Leave A Comment
- My[confined]Space
- Discord
- Help
- Join MCS+
- OTD
- Queue
- Random
- Reviews
- Spaces
- Top10
- Upload
- My Stuff
- Log in
- Legal Defense Fund
-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movie Reviews- Star Trek Images
- “Star Trek: The Motion Picture: Echoes #3” Preview
- “Star Trek: Defiant #14” Preview
- “Star Trek: Discovery: Adventures in the 32nd Century #3” Preview
- “Star Trek: Aliens: Trill #1” Preview
- “Star Trek: Classics: The Mirror Saga TPB” Preview
- “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: The Dog of War #1” Preview
- “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: The Dog of War #2” Preview
- “Star Trek: Discovery: Adventures in the 32nd Century #1” Preview
- “Star Trek: Defiant #12” Preview
- “Star Trek: Defiant #6” Preview
- Movies Coming Soon
- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: The Captain’s Table: Book 1: War Dragons” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Preview of “Star Trek: Defiant #14”
- “Star Trek #19” Review by Dailystartreknews.com
- “Star Trek Picard The Art and Making of the Series” Book Review
- New Star Trek Book: “The Tao of Spock: How Vulcan Philosophy Intersects with Taoism In the Star Trek Universe”
- New Star Trek Book: “Star Trek and the Tragic Hybrid: Children of Two Worlds from Spock to Soji”
- “Star Trek: Picard: Firewall” Review by Shastrix.com
- #198 Star Trek: The Art Of Neville Page 2023
- Last Chance! Star Trek Book Deals For April 2024
- Fivestar Fridays: Traveling the Star Trek World w/ Tom Salinsky!
- Movie Related Products
- Arby’s Made a ‘Good Burger’ Burger
- Marvel Studios’ The Infinity Saga – Iron Man: The Art of the Movie
- “Elemental” Review
- Can’t Catch Me Now (from The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes)
- Universal Soldier 6-Inch Scale Luc Deveraux Figure by Hiya Toys
- Rebel Moon – Part One: A Child of Fire | Official Trailer | Netflix
- Chuck E. Cheese removes animatronics in all locations except 1 following release of ‘Five Nights at Freddy’s’
- “Good Chemistry: The Story of Elemental” Review
- Loki Season 2’s Finale Was Glorious (REVIEW)
- “Interstellar” Review
- Music Video DB
Willow was a sexy witch…this is more creapy 🙂
the word ”sexy” is wasted on this picture
she is definatily hot but whats up with the shorts? What she cant pull those up any higher? The waistband has to be way past her belly button.
That’s how women used to wear pants. It may seem weird now but they were also differently built than women today so it looked fantastic on them. I think Scarlet Johansson is one of the few women who is still built like the women from the 60s. It sounds like I’m talking about robot women doesn’t it. Oh that reminds me, The Stepford Wives! Watch that for more examples of both the clothes and women. The original not the remake though.
That style is older than the sixties. That’s about late 40’s mid 50’s. Women couldn’t show their navel or if fully clothed, the area of the navel. Additionally, the leg was the main attraction. Whatever showed more leg, won out.
This is a great pinup. She’s a classic beauty.
I didn’t say the style was from the 60s but this particular shape of a woman was the most dominant during that time, after the 60s it changed greatly though there are some prime examples left like I said in my prior comment.
I agree.
Unfortunately, I have to disagree. That particular shape was dominant during WWII and early Korean War (KW). After the KW, zaftig women such as Mansfield and Monroe came to dominate. That period also introduced Hugh Hefner’s playboy models who were quite a bit “thicker” than these pinups. Also, most pinups during and after the KW were in color.
Not sure what that last bit about the colour has to do with anything. I’m not sure we’re talking about the same shape. I wasn’t just talking about famous women and pin ups but regular women on the streets. Of course it was present during all of those times, my point was that its peak was during the 60s, I don’t think they had that many photos of regular women before then so it’s not exactly possible to determine that precisely. You’ll have trouble finding an exact term to describe the shape I’m talking about so this is a little pointless to be honest.
all I know is that this isnt the style today so therefor it is stupid and should be ridiculed.
Sound logic. Oh yeah ever heard of how vintage came back in style, is coming back in style and will most likely continue to do so? I guess that really messes with your world view now doesn’t it.
no it fits perfectly in my worldview, once its in style again it wont be stupid. It will be time to ridicule whatever used to be popular like when women would wear a skirt but having fucking jeans underneath.
Oh snap, well Scarlett disagrees with you on that one.
www.innergeek.us/blog/2009/04/vintage/scarlett-johansson.jpg
It is in style again already. You may not like it but at least it keeps women from wearing that stupid jeans + skirt combination.
what about the terribly furry boots worn with shorts?
I’m not impressed with ugly shoes even if they’re comfy but I think it’s just something rich people wear for that very reason while pretending it looks good. Look you can’t have everything, let’s just ogle Scarlett and forget everything else.
I also had to think of the Ross Sisters, they were so bendy: www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRRKMOGKKFU
Ah pure gold, that is beyond incredible.
I betcha those women didn’t preform on The Ed Sullivan Show. lol
I Dream of Jeannie and Gilligan’s Mary Ann could show skin, but no navel at first.
Bu… bu.. but I like cheesecake pin-ups. I prefer it to graphicitiness of today’s porn. Besides, women didn’t even have belly buttons back then!
Quote hufnmouth: Women couldn’t show their navel or if fully clothed, the area of the navel.
reply jediadept: Carmen Miranda
M[c]s used to be about gutter jokes and internet laughter. Not stupid debates.
Tiki LOVES when people debate on his site, he used to egg people on. Debates appeared as soon as his site got popular so unless you wish you had never heard of MCS make some jokes yourself and don’t tell others what they should be doing.
This is why you’re hot.
om nom nom