george lucas 1983 vs 2005

george lucas 1983 vs 2005

  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    5 Comment threads
    4 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    7 Comment authors
    Tyger42P41N90Dbstaplesbejamusnyokki Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    j_bryon
    Member

    Now compare the quality of the visual and sound effects between 1983 and 2005.

    nyoki
    Member
    bstaples
    Member

    OH NO IT’S TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT
    RUN DAMN YOU RUN

    bejamus
    Member

    No, it’s awful and unrealistic looking. Someone once made the comment that when he went to go see the movies, he started looking for his Xbox controller because it looks more like a video game any more than a movie.

    Tyger42
    Member

    Technological advancement isn’t always a good thing. Especially when it’s not well used. Combine that with the writing going to shit, and, well… Lucas is dead to me.

    bstaples
    Member

    Writing? Absolutely, oh god, yes.
    But i’d rather what we have now than puppets and models. It was awesome…for it’s time…we can move forward.

    Tyger42
    Member

    I liked the puppets. They may have looked artificial, but they looked more “there” than the CGI aliens that looked shoehorned into it. Practically felt like I was watching Who Framed Roger Rabbit…

    P41N90D
    Member

    Yea the acting pretty much sucked, Lucas should have stretched the movies, especially in III
    Longer movies could have saved his so called “reputation”



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas