Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.





(8 votes, average: 3.63 out of 5)


January 11, 2010 at 9:57 am
im so sick of our two party system
January 19, 2010 at 7:03 pm
So you haven’t realized it’s the same shit in two different colors?
January 12, 2010 at 5:50 pm
I thought there would be a pic for the Retarded Right.
January 19, 2010 at 4:43 am
The problem is, that the lefts arguments actually make sense and are based on logic and facts. The rights (or conservatives) argument is based on faith/religious ideologies and biases/hatred. However, it is my understanding that the two party system will evolve very soon, since the Republicans are mostly older and richer generations, which are slowly dying off.
January 19, 2010 at 4:44 am
Still 100x better than the American Taliban.
Then again Pelosi should give up her post for wanting to cut NASA funding. Cunting cunt!
January 19, 2010 at 6:57 am
most things are better than the american terrorists
January 19, 2010 at 5:35 am
This is a brave statement considering the pack of losers contending for the republican presidential nomination last year.
BTW – I have to agree with Natedog. A 2 party system is truly stupid.
A separate house and senate that parallel process legislation before merging it into some kind of unholy bastard love child is also quite stupid.
On the other hand, both are better than being ruled (directly) by your religion.
January 19, 2010 at 6:12 am
Bitches don’t know about my proportional democracy.
January 19, 2010 at 8:26 am
The Corporations and Elites have enough issues paying off the members of your two party system, they just can’t afford to lobby a third…
January 19, 2010 at 9:14 am
Again, the American Right makes a lazy and terrible political cartoon. How is it that some mediums (Talk Radio, Cable News) can be utterly dominated by one political philosophy, while others (Political Cartoons, Blogosphere, Internet-in-general, and Political Comedy) dominated by the other? Is there something about cartooning that systematically appeals to lefties and doesn’t to the righties? Do conservatives systematically prefer to listen or watch their political arguments while Liberals prefer to read theirs?
January 19, 2010 at 9:54 am
I think that’s about it, though I wouldn’t say that the radio is overly right nor is TV. what I can say though is that usually Right wing humor just doesn’t work for most people.
January 21, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Right wingers are not funny. End of story.
January 19, 2010 at 10:07 am
‘right wingers’ or ‘conservatives’ are either stupid or insane.
What do you call a person who is not educated enough to understand that global warming is a reality but arrogant enough to chime in and claim that they know better than all of the worlds scientists?
I have the answer narrowed down to either republican or asshole.
January 19, 2010 at 10:39 am
Not all of the worlds scientists agree on global warming.
Nice of you to be arrogant enough to chime in though.
BTW – That was a sarcastic slam, just in case you didn’t catch it. You might want to go back and read it again.
January 19, 2010 at 11:16 am
…pollution caused by human activity has no effect on climate
Gee thanks for teaching me about this sarcasm thing ack.
and thanks also for answering my question for me (in your case the answer is ‘asshole’)
January 19, 2010 at 4:32 pm
“…pollution caused by human activity has no effect on climate”
Nobody said that but you (i.e. lame Straw Man). I just disagree with you and apparently the “everyone” you have invented.
There are many very educated people who do not agree with global warming. Some even believe an ice age is coming.
Who is right? I don’t know, however the first asshole who can make an accurate 7-day forecast has my attention.
BTW. Grammar. Learn it.
January 19, 2010 at 7:37 pm
Ok, I have no iron in this fire, but I just have to point out a fallacy there: Any time you are not actually in an ice age, you are going into an ice age. You can believe we are going into an ice age and also believe that man made carbon emissions are causing a more immediate climate shift that is detrimental to our own future.
January 19, 2010 at 8:42 pm
Weather is not climate, FFS!
January 20, 2010 at 1:02 am
Don’t be stupid, you moron.
Evidence. You either have it or you don’t.
The anti climate change bunch don’t have it, but hey, they do have a list of people who don’t work in climatology (except for Soon, but he’s both a climate scientist and registered Exxon lobbyist)! That counts for… nothing at all.
January 20, 2010 at 11:50 am
There is no evidence in either direction you fucking retard.
