For your consumption
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.











Processing your request, Please wait....
March 19, 2010 at 1:00 pm
I like how the art that’s being posted on this site that you disagree with keeps provoking you to post art that you consider good.
Here’s what Picasso said once,
“It is not what the artist does that counts. But what he is. Cézanne would never have interested me if he had lived and thought like Jacques-Émile Blanche, even if the apple he had painted had been ten times more beautiful. What interests us is the anxiety of Cézanne, the teaching of Cézanne, the anguish of Van Gogh, in short the inner drama of the man. The rest is false.”
March 21, 2010 at 7:05 pm
That is an awesome quote! And quite true, as well.
Poor Jacques-Émile Blanche…..
March 23, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Well, Pablo and I can disagree on that. I believe that humans share something like 99.9% of the same experiences, so it’s not our experiences that set us apart, but our abilities.
It’s all too true, though. Would we remember Einstein if it weren’t for his haircut? And why have we forgotten all those other scientists with boring haircuts?
March 23, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Marie Curie had a boring haircut.
March 23, 2010 at 7:10 pm
Yes. But we might not remember what he looks like.
March 20, 2010 at 8:37 am
are the top and bottom ones self portraits?
March 23, 2010 at 2:44 pm
yeah. what you said.
seriously. hes one fantastic artist
and does anyone know the name of that haircut?
i want that haircut!
is it called the picasso?
March 23, 2010 at 2:57 pm
it’s called ‘the one ear’
March 23, 2010 at 3:09 pm
youre thinking of van goh, man.
March 23, 2010 at 2:59 pm
A source of endless amusement is how many people don’t know, or easily forget, what a master of formalist painting Picasso was before he branched off into Cubism. ^This is what you want to show anyone who looks at his more modern works & says something retarded like “my six-year-old could’ve painted this”.
March 23, 2010 at 3:06 pm
Ex-fucking-ZACKLY!
March 23, 2010 at 4:13 pm
His sentimental period,eh?
March 23, 2010 at 9:36 pm
Whenever I look at Picasso paintings, sketches and drawings, I think “What a mind, that he could produce that diversity!”. I think his earlier works are what he saw and his later pieces reflect what he thought.
March 24, 2010 at 9:44 pm
I worked at the Picasso museum for a year…look up the dimensions for “The First Communion”, which is the second painting posted. It’s quite large…having had to clean it twice…and this photo doesn’t do it justice either, it’s spectacularly detailed.
I’ll have to look for my pictures from the museum…he did paper cuttings as well that are incredible.
March 24, 2010 at 11:11 pm
give ‘em to us!
March 24, 2010 at 9:51 pm
Oh, almost forgot. He began painting “The First Communion” when he was 14.
March 27, 2010 at 1:50 am
Picasso: Pure Fucking Genius.