce
    Member

    I’ve been noticing the similarities a lot recently.

    Caio
    Member

    Yeah but I’m not worried about time-travelling knights attacking me. That would actually be pretty awesome.

    Gropegrope
    Member

    Plus, you’re not an infidel…

    Caio
    Member

    I have a Hebrew phrase book. Having a non-medical book with Hebrew in it would be enough to get me executed in Portugal in 1495, for example. I’m also an atheist, but I think most modern fundamentalists would be considered heretics by the standards of back then.

    When modern people complain about modern societies being normative and conformist and oppressive, they have no idea what could get you instantly executed for most of human history.

    notspamming
    Member

    If you lived in 1400’s, you would be.

    notspamming
    Member

    Time-traveling not required.

    Old Tofu
    Member
    Old Tofu

    you don’t have to time travel to live in the 1400’s? is this the new reading rainbow commercial?

    notspamming
    Member

    Are you really this retarded, or is just English not your native language ?

    przxqgl
    Member

    the girl on the left won’t kill you if you draw a cartoon picture of mohammed, but she will kill you if your profession is providing safe abortion services. either way, you’re going to be dead. i don’t see much difference in that.



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas