Stewart -v- Colbert


Rally in DC
Get ready to ruuuuuuuumble!


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    8 Comment threads
    11 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    13 Comment authors
    DrethdogsurfernatedogKorinthianPuulaahi Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Korinthian
    Member

    Colbert can deliver a joke. Stewart is just embarrassing to watch.

    #makecasemdsgreatagain
    Member

    Right on.

    TrikYodz
    Member

    amen. i said this a while ago on the first post with the march and rally, but like 10 people didnt like it. hahahaha SUCK IT DOORKNOBS.

    vincent.ex2
    Member

    Yeah, his jokes are alright, but he comes off overly fake to me. Falseness just emanates from him. I don’t like that kind of people. Stewart is bad when telling a joke or trying to be silly, but when he is serious, or at least dead-pan sarcastic, he is awesome.

    Dreth
    Member

    Two different comedy styles, even if they seem to overlap at times, Colbert is more like /b/, while Stewart is Slashdot users.

    I prefer Stewart, it’s a more balanced informative/comedy style.

    casemods UID# 667
    Member

    I’ve been on the daily show.

    Korinthian
    Member

    I heard that show was full of jokes.

    fracked again
    Member

    Being in the audience and being briefly seen during a pan of the audience is not being on the daily show.

    vincent.ex2
    Member

    There is no pan.

    Reaver
    Member

    Stewart is just Colberts opening act

    JimsShip
    Member

    John Stewart Rocks! He made Colbert what he is today.
    Colbert started on the Daily Show and branched out.
    Without the Daily Show there would be no Colbert Report.

    #makecasemdsgreatagain
    Member

    please go die.

    DMYTRIW WDS
    Member

    I like the Daily Show. Colbert is too corny for me, but I can see how people like him.

    Stewart can really call out some of his guests on their idiocy and contradictions.

    Puulaahi
    Member

    Without Stewart there would be no Colbert.

    dogsurfer
    Member

    If you record Colbert’s show, you’ll find his slow delivery makes watching at double-speed preferable, worth the 11 minutes per show. Stewart talks and delivers content too fast for double-speed.

    Korinthian
    Member

    You’re kidding, aren’t you? Watch Stewart some time and count how many times he lapses into long silences before he makes a point, that’s when he’s not making retarded faces, trying to display shock at the news he’s just witnessed in a clip.

    Stewart isn’t all bad, but comedy is really not his strong side.

    dogsurfer
    Member

    People generally speak at 120/150 words per minute but can comprehend at 600/700 wpm. To Colbert’s credit, he enunciates clearly, distinctly, with a common vocabulary, that can heard comfortably at double-speed. Double-speeding Stewart tends to require too many replays for comprehension, due a more rapid delivery and varied vocabulary, even with his gaps and forced chuckles. Skipping Colbert’s commercials, intro, applause, trailer, and at double speed trims off 19 minutes, for the 11 minutes of “Colbert truthiness”, with no discernible loss of quality. Aside from the advertisers, why take offense? I figure the skip and double-speed saves 5.5 hours/month, half… Read more »

    Dreth
    Member

    Or sit back and enjoy both shows for what they offer.

    natedog
    Member

    have you ever watched Jon Stewart…. on weed?



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas