how much extra for only whitepeople to touch my food
(12 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Loading...
Click to Add to favorites | Tags: Humor, Mitt Romney, Racist Leave A Comment
Leave a comment ?
18 Responses to how much extra for only whitepeople to touch my food
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 16, 2013 at 7:27 pm
In Utah- it all white kids all the time. It’s rare to see a minority.
February 16, 2013 at 7:34 pm
Yeah … how dare he run against the great one?
Only a racist would have the gall to present himself at what should have been the mere formality of an acclamation for an economic genius, a man of so much accomplishment, man to rule all 57 states, etc. (before anybody tries a high 5 – that was sarcasm)
February 16, 2013 at 7:45 pm
Handle it?You better be more concerned about it being spat into.
February 16, 2013 at 9:12 pm
If you’re stupid enough to think that “whitepeople” is a word, you don’t get to criticize others.
February 16, 2013 at 9:31 pm
He shoud have won. Four more years of
0vomit,God help us.
February 16, 2013 at 10:22 pm
Don’t you people (who use terms like “0vimit” and refer to groups who support anything you dislike as “The Liberals / Conservatives” regardless of connection to their platform) feel any shame for being successfully trolled by divisive party tactics to polarize your loyalties?
Same type of fuckers who referred to Bush as a “fascist” and Obama as a “socialist” as if they were meant to be any more than affect-shifting buzzwords.
Am I the only one that sees this type of behavior as a giant “I’m With Stupid” arrow that points upwards? Before I use a label I at least try to remember to make sure it respects the office of my nation and represents the platform I’m attempting to refer to.
February 17, 2013 at 2:20 am
I see them the same way. I pointed out that Obama was not even close to being Hitler- and a guy from North Carolina threatened my life! LOL
February 18, 2013 at 5:29 pm
Dear lord…
February 16, 2013 at 10:18 pm
Mitt who?
February 16, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Lets ignore that much of his extended family lives in Mexico
February 17, 2013 at 1:36 am
Staged. Mittens would never eat “poor people food.”
Fairly certain he’s never tasted even true homemade mac & cheese. That’s how out of touch he is. He lost by fucking up every time he tried to look human. Self-pwnage.
February 18, 2013 at 4:24 am
Idiotic, uninformed stereotype. The sort of which you’d be screaming bloody murder over if it were about homosexuals. Shame on — oh, you’re a lib. Never mind ‘shame on’ part since you can’t feel shame. Ever.
February 18, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Stereotypes refer to groups, not individuals. You should feel shame.
But I do agree the statement is uninformed, I’m sure Mitt ate plenty of “poor people food” on the campaign trail if only for the publicity.
February 19, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Stereotype of rich guys who happen to be white. Is that enough of a group for your ass?
February 17, 2013 at 10:00 am
How long has it been since this shit has been relevant? Isn’t it time to find something else to bitch about and fight about… I nominate Celebrities.. Now lets get our pantie’s in a bunch about them.. THOSE POMPOUS SONS OF BITCHES*
*disclaimer: I actually like some of them but who gives a fuck we are fighting
February 19, 2013 at 6:56 am
It’s funny because he’s a rich ass cracker. Just like it’s funny when a black girl is named “Shaniqua”, or an Asian dude is good at math.
Dammit I remember when this site had a sense of humour. Now it is full of little girl boys, all “waa waa genocide” and “waa waa school shootings.” I remember when three full days of 9-11 jokes would hardly bat an eyebrow.
You pussies need to grow some or go back to barney.com or your non-graphical gopher sites if you can’t handle the raw unfiltered glory that was the internet.
February 19, 2013 at 7:03 am
I’m gonna say another thing. Everyone in the English-speaking world nowadays gets upset when they are reminded that they are in a sick violent world. They’re rewriting history and literature (the recent nigerless Huck Finn, for example) just so they don’t have to be personally uncomfortable, as if their own delicate feelings should be society’s highest priority.
I’ve recently dusted off my old copies of the complete Tacitus, and I’m reminded what he said about the decline of the Roman Empire: As the Romans became wealthier and more comfortable, they sacrificed more of their freedoms and became too soft and sensitive to face the realities of life. Their tribal neighbours remained free, democratic in a primitive way, and thick-skinned. It was inevitable, he said, that these now superior-peoples would topple a Roman culture so quickly abandoning all the things that it takes to survive on earth. He was writing when Rome was nearly at its peak but he turned out to be right in the end.
This is exacly what is happening now. English speakers are sitting on the internet whining about how sensitive their delicate their feelings are, and writing big essays about how English is the universal language and technology will keep it that way forever, while more robust cultures aren’t letting themselves fall into the same kind of decadence. We’re going to become another medieval Europe or Qing-dynasty China.
February 19, 2013 at 4:22 pm
Huck Finn took place in Niger…?