Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.





(7 votes, average: 3.43 out of 5)


Processing your request, Please wait....
January 27, 2010 at 5:53 pm
I don’t see it. Wait! There is is!
January 27, 2010 at 7:18 pm
I…. think I see it.
January 27, 2010 at 8:56 pm
My sympathies if the euphemism is “rare”
February 17, 2010 at 10:47 am
Snatch on rye,hold the mustard,please.
February 17, 2010 at 10:48 am
Talk about a forced euphEmism. Sorry Demon, but that is just a sandwich. Not a euphemisn for anything sexual. It’s clear that you think that it looks somewhat vaginal, but really no… no it does not. It looks like a sandwich.
February 17, 2010 at 11:22 am
It does however, look like one delicious sandwich!
February 17, 2010 at 11:36 am
I have a question regarding antibiotics. Can you help? Something tells me you’re an expert.
February 17, 2010 at 12:33 pm
@ Demon
weird sammiches that resemble vaginas.
you can all be replaced by one.
February 17, 2010 at 6:57 pm
If that’s a vag then why is it so many colors?
February 17, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Euphemism doesn’t mean “something that looks like something else.”
February 17, 2010 at 8:05 pm
Thank you for your input Dr. Pendantic. You do realize that pedants rank below furries in the internet respect list, right?
February 17, 2010 at 8:11 pm
Put a comma before Dr. Pedantic and no comma before the word right.
…since we’re just one upping each others smarty pants here.
February 17, 2010 at 9:36 pm
I don’t think it’s pedantry to point out that she could have called it “Sexual Haiku Sandwich” or “Sexual Arithmetic Sandwich” and been just as accurate. But she’s Demon and I still love her.
February 17, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Wait a second – this, from the guy who complained about her spelling of Euphemism and then said it wasn’t one?
February 17, 2010 at 10:07 pm
Good point. Very true. Message received. To be fair, I didn’t complain about it, I just pointed it out. Would it have been better to have used a “(sic)?” or something. Of course if I am also a pedant, I have to point out that you’re making an ad homonym attempt at defending yourself, whether I am or am not a pendant does not mean I can’t call you out on being one as well.
And because I’m having a bad night of people misinterpreting my intentions, I’m going to state outright that I am trying to be whimsically irreverent. I’ll hope that that’s how I seem.
February 18, 2010 at 6:34 am
Doesn’t looked cooked to me.