Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.








September 20, 2012 at 1:26 pm
From recent events, showing a film about the prophet Mohammed is an even bigger insult -
September 20, 2012 at 5:25 pm
The “film” was just an excuse to fool your limp dick president and it worked.
He’s had to since concede it was a coordinated attack.
It only took his weak wimpy ass over a week to cave to the reality that his whole team got played….again.
Retribution? Cut embassy security funding.
Somebody should throw a pig at Obama and see if it gets this same reaction.
September 20, 2012 at 7:09 pm
Not exactly rocket science, every “expert” and media outlet on the planet has suggested it was a setup, that’s why the Secret service took the guy in for questioning. Nobody really thinks that an amateur film that had barely been seen would cause that kind of response without some planning. But face it, if they want an excuse to protest they’ll find one.
September 20, 2012 at 7:32 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
September 20, 2012 at 7:50 pm
Facepalm? Really?
The guy made the film (or someone involved released the info about it) so that the radicals in the Mideast would have something to protest about. Is that so hard to understand?
If showing a film about the prophet Mohammed wasn’t an insult, they wouldn’t have had an excuse to riot. But as I said, they would have found some other excuse eventually.
Think about it REAL HARD Magnus.
September 20, 2012 at 8:43 pm
The guy eh?
Which guy again?
Never could find that guy. Some made up guy.
On the anniversary of Sept 11.
Some guy.
Though it turns out it was a carefully planned attacked by Al Qeada from Yemen.
No you know better.
As does your weak little ape president who now has to agree with what I posted above.
The “film” was out since last spring.
Dumbshits like you are the only ones left who don’t know that movie was not the cause or reason.
Back peddle some more.
Now you’re at the sound of 10000000000 face palms.
Maybe you should contradict yourself again and see if that helps, you pussy dumbshit little queer lol
September 20, 2012 at 8:48 pm
You’re not making any sense, Mags- Maybe you should take a Xanax and lie down for a while.
September 20, 2012 at 10:24 pm
Point out which “guy” made said “film”, “asshole”.
I’m making perfect sense. You’re just too fucking stupid to follow along.
And you contradicted yourself in this thread.
You’re pretty much taking a single step and falling on your face then getting up and taking another step and falling right down on your face again.
Proceed…
September 21, 2012 at 1:09 am
Ok – I said “Nobody really thinks that an amateur film that had barely been seen would cause that kind of response”
And your response was “Dumbshits like you are the only ones left who don’t know that movie was not the cause or reason”
So I said the film was not the reason and you responded that no, the film was not the reason. (as usual with your “elegant” additions)
Is that Your idea of making sense?
The film in question is “Innocence of Muslims” thought to have been written and produced by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, using the pseudonym of “Sam Bacile”. Originally produced in 2011 under the name “Desert Warrior” and shown to the public only once to an audience of less than ten people under the name “Innocence of Bin Laden”. Clips from that film were uploaded to YouTube in July 2012 by the user “Sam Bacile” under the title “The Real Life of Muhammad” and “Muhammad Movie Trailer”. On September 8, 2012, an excerpt of the YouTube video was broadcast on Al-Nas TV, an Egyptian television station.
The New Republic said that the film “includes not a single artistically redeemable aspect” with “atrocious” directing, “terrible” sets and acting consisting of “blank eyes and strained line readings”. The New York Daily News called it an “obscenely inept vanity project” that is “far beneath any reasonable standard of movie-making.”
And actually, current intelligence on the Benghazi attack leads to an al Qaeda affiliate in North Africa known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM. Not Yemen, as you stated.
September 21, 2012 at 1:52 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
September 21, 2012 at 9:49 pm
I said it was an insult, I didn’t say it was the cause for the attacks. I said it was an EXCUSE for the attacks. Try READING next time.
God, you’re even stupid when you call other people stupid.
Yes, Al Qaeda are in Yemen – interesting (and very well known) trivia but that really doesn’t matter because the guys who did the attack are AQIM in North Africa. And yes, Yemen is close to North Africa, but not to the Islamic Maghreb which is on the other side of the continent in Morocco and Algeria.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_the_Islamic_Maghreb
Now, please stop wasting my time and crawl back into your little hidey-hole.
September 22, 2012 at 6:16 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
September 22, 2012 at 7:02 pm
Dude, sorry to interrupt your insane rant, but
“showing a film about the prophet Mohammed is an even bigger insult” Just means it was an insult. All that other shit is just crazy.
September 22, 2012 at 10:20 pm
You know, It’s getting really boring – you say something stupid, I prove it wrong and you follow up with something even stupider.
But here goes:
First off, Anon guy is right, “an even bigger insult” means just that – a big insult. No matter how many times you cut and paste it. People were insulted. At the same time other people carried out a terrorist attack, but that has nothing to do with the OP, does it? So it wasn’t part of the initial comment. If I wanted to say “the attacks in Benghazi were solely the result of a fourth rate film nobody saw” I would have said that.
“After it happened he decreased security around embassies”
actually, no – exactly the opposite, that’s why Fox news ran the headline “US embassies worldwide step up security after Libya attack” – (Step up means INCREASE not decrease) www.foxnews.com/world/2012/09/13/us-embassies-worldwide-step-up-security-after-libya-attack/
“The worst president in history took a week to realize it was a plot”
– no, actually the attack happened on a Tuesday and by the next day (that’s Wednesday, are you following?):
“senior U.S. officials and Middle East analysts raised questions Wednesday about the motivation for the Benghazi attack, noting that it involved the use of a rocket-propelled grenade and followed an al-Qaeda call to avenge the death of a senior Libyan member of the terrorist network. Libyan officials and a witness said the attackers took advantage of a protest over the film to launch their assault.“
That was September 12th, more than a week before I posted my comment, so it was already common knowledge at that point. www.washingtonpost.com/world/news-agencies-us-ambassador-to-libya-killed-in-attack-outside-consulate/2012/09/12/665de5fc-fcc4-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html
On September 13th, a video was uploaded to YouTube with the title “Libya Attack May Have Been Planned” and included the line “an attack that killed four Americans at a U.S. Consulate in eastern Libya may have been planned by extremists and inspired by al-Qaeda” www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEkWGdV3rH4
Can you get more public than YouTube? Are you really saying that it was in the Washington Post on the 12th and on YouTube on the 13th and the president didn’t know about it until the 18th?
“The worst president in history” – that’s your opinion, and you’re entitled to it, but the fact is he’s kicking Romney’s ass in the polls – by 62% in the electorals. Maybe it’s because Romney doesn’t bother to check his facts, either – electoral-vote.com/
Oh, and BTW - Algeria is still nowhere near Yemen.
September 20, 2012 at 1:55 pm
I also keep a little pig in my pocket for just such an occasion.
September 20, 2012 at 3:27 pm
Smart idea, I’ll have to remember that
September 20, 2012 at 4:05 pm
lol right? why would a dude in a suit have a bound pig in they pants?
September 21, 2012 at 1:59 am
He was moving up from Hamsters
September 20, 2012 at 10:37 pm
I wonder… If someone threw a pig at Magnus, would the pig be revolted?
September 21, 2012 at 8:54 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
September 24, 2012 at 2:57 am
Seriously. That’s a terrible thing to do to a pig.