Loading ...
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
July 29, 2010 at 9:07 pm
Candies? Those are wedding cupcakes.
July 29, 2010 at 9:18 pm
srry, baby. the cake is a lie
July 29, 2010 at 11:00 pm
I would prefer “do{ … } while(alive);”, personally.
Or maybe “while(alive) { … }”, since it’s reasonable to assume that dead people aren’t going to call have_and_hold() and love_and_cherish() in the event that they have a wedding.
Oh, and I would think have_and_hold and love_and_cherish operate on the same data. Unless this is a snippet from a language with objects, the lack of parameters implies that they require global data, which is very often not a good idea. For instance, it would be difficult to extend the functions to be able to act on other people, which is a requirements change which should have been anticipated.
July 29, 2010 at 11:23 pm
good grief.
July 30, 2010 at 2:51 am
The use of do{} until(death==true); means that have_and_hold(); and love_and_cherish(); are at least called once, even if you’re dead. If you’re into that sort of thing.
July 30, 2010 at 4:28 am
what’s that thing that looks like a coatrack on the bottom level?
July 30, 2010 at 8:24 am
that would be the USB symbol
July 30, 2010 at 10:04 am
do until? I would want my marriage written in a better language than VB :S