<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More flying cars!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/</link>
	<description>My Confined Space is an image blog with user submitted pictures of anything and everything, funny, serious or dark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birdcat</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-268190</link>
		<dc:creator>Birdcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-268190</guid>
		<description>You win!  The Seagull is definitely the hoax.  Though the others are just prototypes.  The top two need airstrips to take off and land so they are just planes that can travel on the road.  Kinda lame.  REAL flying cars are VTOL (vertical take off and landing) vehicles.

The last car looks the coolest but the X-Hawk (2nd to last pic) is probably the farthest along technologically.  It&#039;s based on a working model developed in the 60s, believe it or not.

http://www.urbanaero.com/Technical_Info.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You win!  The Seagull is definitely the hoax.  Though the others are just prototypes.  The top two need airstrips to take off and land so they are just planes that can travel on the road.  Kinda lame.  REAL flying cars are VTOL (vertical take off and landing) vehicles.</p>
<p>The last car looks the coolest but the X-Hawk (2nd to last pic) is probably the farthest along technologically.  It&#8217;s based on a working model developed in the 60s, believe it or not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbanaero.com/Technical_Info.htm" rel="nofollow">www.urbanaero.com/Technical_Info.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyreblade</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-267740</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-267740</guid>
		<description>The seagull is a shoop. Definitely the seagull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The seagull is a shoop. Definitely the seagull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoneage</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-267601</link>
		<dc:creator>stoneage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-267601</guid>
		<description>the seagull is a shoop of a 50s mercedes car. thanks, google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the seagull is a shoop of a 50s mercedes car. thanks, google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thrella</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-267600</link>
		<dc:creator>Thrella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-267600</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t even need to think about it, those doors wouldn&#039;t close with huge jet engines affixed to them like that. And Mercedez wouldn&#039;t make a 60&#039;s car into a flying car, I think they&#039;d go with a newer version :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t even need to think about it, those doors wouldn&#8217;t close with huge jet engines affixed to them like that. And Mercedez wouldn&#8217;t make a 60&#8242;s car into a flying car, I think they&#8217;d go with a newer version <img src='http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brushaway</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-267587</link>
		<dc:creator>Brushaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-267587</guid>
		<description>my bets on the 2nd one, the seagull, due to the ladder thing. doesnt make any sense, if its grounded, theres no height to call for a ladder, and if its hovering, that engine&#039;s gonna be causing some serious bald spots as you climb in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my bets on the 2nd one, the seagull, due to the ladder thing. doesnt make any sense, if its grounded, theres no height to call for a ladder, and if its hovering, that engine&#8217;s gonna be causing some serious bald spots as you climb in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natedog</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2009/10/19/more-flying-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-267096</link>
		<dc:creator>natedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/?p=105790#comment-267096</guid>
		<description>gotta be the bottom one that&#039;s a hoax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta be the bottom one that&#8217;s a hoax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

