Loading ...
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
![040800_1822[00].jpg (32 KB)](/wp-content/plugins/imageExtractor/thumb/85x85-040800_1822[00].png)
January 20, 2011 at 4:04 pm
Modern Warfare 3?!
January 20, 2011 at 4:35 pm
For all the people out there that also buy the same hockey/football game year after year.
January 20, 2011 at 6:21 pm
I played COD 2 and then didn’t play another game in the series until Black Ops.
I’ll admit it, I enjoyed it. Multilayer is fun. I was playing Bad Company before that, and I like how focused the maps are. There’s no need to include everything, and I don’t have to run across the map for 5 minutes if there isn’t a vehicle around.
Team Fortress 2 is still > ALL though.
January 21, 2011 at 1:42 am
Not a fan of Black Ops. Still playing MW2.
January 21, 2011 at 4:23 am
Prefer the old /original + the united offensive expansion pack – the weapons were pros and cons, not just “pick the fastest/most powerful” because in the original you’d loose accuracy on semis or power – i.e. rifle = powerful/slow rate/high accuracy, semi rifle = medium power/medium rate/high accuracy.
Then theres map size – when I saw a mate on “shipment” in MWF 1 with 16 players I knew it was for the quake crowd – turn a corner, spray, respawn.
Anyway could ramble all day, short version is I prefer a slower pace and the pros/cons of the older weapon selection.