Your Ad Here

Project Orion

2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 52 votes, average: 4.00 out of 52 votes, average: 4.00 out of 52 votes, average: 4.00 out of 52 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) (Log in to vote!)
Loading ... Loading ...

NASA project orion artist 500x400 Project Orion

ProjectOrionConfiguration 499x213 Project Orion

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)

Processing your request, Please wait....
  • submit to reddit
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
This entry was posted in Images. Bookmark the permalink.
lolkittens!

Ology

8 Responses to Project Orion

  1. Why would they name it after that song from Oklahoma?

  2. It would have to be built in orbit; and it would probably leave orbit under conventional thrusters. Only once it was a safe distance from the planet would it light off the first nuke.

  3. What a spectacular waste of money.

  4. @origuy
    Launching with conventional thrusters would defeat the point. The idea was to actually uses nuclear impulse to launch.

  5. Read George Dyson’s (Freeman’s son) book ‘Project Orion: The Atomic Spaceship 1957 – 1965′ for a fascinating overview of the entire project.

    The 10,000 ton version would have done a 3 year round trip to one of Saturn’s moons, Enceladus, delivering a 1,300 ton payload and originally planned to happen in 1970. The ‘Advanced Interplanetary Ship’, as it would be called, would have 4G acceleration using 15 kiloton ‘propulsion modules’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>