Its all guess work based on correlation. That doesn’t even qualify as science. Science knows answers or at least the right questions. Neither side of “climate change” have either. All we have are new taxes because of half wit faggots like you. Pull your head out of your ass.
You count for nothing at all. Accept that and find meaning in something that doesn’t require you to annoy the rest of the world. This hippy shit is over.
January 20, 2010 at 7:58 pm
You fail hard, Maggie. Do you work at being ignorant or is it natural? How many tens of thousands of research articles detailing the evidence do you need before you admit that scientists have evidence of climate change despite you not liking it?
January 20, 2010 at 3:33 am
Now this is good humor and what I find fairly typical of the “climate change” topic. If you do not share the popular point of view – you are a denier and wrong.
That’s pure bullshit.
Some of us simply want to hear both sides of the issue.
And for the FFS… no, weather is not climate change. Given a few years, you can tell if a given weatherman’s predictions are accurate. How can you tell how accurate a climate change scientists predictions are?
January 20, 2010 at 1:10 pm
What would you have us do? Nothing? Right now, I’m willing to trust the vast majority of scientists that say it’s happening, it’s serious and potentially, extremely dangerous. I have my doubts as well, but there really is no reason to do nothing.
January 20, 2010 at 2:07 pm
All some scientists can say is something is happening.
Until they can say what it is then ya I vote for not doing anything yet.
Otherwise it’s just a bunch of wasted time and effort that could be spent fixing the identifiable and diagnosable problems.
January 20, 2010 at 8:05 pm
Your scientific literacy is stuck in the 60s. The 1760s. We know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. We know that human activity is causing an increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. We know that this is a primary factor in the increase in global temperature which is driving climate change. We also have a pretty good idea that cloud forming pollution from India and China is blunting the rise in temperature.
Instead of just shouting at everybody to shut up on a website that isn’t yours, try learning something.
January 22, 2010 at 3:27 am
Which are?
January 20, 2010 at 8:00 pm
Sure… We can give equal time to equal evidence. The anti climate change guys have none, so can we get on with it now? Or would you like to hear evidence against evolution, gravity, the atomic theory as well?
January 21, 2010 at 2:54 am
Or we could give equal time to evidence global warming evidence that is faked, not conclusive and / or exaggerated… there is plenty of that to go around.
I would love to trust records and numbers from people I do not know. Unfortunately Germany and England look and feel like Antarctica at the moment.
Given what I can actually see and feel – I am interested in what the people who do not agree with global warming have to say.
January 19, 2010 at 11:40 am
I don’t vote and am not American. Based on watching the two party system slap fest I favour the right simply because they’re less annoying. Your democratic voter comes across like a hysterical KKK lunatic in the 30′s. Every post I read I picture some malnourished, half educated asshole waving his arms around and trying to keep up with his own bullshit.
January 20, 2010 at 1:03 am
Meh.
January 20, 2010 at 11:47 am
is meh nutjob speak for “you’re right”?
don’t bother answering cause I don’t give a shit.
January 20, 2010 at 8:00 pm
Another meh for Maggie.
January 19, 2010 at 7:00 pm
let’s see how many people can generalize and project their beliefs upon everyone else.
January 19, 2010 at 7:02 pm
The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.
January 19, 2010 at 8:56 pm
I like all the negative points on the comments supporting republicans and positive points supporting democrats.. Hmmm.. Apparently some people can’t pull their heads out of their asses and realize our current system just doesn’t work and perpetuating it isn’t going to solve any problems, just create more… To be clear.. Democrats suck and Republicans suck… Politics in general.. Suck.. Is it going to change in our lifetime? Probably not without a massive decimation of the human race.. Bring on World War Z so we can refocus our resources where they are needed and not where a bunch of aging asshats want them…
January 20, 2010 at 9:01 pm
Oh lookie… I have a -1 on my previous post.. Someone thinks they’re important
How cute…
January 20, 2010 at 11:52 pm
Have another for being a douche over a -1!
January 21, 2010 at 8:30 pm
Lawl.. you guys are funny.. I’m glad I can make you self-important assholes happy
January 23, 2010 at 7:36 am
“The Looney Left”? That’s what you’re going to go with.
Well, all real creative artists and writers are liberals, so I’m going to allow it. Have your fun!