Your Ad Here

Too stupid to understand science?

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5) (Log in to vote!)
Loading ... Loading ...

127175 700b Too stupid to understand science?

Processing your request, Please wait....
  • submit to reddit
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
This entry was posted in Images. Bookmark the permalink.
lolkittens!

Ology

42 Responses to Too stupid to understand science?

  1. sambo78 (UID# 8210) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1

    Incoming shitstorm….

  2. bstaples (UID# 6783) Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 5

    Calling people who don’t agree with you “stupid”…
    Sure is Kindergarten up in here.

  3. magnus-buttfoorson (UID# 238) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 15

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • korinthian (UID# 3174) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 4

      Any moron can make up a religion. It’s really not that complicated.

      • anadin (UID# 110477) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

        • (UID# ) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2

          What do you mean by “the world isn’t logic”? Most well-understood science is really very logical.

          • anadin (UID# 110477) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4

            Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

          • [How come I can't reply to anadin directly?]

            Much of what you say is true, but I disagree with the conclusion that logic is an inappropriate framework with which to interpret the world. It depends at which level of abstraction you choose to study it. If it wasn’t the case that, for example, speed=distance/time or potential difference=current*resistance, we would never have the ability to achieve the incredibly precise engineering that we use every day. The fact is that there IS huge amounts of logic behind the way the world works, and just because we don’t fully understand everything (such as quantum mechanics, or the origins of matter) it doesn’t mean that logic has no real use. Formal mathematics and logic are an excellent framework to use in the majority of science.

          • [There are limited posts - but by replying to previous comments it still looks like you are replying to me]

            I agree that logic and math is the best framework we have. But they cause problems representing nature, because they are human creations – abstract ideas we have dreamed up. One big problem is we are illogical ourselves. Some people have no grasp at all of real logic. Maybe logic will evolve to include the chaos of nature? Or maybe we’ll come up with a new framework? Im just saying we dont have all the facts yet.

        • (UID# ) Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

          I thought that it was an ignorance to science that caused religion? not the other way around.

        • What do you mean by “complicated”?

        • This is one of the most ignorant comments I’ve read on the internets. We’re talking Top Five quality.

          • Yes do I win at internets?

            Seriously though I don’t think you inderstand the word ignorant.

            I dont feel the need to justify myself normally, but just for you – try to argue these points:

            There is an infinite number of religions, therefore it is infinitely more complicated than science. As soon as you document all religions Ill just make up a new one. Science is logic. You cant make it up.

            Which part of the world is logic? Go on just name one part of nature that conforms and Ill take it all back and put on the dunce cap.

          • Anadin: You’re really using the numbers of religions as an argument that religion is more complex than science?

            I’m going to give you a moment to think about that.

          • Yes. What is the problem here?

          • You can examine the claims of religions with science, you can explore the religious story through history. So basically that’s my “your claim, +1″ argument for why you’re wrong.

            That’s not even counting all the things in the (very expansive) universe that you can explore through science.

            Also, I don’t think saying “all these hypothetical religions that don’t exist should count towards my end of the argument”. That’s like me saying “there could be an infinite amount of universes that science could potentially explore”. I wouldn’t feel honest doing that.

  4. drewlicious (UID# 1703) Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 8

    Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you.
    -James 1:27

    I personally think that is pretty bad ass. I don’t care if you don’t agree.

  5. nixolympica (UID# 3768) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

    Science is nice and all, but get back to me when it promotes groups of little kids being mauled by bears. (2 Kings 2:24)

  6. asymon (UID# 4280) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  7. (UID# ) Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    What the fuck is wrong with mormons? Seriously, have you read some of the shit they come up with?

  8. Trolling the faithful – never gets old, does it?

  9. (UID# ) Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

    Here is the design of this t shirt. They are selling for last 2 years.

    www.stabilitees.com/store/too-stupid-to-understand-science-try-religion-t-shirt

  10. “yeah yeah science, but religion wins because [insert bullshit cliche and lack of educatino on topic at hand here]”

    broad, grossly inaccurate generalizations prove magic is real and things like math are the work of evil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>