Too stupid to understand science?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
June 7, 2011 at 2:40 am
Incoming shitstorm….
June 7, 2011 at 3:04 am
Calling people who don’t agree with you “stupid”…
Sure is Kindergarten up in here.
June 7, 2011 at 3:26 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 6:03 am
Any moron can make up a religion. It’s really not that complicated.
June 7, 2011 at 9:08 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 9:43 am
What do you mean by “the world isn’t logic”? Most well-understood science is really very logical.
June 7, 2011 at 1:11 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 11:09 pm
[How come I can't reply to anadin directly?]
Much of what you say is true, but I disagree with the conclusion that logic is an inappropriate framework with which to interpret the world. It depends at which level of abstraction you choose to study it. If it wasn’t the case that, for example, speed=distance/time or potential difference=current*resistance, we would never have the ability to achieve the incredibly precise engineering that we use every day. The fact is that there IS huge amounts of logic behind the way the world works, and just because we don’t fully understand everything (such as quantum mechanics, or the origins of matter) it doesn’t mean that logic has no real use. Formal mathematics and logic are an excellent framework to use in the majority of science.
June 8, 2011 at 10:18 am
[There are limited posts - but by replying to previous comments it still looks like you are replying to me]
I agree that logic and math is the best framework we have. But they cause problems representing nature, because they are human creations – abstract ideas we have dreamed up. One big problem is we are illogical ourselves. Some people have no grasp at all of real logic. Maybe logic will evolve to include the chaos of nature? Or maybe we’ll come up with a new framework? Im just saying we dont have all the facts yet.
June 7, 2011 at 9:49 am
I thought that it was an ignorance to science that caused religion? not the other way around.
June 7, 2011 at 10:10 am
What do you mean by “complicated”?
June 7, 2011 at 1:12 pm
Like our relationship
June 7, 2011 at 11:39 pm
This is one of the most ignorant comments I’ve read on the internets. We’re talking Top Five quality.
June 8, 2011 at 10:22 am
Yes do I win at internets?
Seriously though I don’t think you inderstand the word ignorant.
I dont feel the need to justify myself normally, but just for you – try to argue these points:
There is an infinite number of religions, therefore it is infinitely more complicated than science. As soon as you document all religions Ill just make up a new one. Science is logic. You cant make it up.
Which part of the world is logic? Go on just name one part of nature that conforms and Ill take it all back and put on the dunce cap.
June 8, 2011 at 10:43 am
Anadin: You’re really using the numbers of religions as an argument that religion is more complex than science?
I’m going to give you a moment to think about that.
June 8, 2011 at 12:45 pm
Yes. What is the problem here?
June 9, 2011 at 7:33 pm
You can examine the claims of religions with science, you can explore the religious story through history. So basically that’s my “your claim, +1″ argument for why you’re wrong.
That’s not even counting all the things in the (very expansive) universe that you can explore through science.
Also, I don’t think saying “all these hypothetical religions that don’t exist should count towards my end of the argument”. That’s like me saying “there could be an infinite amount of universes that science could potentially explore”. I wouldn’t feel honest doing that.
June 7, 2011 at 3:57 am
Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you.
-James 1:27
I personally think that is pretty bad ass. I don’t care if you don’t agree.
June 7, 2011 at 6:01 am
You know what else counts as pure and genuine religion?
Genital mutilation and human sacrifice.
Who needs the world when religion can corrupt you?
June 7, 2011 at 9:09 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 9:45 am
His idea of religion isn’t fucked up – he picked extreme examples, but real examples nonetheless. Some less extreme, more common examples could include homophobia and misogyny.
June 7, 2011 at 1:15 pm
There is nothing wrong with misogyny
Genital mutilation is not a religion. It is a tradition of some religions, but you cannot call gential mutilation and human sacrifice a religion. Unless you make up a religion which is just genital mutilation and human sacrifice – in which case its ok – actually, i’ll do just that. We’ll call it casemodism.
I take it all back.
June 7, 2011 at 10:15 am
Tell me why Islam, Christianity and Judaism are called “Abrahamic religions”.
It’s not even an extreme example, it’s fundamental.
June 7, 2011 at 11:34 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 11:40 am
One doesn’t need religion to corrupt you; I said it can corrupt you.
Speaking of communism, what do you think had the biggest influence on the killing, the anti-religion, the communism, or the dictatorship?
June 7, 2011 at 12:06 pm
Probably the dictatorship treating communism like a religion; the only religion that should be observed.
June 7, 2011 at 4:49 pm
Dallasalice, look up the definition of a strawman argument. Then turn off your computer and stay off the internet. You’ll embarrass yourself less.
June 7, 2011 at 9:10 am
That fucking rocks.
My new favourite Bible passage.
June 7, 2011 at 5:34 am
or politics, lol!
June 7, 2011 at 7:35 am
Science is nice and all, but get back to me when it promotes groups of little kids being mauled by bears. (2 Kings 2:24)
June 7, 2011 at 8:57 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 7, 2011 at 9:51 am
What the fuck is wrong with mormons? Seriously, have you read some of the shit they come up with?
June 7, 2011 at 10:16 am
They’re more gullible than ordinary Christians, even.
June 7, 2011 at 1:17 pm
I read that they believe the mark of cain – is dark skin.
Ever met a black mormon?
Thought not.
June 7, 2011 at 2:28 pm
Not only that. It was taught that becoming a Mormon would make your skin white (if it was not so already).
June 7, 2011 at 4:25 pm
That is fuuuuucked up
June 7, 2011 at 11:25 am
Trolling the faithful – never gets old, does it?
June 7, 2011 at 1:17 pm
Like fish in a barrell.
June 17, 2011 at 1:14 am
More like sheep in a barrel.
June 8, 2011 at 11:15 am
Here is the design of this t shirt. They are selling for last 2 years.
www.stabilitees.com/store/too-stupid-to-understand-science-try-religion-t-shirt
June 9, 2011 at 8:12 pm
“yeah yeah science, but religion wins because [insert bullshit cliche and lack of educatino on topic at hand here]”
broad, grossly inaccurate generalizations prove magic is real and things like math are the work of evil.
June 11, 2011 at 6:22 pm
SAVED!