Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
Excerpt from city of charleston v the kanawha players
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
Loading...
Click to Add to favorites | Tags: Humor, Politics Leave A Comment
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)Loading...Click to Add to favorites | Tags: Humor, Politics 
Source:
www.theonion.com/articles/supreme-court-upholds-freedom-of-speech-in-obsceni,17372/
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT, IT’S FAKE?
i was finally proud of someone in my government
D:
yeah that was funny as hell when it was on the onion. Come on Tiki, why are you trying to pass that off?
Imagine how great our country would be if our judges actually issued opinions like this.
yeah it would be like idiocracy, people smoking blunts in congress, talking shit or even fighting reporters who asked a question they didnt like.
i’d trade it in a second for what we have now
Yeah in real life politicians don’t assault people, they just commit acts of battery.
Wow, the liberal elitists are out in force!
Make him Chief Justice,already.
This would be fucking AWESOME if it was real.
the sad part is that once appointed to the bench, they dont have to worry about re-election; it’s a life long position. so what the fuck, cut loose bitches
There is zero empirical evidence that worries about re-election reduce corruption.
how does one empirically measure worry?
With a ruler.
I remember! There are 12 warts in a pester and 3 pesters make a fusspot.
Right, and there’s 6 fusspots in a worry.
Empirical evidence is from observation and experiment. Something does not need to be quantified in order for it to be empirical.
that doesnt answer my question
Then the best way is to liquefy the subject and use HPLC/MS to find post-translational modifications and sequence variants.
And this is why Empiricism is for cunts.
Dammit, pick on Kentucky for awhile. Leave my hillbilly ass alone.