Gaza

Gaza.jpg (75 KB)

  • Leave a comment ?

    54 Responses to Gaza

    1. The preference for expansion over security has been particularly evident since Israel’s fateful decision in 1971, backed by Henry Kissinger, to reject the offer of a full peace treaty by President Sadat of Egypt, offering nothing to the Palestinians — an agreement that the US and Israel were compelled to accept at Camp David eight years later, after a major war that was a near disaster for Israel. A peace treaty with Egypt would have ended any significant security threat, but there was an unacceptable quid pro quo: Israel would have had to abandon its extensive settlement programs in the northeastern Sinai. Security was a lower priority than expansion, as it still is. Substantial evidence for this basic conclusion is provided in a magisterial study of Israel’s security and foreign policy by Zeev Maoz, Defending the Holy Land.

      (…)

      Meanwhile we are quietly observing a rare event in history, what the late Israeli sociologist Baruch Kimmerling called “politicide,” the murder of a nation — at our hands.

      – Noam Chomsky

      Reply

      • And now for my ignorant commentary:

        …do we really need that nation?

        It’s always some war or some revolting shit over there.

        Reply

        • I don’t care what that piece of land is called and who its rulers are as long as there will be peace. And yeah I care, because I have family over there, both Jewish and non Jewish. Unfortunately Palestinians aren’t allowed to leave, so I can’t just send them a ticket and say hey come over here, leave the war behind.

          Reply

        • Here’s the real question: Was Palestine a nation, in any sense of the word (culturally, politically, historically) before the 1960s?

          Reply

          • Also, why, during hundreds of years of Turskish rule, did the sense of Palestinian nationhood not flare up once?

            Also, why did they name themselves after their British occupier’s anglicized Latin word that ultimately is derived from Hebrew? Don’t they speak the Arabic? Isn’t that part of their national identity?

            Reply

          • That’s gotta be the simplest question anyone could ask in this otherwise contentious debate. Yes, both the Israelites and the Palestinians considered the same areas to be their native homeland. This is not uncommon, it is simply a bizarre accident of history that they both survived to modern times to contest the land.

            Reply

            • So, find me one reference to them before the 50s or 60s. Cuz I’m pretty sure that before that they were just Arabs. Arabs who had no problem living under non-arab occupier after non-arab occupier – Muslim and Christian alike – and occupiers who, after the war, had no problem when their Christian overlords divided them between Egypt, Syria and Jordan. It was only that little bit partitioned to the Jewish settlers who had formed a majority in certain areas for over 50 years (in peaceful coexistence with the Turks and Arabs) that seemed to give them any kind of national identity and unity.

              Reply

            • Because their previous occupiers didn’t behave and talk this way: “Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries – all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left.” – Joseph Weiz, Head of the Jewish Agency’s Colonization Department 1940

              Perhaps they want their own country so this won’t happen again.

              Reply

          • Here’s the real answer to the real question….Israel was not a state until the USA and Russia set it up in 1948 after WWII and the holocaust. Try reading a little history. The middle east was pretty peaceful until then and has been in constant turmoil since.

            Reply

            • A state is not equivalent to a people. A people have a common language, history and culture. A state is a bunch of bureaucrats that take bribes and sometimes pretend to care if and only if the mechanics of the state demand it every four to ten years or so.

              Reply

            • Oh, yes. Tell me to read some more history. Two degrees in history and every fucking day of my life as long as I can remember pissing my life away reading bullshit history but your whatever-standup-comedian informed your worldview is so much more valuable.

              Keep bitching to me because George Carlin told you to or whoever the fuck. I love the fucking internet.

              Reply

            • @Caio – I’m so sorry that you have spent “every fucking day of my life as long as I can remember pissing my life away reading bullshit history” and still went on to get “Two degrees in history” and yet still don’t realized that the state of Israel was once Arab land given to the Jews after WWII.

