did you know

did you know.png

  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    5 Comment threads
    3 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    7 Comment authors
    notspammingWistfulDSentinelPanda123TheStone Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Saborlas
    Member

    Because an unstable food market where farming isn’t enough to put food on a farmer’s table is a good thing.

    /maintaining a stable food supply is part of the government’s job
    //deal with it

    TheStone
    Member

    Why was this downvoted?

    WistfulD
    Member

    I don’t know why anyone would expect a special exemption for personally consumed wheat. If there’s a reason to eliminate wheat, there’s a reason to eliminate wheat. Now as to why we would be eliminating wheat, that’s a different issue.

    Panda123
    Member

    They get paid for it.

    Sentinel
    Member

    Farming in the USA is already heavily subsidized in order to keep prices down and stabilize the market. So what’s the real difference if they burn it or if they buy it? We already produce more than we eat. (not that there aren’t people out there that would benefit from the extra food we already have. We just don’t let them have it in the first place.)

    notspamming
    Member

    UE has limits on produced food too, so not a shocker.



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas