en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.




(2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)



Processing your request, Please wait....
November 12, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Will it take off?
November 16, 2009 at 10:25 am
Why would they name it after that song from Oklahoma?
November 20, 2009 at 2:46 am
It would have to be built in orbit; and it would probably leave orbit under conventional thrusters. Only once it was a safe distance from the planet would it light off the first nuke.
November 20, 2009 at 7:27 am
sounds doable
November 20, 2009 at 9:34 am
What a spectacular waste of money.
November 20, 2009 at 10:46 am
@origuy
Launching with conventional thrusters would defeat the point. The idea was to actually uses nuclear impulse to launch.
November 20, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Bang bang
November 20, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Read George Dyson’s (Freeman’s son) book ‘Project Orion: The Atomic Spaceship 1957 – 1965′ for a fascinating overview of the entire project.
The 10,000 ton version would have done a 3 year round trip to one of Saturn’s moons, Enceladus, delivering a 1,300 ton payload and originally planned to happen in 1970. The ‘Advanced Interplanetary Ship’, as it would be called, would have 4G acceleration using 15 kiloton ‘propulsion modules’