              I sincerely hope that you take a moment to reflect on your life choices and consider getting a degree in something that will bring more fulfillment to your days on earth. Life’s too short to carry that much anger my friend.

              But if that doesn’t work, I’m sure that you can reach Nirvana by arguing on the intertubes.

              Reply

            • Maybe you should’ve gotten a real degree…

              Reply

      • If you were trying to pick a Chomsky quote that makes him look like an idiot: great success!
        The settlements in Sinai were withdrawn in 1982 and the settlements in Gaza were withdrawn in 2005.

        Reply

    2. Somewhat less verbose than the post above: Agreed.

      Reply

    3. SHIT STORM!!!
      the jews are the new nazis 😀

      Reply

      • they are worse than nazis
        nazis were quite happy to accept different types of european identity, as long as they were just that, of european ethnicity

        jews dont want anything except one big israel covering the planet with every man woman child, and anything else that can be physically circumcised to be a part of their race

        Reply

    4. US foreign policy in Palestine: “Better the hook-nose kikes control the place where some arbitrary religious crap happened 20 centuries ago, than those dirty, smelly sand-niggers!”

      Reply

      • US foreign policy in palestine is biased by the fact the jews control the US federal banks,…they dont help israel, US goes bankrupt

        we all saw how the US economy turned to shit when Saudi Arabia told usa dont go to war, but they did anyway so the arabs withdrew alot of their wealth from USA

        imagine what would happen to USA if israel got angry…..
        USA would be in africa’s situation

        Reply

    5. I’d take it a little more seriously if they knew how to spell ‘Palestine’.

      I’d take it even more seriously if they considered the West Bank to be part of Palestine.

      Reply

      • Wait, you’re saying that this anti-US/Israeli photograph might possibly not be showing documents written in English? Perhaps that the target audience might not have U.S. English as a first language? How shocking!

        Reply

        • Maybe. My first language isn’t English, either, it’s Portuguese. And I’m not American if that’s what you’re implying. And I live in China so why don’t you try to insinuate that I’m parochial some more: it’s a wonderful way to skirt the issue.

          Some googling tells me that the only language that spells it that way is Scottish Gaelic, so yes maybe this professional-looking image was made in one of the two or three villages that still speaks that language. It would also explain why their knowledge of middle-eastern geography is so weak that they wouldn’t include the West Bank or Gaza – the two areas with the largest Palestinian populations – as part of Palestine.

          Reply

      • Both spellings are correct. As is Palestina which is also a pretty good song by Ministry.

        I’d take you more seriously if you took your meds you racially confused mental patient.

        Reply

    6. For a secret deal to take over the area and giftwrap it for the Jews, they’re sure taking their sweet time to do such a shitty job.

      Reply

    7. Meh, it’s violent for everyone involved, including the Palestinians.

      That place is the biggest cluster fuck on earth, besides “Insert African Nation Here.”

      Reply

    8. israel isnt even on that map

      your argument is invalid

      Reply

    9. No-one should ever, EVER be ‘entitled’ to own land due to religion. Fuck Israel.

      Reply

    10. Nuke em? For some this is the only answer they have.

      Reply

    11. also, no one will EVER fix this problem

      Reply

    12. This shit storm is too mellow…

      Hey if God didn’t want the Jews to have Israel then they wouldn’t have it right?

      Reply

      • well since the original bible was written by jews, even after a bit of mis-translation from aramaic to latin, then to english, the BS remains the same that jews want everyone to think they are the chosen people.

        since the Norse, Egyptian and Greek gods never had to deal with the jews, they would never have given them anything, so the jews are just relying on the fact that a book they wrote says ‘god’ wants them to have israel

        Reply

    13. Cool, now that all palestinians have been crushed between
      the two giant hands, we will now have peace. party on, giant hands!
      [however, someone must have shop’ed this, because everyone knows
      palestinians have green blood.]

      Reply

    Leave a Comment




    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Visual Tricks Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas