Hello, my fellow Americans. As your President, I feel it’s important that we have a talk about faith. Oh you’re busy? That’s alright. I’ll just pass an ass-load of thinly veiled Christ-centric laws.
Presidential Address
Posted in Images on April 29th, 2012 by cottonpicker | Report This Post | 
Add to favorites
Tags: Humor, Politics, Religion

Add to favorites Tags: Humor, Politics, Religion
Leave a comment ?
26 Responses to Presidential Address
Leave a Comment
Tags!





(6 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
April 29, 2012 at 11:21 pm
birth certificate
April 30, 2012 at 4:14 am
Dude… That’s about as old/funny/relevant as duck rolling and the dancing baby. Get off my internet.
April 29, 2012 at 11:49 pm
Yeah, it’ll be just like that time Harry Reid tried to convert everyone from the Senate floor, and that time Steve Young tried to convert everyone at that post-game interview, and that time Ken Jennings tried to convert everyone on Jeopardy, and that time Jon Heder tried to convert everyone at that movie premier, and that time Donny and Marie tried to convert everyone in the 70′s, and that time….
April 30, 2012 at 2:16 am
it’s a slightly different thing when it’s the PotUS
April 30, 2012 at 12:04 pm
Yeah, because none of those people can pass laws just like the President can’t pass laws so it is completely different. I’m just glad we finally recovered from JFK forcing everyone to convert to Catholicism and then Jimmy Carter passing all those laws to make everyone a Southern Baptist. Religious bigotry is ugly.
Have an Evil day
April 30, 2012 at 11:59 pm
ah, you’re thinking this is “anti-morman” when it’s “anti-religion” which isn’t ugly, it’s a necessary step in humanity’s continued growth.
May 1, 2012 at 4:40 am
I agree – religious bigotry is ugly as fuck. That’s why I’m not religious.
April 30, 2012 at 12:56 am
I don’t like Romney, I don’t see anything about him that is genuine, and the whole “dog on the roof of the car” thing tells me that he could care less about anyone that isn’t him.
He flip flops on decisions and seems to take whatever views will get him the most support, until they don’t anymore.
All that said, what does OP have against Mormons?
April 30, 2012 at 3:51 am
Postmortem Babtism, gay-bashing, illegal political financing which should have made them lose their tax-exempt status (shady as fuck that they haven’t)
Not to mention the complete crock of shit that is the supposed history of the book of Mormon.
April 30, 2012 at 5:16 am
This makes it no less bigoted or bogus then the other major religions. I’m not saying it’s right, it’s not, but OP has posted Romney’s head on a few pics now while making fun of the religion.
The Book of Mormon isn’t anymore BS then talking to a burning bush, zombie Jesus, ascending to heaven at the Dome of the Rock, or Xenu.
It is a really good play though.
April 30, 2012 at 6:35 am
I’m Atheist all the way and agree that they’re all bogus. This isn’t about putting down Mormons – they’re already thoroughly disrespected. Even other religious groups look down at Mormons, sometimes as much as they do at Atheists. This is about making people resent seeing this fucker’s face as much as they hate seeing Mormons knocking at the door.
April 30, 2012 at 4:44 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
April 30, 2012 at 5:08 am
You must have skipped the part where I said: I don’t like Romney, I don’t see anything about him that is genuine” and missed the part where I said “He flip flops on decisions and seems to take whatever views will get him the most support, until they don’t anymore.”
For the dog thing: Most people treat people and animals they know better then they would a stranger. So if that’s how he treats his pets, how’s he going to treat us?
April 30, 2012 at 2:37 pm
“You must have skipped the part where I said: I don’t like Romney, I don’t see anything about him that is genuine” and missed the part where I said “He flip flops on decisions and seems to take whatever views will get him the most support, until they don’t anymore.””
No, I got that part, that’s why nothing in my post is directed specifically to you. But I hear it everywhere, hence the “I’m sick of hearing about this”.
It really isn’t the end of the world, but it gets brought up like it’s some kinda sex scandal. This says nothing about Romney. I personally would’ve made the damn thing get off the roof and push our car. Fuck dogs.
“For the dog thing: Most people treat people and animals they know better then they would a stranger. So if that’s how he treats his pets, how’s he going to treat us?”
He doesn’t have a history of animal abuses, or your point would be solid gold. It’s one dubious, isolated, incident. Dog owners make worse decisions daily when they toss unhealthy human food to their pets, they let them run on the street without a leash, or when they decide their text is too important to watch Fido lap at some mystery liquid on the ground.
Romney wants to be PotUS not a dog-sitter. We need to judge him on what he plans to do with that office, and you’ll find you have enough ammo against him.
May 3, 2012 at 8:34 pm
Wait… Are you saying that a examining a sex scandal DOES have it’s place in politics?
April 30, 2012 at 6:59 am
Being a nationally registered animal abuser has no place in political discourse?
And people wonder why we laugh at the term “Compassionate Conservative”
April 30, 2012 at 2:49 am
didn’t people say the same thing about “Catholic” JFK when he was running for office?
(not that anybody here was even a sperm in yer daddy’s loins at the time)
April 30, 2012 at 3:39 am
“Catholic” JFK said outright that a Catholic President should not answer to the Pope, and was pretty damned good about it. Mormon Romney openly pushes plenty of Christ-based policies.
April 30, 2012 at 3:43 am
Fools. Mormons aren’t Christians, why would a Mormon pass Christian laws?
April 30, 2012 at 4:04 am
Ever heard of the “No true Scotsman” logical fallacy?
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and swims like a duck…
They’re on the same branch of the family tree as Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists and such… Just a weird throwback/mutation. Mostly just because it’s new made-up bullshit that doesn’t mesh so well with the old made-up bullshit.
April 30, 2012 at 5:27 am
I’ve got a buddy, Evangelical, who is absolutely convinced Mormons aren’t Christian. Of course, he also thinks Catholics aren’t Christians. Me, I don’t give two tugs of a dead dog’s dick because the whole thing smacks of charlatanry to me anyway.
April 30, 2012 at 6:48 am
And many Catholics and Mormons would say that your Evangelical buddy isn’t a Christian… That’s the point of the “No true Scottsman” fallacy. If every Christian group that’s ever been accused of not being true Christians really wasn’t, there would be no Christians. From within Christianity, the definition is as open to interpretation as the Bible itself. From outside, it’s far more simple than that.
May 1, 2012 at 9:15 am
At the end of it he’s still the lesser of two evils in a two party system.
May 3, 2012 at 8:40 pm
That is shockingly original and deep, man. Think of it yourself?
May 1, 2012 at 12:55 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
May 3, 2012 at 8:44 pm
And how much of this Muslim’s policy-making has been based around Muslim faith, both before and during his presidency?
All the while, Romney will gladly say things to the effect of “That’s not what marriage is in the Bible, that’s not what marriage will be in America.”