skin color vs. development

map_of_skin_color_distribution.png (23 KB)

UN_Human_Development.jpg (180 KB)

First pic shows skin color variations, second is the UN’s report on human development see it here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

and …..fight.

  • Leave a comment ?

    29 Responses to skin color vs. development

    1. ZOMG RACISM!QUICK, BLAME ISRAEL THE USA AND CHINA!!

      Reply

    2. Fight? What for. Any educated man who knows what modern science, biology, and history have to say about these things would be unimpressed by this poor attempt at a logical fallacy. It’s simple, correlation does not equal causation.

      You might as well title this modern science vs. fanaticism of the 18th century. I’ve noticed that it’s usually only people who have strong political beliefs who believe this argument holds any truth. Educated people who are interested in a variety of things tend to not even care for discussions (at least not if it concerns only the racial aspect) this topic could provide. Also, it’s probably close to impossible to find any kind of non-scientist person who is interested in this solely on a scientific level, their actual interests are usually of a more barbaric kind. Like justifying crimes of the past, or supporting crimes in the future. And yet it is almost guaranteed that there will be people who comment on this picture trying to make arguments in favour of the implied suggestion.

      So now that I have analyzed any possible discussion that could have come out of this, can we get to the important stuff and discuss why baked potatoes taste so damn good. I realised that it does actually matter where the potatoes come from, and so far, those from Israel are fucking unbeatable.

      Reply

    3. I’ll be over here asleep while the ignorant and uneducated argue over this nonsense. Evolutionary Science VS Socio-Economical spread of resources and wealth is just ridiculous and only something truly dumbass people would argue over.

      Any scientist that has studied Biological Anthropology would find this little theory retarded.

      Groger’s Rule: All humans are darker near the equator.
      Bergmann’s Rule: People near the equator are taller/thinner.

      All humans are genetically the same, no one in science has ever found a way to distinguish from race to race and race is a cultural/social catogory, not biological in which people divide or include each other.

      Melanin produces dark skin,
      Carotine produces yellow skin.
      Hemoglobin produces pink skin,

      Scientists think it takes 30,000 years for a group moving to a new area to change color. It’s evolution baby!

      DieA is correct. This is nothing more then imperial racist bullshit that was popular in the 18th century and earlier. Used to make imperialization over another country/people okay because so and so people are superior.

      I’ll be over here asleep while the ignorant and uneducated argue over this nonsense. Evolutionary Science VS Socio-Economical spread of resources and wealth is just ridiculous and only something truly dumbass people would argue over. I have zero respect people that think this way, that have such a shitty life that all they see is the color of ones skin. As for the wealth/resources aspect, we live in a globalized world where there are only so many resources and all the wealthy country are meddling in everything in the poor countries making a profit while the poor country gets poorer. There are different sides to everything and exceptions to how the rich help the poor, but this is how I see it happening.

      Reply

    4. Any scientist that has studied Biological Anthropology would find this little theory retarded.

      Groger’s Rule: All humans are darker near the equator.
      Bergmann’s Rule: People near the equator are taller/thinner.

      All humans are genetically the same, no one in science has ever found a way to distinguish from race to race and race is a cultural/social catogory, not biological in which people divide or include each other.

      Melanin produces dark skin,
      Carotine produces yellow skin.
      Hemoglobin produces pink skin,

      Scientists think it takes 30,000 years for a group moving to a new area to change color. It’s evolution baby!

      DieA is correct. This is nothing more then imperial racist bullshit that was popular in the 18th century and earlier. Used to make imperialization over another country/people okay because so and so people are superior.

      I’ll be over here asleep while the ignorant and uneducated argue over this nonsense. Evolutionary Science VS Socio-Economical spread of resources and wealth is just ridiculous and only something truly dumbass people would argue over. I have zero respect people that think this way, that have such a shitty life that all they see is the color of ones skin. As for the wealth/resources aspect, we live in a globalized world where there are only so many resources and all the wealthy country are meddling in everything in the poor countries making a profit while the poor country gets poorer. There are different sides to everything and exceptions to how the rich help the poor, but this is how I see it happening. I really enjoy Anthropological Science. 🙂

      FIXED, you can delete the top one.

      Reply

    5. South America’s doing pretty well.

      Reply

    6. Poor trolling image is poor.

      Reply

    7. I never realised that Canadians were a very pale green before, but after seeing this I took a little look outside, and turns out they are. Which is just goddamn creepy.

