2008 proved you were not racist – 2012 prove you are not an idiot

(17 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)

Loading ...

Posted in Images on February 17th, 2012 by tiki god | Report This Post |

Add to favorites

Pause for a moment for a sponsor!

The Tiki Web Group

Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

31 Responses to 2008 proved you were not racist – 2012 prove you are not an idiot

spuggemhate (UID# 18468) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 8 3
February 17, 2012 at 1:57 pm

Hmmmm, can I vote for ‘None of the above’?

Reply
- nobody-knows (UID# 5034) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 3 10
  February 17, 2012 at 2:16 pm
  
  Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
  yes, it’s called being mexican, off to gitmo with you
  
  Reply
  - (UID# ) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 3 6
    February 17, 2012 at 5:17 pm
    
    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
    thanks to obummer its coming down to that.. only it will be americans, mexicans, whites, blacks, yellows, and whoever else they choose to label “terrorist”
    
    Reply
(UID# ) Hot debate. What do you think? 9 8
February 17, 2012 at 2:02 pm

humm center right or psycho right?
Would be nice if a democrat ran this year.

Reply
hochunk (UID# 5604) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 15 7
February 17, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Ron Paulies fall into one of two categories: those who love him in spite of his racist/intolerant past, and those who love him because of it.

Reply
(UID# ) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 14 4
February 17, 2012 at 3:52 pm

I hate American government

Reply
swpuppet (UID# 8549) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 14 6
February 17, 2012 at 3:59 pm

Given the current choices, it’s Obama again!

Reply
- magnus-buttfoorson (UID# 238) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 2 18
  February 17, 2012 at 10:39 pm
  
  Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
  keep dreaming
  
  that nigger will be lucky to leave the White house alive
  
  Reply
wistfuld (UID# 5057) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 16 5
February 17, 2012 at 4:54 pm

Ah yes, Ron Paul fans win this year’s award for “patting oneself on the back for a perceived moral superiority that everyone else is laughing at you for.” Sadly, the only people more pathetic who have won this prize in the past 10 years have been early adopting Facebook users (2004), hipsters (2001), iPhone users (2007), and… oh, what was it again?… oh that’s right, people who claim to be political libertarians without putting any real thought into the actual ramifications of what that position entails (every year running).

Fucking retards.

Reply
(UID# ) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 10 15
February 17, 2012 at 5:27 pm

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
I’ll be voting for Ron Paul.

He wants to run the presidency according to the constitution, and go through congress to declare war instead of just… going. That alone puts him miles ahead of the other candidates.

OOooooo how scary and dangerous.

I urge you all to do more research on Ron Paul. Whats wrong with freedom? whats wrong with keeping the fruits of your labors? And as for the racist thing… he’s probably the least racist candidate running including BO. Look through his long history of speeches, books, interviews, voting record, etc and try to prove otherwise. He has more support from minorities than the other republican candidates.. and he also has more military support then all the candidates including BO combined.
He is referring to some decades old passages from newsletters that came out from a different writer in one of RP’s many newsletters released in the 80′s and 90′s. When RP was made aware of them, over a decade ago.. he apologized and disavowed them. He made some mistakes as the editor of a newsletter… thats it. So why not talk about REAL issues?

Get out of this imaginary Left-Right political sham. Oh no hes a republican that means he’s baaaad! The parties are one in the same. Big government tyrants. Both the left and the right lead us into undeclared perpetual war. Both sides mismanage our money and redistribute it to big banks and failing corporations. Both sides want to take away our freedoms with legislation like the patriot act, NDAA, pipa/sopa, and more.

Go take a look at his record and his platform, and what he wants to accomplish as president, and voice your concern.. based on facts.

Reply
- juiceyfruit (UID# 1624) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 10 5
  February 17, 2012 at 5:55 pm
  
  paul wants to effectively disband the union and go back a step in history to the articles of confederation. we tried that once. it didn’t work. that’s how we got our current constitution. this is the united states of america, not the nation-states of america, for a good historical reason.
  
  all of the things everyone claims ron paul is against in the federal government: he’s only against them because it’s the federal government. if the states continue the war on drugs, if the states mandate racial segregation, if the states outlaw abortion, he’s ok with that. So long as it isn’t the federal government.
  
  It’s the big lie that the internet ron paulies swallow: ron paul will fix everything by fucking up the union, rather than dividing a nation even worse than it already is today.
  
  not to say there isn’t shit way wrong with the fed, which is almost always the counter-argument. disbanding it is not in my opinion the way to fix that.
  
  Reply
  - (UID# ) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 4 8
    February 17, 2012 at 7:04 pm
    
    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
    The constitution was designed to protect the people from over reaching government, not to empower the federal government. It states plainly that the only role of the federal government is for defense of the nation and our liberties, and to ensure we have a sound currency and truly free market. Which really all ties back to liberty and freedom. social freedom, economic freedom, etc.
    
