2008 proved you were not racist – 2012 prove you are not an idiot

2008 proved you were not racist 2012 prove you are not an idiot 500x312 2008 proved you were not racist   2012 prove you are not an idiot

Pause for a moment for a sponsor!

Leave a comment ?

31 Responses to 2008 proved you were not racist – 2012 prove you are not an idiot

  1. Hmmmm, can I vote for ‘None of the above’?

  2. humm center right or psycho right?
    Would be nice if a democrat ran this year.

  3. Ron Paulies fall into one of two categories: those who love him in spite of his racist/intolerant past, and those who love him because of it.

  4. I hate American government

  5. Given the current choices, it’s Obama again!

  6. Ah yes, Ron Paul fans win this year’s award for “patting oneself on the back for a perceived moral superiority that everyone else is laughing at you for.” Sadly, the only people more pathetic who have won this prize in the past 10 years have been early adopting Facebook users (2004), hipsters (2001), iPhone users (2007), and… oh, what was it again?… oh that’s right, people who claim to be political libertarians without putting any real thought into the actual ramifications of what that position entails (every year running).

    Fucking retards.

  7. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • paul wants to effectively disband the union and go back a step in history to the articles of confederation. we tried that once. it didn’t work. that’s how we got our current constitution. this is the united states of america, not the nation-states of america, for a good historical reason.

      all of the things everyone claims ron paul is against in the federal government: he’s only against them because it’s the federal government. if the states continue the war on drugs, if the states mandate racial segregation, if the states outlaw abortion, he’s ok with that. So long as it isn’t the federal government.

      It’s the big lie that the internet ron paulies swallow: ron paul will fix everything by fucking up the union, rather than dividing a nation even worse than it already is today.

      not to say there isn’t shit way wrong with the fed, which is almost always the counter-argument. disbanding it is not in my opinion the way to fix that.

      • Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

        • Wow! You need to actually read the document for once.

        • No, it was designed to prevent monarchy, by forming a strong, but not too strong, federal system that protects the rights of the masses.

          It doesn’t state all of those things clearly at all, particularly with regards to implementation, but broadly speaking the “necessary and proper” clause gives the federal government the power to do whatever it needs to do to ensure those rights.

          You’re going right into what I specifically mentioned as the typical counterargument – BUT THERE ARE THESE THINGS WRONG WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAY AS WELL THROW IT ALL AWAY – and assuming that not voting for ron paul means support for nefarious activities undertaken at a federal level. It is not.

          You think that corruption won’t happen at a state level? Got news for you.

      • Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • “OOooooo how scary and dangerous.”

      “OOooooo how rebellious!” I bet you’ve freaked out your parents!

  8. You still dont get it, do you?
    If elections were to change anything, they would probably be illegal.
    The same companies that sponsored Obama when they realised that he was getting voters and popularity, are going to sponsor Ron Paul and whoever the next president is.
    [Obama’s top contributors: www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638

    But of course all that are conspiracy theories of them commies. Long live Jesus and the multinational corporations!

    PS: dont vote people, vote companies. I stand with McDonald’s and Coke…

  9. And the flaws of a “democratic” two party system.

  10. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  11. Not to break the thread, but who else loves waffles? I fucking love waffles!

  12. The creator of the image misspelled “are.”

  13. True; I did vote for the black man, Obama, in order to prove I was not a racist – hadn’t animosity towards blacks anymore. However, I still do have a bad attitude towards idiots – don’t like crazies. And that is bigotry and that needs to also be dropped, like racism. So, it follows to prove this new lack of animosity on my part I will vote for the crazy man, Paul.

  14. Because the government that governs least…is the background story to Mad Max movies.

  15. I hate American politics. Mostly because every election year the internet fills up with bullshit like this.

  16. Technically, to prove you’re not a racist, you have to vote for him for two terms.

Leave a Comment

NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> [img]URL[/img], [youtube]URL[/youtube].




Tags!

Advertisements Alcohol Animated Image Art awesome Awesome Things Cars Comic Books Computers Cute As Hell Animals Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Fantasy - Science Fiction Food forum fodder Forum Fodder funny Gaming GIFS Humor interesting lolcats Military Motivational Posters Movie posters Movies Music Nature not exactly safe for work Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports star wars Technology Television Toys Visual Tricks Wallpaper Weapons women wtf