Star Trek
(8 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites Tags: Movies, star trek
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(8 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites Tags: Movies, star trek
December 31, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Gene Roddenberry would not approve of the shakey cam.
December 31, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Nope I think he wouldn’t have approved of the entire movie, too much exploding not enough treking!.
Though I will say, it was a good action film and had some great scenes, I just didn’t think it was a good Star Trek film
December 31, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Compared to all the Trek abominations that have occurred since Gene died, the latest film is fairly benign.
December 31, 2009 at 3:22 pm
I dunno, some of the TNG films were good (well the first 2 were anyway) VOY wasn’t terrible , thought it did have some AWFUL episodes, DS9…well… meh, I liked the relationship between bashir and O’brien that was it. ENT, the less said about that the better.
Like I said it’s not a bad film, in fact I quite enjoyed it, there was always just a tiny piece of me going “urggggh doesn’t feel like proper Star Trek” I didn’t like the way they implied in the comics that Geordie made that HORRIBLE ship at the start
December 31, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Generations sucked, but First Contact was really good.
January 1, 2010 at 12:52 pm
Yeah LOVED First Contact, Nemesis wasn’t too great but it had it’s good moments
January 1, 2010 at 6:39 pm
The Voyage Home and First Contact are my faves of the Star Trek movies.
January 2, 2010 at 12:22 am
Generations was great!
December 31, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Especially compared to nemesis.
December 31, 2009 at 7:39 pm
Same level of Nemesis: Forget the plot and have fun!
December 31, 2009 at 1:10 pm
And they’ve signed on for a second instalment…
Pass…
December 31, 2009 at 1:36 pm
I loved this movie and will be seeing any sequels. I am not die hard trekster, so the little nerdy nuances escape me. all in all I thought this was better than 1/2 of the original movies (I saw several of them in the theatre, including Wrath of Kaaaaaaan), and I though they did an awesome job casting the characters.
so there
December 31, 2009 at 7:21 pm
^^This. I didn’t “love” it, but I did enjoy the movie.
December 31, 2009 at 10:15 pm
I hate this movie, and the more I think about it the more I hate it. The script is the laziest piece of crap ever. The only reason anything happens is to move the action along to yet another cliched action piece. It ignores real science AND established Trek science. Someone should explain to the filmmakers such basic terms as “galaxy”, “supernova” and “black hole.” Oh, and “plot.”
Argh.
Red Matter? What the frig is that? Oh yeah, it’s red and looks pretty on screen. It’s is almost not entirely unlike antimatter, but red, and pretty! And Spock is carrying enough to devastate the entire galaxy, even though he just needs a little drop to blow up a star. I hope he drives safe!
Oh, and now our solar system has a black hole IN IT. That might cause problems with, I don’t know, existance?
Oh how I hate that film. Its popularity is inexplicable.
January 1, 2010 at 12:05 am
No ship shields X Spock sexuality defined
No more Vulcan X Orion girl
No plot X Fun
Transwarp teleportation X Well recasted
No coherent ship scale X Humor
Time travel again X
Incredible coincidences X
Chekhov as a 17 old
genius X
Who needs a spacedock? X
Inferior Enterprise
design X
Incoherent distances X
Inexplicable destruction
of the Prime Timeline X
Inexplicable destruction
of Romulus X
Crappy DVD cover X
I can’t find any more good points… someone help!
January 1, 2010 at 12:53 pm
Simon pegg made that film
January 5, 2010 at 3:25 am
Evilcritter is scared of fiction. ooooooo scawy