    Not to redistribute wealth and give bailouts, not to be the policemen of the world, and definitely not to encroach on states rights.
    
    Anything else should be left up to the states. This is what the constitution calls for. So your comparison to the articles of confederation just doesn’t make any sense here, when Paul’s main focus is the CONSTITUTION.
    
    Reply
    - wistfuld (UID# 5057) 2 2
      February 17, 2012 at 9:56 pm
      
      Wow! You need to actually read the document for once.
      
      Reply
    - juiceyfruit (UID# 1624) 1 0
      February 18, 2012 at 3:29 am
      
      No, it was designed to prevent monarchy, by forming a strong, but not too strong, federal system that protects the rights of the masses.
      
      It doesn’t state all of those things clearly at all, particularly with regards to implementation, but broadly speaking the “necessary and proper” clause gives the federal government the power to do whatever it needs to do to ensure those rights.
      
      You’re going right into what I specifically mentioned as the typical counterargument – BUT THERE ARE THESE THINGS WRONG WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAY AS WELL THROW IT ALL AWAY – and assuming that not voting for ron paul means support for nefarious activities undertaken at a federal level. It is not.
      
      You think that corruption won’t happen at a state level? Got news for you.
      
      Reply
  - magnus-buttfoorson (UID# 238) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 1 7
    February 17, 2012 at 8:01 pm
    
    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
    If it’s already divided then he’s giving the people what they want.
    
    You just don’t want that because suddenly your politics and agendas won’t be forced on the majority any more and coastal America will see it’s damaging influence vanish.
    
    Reply
- wistfuld (UID# 5057) 2 2
  February 17, 2012 at 9:49 pm
  
  “OOooooo how scary and dangerous.”
  
  “OOooooo how rebellious!” I bet you’ve freaked out your parents!
  
  Reply
v0id (UID# 10432) 2 2
February 17, 2012 at 6:39 pm

You still dont get it, do you?
If elections were to change anything, they would probably be illegal.
The same companies that sponsored Obama when they realised that he was getting voters and popularity, are going to sponsor Ron Paul and whoever the next president is.
[Obama’s top contributors: www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638

But of course all that are conspiracy theories of them commies. Long live Jesus and the multinational corporations!

PS: dont vote people, vote companies. I stand with McDonald’s and Coke…

Reply
- v0id (UID# 10432) 0 1
  February 17, 2012 at 6:44 pm
  
  PS2: … because they make my belly happy
  
  Reply
absent (UID# 7511) 4 1
February 17, 2012 at 7:26 pm

And the flaws of a “democratic” two party system.

Reply
magnus-buttfoorson (UID# 238) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 1 6
February 17, 2012 at 7:51 pm

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Should read: in 2008 you voted for me because you’re an idiot. In 2012 I’m hoping you’ve learned something from your mistake and will vote for experience this time instead of who you’re being told to vote for.

Reply
- wistfuld (UID# 5057) 5 2
  February 17, 2012 at 9:57 pm
  
  If people followed that logic, Ron Paul would get absolutely 0 votes.
  
  Reply
timmay72 (UID# 669) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 10 1
February 17, 2012 at 8:35 pm

Not to break the thread, but who else loves waffles? I fucking love waffles!

Reply
- tiki-god (UID# 1) 1 0
  February 18, 2012 at 3:25 am
  
  fucking waffles with fried chicken at IHOP. it was the best meal I have ever had.
  
  Mind you, I was drunk and in love, so there’s that.
  
  Reply
  - timmay72 (UID# 669) 0 0
    February 26, 2012 at 8:27 pm
    
    Our Applebees makes Oreo waffles!
    
    Reply
- v0id (UID# 10432) 0 0
  February 18, 2012 at 4:47 am
  
  yeah, why not
  
  Reply
saborlas (UID# 554) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 7 1
February 17, 2012 at 8:56 pm

The creator of the image misspelled “are.”

Reply
- scandata (UID# 7698) 0 1
  February 18, 2012 at 1:14 am
  
  HA! I was going to post the same thing, almost word for word!
  
  Reply
(UID# ) 3 2
February 18, 2012 at 2:12 am

True; I did vote for the black man, Obama, in order to prove I was not a racist – hadn’t animosity towards blacks anymore. However, I still do have a bad attitude towards idiots – don’t like crazies. And that is bigotry and that needs to also be dropped, like racism. So, it follows to prove this new lack of animosity on my part I will vote for the crazy man, Paul.

Reply
(UID# ) 2 0
February 18, 2012 at 3:14 am

Because the government that governs least…is the background story to Mad Max movies.

Reply
lukev1-5 (UID# 1029) 2 0
February 18, 2012 at 1:47 pm

I hate American politics. Mostly because every election year the internet fills up with bullshit like this.

Reply
skat1140 (UID# 9397) 0 0
February 22, 2012 at 9:48 pm

Technically, to prove you’re not a racist, you have to vote for him for two terms.

Reply