Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.







Processing your request, Please wait....
December 23, 2010 at 9:06 pm
I’m pretty sure that’s what you call taking a picture of something
December 23, 2010 at 9:08 pm
…of not soda.
December 23, 2010 at 9:11 pm
…and not posted on mcs
December 23, 2010 at 9:35 pm
If it’s computer generated, it is impressive. If the image is made with crayons it’s fantastic!
December 23, 2010 at 9:42 pm
this was made by Chuck Norris, and he used only black charcoal.
December 24, 2010 at 11:09 am
It is much less impressive if it is painted from a still life than if it were modeled and rendered; when one can cheat moist translucence by simply painting it instead of manipulating the shaders to achieve such an effect, I am less impressed with the result.
Please don’t use phrases like “computer generated” because you cheapen the work with that dismissive insinuation; if you have affection for the acronym ‘CG’, use Computer Graphics instead as it is less overtly demeaning.
December 24, 2010 at 3:27 pm
I did use the word “impressive”, which might indicate that I didn’t intend to be dismissive. Perhaps it was a bad choice of term, though.
December 25, 2010 at 6:34 pm
some may consider the painting method more difficult, but I have tried neither.
December 23, 2010 at 9:35 pm
*by Pedro Campos
December 24, 2010 at 3:54 am
Really amazing Ai skills?
December 24, 2010 at 6:56 am
ray-traced?
December 24, 2010 at 5:29 pm
soda.