Not a photograph
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites 
December 23, 2010 at 9:06 pm
I’m pretty sure that’s what you call taking a picture of something
December 23, 2010 at 9:08 pm
…of not soda.
December 23, 2010 at 9:11 pm
…and not posted on mcs
December 23, 2010 at 9:35 pm
If it’s computer generated, it is impressive. If the image is made with crayons it’s fantastic!
December 23, 2010 at 9:42 pm
this was made by Chuck Norris, and he used only black charcoal.
December 24, 2010 at 11:09 am
It is much less impressive if it is painted from a still life than if it were modeled and rendered; when one can cheat moist translucence by simply painting it instead of manipulating the shaders to achieve such an effect, I am less impressed with the result.
Please don’t use phrases like “computer generated” because you cheapen the work with that dismissive insinuation; if you have affection for the acronym ‘CG’, use Computer Graphics instead as it is less overtly demeaning.
December 24, 2010 at 3:27 pm
I did use the word “impressive”, which might indicate that I didn’t intend to be dismissive. Perhaps it was a bad choice of term, though.
December 25, 2010 at 6:34 pm
some may consider the painting method more difficult, but I have tried neither.
December 23, 2010 at 9:35 pm
*by Pedro Campos
December 24, 2010 at 3:54 am
Really amazing Ai skills?
December 24, 2010 at 6:56 am
ray-traced?
December 24, 2010 at 5:29 pm
soda.