Science vs Faith

2007-01-15-science-vs-faith.png (74 KB)

  • Leave A Comment

    Leave a comment ?

    16 Responses to Science vs Faith

    1. I’m not sure what the circumstance that the steps in the left diagram are in the wrong order is meant to tell me.
      Maybe that the creator didn’t know too much about scientific processes. But that would only confirm my feeling that most interweb atheists aren’t the brightest bulbs in the luster.

      Reply

      • The effects of funding, tenure and publicity are also missing from the science graph.
        “Faith” is also a quality required of those who blindly accept the dictates of the socialist padres and the priests of green.

        Reply

    2. I guess since observable data over the last 15 years hasn’t matched up with predictions the climate change computer models made, and the Left is still pushing this drek, it means Climate Science is a Religion.

      Reply

      • Setting aside the fact that you are spouting nonsense talking points from heavily funded “think” tanks (scare quotes are fun!) that cherry pick isolated bits and pieces of complex and detailed studies and ignore the 99.99% of said studies that support the climate change models, the fact that there hasn’t been an actual “left” anywhere in the U.S.A. for decades, and the fact that in the isolated and rare instances where the predictions are proving off base the researchers are using sweet, sweet peer reviewed science to re-examine and refine said models, you are absolutely correct. And by “absolutely correct”, I of course mean a total moron. You always were the shitty and loud uncle at thanksgiving dinner, Frank.

        Reply

        • You’re my hero.

          Frank IS an asshole.

          Reply

        • ‘Nonsense’ from ‘heavily funded think tanks’? – From a Canadian perspective that sounds just like Soros. “99.9%” was a reading clue as to your eventual intent however. A bullshit number often used by leftists to imply a grasp of statistics. Are you absolutely sure that the residual .1% doesn’t detract a bit from your ‘argument’? ‘Cherry picking’ implies factual existence and is probably a lot more hygienic than pulling assertions out of one’s own ass.

          Reply

    3. I just don’t understand why atheists are so butthurt about religion all the time. Maybe its because atheists actually *do* worship something (Global Warming, Obama, themselves) and they view religion as competition.

      It would be like if Texas was constantly attacking Rhode Island over which was the best state. As some point you gotta ask why they even feel the need.

      Reply

    4. Wow.
      This one attracted the fundies and the carbon deniers….
      Good post….

      Reply

    5. Wow.
      This one attracted the fundies and the carbon deniers….
      Good post….

      Reply

    6. Wow.
      This one attracted the fundies and the carbon deniers….
      Good post….

      Reply

    7. Awwww. Poor little brownshirts got all butt hurt about the 15 year “pause” in warming and had to censor it.

      Reply

    8. Whomever drew this “flowchart”, clearly does not understand either one. If they even remotely understood, they would understand the two are tightly intertwined and are of the same universe. Science and creation are just different avenues for looking at the same thing. Experience in both.

      Reply

    Leave a Comment



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas