The loser
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
March 7, 2011 at 10:23 am
Is there any advantage to having the wings look that ugly?
March 7, 2011 at 10:50 am
Fewer right angles means smaller radar signature (from what I understand). It’s part of the stealth strategy.
March 7, 2011 at 10:53 am
better looking plane IMHO
looking a little like the new Russkie Pak Fa
www.moddb.com/groups/aircraft-lovers-group/images/t-50-and-f-22-visual-comparation
March 7, 2011 at 6:24 pm
Why are designers still using this antiquated planform and go with the inherently unstable (thus, more efficient and maneuverable) canard configuration??? The YF-23 is an pretty elegant design though. I think the F-22 is just plain ugly.
March 9, 2011 at 10:59 pm
By now this design really is antiquated.
A friend at Pratt & Whitney sent me a poster-size copy of the third image, just before they got the contract to build the F-22,
In 1996