it was good for the economy
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
October 5, 2011 at 8:48 am
Of course those who agree with the statement fail to understand that even if we burned twice as much fossil fuels as we do now for 100 years it would not even come close to poisoning the water, making the air toxic, or making the land infertile. If anything more CO2 would make crops grow faster.
October 5, 2011 at 10:17 am
Except when you burn coal those heavy metals left over have to go somewhere. Like our drinking water. And how do you think that shit gets to the plant? Magic? Mountain top removal mining destroys clean rivers and streams. And we don’t even know how dangerous fracking is because the Bush admin told companies they dont have to tell us what they use in their chemical compounds they use to dissolve fucking rock.
October 5, 2011 at 12:24 pm
“If anything more CO2 would make crops grow faster.”
^There is neither a face nor a palm big enough.
October 5, 2011 at 12:33 pm
why are you assuming they’re talking about just CO2? heavy metal pollution and toxic dumps are also commercial by products.
October 5, 2011 at 3:12 pm
This has to be Buttforsoon – nobody else could say something like that
October 5, 2011 at 4:04 pm
Not enough racial slurs and homophobia.
October 5, 2011 at 11:28 am
A while back I would have said “Fuck that, they can go live in domes on the moon”.
But now… : |
October 5, 2011 at 8:11 pm
Oh, the things I would do in one third gravity….
October 5, 2011 at 5:05 pm
And yet, the air, land and water in the US is cleaner than it was 20, 30, 40 years ago. So, industrialization is not the death sentence some would have us believe.
Have an Evil day
October 5, 2011 at 5:48 pm
Citation needed.
October 5, 2011 at 6:48 pm
Anon’s definition of “clean” needed.