*UC* Society
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
June 2, 2011 at 8:07 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 3, 2011 at 5:20 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 3, 2011 at 11:44 am
Bandwagon. Roll with it.
June 2, 2011 at 8:07 pm
Why make a strawman argument? I don’t think anyone would disagree. I don’t even know who the second picture is.
June 2, 2011 at 8:27 pm
Rebecca Romijn
June 2, 2011 at 10:38 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 8:22 pm
Why? Because way too many women starve themselves to death or lock themselves into yo-yo dieting hell thinking that men will find them more attractive if they look like the one on the right.
June 2, 2011 at 8:28 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 8:40 pm
wrong
June 2, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Maybe. I forgot to say that attractiveness comes down to personal preference. I simply find the girl on the left completely unattractive.
June 2, 2011 at 10:38 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 11:05 pm
rykocolor, you really need to learn more about human physiology.
You’re conflating what you find attractive with fitness. That’s dangerously ignorant, my friend.
The woman on the right is not fit. She’s anorexic.
June 2, 2011 at 11:22 pm
I find fitness attractive, not only on a looks level but on a personality level because that is important to me and I like girls who also feel that way. I am not sure why you find that ignorant.
The woman on the right is not anorexic, I am confused as to why you think that. Do tell? Again, you cannot see her bones on her arms/shoulders, or her ribs, and you can barely see her collarbone or hipbone.
June 3, 2011 at 12:44 am
Don’t worry about him. I genuinely suspect he’s either mentally ill or he went full retard.
June 3, 2011 at 1:11 am
Hey, when are you going to start claiming you know the contents of secret government documents again?
June 3, 2011 at 2:00 am
rykocolor, you can see her ribs. They’re protruding from her side. If you can see her ribs in profile, that means she has very little fat or muscle tissue.
Most notable is you tried to point out bones that are obscured bey shadow, and you tried to discount the visible bones that are sticking out.
If you’re curious, what led me to believe she’s anorexic is her physique. She has no mass or shape, but her skin is still tight, showing undeveloped muscle and bones. This is actually a pretty good indication someone is undernourished.
rykocolor, you’re really doing a disservice to women with your attitude. You trying to promote an unhealthy and self destructive lifestyle simply because you think it makes women more attractive.
June 3, 2011 at 3:07 am
Uhm, now who is the one nitpicking about shadows? I also doubt it is a disservice(since when was I in the service?) to woman. I like skinny, in shape woman, not fat girls…hell, I don’t even like average girls, I like girls that are in shape because they are fit. This girl isn’t a great example. it is simply a terribly picture of her. Being fat is what is destructive, and disgusting, being fat and never being called out on it is the true disservice to woman, or people in general.
June 3, 2011 at 3:32 am
“Uhm, now who is the one nitpicking about shadows?”
What the fuck are you implying?
June 3, 2011 at 5:31 am
I am implying that you are trying to make shadows out to be bony protrusions -which they are not.
June 3, 2011 at 6:19 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 8:24 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 8:33 pm
I know you’re just trying to troll but….
That one on the left is Marilyn Monroe. Those aren’t thunder thighs, they’re gorgeous. Photoshop didn’t exist before she died. Women are supposed to have about 20% body fat, so that they can have healthy babies and milk.
Rakes aren’t sexy.
June 2, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 8:46 pm
Define overweight
June 2, 2011 at 8:51 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 11:17 pm
rykocolor, you do realize it’s more dangerous to be 40 pounds underweight than 40 pounds overweight, especially for shorter people?
June 2, 2011 at 11:26 pm
Yes, I do realize it’s more dangerous to be 40 pounds underweight than 40 pounds overweight. You do realize I didn’t say girls should be 40 pounds underweight, or even 10 pounds underweight? I am not advocating girls should be skinny as hell or underweight, only that woman- nay, people should be healthy. The woman on the right is NOT anorexic, she is skinny yes, but most likely due to cardio than to an eating disorder.
June 3, 2011 at 12:47 am
You do realize to be 40lbs underweight you’d need to cut off your legs?
, did, you, pass, grade 7 , English , , >?
June 3, 2011 at 12:49 am
My last comment was to sambo78 (the guy who loves dick but is whining about women and body image) of course.
June 3, 2011 at 1:20 am
Is this where you start criticizing correct grammar again, mags?
I really like your thread on the forum, where you use a correct sentence as an example of an incorrect sentence.
I really owe you thanks, troll boy. You spit out easily refutable garbage every time we talk. You make it too easy for me. I really should buy you alcohol next time I’m in Canadia.
June 2, 2011 at 8:27 pm
The difference between these two girls is too much for an (A) and (B) preference comparison. There’s a happy medium between them that I find to be more attractive than either.
Show me (A)-and-a-Half-but-not-quite-(B) and we’ll see if the preferred choice remains the same.
That, or we could just find someone with muscle tone as opposed to skeletor over there for our example of thin…
June 2, 2011 at 9:15 pm
Threesome.
