On average, on any given spot on the map, the temperature change between the coldest part of any day and the hottest is over 10º Celsius. The difference between the coldest time of the year and the coldest is over 20º.

How do the “climate scientists” do all those calculations about temperature? They average all collected temperature readings in a single day, then average those readings for the every month, then average those for the year. Why do they do this instead of dealing with the individual readings directly? Is is convenience? No. It’s because the standard deviation, and all other error-checking measurements go to hell if you use the individual temperature measurements. They’d be several times the value of the supposed “warming” occurring and anyone with any knowledge of statistics would immediately dismiss that warming as simply a glitch caused by the temperature oscillations that naturally occur during the day. They need to use average-of-average-of-average to hide all statistical error-checking values.

There’s also the fact that there’s absolutely no reliable temperature measurements made anywhere in the third world (aka over 80% of Earth’s surface) before the 1980’s. None. Not a single one. All measurements, if they exist at all, were made by hand by a person who rounded up the number to the nearest integer, giving every single measurement a +/- 0.5º Celsius error. Notice that the “global warming” would fall below the error margin of the measurements.

And last, the change in ambient temperature on any given spot on earth between noon temperature and midnight temperature is directly proportional to that spot’s ability to retain heat. If there was any temperature change due to an increment in retained heat (aka, global warming), the first telltale sign would be an reduction in the difference between noon and midnight temperatures. This would be considerably easier to measure and demonstrate that anything shown by the liberal idiots who support this nonsense. So why is it that you’ve never heard of this before? Because the few times anyone has tried to measure it, it has proven to be no change at all. If there is a change in temperature on Earth at all, it has absolutely nothing to do with the atmosphere’s capacity to retain heat.

As a bonus, their “measurements” show that the arctic pole (North pole) has had the largest increase in temperature of any region on earth. This completely contradicts the notion of CO2-made global warming since there’s virtually no man-made CO2 there, no way for it to get there, and no ground “heat” to be trapped by it. The only way for the pole to become hotter is for the atmosphere to LOSE its capacity to absorb heat allowing more sunlight to reach there.

I am glad the McS crew sorted out climate change. Shit had me worried.