Excerpt from city of charleston v the kanawha players
(0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...
Click to Add to favorites | Tags: Humor, Politics Leave a comment ?
21 Responses to Excerpt from city of charleston v the kanawha players
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 22, 2010 at 11:09 am
Source:
www.theonion.com/articles/supreme-court-upholds-freedom-of-speech-in-obsceni,17372/
June 22, 2010 at 11:16 am
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT, IT’S FAKE?
i was finally proud of someone in my government
D:
June 22, 2010 at 11:15 am
yeah that was funny as hell when it was on the onion. Come on Tiki, why are you trying to pass that off?
June 22, 2010 at 11:20 am
Imagine how great our country would be if our judges actually issued opinions like this.
June 22, 2010 at 11:27 am
yeah it would be like idiocracy, people smoking blunts in congress, talking shit or even fighting reporters who asked a question they didnt like.
June 22, 2010 at 1:21 pm
i’d trade it in a second for what we have now
June 25, 2010 at 1:40 am
Yeah in real life politicians don’t assault people, they just commit acts of battery.
June 22, 2010 at 11:29 am
Wow, the liberal elitists are out in force!
June 22, 2010 at 11:38 am
Make him Chief Justice,already.
June 22, 2010 at 12:58 pm
This would be fucking AWESOME if it was real.
June 22, 2010 at 1:22 pm
the sad part is that once appointed to the bench, they dont have to worry about re-election; it’s a life long position. so what the fuck, cut loose bitches
June 22, 2010 at 1:43 pm
There is zero empirical evidence that worries about re-election reduce corruption.
June 22, 2010 at 2:34 pm
how does one empirically measure worry?
June 22, 2010 at 3:00 pm
With a ruler.
June 22, 2010 at 3:52 pm
I remember! There are 12 warts in a pester and 3 pesters make a fusspot.
June 22, 2010 at 4:58 pm
Right, and there’s 6 fusspots in a worry.
June 22, 2010 at 3:08 pm
Empirical evidence is from observation and experiment. Something does not need to be quantified in order for it to be empirical.
June 22, 2010 at 3:43 pm
that doesnt answer my question
June 22, 2010 at 5:11 pm
Then the best way is to liquefy the subject and use HPLC/MS to find post-translational modifications and sequence variants.
June 22, 2010 at 3:45 pm
And this is why Empiricism is for cunts.
June 22, 2010 at 2:10 pm
Dammit, pick on Kentucky for awhile. Leave my hillbilly ass alone.