June 2, 2011 at 11:26 pm
^ This guy gets it.
June 3, 2011 at 1:08 am
I came here to say I’d fuck ‘em both (given the chance & the requisite time machine). Both at the same time did not occur to me. I bow before your awesomeness, sir.
June 3, 2011 at 5:20 am
DING DING DING!
We have a winner!!
June 2, 2011 at 9:33 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 2, 2011 at 9:47 pm
You’re kidding, aren’t you ?
June 2, 2011 at 9:45 pm
HEY GUYS!!!! I AM POSTING IN CAPS LOCK!! FUCKING CRUISE CONTROL BITCHES (now that i have your attention)
To be correct the real society prefers women who is basically in the middle of these two as what
“anonymoose” is trying to say. The problem is that women will always go where the money is, which evidently leads to attention. These big fashion corporations decides it’s now art too look like a skeleton, bitches will follow.
@ductile-logistics: “Photoshop didn’t exist before she died.” This statement is correct! but clearly you haven’t won this argument. It doesn’t matter if it existed back then or not. The point is anybody who has the originals or not can alternate the images with Photoshop right now.
@Storminator: you’re truly a wise man. As they would say. “Pussy comes and Pussy goes. Complain about it, and it will never show!
June 2, 2011 at 10:12 pm
It’s simply all about preference.
Marilyn Monroe was one of the sexiest women of her time, and she was a size 14. Most of the sexy women today are around a size 1.
Society manipulates what we think looks best, and no matter how many times you try and prove it wrong… it’s always just a matter of preference.
June 3, 2011 at 3:09 am
Audrey Hepburn was also a veritable sex symbol in her day, trailing Marylin by just a few years in popularity, was highly admired by both men and women, had infinitely more class than that cellulite-ridden bleached skank on the left, and she was an elegant, beautiful, THIN, TRIM, SLIM woman. Audrey was an ideal. Monroe was a monument to excess, both in form and behaviour.
June 2, 2011 at 10:24 pm
Christina Hendricks seem to be pretty popular these days.
Just saying.
June 2, 2011 at 10:41 pm
If you’re a desperate loser settling for fatties and claiming its your preference then you like the dead bitch on the left.
If you are actually the kind of guy women are attracted to and have a thing called choice in who you fuck then obviously you’d go for the supermodel on the right they’ve picked a bad picture of on purpose.
images1.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/Rebecca-rebecca-romijn-968031_1024_768.jpg
Compare fat to that.
Thank you and good night.
June 2, 2011 at 10:59 pm
FUCK YES!!! I am new to commenting, didn’t realize you actually have to spell it out for most of the other people on here.
June 2, 2011 at 11:08 pm
No, we know what you’re saying. We just disagree with you.
June 2, 2011 at 11:32 pm
I know…I just feel that there is in fact such a thing as being healthy in a factual way. The girl on the right is probably the exact right weight for her, perhaps a pound or two underweight but still healthy on the BMI scale -I know many, many girls who look just like her, eat as much as I do if not more, but workout everyday like a healthy person would. You confuse anorexia with working out, caring a bit about how you look, and being healthy -something most people seems to struggle with. Whereas the girl on the left looks to be around 40 pounds overweight. People today, especially Americans because of the statistical fat population make more excuses for fat people, and it becomes the status quo and accepted. The girl on the left could not fit comfortably in most seats on the trams where I live in Germany.
June 3, 2011 at 1:23 am
Since you mentioned BMI I thought I would look it up.
Rebecca Romijn, (the one on the right) has a reported mass of 56kg and a height of 1.78m. This puts her at a BMI of 17.9, which is underweight. {16 < BMI < 18.5}
Monroe's reported mass was 54.4kg and a height of 1.66m, yielding a BMI of 19.75. At her heaviest during her depression she was 63.5 kg for a -peak- BMI of 23.0
Normal healthy BMI is 18.5 to 25. This puts Monroe virtually dead center in the "healthy" BMI range.
June 2, 2011 at 11:29 pm
Magnus & Storminator are the backbone of this place and can always set the kiddies straight. Just watch out for Casefags and Reboot, they’re like on crack or something. Me, I just like trolling the trolls.
June 2, 2011 at 11:33 pm
haha yea, I have actually been looking at this website for years, but only recently did I feel my English was good enough to actually partake of the discussion. I like Magnus & Storminator, I even think casemods or whatever is kinda funny, and often right even though people don’t want to admit it!
June 3, 2011 at 1:19 am
i want to see how long you will think highly of Magnus…
June 3, 2011 at 5:41 pm
F UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
You worship me like a pasty God.
June 2, 2011 at 11:49 pm
You should start doing something you’re good at instead.
June 3, 2011 at 1:27 am
The woman in those pictures literally doesn’t exist. She’s about as real as the cat people from Avatar. It’s vaguely based on a real woman, but the real woman is a bag of bones, with liposuction scars and a permanent smell of the guy from Full House.
June 2, 2011 at 11:33 pm
Marilyn Monroe measurements were recorded by her dressmaker as 36-23-37 and sometimes fluctuated between that and 36-24-37.
Rebecca Romijn measurements in 1998: 35B – 24 – 35.
Just bad pictures of both,
June 2, 2011 at 11:55 pm
I don’t know what those numbers mean
June 3, 2011 at 1:26 am
Inches around (bust:waist:hips). Romjin is also 5 inches taller than Monroe.
June 3, 2011 at 2:22 am
thanks, back to fapping
ps you have a high uid, lurk more
June 3, 2011 at 2:27 am
I’ve been lurking for years. Just finally said something a couple months ago.
June 2, 2011 at 11:41 pm
You all seem to be missing the point – it’s not a choice. If you like chubbies, chase chubbies – if you like skinnies, chase skinnies.
If you like chubbies and I like skinnies – everyone wins!
If everyone liked just one kind of partner there would be a LOT of unhappy people in the world.
June 3, 2011 at 1:28 am
The problem is the horrible, sometimes fatal things young girls do to themselves thinking they aren’t good enough unless their BMI is below 18.
June 3, 2011 at 1:49 am
This is my point exactly, but you’re saying it much better than I was.
June 2, 2011 at 11:57 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
June 3, 2011 at 5:23 am
Pot to kettle “you are black”.
June 3, 2011 at 2:26 am
You know societies gotten pretty sad when Marilyn Monroe is considered a ‘cow’. Literally the most famous sex symbol of all time.
She was 5’5’, and about 118-140 pounds. The ideal/normal/healthy weight for a 5’5 woman is 113-149 pounds. (Its amazing how much 3 minutes on Google will help an argument.)
So she was actually completely normal, and healthy.
June 3, 2011 at 2:47 am
Neither is attractive.
I like my women naturally fit. Not anorexic skinny, but fit and healthy.
3.bp.blogspot.com/_0X1ggm5ZqsA/S9z6lisSacI/AAAAAAAAE24/EnB7qNtPTDA/s1600/body.jpg
See numbers 2 and 3. Fit and thin. THATS what is attractive in my mind.
June 3, 2011 at 3:04 am
Agreed, preferably #2
June 3, 2011 at 3:18 am
3, 4 and 8 are my typical types with the occasional 5 if she carries it well. 2 and 9 are also fine if it is carried well, but it is definitely pushing it, and maybe 1 if she is short. … Aw hell… I guess I just generally like most women…
June 3, 2011 at 3:59 am
Woah, strong opinions on this subject. People are people. Some love food a little too much and some enjoy throwing up food.
Personally, I like a woman that likes to eat, enjoys working out and has a personality. I know personality… LOL Nice butt helps too.
June 3, 2011 at 5:31 am
Stop being so modest at start calling people names or you’re a little bitch ninja.
In all seriousness though, I’m a butt man myself. That probably explains why I don’t like the skinny girls.
June 3, 2011 at 5:56 am
Skinny girls can have nice shapely butts, they just don’t usually have tatas. By skinny I am not talking about “hey check out my rib cage cus I don’t eat” skinny.
June 3, 2011 at 6:21 am
Stop doing that or we might have a rational discussion here.
June 3, 2011 at 5:42 pm
We all know you’re a butt man and you don’t like girls.
June 3, 2011 at 5:53 pm
We don’t even know that sambo is a guy.
You might have mistakenly called someone a heterosexual.
(You will never live that down).
June 4, 2011 at 6:43 am
There are no girls on the internet.
June 3, 2011 at 5:55 pm
Your deep homophobia indicates that you’re more than likely gay.
Are you gay, Magnus? It’s ok. I won’t judge you.
June 3, 2011 at 12:39 pm
Meh…. attraction is subjective.
I like ‘em all different shapes and sizes.. variety is the spice right!?
No fatties though, I draw the line at sleeping with anyone that weighs more than me.
June 3, 2011 at 1:40 pm
I am shocked an amazed that magnus actually posted in this threat, not once, but on several occasions
June 3, 2011 at 2:31 pm
poor buggers id take both home to make them warm
June 3, 2011 at 9:19 pm
I likes my women to be female and human. that said, Ians link. 3,4,5 seem to be my pref, I have tied it on with one girl that fell in the 9 on that index…. fun but ouch she could clamp down.
June 3, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Valkyrie thinking:
I’ll draw my mace and it’s an instakill to the skeleton for 1d2 bludgeoning.
though i suspect piercing or slashing should work just as well…
p.s: who gives a shit about health ?! one looks fun and fuckable, the other looks like she’ll break her hip the minute you’d touch her.
June 5, 2011 at 2:25 am
I just want to state for the record that Monroe-era size 14 is equivalent to today’s size 6. And she had plenty of plastic surgery so the comparison to Stamos is just silly really.