      Reply

    8. Australia’s an awesome place…NOW STAY THE FUCK OUT

      Reply

    9. Baked Potatoes are so fuckin awsome! i put cheese and bacon bits on mine. I grew my own potatoes once but they were small and ugly. I’m trying to buy a house as well tiki. Im looking for homes 2-3 bedrooms with big back yards so i can grow my own crops. So …stay the fuck away from them! Thats my house! Loveing Potatoes, Moe.

      Reply

    10. Hey, hey guys.

      Remember the North African/Middle Eastern empires that ruled the world while Europe was a bunch of unruly savages diddling goats?

      Cool story bros.

      Reply

      • Not to be a racist, but the only empires that ever ruled the world in a literal sense were European. The Middle Eastern/North African civilizations never stretched farther than, well, the Middle East and North Africa. Although they were impressive empires, they pale in comparison to 16-19th century European imperialism, when single countries ruled complete continents. And if you want to stay contemporary, Alexander and the Romans were European.
        Of course, all this has nothing to do with race, but more with geo-political circumstances, like the way civilizations around the Mediterranean sea developed.

        Reply

        • British Empire – 36.6 million km² – 1922

          Mongol Empire – 33.2 million km² – 1268

          They barely even had the wheel in 1268. Imagine a Mongol army with guns and ships.

          Reply

          • Actually, the Chinese (who were then ruled by the Mongols) were the first to use cannons in battle in 1132. Also, the Mongols used ships to invade Japan (without success). Much of the territory they conquered were the scarcely populated steppes of Central Asia. Nevertheless, it’s very impressive how they destroyed every state they ran into. If it wasn’t for Genghis Khan’s death, they might have conquered Europe too.
            By the way, the wheel was invented in the 5th millennium BC.

            Where did you get those numbers from? I’d like to look up some other empires.

            Reply

        • The only true awe-inspiring European Empires were the modern ones, when it was basically people with 16th century tech fighting people with spears and slings. When you look at things like the Chinese Empire, the Mongol Empire, the Moorish Empire – not only in size but also technological advancement, you realize post-Roman empires were less about actual Empires and more about more advanced civilizations destroying/enslaving less advanced ones and taking their shit.

          Reply

          • Actually, screw that. Pretty much every European Empire, ever, was about moving somewhere, subjugating natives and taking their shit.

            Reply

          • Your division fails. The Holy Roman Empire and the Carolingian Empire (both European) resemble the Chinese Empire in the sense that they all consisted of people of similar origin. And the Roman, the Mongol and the Moorish empires were all formed by one states conquering a bunch of other states, just like the modern European empires.
            Also, controlling people and taking their possessions is something every state does. Today, it’s called ‘police force’ and ‘taxes’. Of course, slaughtering millions just to enrich yourself is wrong, but it’s something each of the empires you mentioned have done.

            Reply

    11. I’m totally moving to the place where it’s 1-12

      Reply

    12. Dear KiltedForbes:

      This data can’t be correlated together. The first diagram is from “http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/adapt_4.htm” and is Data for native populations collected by R. Biasutti prior to 1940.
      The second diagram is from Wiki detailing results from 2007.

      67 years difference – such a Fail!

      P.S. Go Australia!

      Reply

    13. Dude, if you want people to argue about it, you could at least explain the second graphic yourself. That’s just a lazy attempt at trolling.

      Reply

    14. Australia, development and bigger penis… that is evolution!

      Reply

    15. all throughout history, the great empires of the world have naturally been of the superior races dominating the inferior races

      The Egyptian empire was a race of tan-skinned people dominating the inferior black race

      The Roman Empire was of southern europeans dominating the slavic people

      The initial conquest of russia was of Scandanavians moving south and dominating the slavs and mongols,….then this was followed up centuries later by what became the Russians dominating the slavs and middle eastern countries and forming the soviet union

      the Reich was of Germans dominating the slavics

      the united states was of europeans dominating the american indians and the mexicans

      what was the british empire was europeans dominating non-european nations

      the persian empire was of one dark race uniting others

      Darwin’s wisdom will always be known throughout past present and future, as in survival of the fittest, one species will always sit above the others.
      If only we could truly fulfil the full cycle of survival and eliminate the weaker species so that they no longer threaten the stability that we the superior species strive to maintain

      Reply

    Leave a Comment




    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Visual Tricks Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas