FUCK GOOGLE!!!!!!!
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
February 2, 2011 at 3:15 am
Alternatives?
February 3, 2011 at 11:25 pm
overthrow google?
February 7, 2011 at 5:57 pm
I have no problem using Google for torrent searches. Sounds like the problem exists between the keyboard the chair.
February 7, 2011 at 10:19 pm
Quick Google search for “bittorent” = “About 66,400,000 results (0.12 seconds)”
February 7, 2011 at 10:54 pm
they’re talking about the instant search feature that suggests all sorts of fun stuff for you.
February 8, 2011 at 3:53 am
I get plenty of utorrent suggestions, once you finish the first word.
February 7, 2011 at 10:54 pm
Yes, them not popping up auto suggestions is the same as “censoring!”
…moron.
February 8, 2011 at 12:30 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 8, 2011 at 1:27 pm
I’m sorry, but he’s the one that is ranting? Try googling ‘reality.’
February 8, 2011 at 3:53 pm
Reality is what you make of it. Just ask Casemods.
Try googling: Ad hominem
Wait, maybe Google will “censor” (snicker) and not auto-complete the word when you type ” ad ”
Just in case:
An ad hominem (Latin: “to the man”), also known as argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1] The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy,[2] but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue.[3]
(Sorry CM, too easy).
February 8, 2011 at 8:22 pm
While you’re suggesting words for me to look up, here’s one for you to look up: SARCASM.
Good god, jackass, I couldn’t have made it any more obvious that I was being sarcastic there.
February 8, 2011 at 8:53 pm
Sorry, I missed the “sacrasm” font you used, lol.
February 8, 2011 at 9:19 pm
The wording, the quotes around “censoring!”, and the pot-shot insult a couple lines down were pretty blatant clues.
February 8, 2011 at 10:55 pm
Uh…I think he was being sarcastic.
February 7, 2011 at 11:43 pm
funny that the enlarged version of the image does not load..
censorship?
February 7, 2011 at 11:54 pm
Isn’t the Google suggestion logic based on the frequency of similar searches? That would imply that an inordinate amount of people are looking for those things, rather than Google “giving” you those things. And if people want that info, why would they censor it? Durhur.
February 8, 2011 at 12:30 am
damn it
anyone got tips for kidnapping kids?
February 8, 2011 at 1:00 am
I was shocked to see that someone actually chose Papyrus
February 8, 2011 at 2:06 am
Well, this makes sense, since we all already know that copyright infringement is far worse than murder and kidnapping.
February 8, 2011 at 2:36 am
So basically it’s a choice between one set of censored searches and another?
And I’m pretty sure I can find out how to make bombs and mustard gas from a library.
February 8, 2011 at 3:57 am
Censorship is not involved. The searches are different. Notice all the examples have at least one entire word?
Type in the whole word utorrent, and you get plenty of valid suggestions.
Case closed.
February 8, 2011 at 11:30 am
you people that think this isnt censorship are retarded.
February 8, 2011 at 11:43 am
As defined by Webster:
Definition of CENSOR
transitive verb
: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable ; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable
Being too lazy to finish typing a word is not the same as the information being deleted or not listed by Google.
Maybe if “you people” spent more time thinking logically and less time looking for something to be mad about, you might get more accomplished with your life.
February 8, 2011 at 11:58 pm
yes, the reason google auto-completes other words but not anything to do with torrents is because it is lazy and not because it is being censored
February 9, 2011 at 12:29 am
Are you saying a search engine on the Internuts can’t have emotions and feelings? What a preposterous notion.
And at the cheeta guy above: You get suggestions for “how to build a bom” but not for “how to tor”, both have incomplete words at the end, only one gets suggestions.
I don’t even know why everyone acts like Google wouldn’t do this, they’ve done it before and they were called out on it already.
August 13, 2011 at 11:59 pm
i think i would have taken this more seriously if the creator didn’t papyrus.