Lust was calculated by compiling the number of sexually transmitted diseases – HIV, AIDS, syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhea – reported per capita.
abstinence only education works
Leave a comment ?




(8 votes, average: 1.13 out of 5)
Add to favorites Lust was calculated by compiling the number of sexually transmitted diseases – HIV, AIDS, syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhea – reported per capita.
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
© Copyright 2012 | My[confined]Space. All rights reserved. My[confined]Space is proudly powered by WordPress




September 16, 2009 at 10:57 am
Iam stupid I don’t get this.
September 16, 2009 at 11:03 am
I don’t understand how anyone could calculate something like “lust” by compiling the number of sexually transmitted diseases. Whoever made this should watch the film “Kids.”
It’s apparent what the point of this is, but I don’t think it’s because of “lust.” One teenager can get all of those diseases by having sex only once, all it takes is a lack of education so it has nothing to do with lust.
September 18, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Agreed. I think too many people these days appear to not understand the fundamental concept of a “scientific” study…
September 16, 2009 at 11:16 am
I wanna know who the fuck put my college’s logo on that first map. No teacher here would condone this project. Lust is not a scientifically measurable number.
September 16, 2009 at 11:24 am
“One teenager can get all of those diseases by having sex only once.”
This.
Also neglects the fact that one Catholic/Baptist family could have an insane amount of “Catholic/Baptist” members due to not using contraceptives. Hence, the high pop rate.
This is why we can’t cure cancer yet, our scientists are wasting funding on this shit.
September 16, 2009 at 11:35 am
The first map is kind of interesting but has absolutely nothing to do with “lust”. The second map makes even less sense. What is it trying to depict? What the “majority” religion is in each state? No, that doesn’t jive with the “no religion” states.
Someone randomly threw some colors down using some innocuous data to troll the intertubes. 4chan fodder.
September 16, 2009 at 11:36 am
FUCK YEAH KINGS AND TULARE COUNTY! NUMBER 1 IN CALIFORNIA WOOT WOOT!….. aw man. :’(
September 16, 2009 at 11:41 am
They did one for every major sin based on questionable data. For example:
scienceblogs.com/gnxp/gluttonyMap.png
A map of Gluttony based on fast food restaurants per capita. That, map should be a lot more red than it is. Nevermind the fact that you can’t really measure gluttony itself, just it’s symptoms, which don’t really depend on how many fast food restaurants you have per county. Same thing with lust up there. You might as well track sales of sextoys instead.
These maps don’t really prove anything in the way of abstinence only education. Though I did get a chuckle out of the “GiZ Score” just under “Lust” in the first picture.
September 16, 2009 at 12:27 pm
Another loss for South Carolina.
September 16, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Funny that the blue areas are where most of the inbreeding in this country occurs. Guess it’s hard to get an STD if you’re only fucking your siblings/cousins.
September 16, 2009 at 12:48 pm
…and now for the bell-curve charts on
IQ levels by ethnicity!
September 16, 2009 at 1:21 pm
I keep looking at the legend for the 1st one, and I can’t figure it out. Are those negative scores?
Well, I’m glad I’m in florida.
September 16, 2009 at 3:05 pm
GiZ Score? Makes me think of Jizz score!
September 16, 2009 at 6:02 pm
This just helps motivate me to use condoms and not kiss girls.
September 17, 2009 at 5:11 am
There are also at least 2 major Army bases in almost every state with a high concentration of STDs
September 17, 2009 at 5:59 pm
I theorize that kissing led to this. You can get STD’s from kissing can’t you? And then people probably think you can’t get STD’s from oral sex, and add the fact that you can’t see most STD’s symptoms.
September 17, 2009 at 10:36 am
It looks even closer to the map at www.valpo.edu/geomet/pics/geo200/pct_black.pdf. Do you want to draw a comparison to that? No? I did not think so.